What perplexes me is how he says the common ancestor of humans and reptiles crawled out of the sea millions of years ago (a completely unobservable event, quite contrary to the definition of the scientific method) and that the fish we see today are modern animals. My question is, why are fish still not climbing out of the ocean to evolve into something else? This has always perplexed me in their stance. What they propose is not scientific at all. It is fanciful and imaginative, but there is zero evidence for what they accept as being true, even as they claim to base their beliefs on facts, and to be superior in intelligence for accepting things with no evidence, while they claim we have no evidence for what we believe, which is actually not true, for we accept as evidence that which they reject.