Jesus turned water into unfermented wine and not fermented wine.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U

Ukorin

Guest
The red part just says "when he had supped" So that would be after they had finished eating the famous Last Supper. Then he took the cup and show the apostles what to do. Doesn't say he drank from that cup. Though if Jesus did drink his own blood, who am I to stand in his way? It's Jesus' blood and he poureth it out as he pleases.
I totally didn't get what Jason was saying.
He thought 'supped' was past tense for 'sip', lol.
Another KJV misunderstanding. I think seminaries should do classes on the language of KJV. It would solve more misunderstandings than the Greek courses solve.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
well i misunderstand you. i thought you meant that since "they had already had drank a good amount of wine already and would have been either tipsy or close to being tipsy (at the very least), Jesus creating more good wine (i.e. good wine supposedly meaning that it was stronger in alcoholic content) would have contributed to the intoxication of those at the wedding party"

i didn't realize you think the guests already "well drunk" meant simply that their bladders were full. i'm not sure why, taking that position, they weren't simply served the water that was obviously on hand and poured into the jars as Christ commanded.

i don't think that's an accurate understanding of the text. drinking a lot of juice doesn't numb the palate to juice in the way that drinking a lot of wine does -- if none of the wine served over the course of the feast was alcoholic, the comment that the master of the feast made doesn't make sense.

if my understanding of the culture is correct, this wedding feast likely involved a great number of people and went on for many days -- it's entirely possible for a very large amount of wine to have been served and ingested without the sort of scene one sees outside a bar at 3am or so taking place at all.
You are still making an assumption. Nowhere does it actually say they were intoxicated. The words "well drunk" is just the same as me saying "well eaten." For I can say that I had "well drunk" of the water at Jack's house and we both know that water is not an intoxicating. Nowhere does it say that they behaved in a drunken manner, either. All this is an assumption on your part that does not exist within the text. Also, "good wine" is based on taste and not alcoholic content. For wine tasters today do not judge a wine on it's goodness soley based on it's alcoholic content.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Hmm!

Who gave you the Judge´s seat?

Call me the names and adjectives you like, sir. I won´t tell you what I have seen in you, sir.

However, that struggle is long. At least I haven´t seen that long list of troublesome issues we "sinners" have (or had). ;)
Well, let me ask you a few quick questions. Do you care if you were to make a brother to stumble by talking favorably about alcohol as if it was good to drink on a forum? Would you drink in front of a weaker brother? Would you drink in public?
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
Rather than teaching such foolishness, that Christ did not make fermented wine,
why don't you focus on teaching abstinence from the view of principle and what is actually in Scripture.

If you were to say something to do with Luke 5:33-35, how could we debate you?

Why add to Scripture to prove what is true? Just read what is plainly there!

Jesus' disciples certainly drank real wine, and Jesus certainly made real wine,
but this does not mean that we should indulge today, while the Bridegroom is away.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
Well, let me ask you a few quick questions. Do you care if you were to make a brother to stumble by talking favorably about alcohol as if it was good to drink on a forum? Would you drink in front of a weaker brother? Would you drink in public?
Sorry said brother is so easily swayed by my words, I cant know everyones backstory, would i drink in front of a knoewn recovering alcoholic? No. Am I going to interview everyone around me everytime i want a beer? also no. Would I drink in public? Yes Im not ashamed.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
I believe many Christians take the 'weaker brother' verses out of context to justify their own stance.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Sorry said brother is so easily swayed by my words, I cant know everyones backstory, would i drink in front of a knoewn recovering alcoholic? No. Am I going to interview everyone around me everytime i want a beer? also no. Would I drink in public? Yes Im not ashamed.
So what if another believer looked up to you and they were going to ask you for spiritual strength in resisting alcohol and they tracked you down at a local restaurant drinking. What would you do if you later found out that they slipped back into alcoholism because of your public display?

Also, you don't seem to understand that Jesus openly promoting a drinking fest within the Scriptures gives every struggling alcoholic an excuse to think that there is nothing wrong with drinking, too.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
I believe many Christians take the 'weaker brother' verses out of context to justify their own stance.
The weaker brother is the one who abuses their liberty in Christ Jesus. For we are not to let our good be evil spoken of.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Rather than teaching such foolishness, that Christ did not make fermented wine,
why don't you focus on teaching abstinence from the view of principle and what is actually in Scripture.

If you were to say something to do with Luke 5:33-35, how could we debate you?

Why add to Scripture to prove what is true? Just read what is plainly there!

Jesus' disciples certainly drank real wine, and Jesus certainly made real wine,
but this does not mean that we should indulge today, while the Bridegroom is away.
Well, you are ignoring the reality of the world around you. For what you are doing is that you are forcing a round peg into a square hole. You are trying to force a modern meaning of how you understand a word today upon English translations that were influenced by the 1611 King James and by past decades use of that word was used differently in the past. For example: Back in the past, if you had spoken the word "gay", folks would be thinking you were speaking about being happy. However, today, if you were to say that word, people would be thinking something entirely different. I mean, you probably think that the word "liquor" also means an alcoholic drink thru out all of history, too? Right? Sure, you can say liquor store today and it will be a place where you can buy alcoholic liquor. But the word "liquor" did not always refer to alcoholic beverages like it does today. Just as the word "wine" did not refer to alcoholic beverages like it does today. Please, pretty please. Just look at some dictionaries going back into the past.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
I totally didn't get what Jason was saying.
He thought 'supped' was past tense for 'sip', lol.
Another KJV misunderstanding. I think seminaries should do classes on the language of KJV. It would solve more misunderstandings than the Greek courses solve.
I don't think too many people are confused between the words "supped" and "sipped." I think they can figure out that they are saying the same thing pretty easily. As for spelling or grammar, the 1611 was created before there was a standardization of spelling. That does not mean that the spelling is wrong. It is merely an earlier form of English with it's own set of rules. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the differences between the two.
 
L

lisa79

Guest
Actually, my life was not effected by alcoholism in any way. I was not abused because of it nor did I ever have a problem with alcohol itself. I have came to my conclusions purely based on wanting to know the truth of God's Word on the matter. I have drank moderately believing it was lawful and chose to walk the higher road as a promise to someone I love. But that decision did not influence me in desiring to know the truth of what God's Word on this matter. Most people just skim the surface when they read the Bible. They see words in the Bible and immediately jump to conclusions without really looking at the context (looking up what that word means in English) or examing the Scriptures as if they were a detective trying to gather all of the facts of Scripture to make an intelligent decision. For me, this is a moral issue. If Jesus made alcoholic wine and pushed it upon a party who was already drunk or close to drunk, then Jesus would be using His powers for evil and not good. It is that simple.
Do you realize that if you are wrong that you just said Jesus was immoral and used His powers for evil? Then you judged others who drink moderately and claim to be above (you are not) them by walking the higher road. You judge the effects of alcoholism yet your life has never been touched by it.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
The red part just says "when he had supped" So that would be after they had finished eating the famous Last Supper. Then he took the cup and show the apostles what to do. Doesn't say he drank from that cup. Though if Jesus did drink his own blood, who am I to stand in his way? It's Jesus' blood and he poureth it out as he pleases.
So if the word "supped" is pretending to drink in this passage in Corinthians, then how do you explain the word "sup" in Revelation 3:20?

"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me."

Is Jesus pretending to drink with us here, too?
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
So if the word "supped" is pretending to drink in this passage in Corinthians, then how do you explain the word "sup" in Revelation 3:20?

"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me."

Is Jesus pretending to drink with us here, too?
O
Please, please, please.
Supped has nothing to do with drinking!
It means eating!

How can you call yourself a minister with so little understanding?
Get back to the basics before teaching any further.
Supped means to have supper. Use a different translation if you don't understand the KJV.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Do you realize that if you are wrong that you just said Jesus was immoral and used His powers for evil? Then you judged others who drink moderately and claim to be above (you are not) them by walking the higher road. You judge the effects of alcoholism yet your life has never been touched by it.
I am sorry, that just doesn't make sense. I am telling you a moral action that is endorsed by the Bible itself. For the Bible says that wine is a mocker. Strong drink is raging and it can bite you like a serpent. The Bible also says drunkards will not inherit the Kingdom of God. The Scriptures also say that we are to be sober minded many times. How exactly is getting tipsy or drunk with alcohol being sober minded? Seeing God inspired men to write His Word, they are the very words of God to us. And seeing God cannot break His own Word and seeing God is good and not evil, I know that the Lord would never do anything bad such as influencing an individual to get drunk. It's just not possible. You might as well say that water is not wet in it's liquid state. I know it is morally wrong for any being to influence another person into drinking so as to get drunk. Certainly God would never do such a thing seeing He is more perfect and righteous than any other being that has ever existed.
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
This is the foremost issue with most Pentacostal churches.
Babes teaching babes.
Where are the elders to correct the young preacher?
Instead the babes continue in error, and confidently teach error to others.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
O
Please, please, please.
Supped has nothing to do with drinking!
It means eating!

How can you call yourself a minister with so little understanding?
Get back to the basics before teaching any further.
Supped means to have supper. Use a different translation if you don't understand the KJV.
Right. Supper includes both eating and drinking.

Just look at the various translations for:

Luke 17:8
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
Right. Supper includes both eating and drinking.

Just look at the various translations for:

Luke 17:8
Deipneso means "to eat", "to dine".
Sorry man, but you are not equipped for this.
Get your armor on before going into battle.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Deipneso means "to eat", "to dine".
Sorry man, but you are not equipped for this.
Get your armor on before going into battle.
No. In John 6, Jesus tells us that we must drink of his blood and eat of his flesh. That is what Revelation 3:20 is referring to. Suppers involve both drinking and eating. Both in the past and now.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Besides, Jesus did drink of the wine at the Lord's supper. Here is another passage that confirms it.

Mark 14:23
"And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it."
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
And so because of this, it is obviously not fermented...
Good night.