It says this woman was offered other options and that she refused them.
She had other choices and would not accept them.
She had a choice.
She Refused to leave even when there were other options.
And she openly defied police. Broke the law.
Seems everyone is skipping those points.
We don't actually know the real story. We know one side of it once it's filtered through a journalists views. There was only one statement by the facility, thrown in at the end of the article. A short one. Obviously this was written slanted.
And the article says she wasn't Arrested in handcuffs, but the picture shown is not of the arrest. It's within the jail.
Why is she wearing an orange jumpsuit? Because that's jail policy for All inmates? Not rocket science people.
Jail is for people that have clearly broken, or appear to have broken the law. Such as she did.
To think this facility is going to risk it's reputation kicking out a 93 year old without having just cause and having taken steps to ensure she had other options is ridiculous. Funny how so many here turn on the Christians and support the one breaking the law, instead of realizing they don't know the whole story.
Perhaps this secular journalist purposefully slanted the story to make the Christian facility look bad? Hmm...