I Don't Believe There is a God

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#41
#41
But DannyC, seeing as I'm so ignorant regarding science, could you address the problems with the Logical positivists, Falsificiationists, and Relativists regarding the scientific method, and show me how the scientific method is on firm rational grounds? Because if you could do so, I'd suggest you write a book on it and have people studying the Philosophy of Science read it, as it would solve so much confusion that exists today.
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#42
#42
I find it funny you are still yet to address any of the logical problems I raised. I'm still waiting..
 
T

TexasHallelujahGal

Guest
#43
#43
you won't listen to Gods people guess its time our lord pays you a visit via Holy Spirit ...what day is good for you ? and we will pray for you and bind the enemy for your search ...You don't have to believe in God or the enemy ...." They believe in you " By not choosing God beloved you choose the enemy . surrender all and gain all .
 
D

DannyC

Guest
#44
#44
FormerAtheist said:
I find it funny you are still yet to address any of the logical problems I raised. I'm still waiting..
Click to expand...
You don't understand the basic principles of science why bother going into detail, if you can't get the basic principles down there is little point moving on and I will be getting nothing out of it other than annoyance at willing ignorance,I have no problem discussing something with someone who has done their homework but very obviously you have not, that wasn't a minor mistake you made that was a huge one and one of the most common mistakes.

I know the arguments about the scientific method, I don't find them that engaging for me, they are not that interesting or validated, and especially not with someone who can't discern a law and a theory.
 
D

DannyC

Guest
#45
#45
FormerAtheist said:
But DannyC, seeing as I'm so ignorant regarding science, could you address the problems with the Logical positivists, Falsificiationists, and Relativists regarding the scientific method, and show me how the scientific method is on firm rational grounds? Because if you could do so, I'd suggest you write a book on it and have people studying the Philosophy of Science read it, as it would solve so much confusion that exists today.
Click to expand...
Childishness is not the way to talk to people, also if you want to present a topic I insist you spell it properly, 'Falsificiationists' is not a word nor is the word spelt 'sificiation' it is 'sification'.
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#46
#46
That's quite a weak way of conceding an argument DannyC. Although I expected you to take this route.

What's ironic is, let's say I'm totally ignorant regarding Science, wouldn't it be so easy for you to disprove me right now? You're attacking the man, not the argument. Surely you know this fallacy?

So very simply, if these arguments regarding the scientific method don't engage you enough, then share with all of us who are so ignorant, the answer. Explain yet again how Science is the best way for finding out the fact? Address the logical problems.

Yet again, you have yet to address these problems and show great ignorance.

Once again, I'm waiting for an answer to these problems...
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#47
#47
It's amazing how you retreat to personal attacks and critiquing spelling, instead of answering the questions asked. It's a good way of avoiding the fact that you have a very weak argument. That in itself, is very childish.
 
K

Kefa52

Guest
#48
#48
I can't believe that a seeker asks a question and it gets turned into an argument.
( Knowing about God is worthless without knowing of God)
 
D

DannyC

Guest
#50
#50
FormerAtheist said:
It's amazing how you retreat to personal attacks and critiquing spelling, instead of answering the questions asks. It's a good way of avoiding the fact that you have a very weak argument. That in itself, is very childish.
Click to expand...
I never said I had the answers I would have to sit down and research them,you just demand them actually you continue to demand them like I represent science in some form,I don't, if I don't want to engage in a topic I don't have to, but when I do I know a bit about the topic but you made an error a huge one its very obvious. I am making a point about your error not you. The spelling error in your topic you're pushing is very poor I don't see why you cant spell it properly.

But not unlike most people you will try to push a topic and I will keep saying I am not discussing it, then you give yourself a self obtained sense of victory, go ahead you might as well be discussing this with yourself.
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#51
#51
Oh no. You claimed I was ignorant regarding Science. You claimed you have engaged in these arguments before. If you were not informed enough, you should have stated so, instead of making the claim that Science is the best possible way of arriving at the 'facts'.

This is directly quoted from one of your previous posts: "I find this laughable you presume so much about science yet know so little, I just read a straw man argument play out with yourself when you decide to listen then we can maybe talk." This line of text has major grammatical errors. But did I bother to say anything regarding this? No, I did not. Because that is childish, and has no bearing on this debate.
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#52
#52
Even in your last post, there should be a comma before 'but'. But yet again, all of this is pointless critique.
 
D

DannyC

Guest
#53
#53
FormerAtheist said:
Oh no. You claimed I was ignorant regarding Science. You claimed you have engaged in these arguments before. If you were not informed enough, you should have stated so, instead of making the claim that Science is the best possible way of arriving at the 'facts'.

This is directly quoted from one of your previous posts: "I find this laughable you presume so much about science yet know so little, I just read a straw man argument play out with yourself when you decide to listen then we can maybe talk." This line of text has major grammatical errors. But did I bother to say anything regarding this? No, I did not. Because that is childish, and has no bearing on this debate.
Click to expand...
This is far too childish for me, I'm done discussing this.
 
F

FormerAtheist

Guest
#54
#54
"I never said I had the answers I would have to sit down and research them,you just demand them actually you continue to demand them like I represent science in some form," You don't see how this should be broken up into sentences with full stops? Yet again, my point here is to point out that neither of us are writing books in this post. We are debating. So critiquing spelling or grammar is extremely childish, and even more so when you yourself make mistakes.
 
H

Hungry

Banned
#56
Nov 26, 2012
3,095
1,050
113
#56
DannyC said:
That's not the theory of evolution, your mixing a few different theories and you're not even getting them right.
Click to expand...
You claim to know so much but reveal no arguments. My objections are based in truth. If you could have offered a reasonable rebuttal you would have. You don't want to argue because even a child can see that your science has left you defenseless. If you admit that there is credibility to what I claim then you are no longer master of your world. I see you're scared but sometimes the most obvious answer is the right answer. There is a God. Accept it and embrace wisdom.
 
P

progressivenerdgirl

Guest
#57
#57
rycag said:
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD WHATSOEVER! However, I'm skeptical. If one of you can give me a solid reason as to why I should believe in God, and I mean a really good reason, I will admit on here that God is real. But I have to tell you that I don't think any of you can give me a solid reason because there isn't any proof.
Click to expand...
Why do you come in here shouting (analogically), making demands and so forth? There is a difference between real curiosity and childish provocation.
 
B

Batman007

Guest
#58
#58
rycag said:
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD WHATSOEVER! However, I'm skeptical. If one of you can give me a solid reason as to why I should believe in God, and I mean a really good reason, I will admit on here that God is real. But I have to tell you that I don't think any of you can give me a solid reason because there isn't any proof.
Click to expand...
Well, to be fair, maybe there isn't a god. I think it's important and healthy to entertain all ideas.
 
P

progressivenerdgirl

Guest
#59
#59
Batman007 said:
Well, to be fair, maybe there isn't a god. I think it's important and healthy to entertain all ideas.
Click to expand...
I actually don't have a problem with the literal meaning of 'God does not exist', since it means 'steps out' and God is not something like a hairbrush. On the other hand people usually mean 'God is not real', which I utterly repudiate.
 
J

jo_ptrp

Guest
#60
#60
if you don't believe on our testimonies and proofs that God exist, then ask directly God if He is real;-) God bless.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.