Florida's ballot

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 7, 2012
532
0
0
#1
srael on Nov 13, 2012 at 5:40 pm
Credit: Joe Skipper/Reuters


After Florida voters had to spend up to seven hours waiting to vote last Tuesday, Gov. Rick Scott (R) and the Republican-legislature have come under heavy criticism for their efforts to suppress the vote. But while much of the focus has been on their unconstitutional restrictions on voter registration and their reductions in early voting, Florida officials note another major factor behind the long lines: 11 lengthy state Constitutional amendments. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher told ThinkProgress that the length of the ballot played a huge role in the slow-moving lines on election day and during early voting. The six-page ballot, she noted, took voters “30 to 45 minutes” for voters to read and comprehend. “There were 11 amendments and no one knew what they were,” she observed, noting that one voter took two hours in a poll booth. With such a long ballot, the lines moved slowly. “Our last voter, the Saturday early voting ended, was at 2:30 in the morning,” Bucher said, adding, “It’s atrocious someone had to wait 7 hours.”
The amendments — mostly defeated by the voters — dealt with implementation of Obamacare, restrictions on abortion rights, and allowing public funding for religious institutions. All were placed there by the Republican-controlled Florida legislature and many could have been accomplished by legislative action.
Two Florida state representatives told ThinkProgress they believe the larger than usual number of ballot initiatives were part of an intentional strategy aimed precisely at creating long lines and discouraging citizens from voting.
State Rep. Perry Thurston, the incoming House Democratic Leader, said:
Without a doubt it was intentional. The items in those amendments were not items that needed to be placed in our constitution. Such a long ballot that requires so much reading, you see so many of them were defeated. That, along with the cutting back on the days for early voting, the hours. You could just see it coming and it was gonna be turmoil. … It clearly was [the Republican majority's] intention to make it more difficult, and to discourage individuals. There is no way people should be waiting six to seven hours, but four to five hours is too long as well. It’s a sad reflection on our state when you require that kind of time to do something that’s not a privilege but a right.
Rep. Mark S. Pafford (D), agreed that the amendments were designed to slow down voting:
Basically what they did was load up the ballot so more people would have to take time either reading through or standing in lines of five to six hours in Palm Beach County— and make a decision after a long wait. I don’t think there’s any question that what occurred was designed to suppress voters in FL. … We had amendments – the ballot was full of things that, during the holidays, you don’t talk about at home. Religion and politics.
Pafford said that he believes that the amendments were designed to bring out voters in conservative counties — and keep them away, in more populous Democratic counties. “I knew what was on the ballot very well,” he added, “and I took probably 10 minutes to make sure I wasn’t putting an arrow somewhere I shouldn’t have put it.”
At least one state senator all-but-admitted that voter suppression was a priority for the Republican majority. Sen. Mike Bennett (R) said last year that voting should be a more difficult process: “I wouldn’t have any problem making it harder. I would want them to vote as badly as I want to vote. I want the people of the state of Florida to want to vote as bad as that person in Africa who’s willing to walk 200 miles…This should not be easy.”
 
V

violakat

Guest
#2
Celeste, don't the people of FL have voter guides well before the elections, to guide them in what they are voting on, and aren't they allowed to bring those guides with them? Because if so, then someone needs to make sure all the voters are aware of these guides.
 
T

TheGrungeDiva

Guest
#3
Celeste, don't the people of FL have voter guides well before the elections, to guide them in what they are voting on, and aren't they allowed to bring those guides with them? Because if so, then someone needs to make sure all the voters are aware of these guides.
Not all states provide non-partisan guides like you are describing. I don't know if Florida is one that does or does not.

There are a few organizations who provide their own guides, but they are partisan (i.e. League of Women Voters puts one out, but that will often be somewhat left-leaning, and I've seen some right-leaning ones from certain organizations as well), and some states have a law against bringing any partisan material into the voting booth with you. Again, Florida may be one of those states.
 
Q

quakerzen

Guest
#4
As a Florida voter, I can say Grunge is right. A lot of counties here don't put out any kind of non-partisan, or even partisan, voting guide. I voted absentee so I had time to sit down and research the amendments but most people had to stand there at the voting booth and translate the HORRIBLY written amendments into English. They were all worded to make you support the amendment, the so called "Freedom of Religion" amendment basically made it so religious institutions could get state funding for non-community service based programs. Soup kitchens, clinics and homeless shelters are already funded by the state, even religious ones. This would've allowed for state funding of a church or a religious school, which is illegal. But the amendment made it seem like people were being banned from government help (welfare, school grants) because of their religion, which is federally illegal. It's disgusting how corrupt Florida government is.
 
V

violakat

Guest
#5
As a Florida voter, I can say Grunge is right. A lot of counties here don't put out any kind of non-partisan, or even partisan, voting guide. I voted absentee so I had time to sit down and research the amendments but most people had to stand there at the voting booth and translate the HORRIBLY written amendments into English. They were all worded to make you support the amendment, the so called "Freedom of Religion" amendment basically made it so religious institutions could get state funding for non-community service based programs. Soup kitchens, clinics and homeless shelters are already funded by the state, even religious ones. This would've allowed for state funding of a church or a religious school, which is illegal. But the amendment made it seem like people were being banned from government help (welfare, school grants) because of their religion, which is federally illegal. It's disgusting how corrupt Florida government is.
Quakerzen,

I don't know if your stationed overseas or not, but I'm going to assume for now that your not. If you are forgive me. This might be something that you could do to help your Government. Use the social media tools that you have and create a wave among your friends and family, getting them to demand that the state and counties provide non-partisan voter guides that they are allowed to take in when they vote. That way voters can be more informed. As a citizen, it is your right to know what your state government is doing. Demand that right.
 
T

TheGrungeDiva

Guest
#6
Use the social media tools that you have and create a wave among your friends and family, getting them to demand that the state and counties provide non-partisan voter guides that they are allowed to take in when they vote. That way voters can be more informed. As a citizen, it is your right to know what your state government is doing. Demand that right.
That's a cool idea for anyone!
 
Sep 7, 2012
532
0
0
#7
But when the state government is out to confuse the voters and to make it difficult they are not so eager to allow such things. I live in Oregon and we have mail in ballots with about a month before we have to mail them back in so we have plenty of time to decide without delaying others at polling places.

Remarkably there was a tea Party candidate who publicly claimed that voting at home did not provide as much "privacy" as a polling booth, that argument was hilarious and he did not get elected, but still he joined in with Tea Partiers all around the country attempting to skew the election in their own direction