Baracks Attempt to Force America's Normal into Insanity is Much More...

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Apr 22, 2016
1,218
12
0
#1
Barack Obama's attempt to force America's public school systems to require that boys be allowed in girls' bathrooms is about MUCH MORE than bathrooms.
The order demands the total integration of boys and girls in the most private and sensitive situations. It requires that boys and girls to be allowed to take showers together and to share sleeping arrangements on school-sponsored trips and activities. It demands that boys' sports teams be forced to accept girls and girls' sports teams be forced to accept boys--no matter what kind of physical contact would be required. All of this is under the rubric of normalizing "transgender" (translated: sexually deviant) behavior.
And under the order, school administrators, principals, and teachers are given NO CHOICE. But the fact is the federal government has no constitutional authority to make such a demand. NONE.
If this isn't an example of how much the U.S. federal government has usurped its constitutional boundaries and invaded the rights and duties of the states and local communities--and in this case, PARENTS--there isn't one.
And the truly disgusting thing about all of this is that the Republican Party, for the most part, has said absolutely NOTHING in opposition. They are too busy trying to not offend the media.
And even MORE disgusting than that is, for the most part, America's pastors and churches have said absolutely NOTHING. They are too busy trying to not offend the IRS and trying to figure out how they can out Hollywood Hollywood in order to draw bigger and bigger crowds.
The big question is: are the moms and dads of America's public school children going to stand for this? Are they really going to sit back and give their children over to the government-mandated corruption of the innocence and moral purity of our nation's schoolchildren?
If this order is allowed to be fully implemented, this nation is toast. In the entire history of the world, NO NATION has ever survived once it has given itself--and especially its children--over to universal moral corruption. EVER.
This is not a conservative or liberal issue. It is not even a religious issue. This is an issue about the most fundamental duty that responsible adults have in a civilized society: the responsibility to safeguard their posterity. Failure at this level would mean that this country no longer has the will or reason to survive.




Chuck Baldwin
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#2
It's backfiring big time. I think we're gonna see a national outcry from moms and dads across the land. I hope so anyway. If we roll over on this one I don't even kmow what to say.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#3
It's backfiring big time. I think we're gonna see a national outcry from moms and dads across the land. I hope so anyway. If we roll over on this one I don't even kmow what to say.

There is outrage because of the young girl that was strangled last week. I dont know if Obama is going to be able to push this through. Not that its stopped him before. Never been a president this evil.
 

JimJimmers

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2012
2,584
70
48
#4
I found this relevant to the topic:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nyc-rule-says-transgender-pronouns-risk-250-000-200048799.html

New York thinks businesses should reasonably be expected to ask every customer what gender pronoun they should use for them. I know your thread is about Obama, I hope I am not crashing the thread. But it seemed to me silly to start another thread when you had this one going.


Also, if anyone in New York ask me my gender pronoun, I'm going to say I want to be referred to by "Bill-DeBlasio-is-a-power-hungry-authoritarian-wacko". A quarter of a million dollars if they decide you were trying to be mean by calling someone "him" when they preferred "her"? *sigh*
 
P

psalm6819

Guest
#5
Hospital delivery room after the birth of child

New Mother : Is it a boy or a girl?

Doctor: I don't know, we'll have to wait until the baby decides.

Life in obamanation :)
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,312
1,039
113
#6
Obama has done African Americans a great Injustice. He has screwed up so bad you will probably never see another black man in the White House. Just like you'll never see another Bush in the White House
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#7
Obama has done African Americans a great Injustice. He has screwed up so bad you will probably never see another black man in the White House. Just like you'll never see another Bush in the White House
It is not about him being black and never has been for most people. It is about him being STUPID.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,945
8,664
113
#8
Obama has done African Americans a great Injustice. He has screwed up so bad you will probably never see another black man in the White House. Just like you'll never see another Bush in the White House
I judge people by the content of their charater, NOT the color of their skin. I don't know a single Christian who would not have voted for for someone because of that reason. They may be out there, but I don't know them.
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#9
Where are the parents of the so call transgender kids?
They ought to be horse whipped!
 
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#10
Where are the parents of the so call transgender kids?
They ought to be horse whipped!
Or run out of town. There is no logical reason for us to accept this. Religious or otherwise. This is foolishness on every level. The only thing I can think of is either Michelle really is a man and she is behind this or Obama is just creating more chaos because he hates us.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,312
1,039
113
#11
I judge people by the content of their charater, NOT the color of their skin. I don't know a single Christian who would not have voted for for someone because of that reason. They may be out there, but I don't know them.
Truth be told a lot of African-Americans voted for Obama just because he's black. Now we are reaping the consequences
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
#12
Barack Obama's attempt to force America's public school systems to require that boys be allowed in girls' bathrooms is about MUCH MORE than bathrooms.
The order demands the total integration of boys and girls in the most private and sensitive situations. It requires that boys and girls to be allowed to take showers together and to share sleeping arrangements on school-sponsored trips and activities. It demands that boys' sports teams be forced to accept girls and girls' sports teams be forced to accept boys--no matter what kind of physical contact would be required. All of this is under the rubric of normalizing "transgender" (translated: sexually deviant) behavior.
And under the order, school administrators, principals, and teachers are given NO CHOICE. But the fact is the federal government has no constitutional authority to make such a demand. NONE.
If this isn't an example of how much the U.S. federal government has usurped its constitutional boundaries and invaded the rights and duties of the states and local communities--and in this case, PARENTS--there isn't one.
And the truly disgusting thing about all of this is that the Republican Party, for the most part, has said absolutely NOTHING in opposition. They are too busy trying to not offend the media.
And even MORE disgusting than that is, for the most part, America's pastors and churches have said absolutely NOTHING. They are too busy trying to not offend the IRS and trying to figure out how they can out Hollywood Hollywood in order to draw bigger and bigger crowds.
The big question is: are the moms and dads of America's public school children going to stand for this? Are they really going to sit back and give their children over to the government-mandated corruption of the innocence and moral purity of our nation's schoolchildren?
If this order is allowed to be fully implemented, this nation is toast. In the entire history of the world, NO NATION has ever survived once it has given itself--and especially its children--over to universal moral corruption. EVER.
This is not a conservative or liberal issue. It is not even a religious issue. This is an issue about the most fundamental duty that responsible adults have in a civilized society: the responsibility to safeguard their posterity. Failure at this level would mean that this country no longer has the will or reason to survive.




Chuck Baldwin
Chuck Baldwin is a little slow in his observations if he thinks that transgender bathroom use is the tipping point of this nation being toast.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
#13
Truth be told a lot of African-Americans voted for Obama just because he's black. Now we are reaping the consequences
I keep saying that, we are getting the leaders we deserve, and that just reflect us.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
#14
It's backfiring big time. I think we're gonna see a national outcry from moms and dads across the land. I hope so anyway. If we roll over on this one I don't even kmow what to say.
There will be no outrage, not like you think. Maybe some pockets of it, but in time transgender bathrooms will be the norm.
Anyone who thinks this country is coming back to anything near what it was morally is practicing wishful thinking.
People are to self absorbed, to brainwashed. We think why even bother, whats the use, government is just to powerful.
We have lost our spirit. These days it is all about how much money we can make, and protecting our own butts. There is no mindset about the greater good in a way that will prevent this avalanche of wickedness. It is setting up the final act of the play...
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#15
There will be no outrage, not like you think. Maybe some pockets of it, but in time transgender bathrooms will be the norm.
Anyone who thinks this country is coming back to anything near what it was morally is practicing wishful thinking.
People are to self absorbed, to brainwashed. We think why even bother, whats the use, government is just to powerful.
We have lost our spirit. These days it is all about how much money we can make, and protecting our own butts. There is no mindset about the greater good in a way that will prevent this avalanche of wickedness. It is setting up the final act of the play...
Possibly a very valid assessment.
 

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
#16
Here is just one example of how far we have fallen...

Why does everyone think we want to see them naked?

By Andrea Peyser

May 20, 2016 | 12:55am

Caitlyn might as well go back to being Bruce

Malia Obama taking a gap year is the ultimate sign of luxury


The culture has devolved into a sea of immodest, exhibitionistic bimbos and sluts. Be afraid.
Walk down any street outside of the putrid parts of the Middle East, or gaze at a random picture of pint-sized pop star Justin Bieber, and one is likely to encounter a beltless dude with pants hanging below his butt, revealing grungy boxer shorts — or the naughty bits God gave him.
Musical attention whore Madonna walked the red carpet at this month’s Met Gala in New York City in a tragic, bondage-inspired get-up with see-through panels exposing her 57-year-old boobs and bum. Ick. Was this wardrobe malfunction a desperate cry for help, or the result of Her Madgesty’s lack of style, common sense and, perhaps, a full-length mirror?
As the mother of a teenage girl, I’m ready to throw the TV out the window, switch off the internet and check out convents. (For me.)
Anything to shut out the influences of obscene folks posing as role models.
The most recent assault on ordinary standards of taste and decency is worth barely a whimper, comparatively speaking. But I see this epic fashion fail as a symbol of decay, moral and sartorial.
Los Angeles TV meteorologist and reporter Liberté Chan showed up to present the weather on *WKTLA this past Saturday morning dressed as if she’d just spilled out of a late-night cocktail party, in a sparkly, black minidress attached to her bare shoulders by narrow fabric straps.
Her colleagues and bosses seemed to have missed the fact that her cheesy attire was inappropriate for live television, until emails of complaint flooded into the station.
A disembodied hand then shoved a frumpy, gray sweater at the weather babe.
“What’s going on? You want me to put this on? Why? Because it’s cold?” Chan yammered cluelessly, slipping the sweater over her Aidan Mattox dress.
“We’re getting a lot of emails,” the sweater-giver, anchorman Chris Burrous, replied, later claiming that some viewers were upset Chan wore a dress suitable for a New Year’s Eve fete or a brothel.
“What? Really? I look like a librarian now,’’ Chan said as cameras rolled.
Sexist, as TV watchers who exercised the hashtag #sweatergate have tweeted? Nah. I think Chan should thank her scantily clad lucky stars that she finally, however embarrassingly, was compelled into dressing for the workplace.
She’s far from the worst skin offender. Songstress Rihanna showed off her nipples, which are fast becoming yawn material, her backside obfuscated only by a thong, at the 2014 Council of Fashion Designers of America awards-show gala in New York. RiRi left nothing to the imagination in an indecent, sheer shmatta decorated with 216,000 Swarovski crystals.
Bette Midler has had enough. At the sight of a selfie posted on Instagram by Kim Kardashian West, her cartoonishly voluptuous body completely starkers, the singer, songwriter, comedienne and actress, 70, was among celebs who expressed disapproval of the 35-year-old reality-TV creature, who suffers from a chronic inability to keep her clothes on.

“If Kim wants us to see a part of her we’ve never seen, she’s gonna have to swallow the camera,’’ Midler tweeted in March.
“Hey @BetteMidler I know it’s past your bedtime but if you’re still up and reading this send nudes #justkidding” — Kim K tweeted back snarkily.
“It’s 2016. The body-shaming and slut-shaming — it’s like, enough is enough,’’ she, like, posted on her website, failing to mention that she’s the mom of a little girl and a boy, North and Saint, with her rap-mogul hubby, Kanye West.
Midler got the last laugh, tweeting a picture of herself, seemingly dressed in underwear, standing behind a cardboard sign urging, “Like Kim . . . put your selfie to work for a good cause.’’ She offered a 2-to-1 match for donations to her Stages For Success charity, which renovates outdated public-school auditoriums.
Transgender chick Caitlyn Jenner, 66, is reportedly making a naked photographic foray this summer on the cover of Sports Illustrated magazine. Zir (how’s that for a politically correct pronoun?) still-present junk is to be obscured by an American flag and the Olympic gold decathlon medal won in 1976, when ze (!) was a guy named Bruce. It’s as gross as it is grammatically suspect and un-American.
We are sliding into a look-at-me abyss, people. Turn away! If you possibly can
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#17
I judge people by the content of their charater, NOT the color of their skin. I don't know a single Christian who would not have voted for for someone because of that reason. They may be out there, but I don't know them.
I am close friends with a Presbyterian Elder (a good Black man whom I still like) who told me he voted for Obama strictly because he was black. (At least, in the first election. I don't know about the second.)
 
Last edited:

JosephsDreams

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2015
4,313
467
83
#18
And another...


Orgies for profit are coming to the Hamptons.
Killing Kittens, the London-based club for swingers, is holding its first East End party June 18 at an undisclosed private estate.Member couples shell out $400, while single women pay $150. Paying partiers are allowed to bring a single girlfriend for free and, of course, single men are forbidden. Private rooms can be had for $600.The kinky club, which started in London and arrived in New York a year ago, was started by Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton’s friend Emma Sayle, who found existing sex clubs too patriarchal.The first rule of Killing Kittens: Men aren’t allowed to approach women first. Hamptonites — who stress over traffic, helicopters and nightclub noise — aren’t worried about the impact of orgies on their property values. One said, “As long as they don’t frighten the horses.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#19
Obama has done African Americans a great Injustice. He has screwed up so bad you will probably never see another black man in the White House. Just like you'll never see another Bush in the White House
Have black people lost faith in Obama, do you think? They are saying Hillary will be a third term of Obama and yet it seems most blacks support her. That confuses me.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#20
Have black people lost faith in Obama, do you think? They are saying Hillary will be a third term of Obama and yet it seems most blacks support her. That confuses me.
It honestly doesn't matter who might be running....... If some people (black, white, and Hispanic) think Obama's policies of all the freebees will continue for them, they are going to vote for that person. A huge portion of Americans don't seem to be able to think past that point.