Jesus was young!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 16, 2011
2,957
24
0
#1
Jesus lived to be like 33 years old. I think He would qualify for young adult!
 
May 4, 2011
627
3
0
#2
Nowadays but back then he was probably way past middle aged :p
 
P

peanut09

Guest
#3
im new to the chat site will u chat with me
 
Jul 24, 2010
829
7
0
35
#4
Yeah he was getting up in years at that time considering the life expectancy wasn't as great as it is now.
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#5
Nowadays but back then he was probably way past middle aged :p
I would tend to think that people lived much longer back then, that is if they weren't stricken with disease famine ect. They did not eat processed foods or food with artificial preservatives. Everything was eaten fresh. There were no fast food restaurants plus, they lived a much more active life.

In the Bible: Methuselah lived to be 969 yrs. old. Genesis 5:27
- Jared - 962 Genesis 5:20
- Noah - 950 Genesis 9:29
- Adam - 930 Genesis 5:5
- Seth - 912 Genesis 5:8
- Kenan - 910 Genesis 5:14
- Enosh - 905 Genesis 5:11
- Mahalalel - 895 Genesis 5:17
- Lamech - 777 Genesis 5:31
 
Last edited:
May 4, 2011
627
3
0
#6
It would depend on how wealthy you were I guess poor people would have very simple diets and be pretty malnourished and they'd have to work all there lives to survive so probably eventually work themselves to death. And I guess those people were allowed to live by the "grace" of God. Funny how you dont see that now adays. In 1000 AD life expectancy was 24 years so I dont know if things would have been worse or better a thousand years before that.
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#7
That may be true, but you also have to take into account the amount of very early deaths that skewed those results though. Thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands of babies and children died before the age of 5. If you had one person that lived to 70 and two babies that died at the age of 1, then the average life expectancy of the three would be 24 yrs. That is a very unreliable statistic my friend.
 
May 4, 2011
627
3
0
#8
Yeah but what were the chances of someone living to 70 in a time where a cut on your finger could kill you in a week.
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#9
Most people died back then as an infant. If you made it past the age of five life expectancy was tremendously increased. I'm not sure how many people back then died from a simple cut on their finger, but I am pretty sure that it wasn't too many lol
 
R

Ramon

Guest
#10
Jesus lived to be like 33 years old. I think He would qualify for young adult!
I think Jesus would have far surpassed Methuselah if he hadn't been killed. Wait, even then he far surpasses Methuselah, BECAUSE HE IS ALIVE FOREVER MORE!!
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#11
Right on Ramon, right on! His flesh may have only lived to the age of a young adult, but Christ is an eternal being.
 
Last edited:
May 4, 2011
627
3
0
#12
I would imagine it would be quite a lot back then any wound that got infected would be an almost definite death sentence :\
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#13
I would imagine it would be quite a lot back then any wound that got infected would be an almost definite death sentence :\
I get infected wounds that go untreated all the time, but I have never been given a death sentence... How are the people of old so different from me?
 
S

See_KING_Truth

Guest
#14
Right on Ramon, right on! His flesh may have only lived to the age of a young adult, but Christ is an eternal being.
I should say his flesh only lasted...because Christ didn't live in the flesh, but the spirit.