Benghazi, the Rest of the Story

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#1
(From ACLJ)

Let me be frank. The Obama Administration, including the Secretary of State, lied.
That is the clear conclusion of the bombshell Benghazi report just released from the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi.
The report highlights the disturbing answers to a number of pressing questions we have been focused on at the ACLJ for a number of years. At the same time, the report raises new concerns about the Obama Administration’s blatant cover-up of the jihadist terrorist attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 – on the anniversary of the largest terrorist attack America has ever faced.
Here are just three of the disturbing facts we learned today:

  • How many military assets were sent to Benghazi while our ambassador and his staff were under attack? Zero. None.
    Over the course of the 13 hour attack on our consulate in Benghazi not a single military asset was even set in motion – not even heading in the direction of Benghazi – as four brave Americans including our ambassador were killed.
    The Secretary of Defense reportedly ordered military assets to deploy, but none did. Instead our soldiers were ordered to change in and out of uniforms multiple times, as the Obama Administration national security bureaucracy argued about what Libya’s government would think about soldiers with uniforms and marked cars deploying within their country.
  • The narrative about a video spurring this deadly attack? False.
    We’ve known it all along, but the more we find out, the worse it gets. As the jihadist attack on our consulate and our Ambassador unfolded, the White House was already in full spin mode – worried that the attack, if fully understood by the American people, would undercut its narrative of fighting terrorists and Libya as a glowing example just weeks before President Obama's 2012 reelection. Senior advisors to the President were concerned about Mitt Romney’s statements and whether Obama’s failed foreign policy would be revealed for what it was and still is – an absolutely catastrophic failure. We even see that the Secretary of State was privately telling her daughter it was a terrorist attack carried out by an al-Qaeda like group while publicly blaming an online video.
  • Four years later, how many of the dozens of terrorists responsible for four dead Americans have been captured? One.
    The day after the attack, President Obama promised, “We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.”
    Only one terrorist—Ahmed Abu Khatallah—has been indicted and brought to the U.S. to face charges.
    The committee knows of no one else who has even been arrested or indicted.
It’s unbelievable – and unacceptable.
These are just three of the new revelations in the hundreds of pages in the Benghazi Report. And the more of it you read, the more you realize just how badly the Obama Administration failed in this from beginning to end – from failing to provide the security needed to failing to cooperate with Congress in a fair and thorough investigation into what led to four dead Americans.
The Administration cared more about what uniforms to use than saving American lives. It cared more about its narrative – downplaying the threat of jihad – than saving American lives. It cared more about the political fallout than saving American lives.
Shame on you.
It’s a moral travesty, a political failure, and a constitutional abdication of duty to protect America.
Every American should understand what this report says, what it means, and what we as the American people need to do.
We’ve prepared an in-depth analysis of the entire 800-page congressional report (which was based on the testimony of 81 witnesses and over 75,000 documents).
We’re continuing to work with Members of Congress, in the courts, and through the media to hold this Administration accountable. We must not allow this failure to happen again. We must stop the lies. We must cut off the Administration’s false narrative.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,721
6,313
113
#2
all this is true, but unless abc, cbs, nbc, cnn, etc. come together as one and without slant report this, nothing is going happen. as long as 70% of the media supports and defends and covers up for the left, nothing is going to happen. the sheep out there that get their info from these places never hear objective truth.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#3






far more deaths under Reagan and Bush which the far right failed to condemn - and just think, if it had not been for the Republicans reducing security in Benghazi there would not have been an attack there in the first place
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#4






far more deaths under Reagan and Bush which the far right failed to condemn - and just think, if it had not been for the Republicans reducing security in Benghazi there would not have been an attack there in the first place
Troop and intelligence pullouts were well under way under Obama during the time of Benghazi.
Besides, Bush never refused help when help was called for.
Sorry, Obummer's leading from his behind doesn't work.
 
J

jennymae

Guest
#5
The one thing that troubles me is how divided people in the Western world are. The troublemakers down in the Middle East, or wherever they are, must be thrilled to see what the people of the Western countries are spending their time on...bullying each other instead of joining forces against those stone age villains...I wonder how much money we are wasting by throwing jabs at each other over throwing them where they rightfully belongs...
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#6
The one thing that troubles me is how divided people in the Western world are. The troublemakers down in the Middle East, or wherever they are, must be thrilled to see what the people of the Western countries are spending their time on...bullying each other instead of joining forces against those stone age villains...I wonder how much money we are wasting by throwing jabs at each other over throwing them where they rightfully belongs...
They have their divisions as well.
73 sects of Islam (not sure if they are all still existent)..

https://www.alislam.org/library/73divisions/73-09.html
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#8
The one thing that troubles me is how divided people in the Western world are. The troublemakers down in the Middle East, or wherever they are, must be thrilled to see what the people of the Western countries are spending their time on...bullying each other instead of joining forces against those stone age villains...I wonder how much money we are wasting by throwing jabs at each other over throwing them where they rightfully belongs...





Shiia and Sunni are at war with each other.

Republicans and others of the far right are deluded in their thinking and they oppose what we, the more patriotic sorts, believe in. But I would NEVER make war against Republicans. They are entitled to their thinking however limited it may be.


So you say the troublemakers of the East are happy over our divisions. But I'm sure they have other issues that concern them far more.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#9
Troop and intelligence pullouts were well under way under Obama during the time of Benghazi.
Besides, Bush never refused help when help was called for.
Sorry, Obummer's leading from his behind doesn't work.





American personnel overseas, like people domestically, are far safer from foreign terrorism under Mr Obama than under traitor Bush.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#10
American personnel overseas, like people domestically, are far safer from foreign terrorism under Mr Obama than under traitor Bush.
Ya. Those people in Orlando sure were safe. You should tell this to their families.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#11
Ya. Those people in Orlando sure were safe. You should tell this to their families.


The crazed killer there was not a foreign enemy agent and had no ties to any international terrorist group as has been established previously.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#12
The crazed killer there was not a foreign enemy agent and had no ties to any international terrorist group as has been established previously.
nah...just that allah Akbar dude.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#14
I know who you mean - the guy who did not know that the Shiia and Sunni are at war.
Who aren't the Muslims at war with? Certainly not the west. They wanna come over here and sing peace songs with us.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#15
Who aren't the Muslims at war with? Certainly not the west. They wanna come over here and sing peace songs with us.



So which one did that mass murderer have ties to since both sides are at war with each other??
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#16
So which one did that mass murderer have ties to since both sides are at war with each other??
At this point what difference does it make? Hillary Clinton.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#17
That makes no sense. Try again.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#18
That makes no sense. Try again.
I think the angle you are coming at this is very clever. Did you think of it all by yourself or did you pilfer it off of some terrorist sympathizer site? The only thing you prove by pointing this out is that both factions are violent hoards of an ignorant warmongering death cult.
 

peacenik

Senior Member
May 11, 2016
3,071
26
38
#19
terrorist sympathizer site

Yeraza are you paying attention since you like Tintin play the bigotry accusation card and here again I am accused of being anti-American.
 

Sirk

Banned
Mar 2, 2016
8,896
112
0
#20
Yeraza are you paying attention since you like Tintin play the bigotry accusation card and here again I am accused of being anti-American.
What do you stand for? A borderless world, leveling the playing field in the world, and larger powerful central government? In reality if you are for those things back in the day you'd be considered a traitor to your countryman and that is far worse than being just an anti American.