Trump releases policy position on immigration.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#2
i noticed that he wants to end citizenship by birth.

what exactly do you replace that with? how would your children become American citizens, if they are not citizens by birth?

he doesn't say.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#3
he wants to require that anyone immigrating to the US have to certify that they can pay for their own housing, healthcare & other needs before being allowed entry.
so much for "bring me your poor.."
does this mean he only wants to allow the independently wealthy to enter the US? only people who already have jobs lined up that pay enough to cover healthcare and housing? we have lots of people in this country who work full time already, and can't meet those certifications.

these policies might sound good at first glance, but they need some fleshing out for sure.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#4
i noticed that he wants to end citizenship by birth.

what exactly do you replace that with? how would your children become American citizens, if they are not citizens by birth?

he doesn't say.

I would assume that he is talking about the children of illegal aliens. The children of naturalized or natural born citizens would obviously have citizenship under the constitution.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#5
he wants to require that anyone immigrating to the US have to certify that they can pay for their own housing, healthcare & other needs before being allowed entry.
so much for "bring me your poor.."
does this mean he only wants to allow the independently wealthy to enter the US? only people who already have jobs lined up that pay enough to cover healthcare and housing? we have lots of people in this country who work full time already, and can't meet those certifications.

these policies might sound good at first glance, but they need some fleshing out for sure.
My honest opinion is that the best of the best of 3rd world countries who are able to emigrate should be encouraged to stay in their homeland to lift their countrymen up.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#6
he prefaces a list of proposed changes in policy by blaming immigrants for the high unemployment rate among black teenagers, especially those in inner-cities.

do you guys think that's accurate?
 
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#7
i noticed that he wants to end citizenship by birth.

what exactly do you replace that with? how would your children become American citizens, if they are not citizens by birth?

he doesn't say.
That's because chinese women are coming over to California to have babies born in the USA. The child is then a natural citizen and the parents can stay with their child listed as dependent ....its a loop hole that is being used by them for another form of illegal immigration....and the black market tourism associated is big money....

Born In The USA: Why Chinese 'Birth Tourism' Is Booming In California
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#8
My honest opinion is that the best of the best of 3rd world countries who are able to emigrate should be encouraged to stay in their homeland to lift their countrymen up.
a lot of them come here to gain education, skills and a network of support, then go back to their home countries better equipped to help improve them.

how to help lift your countrymen up if you make $10 a month in Central America? but if you can make $1000 a month by emigrating to America that you can send back home to your family . .
this is one of the main reasons that we have so many people trying to cross the southern border. i'm not sure that bankrupting Mexico by forcing them at gunpoint to build an enormous wall is the best way to treat the problem. i think that if we could somehow help Central American countries root out their own corruption and grow their own economies, so that there was the same kind of opportunity in people's homelands as there is here, it would do a lot more to stem the tide than just beefing up security will ever do.

to me, it's like treating the symptoms vs. the cause. i don't know that anyone running for office looks at it that way or has those kinds of proposals though (?) -- Trump certainly doesn't.
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#9
he prefaces a list of proposed changes in policy by blaming immigrants for the high unemployment rate among black teenagers, especially those in inner-cities.

do you guys think that's accurate?
good question. I can't really say. Can anyone else?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#10
That's because chinese women are coming over to California to have babies born in the USA. The child is then a natural citizen and the parents can stay with their child listed as dependent ....its a loop hole that is being used by them for another form of illegal immigration....and the black market tourism associated is big money....

Born In The USA: Why Chinese 'Birth Tourism' Is Booming In California
yeah, it's true, and it's a problem. -- but what do you replace that with? only children of people who are already citizens? or what? maybe that would work fine.
because if you just eliminate citizenship by birth altogether, without replacing it, my kids aren't citizens.
 
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#11
yeah, it's true, and it's a problem. -- but what do you replace that with? only children of people who are already citizens? or what? maybe that would work fine.
because if you just eliminate citizenship by birth altogether, without replacing it, my kids aren't citizens.
If it were up to me, I would have naturalized citizenship for a child of parents who are already citizens, if both parents are not citizens then that child has no right to be a citizen and should be given a greencard or visa as a foreigner not a us citizen....
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#12
a lot of them come here to gain education, skills and a network of support, then go back to their home countries better equipped to help improve them.

how to help lift your countrymen up if you make $10 a month in Central America? but if you can make $1000 a month by emigrating to America that you can send back home to your family . .
this is one of the main reasons that we have so many people trying to cross the southern border. i'm not sure that bankrupting Mexico by forcing them at gunpoint to build an enormous wall is the best way to treat the problem. i think that if we could somehow help Central American countries root out their own corruption and grow their own economies, so that there was the same kind of opportunity in people's homelands as there is here, it would do a lot more to stem the tide than just beefing up security will ever do.

to me, it's like treating the symptoms vs. the cause. i don't know that anyone running for office looks at it that way or has those kinds of proposals though (?) -- Trump certainly doesn't.
Maybe but sometimes necessity is the mother of invention. When my son is ready to have a car he is gonna have to find a way to pay for it. Learning to do things for oneself is a reward in itself. When someone is stealing from you, giving them more isn't going to make them stop stealing from you. Applying enough pressure on someone to force a measure of independence is actually a pretty loving thing to do.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#13
If it were up to me, I would have naturalized citizenship for a child of parents who are already citizens, if both parents are not citizens then that child has no right to be a citizen and should be given a greencard or visa as a foreigner not a us citizen....
lol so Trump's kids wouldn't be citizens (he married an eastern European woman, who only got citizenship by virtue of marriage)

something like that is probably what you'd have to do though, yeah. i suppose if there was an obvious alternative, we would have already changed the law about it, because this "loophole" has been exploited for a long time.
 
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#14
lol so Trump's kids wouldn't be citizens (he married an eastern European woman, who only got citizenship by virtue of marriage)

something like that is probably what you'd have to do though, yeah. i suppose if there was an obvious alternative, we would have already changed the law about it, because this "loophole" has been exploited for a long time.
Yup no bending the law even for politicians....they would be foreigners and not US citizens...it's like being pregnant you can't be half-pregnant you either are or are not...there is no in-between....and even if they did allow a in between the crooked 3rd worlders would find a way to exploit that by marrying US citizens so that 1 parent is legal while the other foreigner is illegal so the child would be a legal us citizen.....it's best to have a clear cut law like I suggested no gray area....
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#15
Maybe but sometimes necessity is the mother of invention. When my son is ready to have a car he is gonna have to find a way to pay for it. Learning to do things for oneself is a reward in itself. When someone is stealing from you, giving them more isn't going to make them stop stealing from you. Applying enough pressure on someone to force a measure of independence is actually a pretty loving thing to do.

it's the necessity in Central America and the opportunity here that drives the invention of all kinds of ways to get here :)

i think the necessity is turning all of the Americas - South, Central and North - into places where everyone has a fair shot at supporting themselves and their families, and living a peaceful life, without leaving their own country to do so. i'd rather we focused on "teaching those countries how to fish" than just building cages around our own fish-piles.

does that make sense? i'm not against border security. i just don't think that really "solves" anything, any more than giving a man a fish is only a temporary fix.
 
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#16

it's the necessity in Central America and the opportunity here that drives the invention of all kinds of ways to get here :)

i think the necessity is turning all of the Americas - South, Central and North - into places where everyone has a fair shot at supporting themselves and their families, and living a peaceful life, without leaving their own country to do so. i'd rather we focused on "teaching those countries how to fish" than just building cages around our own fish-piles.

does that make sense? i'm not against border security. i just don't think that really "solves" anything, any more than giving a man a fish is only a temporary fix.
No I don't think you want a pan-american union....it will destroy american wealth, destroy american health, and destroy american sovereignty....as the last 8 yrs shows wealth redistribution is NOT the answer....enterprise and making one's own path is the way to freedom and independent wealth....communistic ideas of "everyone equal" wealth redistributing never works b/c the oligarchy who controls the state will be the alpha male and have the most wealth while the idiot peon people who willingly accept communism will be poor and oppressed....

US should secure its borders and protect it's health, wealth, and security all by closing it down....it would make it great again and stop the leeching of it by other countries....
 
Last edited:
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#17

it's the necessity in Central America and the opportunity here that drives the invention of all kinds of ways to get here :)

i think the necessity is turning all of the Americas - South, Central and North - into places where everyone has a fair shot at supporting themselves and their families, and living a peaceful life, without leaving their own country to do so. i'd rather we focused on "teaching those countries how to fish" than just building cages around our own fish-piles.

does that make sense? i'm not against border security. i just don't think that really "solves" anything, any more than giving a man a fish is only a temporary fix.
Ya man. You guys are obviously way smarter than me on this immigration thing and grasp the minutiae of it better than I do. My heart is that we could be compassionate yet still protect our sovereignty as a nation. There are lots of nasty people who are exploiting us because we don't enforce sound immigration practices. It seems we go to the two extremes....ie: you're not compassionate, what about bring me your poor?......to.... they're all evil and we should keep them all out. Lol
 
Last edited:
U

Ultimatum77

Guest
#18
Ya man. You guys are obviously way smarter than me on this immigration thing and grasp the minutiae of it better than I do. My heart is that we could be compassionate yet still protect our sovereignty as a nation. There are lots of nasty people who are exploiting us because we don't enforce sound immigration practices. It seems we go to the two extremes....ie: you're not compassionate, what about bring me your poor?......to.... their all evil and we should keep them all out. Lol
Compassion does not work these days as good people/compassion are abused by the corrupt....to play in this world you got to make hard tough decisions...will they be unpopular yes....but ultimately one should look out for one's own nation....it doesn't matter what morons in the UN/pope think....give them the finger and do what's best for your country...shut down the border....
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#19
Compassion does not work these days as good people/compassion are abused by the corrupt....to play in this world you got to make hard tough decisions...will they be unpopular yes....but ultimately one should look out for one's own nation....it doesn't matter what morons in the UN/pope think....give them the finger and do what's best for your country...shut down the border....
I lean this way because it is common sense when people are trying to kill you that you figure out who they are. You're really not doing the poor and downtrodden a favor by letting them in at the same time you're letting in people that have no qualms about killing them or exploiting them for political or any other reason.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#20
No I don't think you want a pan-american union....it will destroy american wealth, destroy american health, and destroy american sovereignty....as the last 8 yrs shows wealth redistribution is NOT the answer....enterprise and making one's own path is the way to freedom and independent wealth....communistic ideas of "everyone equal" wealth redistributing never works b/c the oligarchy who controls the state will be the alpha male and have the most wealth while the idiot peon people who willingly accept communism will be poor and oppressed....

US should secure its borders and protect it's health, wealth, and security all by closing it down....it would make it great again and stop the leeching of it by other countries....

i never mentioned a pan-American union.

building a glass dome over the country is not addressing the root causes, is what i'm trying to say.
i think we should do something about helping our neighbors, and metaphorically "slamming the door on them and locking & bolting it" when they need to borrow a loaf of bread isn't any kind of full solution.

when people talk about unemployment, they say how much better it is to teach a man to fish than to just give him some fish -- so next week, when he's hungry again, he can help himself.
i think we ought to apply the same principle to immigration -- and invest in helping Central American countries "learn how to fish" so they can help their own citizens have the opportunities in their own home countries that they come here looking for.

forcing them to bankroll a multi-billion dollar wall? that ain't gonna help their economies. border security is important, but it's just a band aid. it does nothing to address the roots of the problem. i'm not saying "don't bother securing the borders"