None of this is what I asked for, which is typical of evolutionists. I asked for EXPERIEMENTS that DEMONSTRATE microevolution leading the macroevolution. All I ever get is "just assume that micro leads to macro. We think that it does, so just believe it, BELIEVE IT."
Excuse me, how do you KNOW this is not what you asked for? Did you read ANY of it?
This post of yours was made approximately one hour after I posted 3 websites and 4 hard-copy books of evidence, just as you asked for.
You may have actually clicked on all 3 of the links. In fact, I'll be generous. I doubt it, but let's just pretend that you actually read one or more articles on each of those websites.
You absolutely did NOT pick up and read ANY of the books I suggested. How do I know this? Because you would have needed to go to a book store or library to GET the books, and you're trying to tell me that you purchased or checked the books out, got home, and read even ONE of them completely, and then responded to my post?
No evidence would suffice for someone who refuses to listen.
And this is the problem.
The later 3 books of the 4 I listed absolutely do provide exactly what you're requesting. There is scientific evidence that proves exactly what you want. Problem is, you won't look at it. You refuse to look at it, because if you do, it will prove you wrong. It is irrefutable, and you know once you look at it, you will not be able to reject evolution any more.
What is easier, to close your eyes and say "ha, ha, you aren't showing me anything" or to risk being wrong?
Ok, let's try this again. According to the theory of evolution, the first living cell + evolution = every different living animal we have today. The first single living cell would have reproduced asexually. Now here's the evidence I'm asking for. Give me an EXPERIEMENT that DEMONSTRATES that an asexual reproducing organism evolves and developes sexual reproduction organs.
This exact experiment was actually described in detail in at least one of the links I provided you. Further proof that you didn't even bother to click the links, let alone read them. How pathetic.
And your 15 questions are so simple even a non-scientists such as myself can answer them.
The first two questions have the same answer: God created life, using evolution to do it. This is also the same answer for five, seven, and eight.
Numbers three, six, nine through twelve, and fourteen and fifteen all have false premises:
Three: Mutations don't create the huge volumes of information, and no one is claiming they do.
Six: Scientists do not "know" that living things were not created. Some scientists do not believe in God, and think that evolution is the only explanation needed. Most scientists do believe in god, and believe that God created all living things.
Nine: There are no "missing links." This is an urban legend that is just not true.
Ten: Calling an earthworm a "living fossil" likewise stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the basic premise of what evolution teaches.
Eleven: Chemistry did not create morality, and no one is claiming that it did.
Twelve: I don't even know what "evolutionary just-so story telling" means.
Fourteen: Evolution is not a theory about history; it is operational science, and has been observed through experiment.
Fifteen: It is not a dogmatic belief system, and it continues to explain new discoveries as they are made.
Number four: Natural selection is taught as evolution because that's exactly what it is. I'm not sure why you don't like the word "evolution." If you accept natural selection, then you accept evolution. If you think evolution teaches something other than natural selection, then you are mistaken about what evolution teaches. Which is what I've been saying all along.
On number thirteen, the writer of that question should be ashamed to have written it. The science of evolution has cured polio and small pox. Inoculations against hundreds -- possibly thousands -- of other sicknesses, diseases and disabilities have been discovered through evolutionary science. Children with birth defects have been given sight, hearing, skin grafts that would not have been possible without this science. Biologists are close to finding cures to cancer, AIDS, and even the common cold, all from evolutionary genetics. We even cloned a sheep! And this dofus asks "where's the scientific breakthrough?" Really?
Really?