"Don't judge me you judgy mcjudgerpants"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 27, 2005
1,282
12
38
34
#1
This blog entry was posted by the youth leader in my church (he didn't write it though) and it just resonated with everything I believe. I've been known to say "I know we're not supposed to judge.." And it seems like a popular phrase now... We can't "judge" about anything. Well anyway.. I really recommend taking the time to read this and see if it doesn't "click" with you too. It is a bit of a long read though! (I originally posted this in the Bible discussion area but it moves really fast and wasn't seen by many before being pushed to the side.. I feel like it's appropriate here as well.)

blog entry:

I’ve always been a pretty big fan of
the Ten Commandments. My favorites is the one that says “Thou shalt not judge.”


Oh, that one isn’t in there, you say?


Sorry, it’s easy to forget nowadays, especially in this country where many Christians carry on as though the entire Bible could be summed up by the phrase, “it’s all good, bro.”


In actual fact, there are a lot of urgent truths and important moral lessons in the Bible. Interestingly, almost all of them have fallen out of favor in modern American society. Here are just a few verses that aren’t particularly trendy or popular nowadays:


(WARNING: Politically incorrect truths ahead)


“Whoever harms one of these little ones that believes in me, it would be better for him if a millstone where tied around his neck and he were drowned in the depths of the ocean.”


“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart.”


“But I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, unless the marriage is unlawful, causes her to commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”


“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”


“For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” We hear that some among you are idle and disruptive. They are not busy; they are busybodies. Such people we command and urge in the Lord Jesus Christ to settle down and earn the food they eat.”


Strange as it may seem, enlightened, progressive Christians rarely attempt to wrestle Ephesians 5 or 2 Thessalonians 3 into a conversation. Yet, while the bulk of the Bible has ended up on our civilization’s cutting room floor, the warnings about “judging” are quoted and repeated incessantly, by Christians and non-Christians alike.


Apparently, the rest of the Book is outdated, outmoded, antiquated and fabricated, but the verses about judging — that stuff is gold, man.


Here’s a fun experiment: post something on your Facebook condemning any sin — not sinner, but sin. Maybe write a few paragraphs about why we shouldn’t kill babies, or why marriage is sacred. Write something defending truth. Write something combating popular cultural lies about morality. Write something where you call out an act — not a person — an act, and then sit back and wait for the responses. Statistically speaking, it will take only 4.7 seconds before a self identified Christian rushes in to insist that you must never speak out against any evil, ever, for any reason, lest you be guilty of “judging.”


And then the “no judging” chorus will begin:


“We’re not allowed to judge.”


“Christians shouldn’t judge.”


“Jesus said to never judge.”


“You’re not a real Christian because you are judging.”


“You’re judging so I’m going to judge you and tell you that you’re a piece of garbage because you judge so much!”


“Judger! You’re a big fat judge-face, all you do is judge all day like a judging judge McJudgePants!”


And so on.


Now, here’s the thing: they’re right — well, almost. Unfortunately, they left out an important word. It’s not that we shouldn’t judge at all — it’s that we shouldn’t judge WRONGLY. The idea that we shouldn’t judge at all is 1) absurd, 2) impossible, 3) very much at odds with every moral edict in all of Scripture. It’s also hypocritical, because telling someone not to judge is, in and of itself, a judgement. Any time you start a sentence with “you shouldn’t,” whatever comes next will constitute a judgement of some kind. Saying, “you shouldn’t judge,” is like saying, “there are no absolutes.”


Translation: you shouldn’t judge… except when judging people for judging. There are no absolutes… except the absolute that there aren’t any absolutes.


Yet, have you ever noticed that these “Don’t Judge” folks are nowhere to be found when the conversation turns to the Westboro Baptists, or domestic abusers, or the Nazis, or Republicans? I guarantee I could write a post condemning gay marriage opponents as bigots and homophobes and not a one of these pragmatists would swoop in to tell me not to “judge.”


Behind the Bible, my second favorite book is the dictionary. Let’s consult it, shall we?


Judge: To form an opinion of; decide upon; settle; to infer, think, hold as an opinion.


When you tell someone not to judge, you’re telling them to stop deciding things, to stop forming opinions, to stop thinking, and to stop inferring. Brilliant bit of philosophy, Plato. “Stop thinking and deciding!” Do you really think Jesus meant THAT when he told us not to judge? Well, I guess you can’t think about it one way or another if you’re adhering to this whole “never judge” schtick.


I know we live in a sound bite culture. Everything has to be condensed down to 14 syllables or less, and every concept must be communicated in under 12 seconds. Entire elections are decided this way. And while this strategy doesn’t work well in the democratic system, it’s an absolute catastrophic heretical disaster if you try to utilize it in the realm of theology. Yes, Jesus said “Judge not,” but you have to read the rest of that passage, and then the rest of the Book to put those two words into context. Once you’ve done that, you’ll understand that what He meant is precisely the opposite of how it is translated by modern cowards who are looking for any excuse to shrink away from the task of standing up against our culture and its many lies.


We must judge. We must exercise judgement. We must be discerning and decisive. We must expose evil and identify sin. Only we must do it righteously and truly. Judge, but judge rightly. That’s the point. We are to judge the sin, not the sinner. People seem to love the latter part of that phrase, and then selectively forget the first portion.


We can not condemn a man to hell. We can not see inside his soul. This is an important point, but it doesn’t mean we can’t speak harshly about the atrocities of a particular individual. If a guy commits adultery, I’ll call him an adulterer. That’s not an insult or an evaluation of his soul; it’s a true and accurate judgement based on the fruits he has produced. If a guy steals, he is a thief. If he murders, he is a murderer. If he commits tyrannies, he is a tyrant.


Jesus stopped a bloodthirsty mob from stoning a woman to death for adultery. Famously, he said “let he without sin cast the first stone.” This profound Biblical event has since been contorted to mean that nobody can condemn any (popular) sin, or speak out against any (popular) evil, because nobody is perfect.


Nonsense.


Jesus wasn’t telling the crowd to chill out and be cool with infidelity; he was telling them that they don’t have the authority to pass final judgement on another human being for their moral shortcomings. In the immediate sense, he was also stopping them from brutally killing a woman. This can not be construed into him strolling in with a shrug and saying, “Hey, live and let live, dudes.” In fact, after he forgave the woman’s sin, he commanded her to “sin no more.”


Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. That doesn’t mean that we must be without sin before we can call a sin a sin. Just because we make a judgment does not mean we are throwing rocks at a helpless woman. Sometimes, it means we are shedding light into a terrifying darkness.


Remember, this is the same Jesus who told us to separate the wheat from the chaff and the sheep from the wolves; the Jesus who called his opponents “snakes” and “vipers”; the Jesus who made a whip and violently drove the money changers out of the temple; the Jesus who said he came to bring a sword and drive a wedge between families.


He was loving and peaceful, but He was also manly, strong, courageous, outspoken, decisive, and commanding. He wasn’t a hippy. He was, and is, a King and a Warrior. Our culture has an agenda, and the agenda has nothing to do with following Christ or His precepts. Flimsy modern weaklings have taken the “don’t judge” concept out of context — twisted it, perverted it, and used it as an excuse to sit silently while all manner of unspeakable evils happen in their midst.


They’ve tried to turn Christianity into a religion of apathy and permissiveness. I certainly make judgments about their slander of my faith. I judge it to be sacrilegious, evil, and despicable.


And I judge it rightly.


So, don’t judge? Wrong. Judge. We must judge. The Bible exists, in large part, to shape our judgement and to tell us how to judge. We must teach our kids to have good and moral judgement. We must equip them with the spiritual tools to exercise it publicly, without fear. We must show them how to be discerning, critical thinkers.


You can not raise your children without judgement; you can’t function as a civilized human being without judgement; and you certainly can’t be an obedient Christian without judgment.


I am a sinful person. If you would ever consider accepting and celebrating my sins for the sake of being “non-judgmental,” please do me a favor and stop doing me that favor. I don’t want to be made comfortable and confident in my wrongdoing.


I’d rather have you hurt my feelings as you help me get to Heaven, than protect my feelings as you usher me right along to Hell.
 

Misty77

Senior Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,746
45
0
#2
I think this is mostly a semantics problem. When people are saying, "Don't judge me," they generally mean, "Don't falsely or hastily condemn me." The blog is using the word "judge" to mean "discern." That has a different connotation.
 

just_monicat

Senior Member
Jan 1, 2014
1,284
17
0
#3
i find it fascinating that in this entire, lengthy edict proclaiming the abject need for "judging sin", there is not a single mention of the audience this message should be considered for. there are references to american society, but we, as christians, are NOT called to run around identifying and heralding the sinful acts of the non-christian. non-christians need Christ, not to be hit over the head by a rule book that wasn't written for them.

second, i agree that we need to be honest reflections of what the bible asks of us. we are to be discerning, to be honest and unflinching in the assessment of sin, be it ourselves or our brother. since this entire post appears to be about discerning others' sin, i find it lacking in (both the spirit and) the instructions we are called to follow whenever we address about such a topic -- with a gentleness/meekness of spirit, for starters.

thanks for sharing.
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#6
I agree that we are called to discern... what I don't agree with is calling someone who commits adultery an adulterer, or someone who commits murder a murderer, and so forth. I don't believe in putting labels on people, whether it be for sin or for who they are. There is some convenience in labels - you wouldn't know I was talking about gay men/women unless I said "homosexual people." But here's the problem: often times when we label someone, we're using a second-hand source. "Someone told me this." That's where gossip and rumors come in. Even when we know the person we're labeling first-hand, we may not have all the facts... a woman, for example, can falsely accuse a man of rape. So, we take her word for it, label him a raciest, and thus are not "judging rightly." The problem with labels is that things aren't always as they appear... and thus, by identifying someone for the sin you think they committed, you are falsely judging that person - all the while thinking you're being a good little Christian for calling out sin.

I agree with the sentiment to say, "Hey, I believe it's wrong to murder. I believe it's wrong to steal." What I'm saying is that you don't always know - although you may think you do - that this person is doing something wrong. I believe in correcting a bro/sis in Christ - but like was brought up already, you don't beat non-Christians up with rules on holy living... the rules are for the Christians. Non-Christians are "dead in trespasses and sins"... dead people can't follow rules. What they need is the Gospel and love, and a listening Christian. It's very important to listen to non-believers. I actually had a Satanist tell me that I wasn't like other Christians she met because I actually listened to her beliefs - and because of that, she was willing to let me share mine. I got to witness to her.

This article appeared to me more a rant than a loving call to living a holy life. If you're trying to correct someone, this is not the tone to use - they'll tune you out because you're being so abrasive. Since he quoted tons of Scripture, I'll quote one: "Speak the truth in love." And like what was mentioned in this thread, he didn't explicitly say this message was for Christians, though I can see how that is implied.

I will say, that I agree with quite bit of the article. I agree that we can't discern someone's soul. That's very true. Yes, theology can't be summed up in a few words, and you have to read context. But actually, the context of the "judge not" passage is hypocrisy. Jesus, in context, is telling people not to judge people for things that they do themselves... and often, we do that without even realizing it - like making a judgement for someone not to judge. That's why, I think, it's best not to label people for their sins, because we may commit the same sin, just in a milder fashion. The same Christians who condemn homosexuals, themselves get married and divorced one, two, maybe three times - and that's a sin, in intimate relationships regarding significant others, just as the homosexual lifestyle is supposed to be a sin (I'm on the fence about the issue, actually.) But that's just an example of how by calling out sin, we may be acting as hypocrites.

Just a few things nobody mentioned so far that I thought (well, hadn't mentioned before I started this long post. ^_^ )
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#7
LITTLE NOTE TO EDIT PREVIOUS POST:

In the first paragraph, I met rapist, not raciest. LOL But I'm sure ya'll discerned that from the context. I just wanted to clarify.
 
Feb 1, 2007
44
1
8
16
#8
Excellent post Beasty. A couple comments: When people say "don't judge me", what they're actually saying is "since right and wrong are situationally relative, I can do anything I please, and how dare you suggest that I will be held accountable for my actions, whose merit is based on absolute standards give by The Creator" (which they don't believe anyway).
Also, as Christians, it is our duty and a command that we give a kick in the pants to any fellow believer who is living in sin.
This new age "don't judge me" bit is just another excuse for people to be their own god.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#9
Excellent post Beasty. A couple comments: When people say "don't judge me", what they're actually saying is "since right and wrong are situationally relative, I can do anything I please, and how dare you suggest that I will be held accountable for my actions, whose merit is based on absolute standards give by The Creator" (which they don't believe anyway).
Also, as Christians, it is our duty and a command that we give a kick in the pants to any fellow believer who is living in sin.
This new age "don't judge me" bit is just another excuse for people to be their own god.
For a 5 year-old, this is very well written. ;)
 

Misty77

Senior Member
Aug 30, 2013
1,746
45
0
#10
Excellent post Beasty. A couple comments: When people say "don't judge me", what they're actually saying is "since right and wrong are situationally relative, I can do anything I please, and how dare you suggest that I will be held accountable for my actions, whose merit is based on absolute standards give by The Creator" (which they don't believe anyway).
Also, as Christians, it is our duty and a command that we give a kick in the pants to any fellow believer who is living in sin.
This new age "don't judge me" bit is just another excuse for people to be their own god.
No, we are not supposed give someone a "kick in the pants." We are to rebuke a fellow believer in love and in a spirit of humility for the purpose of restoration. It is not punishment for punishment's sake.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#11
No, we are not supposed give someone a "kick in the pants." We are to rebuke a fellow believer in love and in a spirit of humility for the purpose of restoration. It is not punishment for punishment's sake.
I'm pretty sure that's what he meant.
 

jandian

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2011
772
11
18
#13
This blog entry was posted by the youth leader in my church (he didn't write it though) and it just resonated with everything I believe. I've been known to say "I know we're not supposed to judge.." And it seems like a popular phrase now... We can't "judge" about anything. Well anyway.. I really recommend taking the time to read this and see if it doesn't "click" with you too. It is a bit of a long read though! (I originally posted this in the Bible discussion area but it moves really fast and wasn't seen by many before being pushed to the side.. I feel like it's appropriate here as well.)

blog entry:

I’ve always been a pretty big fan of
the Ten Commandments. My favorites is the one that says “Thou shalt not judge.”


Oh, that one isn’t in there, you say?


Sorry, it’s easy to forget nowadays, especially in this country where many Christians carry on as though the entire Bible could be summed up by the phrase, “it’s all good, bro.”


In actual fact, there are a lot of urgent truths and important moral lessons in the Bible. Interestingly, almost all of them have fallen out of favor in modern American society. Here are just a few verses that aren’t particularly trendy or popular nowadays:


(WARNING: Politically incorrect truths ahead)


“Whoever harms one of these little ones that believes in me, it would be better for him if a millstone where tied around his neck and he were drowned in the depths of the ocean.”


“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart.”


“But I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, unless the marriage is unlawful, causes her to commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.”


“Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”


“For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.” We hear that some among you are idle and disruptive. They are not busy; they are busybodies. Such people we command and urge in the Lord Jesus Christ to settle down and earn the food they eat.”


Strange as it may seem, enlightened, progressive Christians rarely attempt to wrestle Ephesians 5 or 2 Thessalonians 3 into a conversation. Yet, while the bulk of the Bible has ended up on our civilization’s cutting room floor, the warnings about “judging” are quoted and repeated incessantly, by Christians and non-Christians alike.


Apparently, the rest of the Book is outdated, outmoded, antiquated and fabricated, but the verses about judging — that stuff is gold, man.


Here’s a fun experiment: post something on your Facebook condemning any sin — not sinner, but sin. Maybe write a few paragraphs about why we shouldn’t kill babies, or why marriage is sacred. Write something defending truth. Write something combating popular cultural lies about morality. Write something where you call out an act — not a person — an act, and then sit back and wait for the responses. Statistically speaking, it will take only 4.7 seconds before a self identified Christian rushes in to insist that you must never speak out against any evil, ever, for any reason, lest you be guilty of “judging.”


And then the “no judging” chorus will begin:


“We’re not allowed to judge.”


“Christians shouldn’t judge.”


“Jesus said to never judge.”


“You’re not a real Christian because you are judging.”


“You’re judging so I’m going to judge you and tell you that you’re a piece of garbage because you judge so much!”


“Judger! You’re a big fat judge-face, all you do is judge all day like a judging judge McJudgePants!”


And so on.


Now, here’s the thing: they’re right — well, almost. Unfortunately, they left out an important word. It’s not that we shouldn’t judge at all — it’s that we shouldn’t judge WRONGLY. The idea that we shouldn’t judge at all is 1) absurd, 2) impossible, 3) very much at odds with every moral edict in all of Scripture. It’s also hypocritical, because telling someone not to judge is, in and of itself, a judgement. Any time you start a sentence with “you shouldn’t,” whatever comes next will constitute a judgement of some kind. Saying, “you shouldn’t judge,” is like saying, “there are no absolutes.”


Translation: you shouldn’t judge… except when judging people for judging. There are no absolutes… except the absolute that there aren’t any absolutes.


Yet, have you ever noticed that these “Don’t Judge” folks are nowhere to be found when the conversation turns to the Westboro Baptists, or domestic abusers, or the Nazis, or Republicans? I guarantee I could write a post condemning gay marriage opponents as bigots and homophobes and not a one of these pragmatists would swoop in to tell me not to “judge.”


Behind the Bible, my second favorite book is the dictionary. Let’s consult it, shall we?


Judge: To form an opinion of; decide upon; settle; to infer, think, hold as an opinion.


When you tell someone not to judge, you’re telling them to stop deciding things, to stop forming opinions, to stop thinking, and to stop inferring. Brilliant bit of philosophy, Plato. “Stop thinking and deciding!” Do you really think Jesus meant THAT when he told us not to judge? Well, I guess you can’t think about it one way or another if you’re adhering to this whole “never judge” schtick.


I know we live in a sound bite culture. Everything has to be condensed down to 14 syllables or less, and every concept must be communicated in under 12 seconds. Entire elections are decided this way. And while this strategy doesn’t work well in the democratic system, it’s an absolute catastrophic heretical disaster if you try to utilize it in the realm of theology. Yes, Jesus said “Judge not,” but you have to read the rest of that passage, and then the rest of the Book to put those two words into context. Once you’ve done that, you’ll understand that what He meant is precisely the opposite of how it is translated by modern cowards who are looking for any excuse to shrink away from the task of standing up against our culture and its many lies.


We must judge. We must exercise judgement. We must be discerning and decisive. We must expose evil and identify sin. Only we must do it righteously and truly. Judge, but judge rightly. That’s the point. We are to judge the sin, not the sinner. People seem to love the latter part of that phrase, and then selectively forget the first portion.


We can not condemn a man to hell. We can not see inside his soul. This is an important point, but it doesn’t mean we can’t speak harshly about the atrocities of a particular individual. If a guy commits adultery, I’ll call him an adulterer. That’s not an insult or an evaluation of his soul; it’s a true and accurate judgement based on the fruits he has produced. If a guy steals, he is a thief. If he murders, he is a murderer. If he commits tyrannies, he is a tyrant.


Jesus stopped a bloodthirsty mob from stoning a woman to death for adultery. Famously, he said “let he without sin cast the first stone.” This profound Biblical event has since been contorted to mean that nobody can condemn any (popular) sin, or speak out against any (popular) evil, because nobody is perfect.


Nonsense.


Jesus wasn’t telling the crowd to chill out and be cool with infidelity; he was telling them that they don’t have the authority to pass final judgement on another human being for their moral shortcomings. In the immediate sense, he was also stopping them from brutally killing a woman. This can not be construed into him strolling in with a shrug and saying, “Hey, live and let live, dudes.” In fact, after he forgave the woman’s sin, he commanded her to “sin no more.”


Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. That doesn’t mean that we must be without sin before we can call a sin a sin. Just because we make a judgment does not mean we are throwing rocks at a helpless woman. Sometimes, it means we are shedding light into a terrifying darkness.


Remember, this is the same Jesus who told us to separate the wheat from the chaff and the sheep from the wolves; the Jesus who called his opponents “snakes” and “vipers”; the Jesus who made a whip and violently drove the money changers out of the temple; the Jesus who said he came to bring a sword and drive a wedge between families.


He was loving and peaceful, but He was also manly, strong, courageous, outspoken, decisive, and commanding. He wasn’t a hippy. He was, and is, a King and a Warrior. Our culture has an agenda, and the agenda has nothing to do with following Christ or His precepts. Flimsy modern weaklings have taken the “don’t judge” concept out of context — twisted it, perverted it, and used it as an excuse to sit silently while all manner of unspeakable evils happen in their midst.


They’ve tried to turn Christianity into a religion of apathy and permissiveness. I certainly make judgments about their slander of my faith. I judge it to be sacrilegious, evil, and despicable.


And I judge it rightly.


So, don’t judge? Wrong. Judge. We must judge. The Bible exists, in large part, to shape our judgement and to tell us how to judge. We must teach our kids to have good and moral judgement. We must equip them with the spiritual tools to exercise it publicly, without fear. We must show them how to be discerning, critical thinkers.


You can not raise your children without judgement; you can’t function as a civilized human being without judgement; and you certainly can’t be an obedient Christian without judgment.


I am a sinful person. If you would ever consider accepting and celebrating my sins for the sake of being “non-judgmental,” please do me a favor and stop doing me that favor. I don’t want to be made comfortable and confident in my wrongdoing.


I’d rather have you hurt my feelings as you help me get to Heaven, than protect my feelings as you usher me right along to Hell.

I love this kid!!!!!!
BRAVO!!!!!!
 
J

Jullianna

Guest
#14
A lotta folks don't know the difference between calling sin "sin" and mistreating people. Jesus had no problem with calling sin "sin", but he was merciful to the repentant, wept/prayed over those who were unknowingly lost and confronted those who were not only lost (and didn't care), but were dragging others into the pit with them.

1 Cor 2 says: The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. 11For who knows a person’s thoughts except their own spirit within them? In the same way no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. 12What we have received is not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit who is from God, so that we may understand what God has freely given us. 13This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, explaining spiritual realities with Spirit-taught words.[SUP]c[/SUP] 14The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit. 15The person with the Spirit makes judgments about all things, but such a person is not subject to merely human judgments, 16for,
“Who has known the mind of the Lord
so as to instruct him?”[SUP]d[/SUP]

But we have the mind of Christ.

We forget sometimes that it says "things", not people. The mind of Christ is merciful. We show mercy because we have received mercy (and continue to); but sin is still sin, especially our own. I've noticed that the more willing we are to discuss our own failings, the more receptive unbelievers are to hearing about the One who can deliver ALL of us from ALL of our sin.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
#15
No one person is fit to judge another!! Whether they are believers or non-believers. God commanded us ALL not to judge, unless we be judged ourselves by others. The ONLY one who has the right to judge us all is GOD. We act as hypocrits when we judge someone by their actions, sins, or beliefs. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
That means if we judge others, we should condemn our own actions first. We are all sinners. It is our nature to sin because we were imperfectly made. We dont have the right to judge others for their sins, when we have sinned ourselves. Their sin is not greater or worse than our own.
 

jamie26301

Senior Member
May 14, 2011
1,154
10
38
39
#16
No one person is fit to judge another!! Whether they are believers or non-believers. God commanded us ALL not to judge, unless we be judged ourselves by others. The ONLY one who has the right to judge us all is GOD. We act as hypocrits when we judge someone by their actions, sins, or beliefs. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
That means if we judge others, we should condemn our own actions first. We are all sinners. It is our nature to sin because we were imperfectly made. We dont have the right to judge others for their sins, when we have sinned ourselves. Their sin is not greater or worse than our own.
This...

This should be a sticky with bold letters "JUDGE NOT, YOU 'ALL-SEEING CHRISTIANS' " at the top of EVERY form!

You go girl!
 
J

Jda016

Guest
#17
1 Corinthians 5:9
"I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. 10 Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. 11 But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.


12 For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.
 
J

Justifiable_Rebel

Guest
#18
Looks like a 5 year old has more common sense than most people in the world today.