Trump to propose deduction on childcare spending:

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#1
WASHINGTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will propose allowing parents to deduct spending on childcare from their income taxes in a speech on Monday meant to challenge the economic policies of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, a campaign aide said.

Reference:
Trump to propose deduction on childcare spending: aide - AOL
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#2
WASHINGTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will propose allowing parents to deduct spending on childcare from their income taxes in a speech on Monday meant to challenge the economic policies of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, a campaign aide said.

Reference:
Trump to propose deduction on childcare spending: aide - AOL
First reaction:
Wow! Trump actually proposes something that's doable and specific. That's different. (Although, I'd be interested in how one divides up how much eat is needed in a house without kids versus with kids, and how much food with and without kids, so people can get that deduction.)

Reaction after clicking link:
How come the video is "Clinton picks Tim Kaine as Running Mate" and it's "Live?" Did they lose every concept of "News?" Because that's "Olds." And, on top of articles about Hillary, do they run stories about Trump picks his running mate?

Reaction while reading article:
Really? When was the last time someone wrote a piece where Hillary is called "a wealthy politician?" The woman does make well over six figures for speaking. And I remember how poor they felt when they lost their home at the White House. Where would that poor couple live? In which mansion would they choose? She's not poor, yet she's been a wife of a politician for a couple of decades before she became her own politician. Why isn't she ever described as "the rich politician?" Are we not supposed to know she's rich?

And then there is that gem on the bottom where The Hill feels the average American couple's pain, and no one should pay more than 30% of their income for child care? Really? 30%? Dang! I really am still in the 20th century. I was taught not to pay that much for housing! If it cost 30% for childcare, it's just better to skip working all together and raise the kids at home. Average family -- two parents working, and the cost of going to work is roughly 10% of the income. (Clothes, transportation, gas, etc.) then that says half of that couple is close to losing money working. I thought we still had minimum wage in this country. But I sure am glad The Hill is up on this stuff. Whew! 1/3rd of the income for childcare, 1/3rd for housing, and then you have a whooping third for food, clothes, bills, healthcare, and all the things kids need and want growing up. How have we survived this far without The Hill teaching us how to budget our lives?

And then there is the stupid "Related: See Donald Trump's Supporters" video below the article. Don't "news articles" even pretend not to be too biased. Because I'm pretty sure that idiot in the Donald Trump mask is NOT a Trump supporter.

We're really going low for any media coverage anymore, aren't we? I mean, even AOL can't pretend to be semi-unbiased in their reporting.

But, hey! Donald Trump actually talking about what he plans to do again, instead of busting on Hillary, sucking his foot again, or telling how he alone is our savior. That's different.
 
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#3
Interesting about the link. I agree AOL as Steve Case and Time Warner is just another system of SCRIBES.

I don't know the details on government child care plans from Trump but the general plan is to
1) get women to make babies in whatever way they choose,
2) get women to work,
3) get women to turn their children over to the government be it day care, schools, Baal camp's or churchianity.

Lots more government money for government programs sponsored by illicit funding - "INDULGENCES" as it were for contraband and gambling; casinos (yeah Trump knows casinos - watch out Indian nations), sports gambling, lottery, alcohol, tobacco, soda taxes and import taxes on slave labor products from the Asian world. Might call it - government orphanages. Baal so loves the children - eat them up, Yum.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#4
Interesting about the link. I agree AOL as Steve Case and Time Warner is just another system of SCRIBES.

I don't know the details on government child care plans from Trump but the general plan is to
1) get women to make babies in whatever way they choose,
2) get women to work,
3) get women to turn their children over to the government be it day care, schools, Baal camp's or churchianity.

Lots more government money for government programs sponsored by illicit funding - "INDULGENCES" as it were for contraband and gambling; casinos (yeah Trump knows casinos - watch out Indian nations), sports gambling, lottery, alcohol, tobacco, soda taxes and import taxes on slave labor products from the Asian world. Might call it - government orphanages. Baal so loves the children - eat them up, Yum.
1. Is there more than one way to make babies?
2. Is there any choice anymore but women working?
3. "Baal's camp or Churchianity?"

Did you miss the correct forum? Sounds more like a Conspiracy Theory statement.

I have no idea where you got that stuff from. But now I know. Don't take your post seriously.
 
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#6
1. Is there more than one way to make babies?
2. Is there any choice anymore but women working?
3. "Baal's camp or Churchianity?"

Did you miss the correct forum? Sounds more like a Conspiracy Theory statement.

I have no idea where you got that stuff from. But now I know. Don't take your post seriously.
Lots (pun intended) of ways to make babies:

* The illegitimacy rate in the US is over 40%
* The Cesearean Section rate in the US is over 30%
* In-vitro fertilization has become a government funded industry
* Multiple marriages / blended families are an American Government staple
* Children of illegal immigrants are Called and used as "anchor babies"

Women in the workplace is the government agenda thus the funding.
Alternatives are stay at home mothers, home schooling, minimalism, homesteading, cottage industries, provident living concept (not a Mormon), remaining unmarried

Baal has been discussed in other threads - it pertains to idolatry in its many forms; music, sports, entertainment, materialism/consumerism/Zionism, building worship, holiday revelry and such like. The relationship between Baal and schools and churches are being discussed in these other threads.

Don't be scared away, offended or confused. The post was from a news site - such as it is - AOL. We would agree not much good to the underpinnings of secular media pretending to be Scribes.

I agree again that it seems more of news of government conspiracy (in Baal) witch means it isn't really "news" at all - just reporting..
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
837
113
#7
1

1LonelyKnight

Guest
#8
Trump on child care:

"You know, it's not expensive for a company to do it. You need one person or two people, and you need some blocks, and you need some swings and some toys," Trump said. "It's not an expensive thing, and I do it all over. And I get great people because of it. Because it's a problem with a lot of other companies."

Reference:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/427e5f6dd29c4c30a99486cdf34cd054/trump-touts-child-care-programs-theyre-guests-only
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#9
Well, it would be a step in the right direction I suppose.
Why? Families that make less than $35,000 a year don't have to do income taxes, so deductions isn't helping the poor at all.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#10
Well if it helps the working class...good