The Review Thread...for Books!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

AsifinPassing

Senior Member
Jul 13, 2010
3,608
40
48
#1
The title is deliberate...as other review threads for things such as movies, art, ext...may now also be made in similar fashion.

Alright then, everyone...! Here is the place where you post the title and author of a book...FE:

'The Shak' by author William P. Young

or

'Great Expectations' by Charles Dickens

...and then people (who hopefully have read more than the sparknotes) will offer their own review (personal feelings, thoughts, and otherwise insights to the book, author, styles, ext...).

So, without any further adieu, as previously 'unearthed' in another thread...we'll begin with:


'Pride & Prejudice' by Jane Austen

(for those who don't know: Pride and Prejudice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
 

AsifinPassing

Senior Member
Jul 13, 2010
3,608
40
48
#3
^^ It's a great one, Jc! ...having a review thread for it might get a little controversial though, so maybe we'll just start with P&P like posted, and then move on to another book once a few people discuss that one. ^^0
 
M

MissCris

Guest
#4
I've probably read Pride & Prejudice more than 10 times, just in the last few years. I think I'm so in love with it because it paints such an interesting picture of society back then. And me, I've always felt like I should have been born in a different century anyway, heh.

I'm sure I'm not the only woman who identifies with Elizabeth Bennet's character. She's as spunky as a lady in those times could be without going too far (usually).

I don't really care for Jane. She's bland, I think. I know she's meant to be angelic and patient and kind and even naive, but that character is just...meh.

But Mrs. Bennet! She's hilarious, and horrible. She's stupid and insipid while being conniving, and she's just so over the top I can't help but kind of like her.

...that's all I have time for right now...
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
14,888
86
48
#5
Victory over depression, by Bob George and all the rest written by Bob George
Living above your circumstances
Classic christianity
Complete in Christ
If want can be ordered at 1.800.727.2828 people to people ministries
 
A

arwen83

Guest
#6
This is an old one. I had the opportunity to read it again for school for last semester to diagnose the main character.Catcher in the Ryeby JD Salinger

It's a classic book that has been handed out in highschools for assignments, and also banned from schools as there is gun references and swears. It's a book about an adolescent's tale of how he ended up in a mental hospital. It's full of existential angst, defiance, seeking authenticity and love. It is something that a number of teenagers can identify with. With the exception that Holden, in addition, had a mental illness (what I believe is borderline personality disorder).

This book has somewhat taken a life on its own, a few serial killers have mentioned that they felt that they were just like Holden. There seems to be this overarching subtle fear that the book has some sort of power, to make someone into a killer by reading it and identifying with Holden. The human condition is far more complex than that. As far as a review on the content, it's engaging, i can usually finish the book in no longer than 2 days, and you can really feel for Holden. And hey, I don't have any plans on killing anyone anytime soon *rolls eyes*
 
Last edited:
P

Powemm

Guest
#7
Just got a copy of redeeming love by Francine Rivera I'll be diving into

The power of words and the wonder of God - still an all time fave
Jesus calling - Sarah young - excellent
Soul to soul - Gary zikav
Around the year with emmet fox - has helped me gain better insight and understanding through the eyes and recovery of an recovering alcoholic with God in their life.. has helped bring me closer to those who have had this struggle in their life as well as gods victory
 
A

arwen83

Guest
#8
The Outsiders
by S.E Hinton

Another classic is the outsiders. This book was made into a movie in the 80's (i believe) starring such actors Tom Cruise, Patrick Swayze, Matt Dillon and Emilio Estivez (mighty ducks). Book is about 50's gangs, the soc's (rich preppy guys) and the greasers (poor, often uneducated guys). The story is a narration of life of Ponyboy Curtis, one if the youngest members, 16 years old i believe. Out if self- defense and protecting his friend, he kills a member of the socs and him and his friend go on the run to an abandon church. One day after getting some food, they find that the church is on fire and kids were trapped in it. They both run in and save the kids with the ultimate expense of his friends life.

Good book.
 
Feb 10, 2008
3,371
16
38
#9
So I'm going to throw a wrench in things here and not go for a classic.

Someone bought me this book called Firebird, by Kathy Tyers. She is a christian and has written a few Star Wars books through the years. This book is sort of a mash-up of christian ideologies, science-fiction, and an over arching theme of love and self-respect. It's definitely more targeted at women, but has a strong male protagonist that I, for one, can both relate to and aspire to.

So far everyone I've recommended it to has liked it., even some non-geeky ones. :)
 
Z

zaoman32

Guest
#10
A book have recommended several times, and will always recommend in the future if anyone asks, Descent into Hell by Charles Williams.

The book mainly follows four different characters who all live in the same community. One is war veteran who finds himself infatuated with a young woman and he becomes so overcome with the idea of being in love with her, that he becomes more and more dependent on his lust until it drives him into the brink of insanity, and eventually kills him. Two more characters, one is a male playwright, the other an actress in his play. The writer teaches her about the idea of selfless love and taking on the pains and hurts of others so that they can live without them and be free of them. The fourth is a man who committed suicide because of self loathing and is stuck in a purgatory of sorts where there is nobody but him. He's stuck living with pain and heartache until the actress finds him, and takes his hurts as her own, and he finally passes away peacefully.

It's beautifully written and absolutely captivating in my opinion. Though it's written like a story there's a lot of poetic imagery and language used, it is truly, art in written form.
 
P

Powemm

Guest
#11
A book have recommended several times, and will always recommend in the future if anyone asks, Descent into Hell by Charles Williams.

The book mainly follows four different characters who all live in the same community. One is war veteran who finds himself infatuated with a young woman and he becomes so overcome with the idea of being in love with her, that he becomes more and more dependent on his lust until it drives him into the brink of insanity, and eventually kills him. Two more characters, on
e is a male playwright, the other an actress in his play. The writer teaches her about the idea of selfless love and taking on the pains and hurts of others so that they can live without them and be free of them. The fourth is a man who committed suicide because of self loathing and is stuck in a purgatory of sorts where there is nobody but him. He's stuck living with pain and
heartache until the actress finds him, and takes his hurts as her own, and he finally passes away peacefully.

It's beautifully written and absolutely captivating in my opinion. Though it's written like a story there's a lot of poetic imagery and language used, it is truly, art in written form.
May have to get this book ..
 

DuchessAimee

Senior Member
Apr 27, 2011
3,922
129
63
#12
I've probably read Pride & Prejudice more than 10 times, just in the last few years. I think I'm so in love with it because it paints such an interesting picture of society back then. And me, I've always felt like I should have been born in a different century anyway, heh.

I'm sure I'm not the only woman who identifies with Elizabeth Bennet's character. She's as spunky as a lady in those times could be without going too far (usually).


The point is for every woman to identify with Elizabeth. Austin's design for characters has given us the "how to" that writers use today. In order to get people to read, watch, or buy your stories is to make them think/feel that they ARE the main character. However, you are rather spunky. :)


I don't really care for Jane. She's bland, I think. I know she's meant to be angelic and patient and kind and even naive, but that character is just...meh.


Jane Austin ALWAYS wrote herself into the story. In my opinion, she's the one who made that popular. However, it's very interesting that she made herself the "plain Jane" (Austin's novels is where it's rumored we get that saying from). Psychologically speaking we can easily see how Austin perceived herself. Which is fascinating all on its own.

But Mrs. Bennet! She's hilarious, and horrible. She's stupid and insipid while being conniving, and she's just so over the top I can't help but kind of like her.


And the classic, back biting, gossiping, female... Mrs. Bennet. I do like what Austin did there. Everyone knows this type of female... they're everywhere. I could name names even now, but you always need to have an antagonist. Mrs. Bennet's character served the story well. Also, I really wanted to punch her in the face. Like all the time.


...that's all I have time for right now...

Please forgive me if my analysis of your post was overstepping my bounds. You may already have known what I said, but the literature analysis part of me couldn't resist.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#13
You can find Charles Williams' novels in eBook form for free (and legal). I've downloaded them and I'll read them but I have so many books in my To Read list.

May have to get this book ..

newcover.jpg

THE MESSIANIC TEMPLE (Non-Fiction)

"The Messianic Temple" by Allen Austin is a heavy book about the parallels between early Egyptian texts (the Edfu Building Texts) and the stories of Genesis (particularly creation and the Flood). There's also some talk about Nephilim, the Great Pyramid originally being an altar built to God, and parallel universes but some of these are discussed sparingly and are divorced from the original text.

Austin discusses his belief that the gods and goddesses of Egypt were originally Egyptian portrayals of the biblical Patriarchs - Adam and Eve, Enoch etc. but that the true stories over time, became conflated and corrupted to the point where those favoured by God (the Patriarchs) were believed to be themselves gods and goddesses. Austin also believes that the animal-heads of the gods/goddesses were used to portray the characteristics of the Patriarchs. For example, Enoch the heavenly scribe was given the head of an ibis because he shared characteristics that reminded the ancient Egyptians of the ibis.

Some of the theories discussed herein are difficult to comprehend, while others make perfect sense, if you believe the Bible to be God's Word. At times I felt there was too much emphasis placed on early Jewish writings eg. the Book of Enoch, to provide evidence for something.

All in all, it's a good book. The writing is fairly average but the content is very intriguing, although it does become redundant in places and sometimes too many topics are discussed at once. Also, there are a number of spelling and grammatical errors but nothing too bad. I suggest that people who wish to read this book, read it slowly and mull over it. This isn't a book to rush.

I'm going to give "The Messianic Temple" a 7/10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T

Tintin

Guest
#14
24094-akira_3_c001_super.jpg

"Akira" was the first adult anime I ever watched. As a young teen, I found the movie intensely violent and disturbing. Critics raved about the movie and I while I agreed with them to an extent, the fluid animation was excellent and the character designs were pretty good, I found the story to be beyond confusing. Last week I started reading the manga series to see if the story made more sense. There's so much more to the manga than the anime. Some additions work, some don't. But is the manga less confusing than the anime? Yes and no. Yes, in that the reader is given far more background context to help understand the story, and no, because the ending is still damn confusing.

"Akira" by Katsuhiro Otomo is a landmark manga series. The series comprises of 6 thick volumes totaling well over 2,000 pages. The story belongs to the cyberpunk thriller genre and paved the way for anime and manga for years to come. I'll be reviewing the English translation.


TRANSLATION:
The English translation is for the most part well done and includes minimal spelling and grammatical errors. Again, the major sound effects throughout should've been left untranslated as the English equivalents don't make much sense, are silly and regularly intrude on Otomo's art. Another pet peeve of mine is that this manga series reads from left to right, not right to left as it was originally created.

ART:
The art varies greatly in quality. The first two manga volumes range from mediocre and average, to quality art. The middle volumes onwards are much more refined and consistent in quality. Otomo has a flair for detail, especially architecture. His character details are also realistic but their facial features are typically cartoony like most manga. Action scenes are particularly well done, as are the ruined city of Neo Tokyo and the scope that comes with the story. In places the art style is very 80's, sometimes for better or worse.

CHARACTERS:
There are many different characters from different positions of society. There's no real lead protagonist but Tetsuo, the runt of a bikie gang is the lead antagonist and Akira, a little boy is his figure head/puppet.

STORY:
"Akira" is by nature, more plot-driven than character-driven. That's not to say character development doesn't play a part, it does, but it's not a focus of the story. The series is set in the not too distant future, a dystopian Tokyo, known as Neo Tokyo. The story involves children with paranormal powers but there's so much more to it. Themes covered include social isolation and the corruption that comes with having great power. It's about broken friendships and surviving in a world that has gone mad. Towards the end there's some talk about human evolution (silly).


FINAL THOUGHTS:
The story starts off a bit rough and much of the art matches it. Thankfully, the story improves fairly quickly but it takes some time for the quality of art to reach the same heights. I found middle 3rd of the story to be the most interesting and satisfying part. I especially enjoyed the endless shots of modern architecture in various states of ruin, with buildings lying at various angles and people traversing them. Also, the interactions between Akira's troupe and other groups in Neo Tokyo were very cool. The last volume was action-packed but I found the ending to be disappointing and confusing. There were allusions to the destructive nature of youth unchecked and to the WW2 Japanese bombings and the effects thereof but it just didn't make sense from any viewpoint. "Akira" is an enjoyable series but it's not a masterpiece.


Not for children. "Akira" contains moderate violence, disturbing imagery, some strong language and mature themes.

7.5/10
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#15
13228149.jpg

Mike Duran's "The Telling" is his finest work to date. The story is a supernatural thriller/horror that seems foreign and yet oddly familiar. It brings to mind "Invasion of the Body Snatchers", along with a whole host of classic and modern speculative stories. There are echoes of Stephen King and Dean Koontz, of Ted Dekker and Frank Peretti and even H.P. Lovecraft. There is liberal use of the prophecy books of the Bible, without pandering to preachiness. "The Telling" is a big step-up from "The Resurrection". The story is more interesting, tightly-written and focused. Characters are well-realised, identifiable and span several demographics. Duran's use of descriptive language is more balanced this time around and a real treat to read. The beginning of the story takes some getting used to as several character P.O.V's are employed, and in rapid succession. It can be a lot to take in. Zephaniah Walker is the lead protagonist. He's a prophet who has given up on his calling and now lives as a hermit. One day he's called to investigate a body - his. And the horrific adventure between Earth, Heaven and Hell begins. I highly recommended "The Telling".

8.5/10
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#16
The Book of Mortals #2: Mortal - Ted Dekker and Tosca Lee

Oh my goodness!

It's not a good sign when it takes me a month (on and off) to read one moderately-sized Ted Dekker novel. I don't say it often but I'm glad I'm finished with "Mortal" - the second book in "The Books of Mortals" series. This story was a real chore to read. As in the first book, "Forbidden", there are some intriguing ideas to be had but the characters are extremely dull (save one or two) and details of the world are kept to a minimum, leading more to confusion than just having enough details to encourage the reader to connect the dots to create their own understanding of the world. The final nail in the coffin, and perhaps the biggest, is that the story is so generic and reminiscent of Ted's other works (particularly "The Circle Quartet" and "Immanuel's Veins") it hurts. The story also shares many similarities with a much better series by Eric Wilson, "Jerusalem's Undead Trilogy". The last 60 pages of "Mortal" are some of Ted's best work (could be Tosca's influence though) but it's far to late in the game to save this story. I don't recommend this novel at all.

4/10
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#17
angel-fall-250.jpg

"Angel Fall" by Coleman Luck is a curious fantasy/adventure novel. Its tone fluctuates between playful and childlike and dark, violent and disturbing. The story is unlike anything I've read but it reads like a hybrid of C.S. Lewis' "The Chronicles of Narnia" and "The Great Divorce", Madeleine L'Engle's "A Wrinkle In Time" and John Bunyan's "Pilgrim's Progress" but with a strong dose of horror. Luck's descriptions are epic and he does a great job of keeping the reader in the dark from what's going on. Unfortunately, sometimes Luck 'tells' what happens to a character when he really should be 'showing' and shifts into high-gear when he should revel a little longer in the drama/situation. This weakens the overall writing quality. Still, "Angel Fall" tells an interesting story and surprised me at almost every turn. That's quite a feat. The book's far from perfect but I thoroughly enjoyed it. Recommended for mature readers.

8/10
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CatHerder

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2013
3,551
79
48
#18
Tintin - Angel Fall sounds interesting. Why not let us know what book you are about to read next so we can discuss it "book club" style afterwards? Or is a book club just a poor excuse for women to sit around and drink wine and escape the kids and other resposibilities under the pretense of discussing a book that no one in the group has actually read the way they do it in Australia? That's the way it works here...
 

CatHerder

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2013
3,551
79
48
#19
...but I'd be willing to have a "real" book club with you and other CC-ers. (problems editing on mobile-excuse me using two posts).
 
Apr 14, 2011
1,515
66
48
33
#20
This is an awesome idea of reviewing books, though for me, I just read books. If I read and decide to get rid of it, either I did not like it or it was a fad. I kept one when I was part of a fad, but I am not obsessed with it anymore. Used too. When it comes to liking books I tend to be subjective. To me it becomes read the book and see if you like it. I also tend to read and notice things like a lot of Asimov's books I am reading are peppered with biblical quotations and I keep seeing them pop up, I sort of understand why those are there because mostly everyone has heard of the Bible but maybe has not read it. He even wrote a guide to the Bible. I really have never encountered a scifi book I didn't like, but there was a part in one that I could not stand about a red heifer the book was called Spin, I had skip that part and stop reading that part. I like the book, but not that part. I probably would have given that a 9/10 or a 10/10, despite that part. But anyway, don't ask me to review a book. If I like it, I say I like it. If I don't, I say I don't.