Harvard Poll says Most Popular Solution is to Impeach President Trump.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,034
1,473
113
#1
According to Tom O’Connor of Newsweek

"Most people in a new survey said the best response to Donald Trump’s actions while president would be to impeach him or otherwise remove him from office.


Harvard University’s Center for American Political Studies and research marketing firm Harris Insights and Analytics this week published the results of their monthly national poll, in which respondents were given three choices for how to deal with the president: 43 percent said he should be impeached or otherwise removed from office, while 42 percent said nothing should be done and 12 percent said he should be censured by Congress.


Trump impeachment most popular solution

Amid multiple investigations into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia, a series of high-level administration dismissals and recent polarizing remarks on the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, talk of removing the president has increased, and some politicians have already begun the process or declared their intentions to do so. Many Trump supporters and critics, however, have warned of dire consequences for the country should such an action occur."

“Try to impeach him. Just try it. You will have a spasm of violence—an insurrection—in this country like you have never seen before.... Both sides are heavily armed, my friend,” Roger Stone, an outspoken onetime Trump consultant who previously worked on campaigns to elect Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, told TMZ Wednesday."

I agree with Roger Stone.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#2
I swear, the Liberals in this country have completely and totally lost what little sanity they might ever have had. I mean that in the most serious of terms. They have become raving Lunatics from the shock of losing an election.
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
#3
You cant trust the polls. I used to do them when I did surveys for cash and prizes. They can choose which group of people to send them to anyway.

It was said that there would be a cry of impeachment but would come to nothing. This was way before Trump ever came on the picture. Was the prophetic word over him from years ago.
 

Socreta93

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2015
2,244
324
83
#4
Has he violated the constitution in any way? Saying mean things aren't grounds for impeachment
 
Last edited:
Oct 6, 2015
27
3
0
#5
In fact YES! Many of his actions and policies have been reviewed and overturned by many judges due to it being unconstitutional. For example the Travel Ban he had to rewrite.


Has he violated the constitution in any way? Saying mean things aren't grounds for impeachment
 
Oct 6, 2015
27
3
0
#6
Liberals "outcry" and "raving" is no different from the Republicans "outcry" and "raving" when President Obama was in Office.

The hypocrisy is astounding.


I swear, the Liberals in this country have completely and totally lost what little sanity they might ever have had. I mean that in the most serious of terms. They have become raving Lunatics from the shock of losing an election.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,034
1,473
113
#7
Has he violated the constitution in any way? Saying mean things aren't grounds for impeachment
Article II of the constitution says "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

High Crimes and Misdemeanors is a pretty broad brush.

IMHO, if the democrats gain the house and senate, President Trump will be gone.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,034
1,473
113
#8
Liberals "outcry" and "raving" is no different from the Republicans "outcry" and "raving" when President Obama was in Office.

The hypocrisy is astounding.

Hypocrisy is a two way street. We have had four presidents where the other side shouted "impeach" him, and one of them was actually impeached, but found innocent. It's time to stop the shouting, and start rebuilding our nation.

As long as we continue to oppose any and everything that our president wants to do because we don't like him, we will continue to deteriorate as a nation. I don't care what party that he represents. He is still the president, and he deserves our support and prayers.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#9
In fact YES! Many of his actions and policies have been reviewed and overturned by many judges due to it being unconstitutional. For example the Travel Ban he had to rewrite.
You do know, don't you, that the so-called "Travel Ban" was concerning a handful of countries the Obama administration had already first identified and compiled?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#10
In fact YES! Many of his actions and policies have been reviewed and overturned by many judges due to it being unconstitutional. For example the Travel Ban he had to rewrite.



Looks like he's in good company...


http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/19/10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-presidency/
 
Oct 6, 2015
27
3
0
#11
I agree to an extent. It is one thing to oppose a President because you simply don't like him and another thing to oppose a President because his policies are not beneficial to the American People.

Congress is a representation of the people who voted for them. However, American Politics have been more like a "game of politics" filled with special interest groups on both sides.




Hypocrisy is a two way street. We have had four presidents where the other side shouted "impeach" him, and one of them was actually impeached, but found innocent. It's time to stop the shouting, and start rebuilding our nation.

As long as we continue to oppose any and everything that our president wants to do because we don't like him, we will continue to deteriorate as a nation. I don't care what party that he represents. He is still the president, and he deserves our support and prayers.
 
Oct 6, 2015
27
3
0
#12
The Unconstitutional portion of the travel ban was not which countries was chosen because we currently have sanctions and travel restrictions for many foreign countries for multiple reasons. This is the unconstitutional part:


"The court makes extensive use of Trump's comments during his campaign when he called for a full ban on Muslims from entering the United States as evidence against this executive order.


"The evidence in the record, viewed from the standpoint of the reasonable observer, creates a compelling case that (the executive order's) primary purpose is religious," the ruling states. "Then-candidate Trump's campaign statements reveal that on numerous occasions, he expressed anti-Muslim sentiment, as well as his intent, if elected, to ban Muslims from the United States."
The Problem was the travel ban was ambiguous and seemed as though religion was based off the ban not national security which is unconstitutional.

Nice try to put President Obama in it.

President Obama Administration gave the Trump Administration the list of countries but it is up to the Trump Administration on what they were going to do concerning these countries. The Trump Administration wrote the original Travel ban very carelessly and messed up. Even till this day revisions are being made.


You do know, don't you, that the so-called "Travel Ban" was concerning a handful of countries the Obama administration had already first identified and compiled?
 

Crustyone

Senior Member
Mar 15, 2015
697
50
28
#13
Regarding the OP, Harvard is a very Liberal college now and will make any poll look like what they want it to look like.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#14
The Unconstitutional portion of the travel ban was not which countries was chosen because we currently have sanctions and travel restrictions for many foreign countries for multiple reasons. This is the unconstitutional part:


"The court makes extensive use of Trump's comments during his campaign when he called for a full ban on Muslims from entering the United States as evidence against this executive order.


"The evidence in the record, viewed from the standpoint of the reasonable observer, creates a compelling case that (the executive order's) primary purpose is religious," the ruling states. "Then-candidate Trump's campaign statements reveal that on numerous occasions, he expressed anti-Muslim sentiment, as well as his intent, if elected, to ban Muslims from the United States."
The Problem was the travel ban was ambiguous and seemed as though religion was based off the ban not national security which is unconstitutional.

Nice try to put President Obama in it.

President Obama Administration gave the Trump Administration the list of countries but it is up to the Trump Administration on what they were going to do concerning these countries. The Trump Administration wrote the original Travel ban very carelessly and messed up. Even till this day revisions are being made.
How many Catholics are members of your church? And what is the reason? It is because you believe what they teach would be harmful to the stability of your own congregation's beliefs.

I certainly hope you know enough about Islam to know the same thing applies to having the members of the local mosque join your church. Well, PRESIDENT Trump understands the danger of that religion to the security of our nation.

Yes, (sadly) PRESIDENT Trump is having to learn to play the emotionally dishonest PC games Washington, and Liberals especially, are bound up in. And perhaps he will get good enough at that game of deception the enemy plays that more of his bills will have their contrived language in them, and get passed.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#15
BTW, the stupidity of all that "religion rhetoric" is that right alongside the countries on the list, were several other countries that are predominately Muslim..... but not involved in the radical Islamic terrorism that cost all those American lives on 9/11. They were not restricted at all.
 
Oct 6, 2015
27
3
0
#16
I hope those questions were rhetorical because they are absolutely ridiculous. LOL

Whatever you are talking about in the second paragraph doesn't make sense please elaborate.

The problem is not Political Correctness or Liberals.

The problem was the the United States Constitution didn't support the original travel ban because the original ban would have affected more than just radical Muslims.

That is why.

SIDE NOTE:

I hope your political affliction doesn't affect your faith and how you treat others. Sorry to break it to you the Gospel of Jesus doesn't discriminate against Liberals and/or Republicans.

You don't have to be republican to make it to heaven and you don't have to be liberal. Think for yourself. Your faith and actions is worth more than the box you check for political elections.



How many Catholics are members of your church? And what is the reason? It is because you believe what they teach would be harmful to the stability of your own congregation's beliefs.

I certainly hope you know enough about Islam to know the same thing applies to having the members of the local mosque join your church. Well, PRESIDENT Trump understands the danger of that religion to the security of our nation.

Yes, (sadly) PRESIDENT Trump is having to learn to play the emotionally dishonest PC games Washington, and Liberals especially, are bound up in. And perhaps he will get good enough at that game of deception the enemy plays that more of his bills will have their contrived language in them, and get passed.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#17
I hope those questions were rhetorical because they are absolutely ridiculous. LOL

Whatever you are talking about in the second paragraph doesn't make sense please elaborate.

The problem is not Political Correctness or Liberals.

The problem was the the United States Constitution didn't support the original travel ban because the original ban would have affected more than just radical Muslims.

That is why.

SIDE NOTE:

I hope your political affliction doesn't affect your faith and how you treat others. Sorry to break it to you the Gospel of Jesus doesn't discriminate against Liberals and/or Republicans.

You don't have to be republican to make it to heaven and you don't have to be liberal. Think for yourself. Your faith and actions is worth more than the box you check for political elections.
Sad. Some Islamists might be a little inconvenienced because they raise terrorists in their countries. Do you really think Radical Islamist wear nametags?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#18
Sad. Some Islamists might be a little inconvenienced because they raise terrorists in their countries. Do you really think Radical Islamist wear nametags?

Islam is a radical religion. While not all Muslims are terrorists,the Islamic religion calls for violence,jihad and subduing those who do not believe as they do. Right now Christians are being murdered in some of these countries. I never seem to hear about that here on CC.I find that odd.

 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#19
People want to get all defensive about the nice guy (Muslim) who runs the 7/11 convenience store.

Well, no, he hasn't killed any of us. And when Islamists start taking over this country in the next 30 years, or so, he probably still won't be in the mob that actually murders some of us.

But, just like Democrats who haven't actually murdered a baby by abortion with their own hands, he will quietly agree with them doing it, and stand with those who DO have the guts to do the dirty work of slaughtering "unbelievers."

We really do have to wake up about the reality of freely welcoming just anyone into our country....... without ever even checking any of them out as best as we possibly can.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,095
6,479
113
#20
the KEY to all of this are the words "Harvard Poll."