Attack on our constitution

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

Eternallife

Guest
#21
#21
I'm not trying to insult anyone on here. I'm simply saying that Christ wasn't bluffing when He said unless we all repent we will all likewise parish. I've lived under God's wrath before as a slave to sin and sin will make you do humiliating things so no one can tell me that Christ isn't seriously going to destroy the wicked. Because I know He is going to.
 
Sirk

Sirk

Banned
#22
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#22
Eternallife said:
I'm not trying to insult anyone on here. I'm simply saying that Christ wasn't bluffing when He said unless we all repent we will all likewise parish. I've lived under God's wrath before as a slave to sin and sin will make you do humiliating things so no one can tell me that Christ isn't seriously going to destroy the wicked. Because I know He is going to.
Click to expand...
This is a thread about the the constitution. Take it to the bdf and get off my thread.
 
E

Eternallife

Guest
#23
#23
God avenges me swiftly.
 
Sirk

Sirk

Banned
#24
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#24
Was thinking about this questioning by Gowdy today. Why is it the libs are going so hard after the second amendment vs the 5th? If they got rid of the 5th the rest would fall like dominos.
 
crossnote

crossnote

Senior Member
#25
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#25
Sirk said:
Was thinking about this questioning by Gowdy today. Why is it the libs are going so hard after the second amendment vs the 5th? If they got rid of the 5th the rest would fall like dominos.
Click to expand...
Perhaps to them, all it means is..."I take the 5th" thinking they can go Scot free.
A little refresher course...

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Click to expand...
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#26
#26
Sirk said:
Was thinking about this questioning by Gowdy today. Why is it the libs are going so hard after the second amendment vs the 5th? If they got rid of the 5th the rest would fall like dominos.
Click to expand...
hillary clinton probably has need of the fifth amendment...
 
P

Persuaded

Guest
#27
#27
peacenik said:
Why, Sirk, I'm disappointed.

Aren't you the great big defender of Second Amendment rights?


You should be applauding armed Black Panthers activities since this is the best example of the use of the 2d Amendment we have ever seen:









Remember when they protested with arms in Texas as compared to Ferguson or Baltimore. When they did so with high powered arms there were no arrests, no cars over turned, no police cars torched, no businesses destroyed, no casualties, no violence. Why?
Click to expand...
Hey peacenik would you ban my hunting hunting rifle that is pictured here?


2400406_01_ruger_mini_14_ranch_rifle_640.jpg
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#32
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#32
Well... it's either a Ruger Mini-14 in .223, or a Mini-30 in 7.62X39...

nice rifles, now that Ruger seems to have the so-so accuracy problem worked out, from what I hear.....


What do I win???
 
Oncefallen

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
#33
Jan 15, 2011
6,031
3,264
113
#33
Persuaded said:
Do you know what it is?
Click to expand...

It is either a Ruger Mini 14 or Mini 30. I just operated on the assumption that it was the Mini 14 (.223/5.56mm) because I knew where you were going with your post that was directed at Peacenik.
 
Oncefallen

Oncefallen

Idiot in Chief
Staff member
#34
Jan 15, 2011
6,031
3,264
113
#34
hornetguy said:
nice rifles, now that Ruger seems to have the so-so accuracy problem worked out, from what I hear.....
Click to expand...

When did Ruger have an accuracy problem with the Mini line? Mind you it's been over 22 or so years since I bought mine and roughly 17 years since I surrendered it (long story) but I never had a problem with accuracy.
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#35
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#35
They had a quality control issue with their barrels for a while. I had a blue one and a stainless one, but neither would group less than about 3 or 4" at 100yds. Most talk on the gun boards indicated it was a fairly common problem. I think they got it all ironed out 10 or 15 years back. IIRC... which I seldom do...:rolleyes:

I would argue that a well put together AR would be a MUCH better varmint/small deer rifle. I've seen guys shooting dimes taped to 100yd targets and hitting the dime EVERY shot... amazingly accurate.
My bone stock entry level DPMS Oracle shoots 1" groups at 100... I was pleasantly surprised.

You can also get a pretty large array of calibers in different upper assemblies, and hunt pretty much anything in North America. Not bad for an "evil black assault rifle"....
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#36
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#36
Despite it having been posted many times, on probably every firearms forum, there seem to still be those that don't know, (or just ignore- if they're a "hater"), that Ruger shut down production of the Mini between '04 and '06 to completely re-tool the production line.

The "new" Mini-14 is a different animal from the old one.

Part of me still thinks Ruger should have just re-named the rifle, to get rid of the old "stigma" of inaccuracy.
Click to expand...
This was a quote from a gun-board I visit.... apparently Ruger revamped them in the early 2000's....

told you not to trust my memory...
 
Sirk

Sirk

Banned
#37
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#37
Love my mini 14. I got the varmint version. Oh...and two 30 round clips.
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#38
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#38
peacenik said:
Why, Sirk, I'm disappointed.

Aren't you the great big defender of Second Amendment rights?


You should be applauding armed Black Panthers activities since this is the best example of the use of the 2d Amendment we have ever seen:









Remember when they protested with arms in Texas as compared to Ferguson or Baltimore. When they did so with high powered arms there were no arrests, no cars over turned, no police cars torched, no businesses destroyed, no casualties, no violence. Why?
Click to expand...
They all look very serious..... they need to work on their sense of humor....

Aside from that, Peacnik... if you think that arming yourself and standing outside voting places to try to intimidate voters is a great application of second amendment rights, you are simply a loon with zero credibility.

I have no problem with them being armed, if they are legally eligible to own firearms, but to abuse that right in trying to intimidate white voters (or brown voters, or any other color) is illegal, and they should have been prosecuted and jailed.
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#39
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#39
Sirk said:
Love my mini 14. I got the varmint version. Oh...and two 30 round clips.
Click to expand...
I really like the design/style of the Mini-14/30. I just love that type of action... like the Garand and the M-14....

If the price was a little more in line with what it was, I'd probably get one.

My issue is the price. I have an SKS that shoots the 7.62x39, and I can group about 4" or so at 100 with open sights... and it only cost me $99 when I bought it. At that time, the Mini's were about $475 or so...

It has never failed to fire. Never.
 
hornetguy

hornetguy

Senior Member
#40
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
#40
but.... back to the topic at hand.. has anyone heard how the voting went in the Senate today, on those 4 bills?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.