Jet Shot Down?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Sirk

Guest
#41
... an accident. The militia thought it was a Ukrainian cargo flight.
I'm sure that in a country the size of the Ukraine they get to 30,000 ft transporting cargo from one end to the other....not. Sounds like Russian propaganda to me.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#42
I'm sure that in a country the size of the Ukraine they get to 30,000 ft transporting cargo from one end to the other....not. Sounds like Russian propaganda to me.
Do you actually know how big Ukraine is? It's the width of Germany and France put together.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#43
There's not a leader in America's history whose reign was entirely selfless and not wicked at any point. Barely a leader in the world has been genuine, honest and compassionate.
You should read about George Washington....he was a selfless as they come. In fact, the King of England was quoted saying as much. Did you know GW saw to it in his will that his slaves were set free and their education was paid for. You have fallen for a false history. William Wilberforce is another example of selfless dedication to others.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#44
I don't think obama is inept at all if you consider that his stated goal is to "transform" (tear down) America. I don't think we come out of his presidency resembling anything at all of what America has been or was formed to be. In fact, I don't think we emerge as a whole nation at all from his breathtaking wickedness.
I think he is inept in that he just reads from the teleprompter and goes golfing. He is not the President but a sock puppet.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#46
You should read about George Washington....he was a selfless as they come. In fact, the King of England was quoted saying as much. Did you know GW saw to it in his will that his slaves were set free and their education was paid for. You have fallen for a false history. William Wilberforce is another example of selfless dedication to others.
Sanctioning killing is some way wicked, even if it's a tough decision whose outcome may be seen to justify the means. I know of only three leaders on Earth who have ever been even remotely selfless in their rules. One, a Northern Indian called Ashoka of whom you've probably never heard, and even he succumbed to wickedness, and the others, the Buddha, and the third and most entirely benevolent is Jesus of Nazareth, both the latter presiding over religious kingdoms.
 

Ella85

Senior Member
May 9, 2014
1,414
106
63
#47
Hostility between Russia and Australia, as Putin is angered by Tony Abbots accusations.

:eek:
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#48
Sanctioning killing is some way wicked, even if it's a tough decision whose outcome may be seen to justify the means. I know of only three leaders on Earth who have ever been even remotely selfless in their rules. One, a Northern Indian called Ashoka of whom you've probably never heard, and even he succumbed to wickedness, and the others, the Buddha, the third and most entirely benevolent is Jesus of Nazareth, both presiding over religious kingdoms.
What planet are you from? Sanctioned killing is evident in Old Testament history. Are you calling God wicked?
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#49
What planet are you from? Sanctioned killing is evident in Old Testament history. Are you calling God wicked?
Whatever planet where compassion towards another person ranks higher than selfish love. Let me ask you, can you change the demeanour of a man who refuses to regard his demeanour as a problem? Was Jesus' time to be born in the days of Moses? NO, it was not. So, Sirk, why was it not?

It is because humans weren't ready to hear it. The character of love and forgiveness can be given to apes, but apes will only be capable of following it so far. Today, we can follow it further. So today we hear it.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#51
Some interesting news. Apparently over 100 AIDS researchers were aboard the flight. It makes me wonder.
 
Mar 21, 2011
1,515
16
0
#52
Crazy...you know it is coming.....crazy times for real!
To be fair, our current Prime Moron is the biggest idiot we've possibly had in the top job.

He's pretty much offended every country.

Recently he annoyed China, but praising the way Japan bombed Australia and what skill the Japanese used in torturing Australian POWs and executing the prisoners.

He wasn't even born here. I'm starting to see why the Americans have that rule.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#53
Was Jesus' time to be born in the days of Moses? NO, it was not. So, Sirk, why was it not?

It is because humans weren't ready to hear it. The character of love and forgiveness can be given to apes, but apes will only be capable of following it so far. Today, we can follow it further. So today we hear it.
They weren't ready to hear it in Moses day but crucified Him when they were ready to hear Him? OOKAYYYYY.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#54
To be fair, our current Prime Moron is the biggest idiot we've possibly had in the top job.

He's pretty much offended every country.

Recently he annoyed China, but praising the way Japan bombed Australia and what skill the Japanese used in torturing Australian POWs and executing the prisoners.

He wasn't even born here. I'm starting to see why the Americans have that rule.
We'll swap Ya !!! :)
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#55
They weren't ready to hear it in Moses day but crucified Him when they were ready to hear Him? OOKAYYYYY.
5+8 = 4

Derp.
They WEREN'T ready to hear him then. That's the point. Perhaps some of US are.
 
S

Sirk

Guest
#56
Whatever planet where compassion towards another person ranks higher than selfish love. Let me ask you, can you change the demeanour of a man who refuses to regard his demeanour as a problem? Was Jesus' time to be born in the days of Moses? NO, it was not. So, Sirk, why was it not?

It is because humans weren't ready to hear it. The character of love and forgiveness can be given to apes, but apes will only be capable of following it so far. Today, we can follow it further. So today we hear it.
I don't even know what this means. It sounds like new age drivel mixed in with Christianity.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#57
Bingo! Our God of love and mercy appears to be divinely HOLY too. God’s instructions were clear: Exodus 23:32–33; 34:11–16; and Deuteronomy 7:1–5; 20:16–18.

In most of these situations, a distinctive Old Testament concept known as ḥerem is present which means “curse,” “that which stood under the ban” or “that which was dedicated to destruction.” The root idea of this term was “separation”; however, this situation was not the positive concept of sanctification in which someone or something was set aside for the service and glory of God. This was the opposite side of the same coin: to set aside or separate for destruction.

God dedicated these things or persons to destruction because they violently and steadfastly impeded or opposed his work over a long period of time. This “dedication to destruction” was not used frequently in the Old Testament. It was reserved for the spoils of southern Canaan (Num 21:2–3), Jericho (Josh 6:21), Ai (Josh 8:26), Makedah (Josh 10:28) and Hazor (Josh 11:11).

In a most amazing prediction, Abraham was told that his descendants would be exiled and mistreated for four hundred years (in round numbers for 430 years) before God would lead them out of that country. The reason for so long a delay, Genesis 15:13–16 explains, was that “the sin of the Amorites [the Canaanites] has not yet reached its full measure.” Thus, God waited for centuries while the Amalekites and those other Canaanite groups slowly filled up their own cups of condemnation by their sinful behavior. God never acted precipitously against them; his grace and mercy waited to see if they would repent and turn from their headlong plummet into self-destruction.

Not that the conquering Israelites were without sin. Deuteronomy 9:5 makes that clear to the Israelites: “It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land; but on account of the wickedness of these nations.”

These nations were cut off to prevent the corruption of Israel and the rest of the world (Deut 20:16–18). When a nation starts burning children as a gift to the gods (Lev 18:21) and practices sodomy, bestiality and all sorts of loathsome vices (Lev 18:25, 27–30), the day of God’s grace and mercy has begun to run out.

Just as surgeons do not hesitate to amputate a gangrenous limb, even if they cannot help cutting off some healthy flesh, so God must do the same. This is not doing evil that good may come; it is removing the cancer that could infect all of society and eventually destroy the remaining good.

God could have used pestilence, hurricanes, famine, diseases or anything else he wanted. In this case he chose to use Israel to reveal his power, but the charge of cruelty against God is no more deserved in this case than it is in the general order of things in the world where all of these same calamities happen.

In the providential acts of life, it is understood that individuals share in the life of their families and nations. As a result we as individuals participate both in our families’ and nations’ rewards and in their punishments. Naturally this will involve some so-called innocent people; however, even that argument involves us in a claim to omniscience which we do not possess. If the women and children had been spared in those profane Canaanite nations, how long would it have been before a fresh crop of adults would emerge just like their pagan predecessors?

Why was God so opposed to the Amalekites? When the Israelites were struggling through the desert toward Canaan, the Amalekites picked off the weak, sick and elderly at the end of the line of marchers and brutally murdered these stragglers. Warned Moses, “Remember what the Amalekites did to you along the way when you came out of Egypt. When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and cut off all who were lagging behind; they had no fear of God” (Deut 25:17–18).

Some commentators note that the Amalekites were not merely plundering or disputing who owned what territories; they were attacking God’s chosen people to discredit the living God. Some trace the Amalekites’ adamant hostility all through the Old Testament, including the most savage butchery of all in Haman’s proclamation that all Jews throughout the Persian Empire could be massacred on a certain day (Esther 3:8–11). Many make a case that Haman was an Amalekite. His actions then would ultimately reveal this nation’s deep hatred for God, manifested toward the people through whom God had chosen to bless the whole world.

In Numbers 25:16–18 and 31:1–18 Israel was also told to conduct a war of extermination against all in Midian, with the exception of the prepubescent girls, because the Midianites had led them into idolatry and immorality. It was not contact with foreigners per se that was the problem, but the threat to Israel’s relationship with the Lord. The divine command, therefore, was to break Midian’s strength by killing all the male children and also the women who had slept with a man and who could still become mothers.

The texts of Deuteronomy 2:34; 3:6; 7:1–2 and Psalm 106:34 are further examples of the principle of ḥerem, dedicating the residents of Canaan to total destruction as an involuntary offering to God.
See also comment on NUMBERS 25:7–13; 2 KINGS 6:21–23.
Taken from Kaiser, W. C., Jr., Davids, P. H., Bruce, F. F., & Brauch, M. T. (1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (206–207). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.


What planet are you from? Sanctioned killing is evident in Old Testament history. Are you calling God wicked?
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#58
Bingo! Our God of love and mercy appears to be divinely HOLY too. God’s instructions were clear: Exodus 23:32–33; 34:11–16; and Deuteronomy 7:1–5; 20:16–18.

In most of these situations, a distinctive Old Testament concept known as ḥerem is present which means “curse,” “that which stood under the ban” or “that which was dedicated to destruction.” The root idea of this term was “separation”; however, this situation was not the positive concept of sanctification in which someone or something was set aside for the service and glory of God. This was the opposite side of the same coin: to set aside or separate for destruction.

God dedicated these things or persons to destruction because they violently and steadfastly impeded or opposed his work over a long period of time. This “dedication to destruction” was not used frequently in the Old Testament. It was reserved for the spoils of southern Canaan (Num 21:2–3), Jericho (Josh 6:21), Ai (Josh 8:26), Makedah (Josh 10:28) and Hazor (Josh 11:11).

In a most amazing prediction, Abraham was told that his descendants would be exiled and mistreated for four hundred years (in round numbers for 430 years) before God would lead them out of that country. The reason for so long a delay, Genesis 15:13–16 explains, was that “the sin of the Amorites [the Canaanites] has not yet reached its full measure.” Thus, God waited for centuries while the Amalekites and those other Canaanite groups slowly filled up their own cups of condemnation by their sinful behavior. God never acted precipitously against them; his grace and mercy waited to see if they would repent and turn from their headlong plummet into self-destruction.

Not that the conquering Israelites were without sin. Deuteronomy 9:5 makes that clear to the Israelites: “It is not because of your righteousness or your integrity that you are going in to take possession of their land; but on account of the wickedness of these nations.”

These nations were cut off to prevent the corruption of Israel and the rest of the world (Deut 20:16–18). When a nation starts burning children as a gift to the gods (Lev 18:21) and practices sodomy, bestiality and all sorts of loathsome vices (Lev 18:25, 27–30), the day of God’s grace and mercy has begun to run out.

Just as surgeons do not hesitate to amputate a gangrenous limb, even if they cannot help cutting off some healthy flesh, so God must do the same. This is not doing evil that good may come; it is removing the cancer that could infect all of society and eventually destroy the remaining good.

God could have used pestilence, hurricanes, famine, diseases or anything else he wanted. In this case he chose to use Israel to reveal his power, but the charge of cruelty against God is no more deserved in this case than it is in the general order of things in the world where all of these same calamities happen.

In the providential acts of life, it is understood that individuals share in the life of their families and nations. As a result we as individuals participate both in our families’ and nations’ rewards and in their punishments. Naturally this will involve some so-called innocent people; however, even that argument involves us in a claim to omniscience which we do not possess. If the women and children had been spared in those profane Canaanite nations, how long would it have been before a fresh crop of adults would emerge just like their pagan predecessors?

Why was God so opposed to the Amalekites? When the Israelites were struggling through the desert toward Canaan, the Amalekites picked off the weak, sick and elderly at the end of the line of marchers and brutally murdered these stragglers. Warned Moses, “Remember what the Amalekites did to you along the way when you came out of Egypt. When you were weary and worn out, they met you on your journey and cut off all who were lagging behind; they had no fear of God” (Deut 25:17–18).

Some commentators note that the Amalekites were not merely plundering or disputing who owned what territories; they were attacking God’s chosen people to discredit the living God. Some trace the Amalekites’ adamant hostility all through the Old Testament, including the most savage butchery of all in Haman’s proclamation that all Jews throughout the Persian Empire could be massacred on a certain day (Esther 3:8–11). Many make a case that Haman was an Amalekite. His actions then would ultimately reveal this nation’s deep hatred for God, manifested toward the people through whom God had chosen to bless the whole world.

In Numbers 25:16–18 and 31:1–18 Israel was also told to conduct a war of extermination against all in Midian, with the exception of the prepubescent girls, because the Midianites had led them into idolatry and immorality. It was not contact with foreigners per se that was the problem, but the threat to Israel’s relationship with the Lord. The divine command, therefore, was to break Midian’s strength by killing all the male children and also the women who had slept with a man and who could still become mothers.

The texts of Deuteronomy 2:34; 3:6; 7:1–2 and Psalm 106:34 are further examples of the principle of ḥerem, dedicating the residents of Canaan to total destruction as an involuntary offering to God.
See also comment on NUMBERS 25:7–13; 2 KINGS 6:21–23.
Taken from Kaiser, W. C., Jr., Davids, P. H., Bruce, F. F., & Brauch, M. T. (1996). Hard sayings of the Bible (206–207). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
Dribble, dribble, drivel.

'Love your enemies'.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#59
What makes me wonder is why non-Christians and apostate Christians think it's OK to indoctrinate children into a life of grave sexual immorality that carries inordinately high risks of AIDS, STDs, drug addiction, etc...

Some interesting news. Apparently over 100 AIDS researchers were aboard the flight. It makes me wonder.
 
Jun 18, 2014
755
3
0
#60
What makes me wonder is why non-Christians and apostate Christians think it's OK to indoctrinate children into a life of grave sexual immorality that carries inordinately high risks of AIDS, STDs, drug addiction, etc...
What are you even talking about, old man? Over 100 AIDS researchers were on board - people who look for a cure to AIDS. These weren't people who ran around screaming 'screw everyone'. They were scientists looking for a cure for the most dangerous STD of the modern age. What has that got to do with indoctrinating people into a life of grave sexual immorality that carries high risks of AIDS?

In all honesty, ALL unprotected sex, hetero or homo, carries a risk of AIDS contraction.
 
Last edited: