Romney proves he is unqualified in foreign policy

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 7, 2012
532
0
0
#1
In Monday night's debate Obama crushed Romney, clearly establishing that Romney could not form a comprehensive and personal foreign policy but he would be totally reliant on experts from the Bush presidency who have gotten us into two wars and cost us $2 Trillion out of budget funds.

Romney's position about the potential of adding another $2 trillion unwanted funds to the defense department over the next 10 years show his total lack of understanding of how the military works and its capabilities. Comparing the navy of 1916 with today's navy was ridiculous and failed completely.

Romney's changing his position regarding leaving Afghanistan was remarkable since Romney has warned consistently over the last 18 months that one should never give such dates of leaving and now specifically laid out a time frame for doing exactly that.

If anything Romney failed the "commander in chief test" showed he has little understanding of foreign policy and seemed like a peacenik compared with the way he was running in the primaries, (etch a sketch.)
 
O

OFM

Guest
#2
In Monday night's debate Obama crushed Romney, clearly establishing that Romney could not form a comprehensive and personal foreign policy but he would be totally reliant on experts from the Bush presidency who have gotten us into two wars and cost us $2 Trillion out of budget funds.

Romney's position about the potential of adding another $2 trillion unwanted funds to the defense department over the next 10 years show his total lack of understanding of how the military works and its capabilities. Comparing the navy of 1916 with today's navy was ridiculous and failed completely.

Romney's changing his position regarding leaving Afghanistan was remarkable since Romney has warned consistently over the last 18 months that one should never give such dates of leaving and now specifically laid out a time frame for doing exactly that.

If anything Romney failed the "commander in chief test" showed he has little understanding of foreign policy and seemed like a peacenik compared with the way he was running in the primaries, (etch a sketch.)

i agree the navy comparision was so wrong outdated and he would stay in the war in afganastian he has said he paid 14 % tax rate if u made 50,000 $ u paid more he said that sounds fair,2 him and he loves china and iran,he looked like he was on something did u see his eyes.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
58
0
#3
Cementakent,
Who do you think you are fooling?
Every one of your posts is nothing more than a political attack
on Romney.
I hope you are making good money campaigning on a christian website for obama.
(I don't support either one), and I certainly wouldn't back
Obama - does the shedding of innocent blood ring any bells?

 

raf

Senior Member
Sep 26, 2009
395
6
18
#4
In Monday night's debate Obama crushed Romney, clearly establishing that Romney could not form a comprehensive and personal foreign policy but he would be totally reliant on experts from the Bush presidency who have gotten us into two wars and cost us $2 Trillion out of budget funds.

Romney's position about the potential of adding another $2 trillion unwanted funds to the defense department over the next 10 years show his total lack of understanding of how the military works and its capabilities. Comparing the navy of 1916 with today's navy was ridiculous and failed completely.

Romney's changing his position regarding leaving Afghanistan was remarkable since Romney has warned consistently over the last 18 months that one should never give such dates of leaving and now specifically laid out a time frame for doing exactly that.

If anything Romney failed the "commander in chief test" showed he has little understanding of foreign policy and seemed like a peacenik compared with the way he was running in the primaries, (etch a sketch.)
I love how he flip flopped from just the previous week im starting to think Romney is not even a human but some sort of robotic form that has some sort of server connected to the internet and keeps track on everything searched and typed into google or forums. Using this technology hes just able to come up with new plans on what people would want. I dont think people can call him a flip flopper, hes just updating his software.
 
Sep 7, 2012
532
0
0
#5
It seems that republicans hate Obama so much that they would vote for a person like that regardless of what his positions are on the issues, they just want Obama out of office.
 
S

sweetspiritgirl

Guest
#6
Im a republican and hate both canidatesbut id choose obama before romney ..just saying
 

JimJimmers

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2012
2,585
71
48
#7
I love how he flip flopped from just the previous week im starting to think Romney is not even a human but some sort of robotic form that has some sort of server connected to the internet and keeps track on everything searched and typed into google or forums. Using this technology hes just able to come up with new plans on what people would want. I dont think people can call him a flip flopper, hes just updating his software.
LOL RAF

 
U

Ugly

Guest
#8
It seems that republicans hate Obama so much that they would vote for a person like that regardless of what his positions are on the issues, they just want Obama out of office.
I'm neither dem or rep, or anything. But yeah, i'd vote for just about anyone long as it got that Christianity hating, bible mocking, baby killing, gay supporting, Israel hating, pro Muslim, big government, gun running, lying, biggest national debt raising, can't fix the economy and joblessness, brainless blowhard out of office.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sep 7, 2012
532
0
0
#9
So Ugly I guess by that criteria that you will be voting for Obama.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#10
So Ugly I guess by that criteria that you will be voting for Obama.
Well, if he was seeking someone with those criteria:

  1. Christianity hating
  2. bible mocking
  3. baby killing
  4. gay supporting
  5. Israel hating
  6. pro Muslim
  7. big government
  8. gun running
  9. lying
  10. biggest national debt raising
  11. can't fix the economy and joblessness
  12. brainless blowhard out of office.
If that's the criteria you're voting for, who else could you vote for but Obama?

I'm glad you recognize the requirements for voting Obama, but I think you misread his post. He was saying those were reasons he wasn't voting Obama, but you must have missed that party. I'm sorry you thought he was voting Obama on those criteria, that must be so embarrassing.
 

raf

Senior Member
Sep 26, 2009
395
6
18
#12
Well, if he was seeking someone with those criteria:

  1. Christianity hating
  2. bible mocking
  3. baby killing
  4. gay supporting
  5. Israel hating
  6. pro Muslim
  7. big government
  8. gun running
  9. lying
  10. biggest national debt raising
  11. can't fix the economy and joblessness
  12. brainless blowhard out of office.
If that's the criteria you're voting for, who else could you vote for but Obama?

I'm glad you recognize the requirements for voting Obama, but I think you misread his post. He was saying those were reasons he wasn't voting Obama, but you must have missed that party. I'm sorry you thought he was voting Obama on those criteria, that must be so embarrassing.
Judging by your list you get your facts from bill O'reily , or a church that preaches more about who to vote for than god. You really need to look stuff up half the stuff on the list can be taken off.
 

raf

Senior Member
Sep 26, 2009
395
6
18
#13
It seems that republicans hate Obama so much that they would vote for a person like that regardless of what his positions are on the issues, they just want Obama out of office.
Of course they hate him obama is working with muslim terrorist, Lord Xenu, Satan, and does abortions in the oval office!!! lol
 
U

Ugly

Guest
#14
Judging by your list you get your facts from bill O'reily , or a church that preaches more about who to vote for than god. You really need to look stuff up half the stuff on the list can be taken off.
Judging by your comments you need to read more and talk less. That list wasn't Jimmy's, it was mine. So yeah, good job shooting your mouth off without knowing what you're saying. Wonder how often that must happen.

Second, i don't watch bill o'reily, nor do i go to a church that preaches about who to vote for. But awfully good of you to make such judgments against people. Shows your true character. Actually i got most of this by listening to the presidents own words and seeing his own actions.

Going by your other post, i find it funny you accuse someone of going to a 'church that preaches about who to vote for than God', yet you are quick to mock and insult other Christians over their political views.
 

raf

Senior Member
Sep 26, 2009
395
6
18
#15
Judging by your comments you need to read more and talk less. That list wasn't Jimmy's, it was mine. So yeah, good job shooting your mouth off without knowing what you're saying. Wonder how often that must happen.

Second, i don't watch bill o'reily, nor do i go to a church that preaches about who to vote for. But awfully good of you to make such judgments against people. Shows your true character. Actually i got most of this by listening to the presidents own words and seeing his own actions.

Going by your other post, i find it funny you accuse someone of going to a 'church that preaches about who to vote for than God', yet you are quick to mock and insult other Christians over their political views.
"If that's the criteria you're voting for, who else could you vote for but Obama?" Obviously if he believes that he clearly believes the same things you do, obviously you are the first one to say it. I think you should read before shooting off your mouth. Also you're criticizing me about making judgments against other people when you are doing the same to me and others, aren't you being a hypocrite, do you even know what that means lol? Judging by your aggressive response you are in fact upset i'm sorry for that as well. lol
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#16
Obama certainly was no "foreign policy expert" when he first ran for President. They are surrounded by them; however, once they are sworn into office.