Tongues Again???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Now that you brought it up, what side of the division on Salvation is by Grace alone, are you on.

Stones:

Are you looking for a "gotcha"? I posted on inspiritintruth 's thread all afternoon. This is off topic here.

You:
We believe that SALVATION the moment we first Believed by HIS GRACE AND MERCY. It has nothing to do with our works of Righteousness, that WILL HAPPEN because we WERE genuinely SAVED, the moment we Believed in our Heart, and not just an intellectual decision on whether or not the stories about Jesus are True.

Stones:
agree...who's we by the way?

You:
Ephesians 2:8-10 (ESV)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
[SUP]10 [/SUP] For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works {Produced after we are SAVED out of GOD's Love the Holy Spirit poured into our hearts, Rom. 5:5), which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

Stones:
true.

Titus 3:4-7 (ESV)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared,
[SUP]5 [/SUP] he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit,
[SUP]6 [/SUP] whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
[SUP]7 [/SUP] so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

I agree. Grace-the divine influence upon the heart with its reflection in the life, including gratitude. It is both unearned and undeserved...a gift as everything from Him is, but is also the work of Holy Spirit in our life.

Back to topic.

by the way it's easy to post just scripture. It's the discussion that brings out what we believe about them.
 
Last edited:

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
Non-Charismatic Believers - additional resource Information:

I just found this webpage:


Dean Bible Ministries Transcripts
Bible teaching from Dr. Robert L. Dean Jr., West Houston Bible Church
Tongues in Paganism


[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]Dr. Robert L. Dean Jr.

Before coming to West Houston Bible Church, Dr. Dean was the Pastor of Preston City Bible Church in Preston, Connecticut. Prior to that he spent seven years as a writer and editor for the publications of R. B. Thieme, Jr., Bible Ministries. He also pastored churches in both the Houston and Dallas, Texas areas and has over twenty five years experience in pastoral ministry.

Dr. Dean is a much sought after Bible teacher both in the United States and overseas. He serves on the adjunct faculties of Faith Evangelical Seminary and Oregon Theological Seminary and is the Chairman of the Governing Board for Chafer Theological Seminary.

Dr. Dean trained for the ministry at Dallas Theological Seminary where he earned a Th.M. in Hebrew and Old Testament Studies and later returned to pursue a Ph.D. in theological studies with an emphasis in Historical Theology. He also earned an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of St. Thomas (1987) and a Doctor of Ministry degree from Faith Evangelical Seminary (2002). In 1988 he was recognized as an Outstanding Young Man of America, and in 1989 was listed in the Who's Who in American Christian Leadership .

His academic training in Greek, Hebrew, theology, philosophy, and history enables him to study the Bible in the original languages and show how these eternal truths are as vital today as always.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]



The Link I provided above is to Dr. Dean's Historical Research paper entitled: Tongues in Paganism. ​ In that Research Paper he gives us a History lesson on the ecstatic utterance style of Tongues in Paganism as far back as 1100 B.C. and how and when it was brought into the Church. It is very tiny print on that webpage, so these old eyes had to Copy/Paste into my Word Processor, change the font to Veranda 12, and then read through is slowly.

YES, I CAN HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT. IT IS ONE OF THE BEST ON THIS SUBJECT THAT I HAVE EVER READ.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
Last edited:

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
Now that you brought it up, what side of the division on Salvation is by Grace alone, are you on.

Stones:

Are you looking for a "gotcha"? I posted on inspiritintruth 's thread all afternoon. This is off topic here.

You:
We believe that SALVATION the moment we first Believed by HIS GRACE AND MERCY. It has nothing to do with our works of Righteousness, that WILL HAPPEN because we WERE genuinely SAVED, the moment we Believed in our Heart, and not just an intellectual decision on whether or not the stories about Jesus are True.

Stones:
agree...who's we by the way?

You:
Ephesians 2:8-10 (ESV)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God,
[SUP]9 [/SUP] not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
[SUP]10 [/SUP] For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works {Produced after we are SAVED out of GOD's Love the Holy Spirit poured into our hearts, Rom. 5:5), which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.

Stones:
true.

Titus 3:4-7 (ESV)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] But when the goodness and loving kindness of God our Savior appeared,
[SUP]5 [/SUP] he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit,
[SUP]6 [/SUP] whom he poured out on us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior,
[SUP]7 [/SUP] so that being justified by his grace we might become heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

I agree. Grace-the divine influence upon the heart with its reflection in the life, including gratitude. It is both unearned and undeserved...a gift as everything from Him is, but is also the work of Holy Spirit in our life.

Back to topic.

by the way it's easy to post just scripture. It's the discussion that brings out what we believe about them.
Well thank GOD and Praise the Lord we can agree on something. The thing I have noticed in all of the various threads that I have been involved in over the years, is we frequently run into Terminology Definition Differences. One time I spent 2 month debating this guy, before I figured the major part of our differences was a Terminology Definition Difference.

Who is WE?

First of all let me explain, when I was younger, we moved a lot, from one small town to another small town, so I would search out the Best Bible Teaching Church I could find. If you know any thing about small towns, your choice in Churches is very limited sometimes. I always slowly read through their Doctrinal Statement of Faith first, then I would go talk to there Pastor personally, before I made the decision if I wanted to be involved in their Church.

So the WE includes:

Baptist Churches
Methodist Churches,
Lutheran Churches
Evangelical Lutheran Churches,
Evangelical Free Churches
Conservative Evangelical Churches
Grace Bretheran Churches
Weslyan Churches
Bible Churches
Community Churches
IFCA Churches

ALL of them non-Charismatic Churches.

Now for the first time in my life, I live in a big City, and after nearly a year, it still feels weird. And I am going to a big non-denominational Conservative Evangelical Bible Teaching Church.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,091
1,755
113


[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]Dr. Robert L. Dean Jr.

Before coming to West Houston Bible Church, Dr. Dean was the Pastor of Preston City Bible Church in Preston, Connecticut. Prior to that he spent seven years as a writer and editor for the publications of R. B. Thieme, Jr., Bible Ministries. He also pastored churches in both the Houston and Dallas, Texas areas and has over twenty five years experience in pastoral ministry.

Dr. Dean is a much sought after Bible teacher both in the United States and overseas. He serves on the adjunct faculties of Faith Evangelical Seminary and Oregon Theological Seminary and is the Chairman of the Governing Board for Chafer Theological Seminary.

Dr. Dean trained for the ministry at Dallas Theological Seminary where he earned a Th.M. in Hebrew and Old Testament Studies and later returned to pursue a Ph.D. in theological studies with an emphasis in Historical Theology. He also earned an M.A. in Philosophy from the University of St. Thomas (1987) and a Doctor of Ministry degree from Faith Evangelical Seminary (2002). In 1988 he was recognized as an Outstanding Young Man of America, and in 1989 was listed in the Who's Who in American Christian Leadership .

His academic training in Greek, Hebrew, theology, philosophy, and history enables him to study the Bible in the original languages and show how these eternal truths are as vital today as always.[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


[TABLE]
[TR]
[TD][TABLE]
[TR]
[TD]



The Link I provided above is to Dr. Dean's Historical Research paper entitled: Tongues in Paganism. ​ In that Research Paper he gives us a History lesson on the ecstatic utterance style of Tongues in Paganism as far back as 1100 B.C. and how and when it was brought into the Church. It is very tiny print on that webpage, so these old eyes had to Copy/Paste into my Word Processor, change the font to Veranda 12, and then read through is slowly.

YES, I CAN HIGHLY RECOMMEND IT. IT IS ONE OF THE BEST ON THIS SUBJECT THAT I HAVE EVER READ.

[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

I had a look at the article. He seems to be reading 'ecstatic utterances' into history where the evidence is meager. Chrystosom, in the 300's might have called the utterances of the oracle at Delphi 'madness.' Does that mean she was speaking gibberish? If she was at that time, in the first century Plutarch was arguing that she could speak in straight forward words rather than ornate poetry. A Christian might call such pagan poetry or prose 'madness' without it being gibberish.

I wouldn't consider rain dance chanting like you see in old westerns the same thing Pentecostals do when speaking in tongues. I wouldn't put Buddhist monk's throat singing in the same category. An atheistic anthropologist might. Someone who was against speaking in tongues, might.

His article does acknowledge the genuine article as real languages. It is a bit of a straw man to treat speaking in tongues as gibberish, too. Even if gibberish might sometimes pass for speaking in tongues, there is the real article as real language, too, and there are accounts of this from Azusa Street, too.

His treatment of Irenaeus certainly seems to be lost. Sometimes statements like these seem dishonest. Does he pretend he read Irenaeus, but didn't? He has degrees, comes off as an expert, but makes pronouncements about things he does not know? I suppose, we could say the translators or wrong and assume this pastor is right about the Greek being in the past tense. But the translations I've read of Irenaeus show him saying the gifts were operative in the present tense. Where do you get the Greek of Ireneaus.

Look at what Ireneaus said,
4. If, however, they maintain that the Lord, too, performed such works simply in appearance, we shall refer them to the prophetical writings, and prove from these both that all things were thus predicted regarding Him, and did take place undoubtedly, and that He is the only Son of God. Wherefore, also, those who are in truth His disciples, receiving grace from Him, do in His name perform [miracles], so as to promote the welfare of other men, according to the gift which each one has received from Him. For some do certainly and truly drive out devils, so that those who have thus been cleansed from evil spirits frequently both believe [in Christ], and join themselves to the Church. Others have foreknowledge of things to come: they see visions, and utter prophetic expressions. Others still, heal the sick by laying their hands upon them, and they are made whole. Yea, moreover, as I have said, the dead even have been raised up, and remained among us for many years. And what shall I more say? It is not possible to name the number of the gifts which the Church, [scattered] throughout the whole world, has received from God, in the name of Jesus Christ, who was crucified under Pontius Pilate, and which she exerts day by day for the benefit of the Gentiles, neither practising deception upon any, nor taking any reward Acts 8:9, 18 from them [on account of such miraculous interpositions]. For as she has received freely Matthew 10:8 from God, freely also does she minister [to others].

5. Nor does she perform anything by means of angelic invocations, or by incantations, or by any other wicked curious art; but, directing her prayers to the Lord, who made all things, in a pure, sincere, and straightforward spirit, and calling upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, she has been accustomed to work miracles for the advantage of mankind, and not to lead them into error. If, therefore, the name of our Lord Jesus Christ even now confers benefits [upon men], and cures thoroughly and effectively all who anywhere believe in Him, but not that of Simon, or Menander, or Carpocrates, or of any other man whatever, it is manifest that, when He was made man, He held fellowship with His own creation, and did all things truly through the power of God, according to the will of the Father of all, as the prophets had foretold. But what these things were, shall be described in dealing with the proofs to be found in the prophetical writings
from CHURCH FATHERS: Against Heresies, II.32 (St. Irenaeus)

I know we make mistakes, but if you are arguing a doctrinal point from history and you make a point about the tense a historical figure uses to prove your case, you should look it up first. Is it wrong of me to think that?

Did he just read Warfield and make assumptions without reading Ireneaus. It just doesn't seem honest. At the least, it seems like bad scholarship.

Ireneaus wrote of brethren speaking in tongues and the church in his own day having success at raising the dead. He also considered rejecting the functioning of the gift of prophecy to be one of the characteristics of the heresies. Irenaeus' writings indicate that he would have considered the doctrine of cessationism which was invented in recent centuries to be a heresy or a false doctrine common to certain heresies.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,591
879
113
61
Thank you Stone for reply.

Stones: They. We don't know for sure how many, but there are those named in one verse, but 120 according to verse 15
received the baptism initially.

Wolf: Acts 1,4-5 is talking clearly about the 11 Apostels. You find this in vers 2 and 3! Where it is written that this 120 from
Vers 15 received the baptism initially?


Stones: well, yes, they were chosen to be His disciples. What does it matter that Thomas went to India?

Wolf: They were not only choosen to be his disciples, they were the Apostels. No other believers till today had this tasks
and authority which they got. (in my eyes is Paul the 12th Apostel and not Matthias)
And this makes the different. When the first believers after pentecost came to faith (Acts 2, 41-43) they had not the
same power like the Apostels.
I mentioned Thomas, because it seems that he travelled to the end of the World. (according acts 1,8)

Till today, nobody could do the miracles which the Apostel did! Ore do you know somebody in our days whose
shadow is falling onsomebody and he is healed? (Acts 5, 12-15)

Stones: please provide a list of what we shouldn't believe.

Wolf: Well, for shure we can not all convey what Jesus told to the Apostels! you want a list?

Mth.10, 1-14 And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease. 2 Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; 3 Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the tax collector; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus; 4 Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. 5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter you not: 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7 And as you go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. 8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons: freely you have received, freely give. 9 Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, 10 Nor bag for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet a staff: for the workman is worthy of his food. 11 And into whatsoever city or town you shall enter, inquire who in it is worthy; and there abide till you go from there. 12 And when you come into a house, greet it. 13 And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you. 14 And whoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when you depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.



Acts 1, 4-5; John 16, 12-16; OK, its a small list! But for shure I could find more!

Stones: Water baptism which is after repentance from sin is the first baptism. What I said was that the disciples received
what Paul calls the Spirit of Christ after He breathed on them before His ascension. He said receive ye my Holy
Spirit. He was leaving, He anoints them and tells them to wait for the promise of the Father.

Wolf: When somebody receives the Holy Spirit? According my understanding when we are born again. And the water
baptism as a sign ore proof openly what happend already inward!
There is only one baptism with the Holy Spirit!

Where stands that Paul means this? In the text were Jesus blow to the Apostels Thomas was not among them. And
also the 120 had no blowing expierience! It was not the Holy Spirit they got, because before pentecost he was not
given.

Stones: On the day of Pentecost 120 assembling together are praying.

Act 2:3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.

Act 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

The first baptism is the water of repentance. The inner witness, Spirit of Christ, new birth.
The second baptism is from Jesus Himself to His body.

Wolf: From the text in Acts 2,1 it is not said that they are 120. It could be more than 120, because it is said all.
Also it is not said that the apostels where ever baptised. Maby they because they were special electet and be pured
in John 13.
In acts then you find: 1. believing (born again) 2. Baptising with water.
When the first 3000 believers which were addet to the church in Acts 2,41, they had not the expierience with
speaking in tongues!!!! And it is also not mentioned that they later got a second baptism with the gift of speaking in
tongues.

My own expierience is: I was born again first and got the Holy Spirit and also a gift. later I searched a church and was
baptised there.

Stones: Some receive in two experiences, and some in one. Both are seen in scripture.

Wolf: This makes no sences! Only if it is mentioned for a sign/proof for all. Acts 2 Jews (partfulfillment Joel 2), Acts 8
Gospel for Samaritians; Acts 10 Gospel for Heathen; Acts 19 Gospel for the Disciples of John the Baptist;
Apart from this 4 events, it is only said that people take the word of the Gospel, ore believed the word.

Stones: What I see as the differences now....the Jews were taught of being born again. It's nothing new to them. They
were baptized in water after repentance and turning to God. That's what we see as the preparation for the Spirit of
Christ. John said one was coming that was greater than the baptism that he preached. This was for Jews only. And
some sects baptized daily for cleansing.

Wolf: The thought to be born again, was completely new for them. Read John 3! If Nicodemus had no Idea about it, than all
others also not.

Of course the baptising from John the baptist was new and also to prepare for Jesus. And it was for jews only, But the
sending of the Holy Spirit was for all mankind!

Stones: Paul speaks to a group later in Acts who had only Johns baptism, so he rebaptizes them in the name of Jesus, and
then lays hands on them and they receive the baptism of Holy Spirit.

Wolf: Actually they were not rebaptised. The baptising from John had nothing to do with the baptising with the Holy Spirit.
They heared before nothing from pentecost!
And only the baptising with the Holy Spirit saves! So they needed this!

Stones: Today, we baptize in the name of Jesus after the preaching of the gospel, and some receive this baptism here at
the water, some have hands laid on them, and some no intervention of man at all.

Wolf: Well, the Holy Spirit comes into a life of somebody, after hearing and accpeting the word! John 1,12-13,
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the children of God, even to them that believe on
his name: Who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

This is the first and only baptism with the Holy Spirit in which we are also sealed (ephesians chapter 1)
And this has nothing to do with the gift of speaking in tongues.

The doctrine with the 2nd baptising and as proof for that the gift of speaking in tongues is a man createt doctrine,
but not biblical!

Till know nobody could show me from the scripture that it is biblical!

Stones: I see three levels in the temple. There actually were in the physical temple.

Passover
Pentecost
Tabernacles.

Wolf: Do you distinguish a different level christianity?

 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63

I do not worry about your salvation because you do not believe in manifesting the gift of holy spirit - I ask that the salvation of those who believe in manifesting the gift of holy spirit not be questioned. Thanks.
1 John 4:7 (ESV)
[SUP]7 [/SUP] Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God.

1 John 4:12 (ESV)
[SUP]12 [/SUP] No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us.

1 John 4:20 (ESV)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] If anyone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen.

John 5:24 (HCSB) [SUP]24 [/SUP] “I assure you: Anyone who hears My word and believes Him who sent Me has eternal life and will not come under judgment but has passed from death to life.

John 6:47 (HCSB)
[SUP]47 [/SUP] I assure you: Anyone who believes has eternal life.

1 John 5:11 (NKJV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP] And this is the testimony: that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.


NOT in manifesting the Charismatic experience.


Colossians 2:13 (NIV)
[SUP]13 [/SUP] When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins,
I'm not sure why you posted these verses in response to what I said. What exactly are you saying here to those who chose to manifest the gift of holy spirit, specifically tongues?
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Wolf
Thank you Stone for reply.

Stones:

You're welcome

Stones: They. We don't know for sure how many, but there are those named in one verse, but 120 according to verse 15
received the baptism initially.

Wolf: Acts 1,4-5 is talking clearly about the 11 Apostels. You find this in vers 2 and 3! Where it is written that this 120 from
Vers 15 received the baptism initially?

Stones:

I agree it does look like Jesus is speaking just to the Apostles, but in verse 15, Luke says 120 were gathered and they all received the baptism.


Stones: well, yes, they were chosen to be His disciples. What does it matter that Thomas went to India?

Wolf: They were not only choosen to be his disciples, they were the Apostels. No other believers till today had this tasks
and authority which they got. (in my eyes is Paul the 12th Apostel and not Matthias)

stones:

I tend to think Paul would be the 12th too, but others say not. It's a non issue. One thing we do know is that Jesus Himself chose Paul, and the Apostles chose Matthias in a superstitious way.

Wolf
And this makes the different. When the first believers after pentecost came to faith (Acts 2, 41-43) they had not the
same power like the Apostles

Stones:

Jesus said His body would do greater things because He goes to the Father.

Wolf
I mentioned Thomas, because it seems that he travelled to the end of the World. (according acts 1,8)

Stones:
ok.

Wolf
Till today, nobody could do the miracles which the Apostel did! Ore do you know somebody in our days whose
shadow is falling onsomebody and he is healed? (Acts 5, 12-15)

Stones:
No, haven't heard.

Stones: please provide a list of what we shouldn't believe.

Wolf: Well, for shure we can not all convey what Jesus told to the Apostels! you want a list?

Mth.10, 1-14 And when he had called unto him his twelve disciples, he gave them power against unclean spirits, to cast them out, and to heal all manner of sickness and all manner of disease. 2 Now the names of the twelve apostles are these; The first, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; 3 Philip, and Bartholomew; Thomas, and Matthew the tax collector; James the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus; 4 Simon the Canaanite, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him. 5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter you not: 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. 7 And as you go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. 8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out demons: freely you have received, freely give. 9 Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, 10 Nor bag for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet a staff: for the workman is worthy of his food. 11 And into whatsoever city or town you shall enter, inquire who in it is worthy; and there abide till you go from there. 12 And when you come into a house, greet it. 13 And if the house be worthy, let your peace come upon it: but if it be not worthy, let your peace return to you. 14 And whoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when you depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.

Acts 1, 4-5; John 16, 12-16; OK, its a small list! But for shure I could find more!

stones:

ok, so just to be sure I am understanding you....no miracles today, no evangelism, no 5 fold ministry in the church, no gifts, no healing, no raising the dead. Does your church not have a Pastor?

Stones: Water baptism which is after repentance from sin is the first baptism. What I said was that the disciples received
what Paul calls the Spirit of Christ after He breathed on them before His ascension. He said receive ye my Holy
Spirit. He was leaving, He anoints them and tells them to wait for the promise of the Father.

Wolf: When somebody receives the Holy Spirit? According my understanding when we are born again. And the water
baptism as a sign ore proof openly what happend already inward!
There is only one baptism with the Holy Spirit!

Where stands that Paul means this? In the text were Jesus blow to the Apostels Thomas was not among them. And
also the 120 had no blowing expierience! It was not the Holy Spirit they got, because before pentecost he was not
given.

Stones:

Joh 20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
Joh 20:23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soeversins ye retain, they are retained.

Stones:

Its up to you whether you choose to believe this or not.

Wolf: From the text in Acts 2,1 it is not said that they are 120. It could be more than 120, because it is said all.

Stones:
read verse 15

wolf
Also it is not said that the apostels where ever baptised. Maby they because they were special electet and be pured
in John 13.

stones:

John was preaching repent and baptizing. Preparing the way for the ministry of Jesus. I assume they were.

In acts then you find: 1. believing (born again) 2. Baptising with water.
When the first 3000 believers which were addet to the church in Acts 2,41, they had not the expierience with
speaking in tongues!!!! And it is also not mentioned that they later got a second baptism with the gift of speaking in
tongues.

Act 2:38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
Act 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.

Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.

Act 4:31 And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness.
Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.

This scripture shows that a multitude of people all together can receive at one time.
The promise is to all.

Wolf
My own expierience is: I was born again first and got the Holy Spirit and also a gift. later I searched a church and was
baptised there.

Stones:

may i ask which gift?

Stones: Some receive in two experiences, and some in one. Both are seen in scripture.

Wolf: This makes no sences! Only if it is mentioned for a sign/proof for all. Acts 2 Jews (partfulfillment Joel 2), Acts 8
Gospel for Samaritians; Acts 10 Gospel for Heathen; Acts 19 Gospel for the Disciples of John the Baptist;
Apart from this 4 events, it is only said that people take the word of the Gospel, ore believed the word.

Stones:

That is not how I see in the scriptures.

Stones: What I see as the differences now....the Jews were taught of being born again. It's nothing new to them. They
were baptized in water after repentance and turning to God. That's what we see as the preparation for the Spirit of
Christ. John said one was coming that was greater than the baptism that he preached. This was for Jews only. And
some sects baptized daily for cleansing.

Wolf: The thought to be born again, was completely new for them. Read John 3! If Nicodemus had no Idea about it, than all
others also not.

stones:

we might think different things about many things if we didn't have history to teach us. We would understand much more if we knew all that the Jews did.
Thats the great thing about the web. We can research.

Wolf:
Of course the baptising from John the baptist was new and also to prepare for Jesus. And it was for jews only, But the
sending of the Holy Spirit was for all mankind!

Stones:
agree

Stones: Paul speaks to a group later in Acts who had only Johns baptism, so he rebaptizes them in the name of Jesus, and
then lays hands on them and they receive the baptism of Holy Spirit.

Wolf: Actually they were not rebaptised. The baptising from John had nothing to do with the baptising with the Holy Spirit.
They heared before nothing from pentecost!

stones:
Acts 19:5

Wolf:
And only the baptising with the Holy Spirit saves! So they needed this!

stones:
the blood sacrifice of Jesus and belief that He died and rose from the dead is our salvation. The baptism of Holy Spirit is for service, to do the same works.
If you say you live in Him, walk as He walked.

Stones: Today, we baptize in the name of Jesus after the preaching of the gospel, and some receive this baptism here at
the water, some have hands laid on them, and some no intervention of man at all.

Wolf: Well, the Holy Spirit comes into a life of somebody, after hearing and accpeting the word! John 1,12-13,
But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the children of God, even to them that believe on
his name: Who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

This is the first and only baptism with the Holy Spirit in which we are also sealed (ephesians chapter 1)
And this has nothing to do with the gift of speaking in tongues.

The doctrine with the 2nd baptising and as proof for that the gift of speaking in tongues is a man createt doctrine,
but not biblical!

Till know nobody could show me from the scripture that it is biblical!

Stones:
I can't make you believe, but I did point to the Word that says it's the will of God for all.

Stones: I see three levels in the temple. There actually were in the physical temple.

Passover
Pentecost
Tabernacles.

Wolf: Do you distinguish a different level christianity?

Stones:

I see that Passover represents salvation by hearing the gospel and believing. Pentecost as already discussed. Tabernacles as the fullness of His glory.
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,091
1,755
113
The article VCO posted from 'divineviewpoint.com' (which seems a bit pretentious of a title to say the least) says Peter was wrong to appoint another apostle. The evidence? That we never heard of Matthias again. But we never hear of the rest of the 12 by name in the rest of the New Testament either. Shouldn't we be learning from the apostles when we read the New Testament rather than judging them? There are a few occasions where there are indications that certain of them did wrong, but we shouldn't read that idea into texts to promote our own theories.

Also, this seems highly questionable: "But they are in a house still and this happened that morning at breakfast and when the day of Pentecost had come, “they,” the eleven apostles. Basic rule of grammar: when you have a pronoun it refers to the nearest antecedent, that is, the closest plural noun preceding: “apostles.” So it is the eleven."

This certainly seems to be a semantic issue rather than a grammatical one. I asked a retired Classics )(as in Greek and Latin) chair from a state university, who was rather careful about making pronouncements about Greek, whether the Greek indicated that only the apostles spoke in tongues. He said he would say 75% it was the 120, and 25% it was the apostles. I don't think we have a grammatical issue here. This is the same semantic issue of interpretation we deal with when reading in English. There were more than 12 languages, spoken, btw.

The same retired professor shared with me his concern on another occasion that a number of the people teaching Greek in the seminaries don't really know the language that well. He mentioned a Princeton professor who certainly was an exception. He went on to explain something about how it had to do with the sophist approach to education in the language as opposed to some other approach.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
I'm not sure why you posted these verses in response to what I said. What exactly are you saying here to those who chose to manifest the gift of holy spirit, specifically tongues?
The way you worded it, sounded to me like, what I have encountered several times in the past, the false doctrine that manifesting Charismatic tongues, was the only proof of Salvation. Whereas the verses I posted validated that proof of Salvation has NOTHING to do with Charismatictongues. Sorry, I misunderstood you.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
The way you worded it, sounded to me like, what I have encountered several times in the past, the false doctrine that manifesting Charismatic tongues, was the only proof of Salvation. Whereas the verses I posted validated that proof of Salvation has NOTHING to do with Charismatictongues. Sorry, I misunderstood you.
Thank you for the apology VCO. I do believe that every Christian has the innate ability to speak in tongues because all have been given the gift of holy spirit but I don't believe that just because a person does not manifest that gift of holy spirit by speaking in tongues that they are not saved.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
Thank you for the apology VCO. I do believe that every Christian has the innate ability to speak in tongues because all have been given the gift of holy spirit but I don't believe that just because a person does not manifest that gift of holy spirit by speaking in tongues that they are not saved.

And I believe that every Christian has the innate ability to speak in Charismatic Ecstatic Utterances, because it is not of the Holy Spirit, but rather for the most part, it simply psychological phenomina. The genuine Miracle of TONGUES was for the APOSTLES to Confirm to Unbelieving Jews, that the N.T. was as much the WORD of GOD as was the O.T.


1 Corinthians 14:21-22 (NIV)
[SUP]21 [/SUP] In the Law it is written: "Through men of strange tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this people, but even then they will not listen to me," says the Lord.
[SUP]22 [/SUP] Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers.

1 Corinthians 1:22 (KJV)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

Acts 2:4-12 (HCSB)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Then they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in different languages, as the Spirit gave them ability for speech.
[SUP]5 [/SUP] There were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven.
[SUP]6 [/SUP] When this sound occurred, a crowd came together and was confused because each one heard them speaking in his own language.
[SUP]7 [/SUP] And they were astounded and amazed, saying, “Look, aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans?
[SUP]8 [/SUP] How is it that each of us can hear in our own native language?
[SUP]9 [/SUP] Parthians, Medes, Elamites; those who live in Mesopotamia, in Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,
[SUP]10 [/SUP] Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes,
[SUP]11 [/SUP] Cretans and Arabs—we hear them speaking the magnificent acts of God in our own languages.”
[SUP]12 [/SUP] They were all astounded and perplexed, saying to one another, “What could this be?”

Mark 16:20 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word by the accompanying signs.

1 Corinthians 13:8-9 (ASV)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] Love never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall be done away; whether there be tongues, they shall cease {and did}; whether there be knowledge, it shall be done away.
[SUP]9 [/SUP] For we know in part, and we prophesy in part;

The Charismatic Tongues Movement started in 1901.

Wikipedia -
Agnes Ozman (1870-1937) was a female student at Charles Fox Parham's Bethel Bible School in Topeka, Kansas. Ozman was considered by many as “the first to speak in tongues”. Her experiences sparked the modern Pentecostal-Holiness movement, which began in the early 20th century.Her parents were farmers, and since childhood, Agnes and her six siblings attended the Methodist Episcopal Church in Nebraska, Wisconsin. As a young woman, Ozman participated in biblical institutions and eventually attended the Bethel Bible School in Kansas.

Parham, Ozman's teacher at the school, taught his students in line with the Holiness movement, from which he introduced the concepts of Divine healing and Sanctification. Parham told his students to ponder over what the Bible verse "receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38) might mean and whether any evidence specifically related to this gift could be found, giving them three days, while he was absent, for this assignment. By the time he returned his students collectively agreed that if the Holy Spirit had descended upon an individual, then speaking in tongues would be present and constitute sufficient proof of that. The students pointed out that this type of event was mentioned four times in the Acts of the Apostles. Therefore, on New Year's Eve, Parham and his students planned to pray for the gift of the Holy Spirit. In 1901, after midnight of January 1, Ozman asked her mentor to pray specifically so that she could be filled with the Holy Spirit through the laying on of hands, so that she might speak in tongues.


Matthew 24:24-25 (ESV)
[SUP]24 [/SUP] For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.
[SUP]25 [/SUP] See, I have told you beforehand.


 
Last edited:

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,091
1,755
113
Btw, I read once that it I likely that some other St. Thomas from the 300's was the one who went to India and started those churches, there, and was later confused with the Biblical St. Thomas because of the name.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
. . .


Stones:

I see that Passover represents salvation by hearing the gospel and believing. Pentecost as already discussed. Tabernacles as the fullness of His glory.
Stones, I can see you have never really studied the Seven Feasts of Israel, from a Born Again Christian JEW. Here is a link to videos on the subject, by Zola Levitt.

You WILL enjoy these, I promise:

https://www.levitt.tv/media/series.html/DSFI?s=DSFI
 
J

jaybird88

Guest
Btw, I read once that it I likely that some other St. Thomas from the 300's was the one who went to India and started those churches, there, and was later confused with the Biblical St. Thomas because of the name.
that sounds about right, in the circle of Jesus and the 12 it seems like every other person had the same name. makes my head spin.
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Stones, I can see you have never really studied the Seven Feasts of Israel, from a Born Again Christian JEW. Here is a link to videos on the subject, by Zola Levitt.

You WILL enjoy these, I promise:

https://www.levitt.tv/media/series.html/DSFI?s=DSFI
I listen to him all the time. Am married to a Jew.

What I said about the three feasts is allegorical not literal.
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Btw, I read once that it I likely that some other St. Thomas from the 300's was the one who went to India and started those churches, there, and was later confused with the Biblical St. Thomas because of the name.
I still don't connect this tidbit of info to the topic. Am I missing something?

But, in the same vein of thought, there was a man mentioned in history (can't pinpoint which writing yet) that moved mightily in miracles after the Ascension by the name of Nicodemus. Some believe it was the same Nicodemus of the scriptures. I thought that very interesting too. And it fits here. Lol
 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,091
1,755
113
stonesoffire,

Another poster, maybe Jaybird, said Thomas started churches in India in one of the previous posts.
 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,591
879
113
61
Hi Stones,

Stones: I agree it does look like Jesus is speaking just to the Apostles, but in verse 15, Luke says 120 were gathered and they
all received the baptism.

Wolf: where is it written in Vers 15 that the 120 received the baptism and which baptism you mean?

Stones: Jesus said His body would do greater things because He goes to the Father.
Wolf: You mean John 14,12?:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believes on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than
these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.




Here Jesus spoke to the Apostels and it came truth after the Holy Spirit came. Do you will claime that we today
have the same power as the Apostels had? There is a difference!

stones: ok, so just to be sure I am understanding you....no miracles today, no evangelism, no 5 fold ministry in the church,
no gifts, no healing, no raising the dead. Does your church not have a Pastor?

Wolf: No this i mean not: Faith to Jesus is in first line not coming through miracles, healings, raising the dead. It is coming
to tell the Gospel, the word of God. And if the Holy Spirit is not opening the heart, then you can do healings so
much if you want, it will be in vain and the people only want be healed but not want to follow the one who did it.
This we can find in Gospels and Acts.
Also we can find in Gospel and Acts that all miracles and healings finally done for one Purpose: To show that Jesus
is the Christ, the son of God. Read John 20, 30+31.

I was around 20 years involved in mission ministry in India. And people came to the Lord also, because he heals
them. through prayer from the church ore from the Missionaries (no pentecost ore charismatic) I believe also he is
useing today also miracles, with the purpose that people came to Christ. But in first way he is uesing his word!

In our church is a Pastor and we have also eldest.

Stones:

Joh 20:22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
Joh 20:23 Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them; and whose soeversins ye retain, they are retained.

Wolf: This vers is difficult to lay out: And among the scholars are different meanings. In greek is not written the Holy Ghost.
It is written Holy Ghost. Also they had not the Power! And also it is written that the Holy Spirit will came when Jesus
is turened to heaven. This all speaks against that they had a baptism with the Holy Spirit. Also Thomas was missed
when Jesus blows them on.

Stones: Its up to you whether you choose to believe this or not.

Wolf: I believe scripture more then man made suggestions

Stones: John was preaching repent and baptizing. Preparing the way for the ministry of Jesus. I assume they were.

Wolf: So it is only a asssumtion, but not scripture proofed.

Stones: Acts 2,38:Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the
remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Act 2:39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord
our shall call.

Act 2:40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward
generation.

Act 4:31 And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together; and they were all
filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness.
Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that
ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.

This scripture shows that a multitude of people all together can receive at one time. The promise is to all.

Wolf: to this verses is to say that we dont find this today! It´s also to mention, that the baptising for remission of sins is
only mentioned in connection with jewish people!
Also it is important to note that only those receive the Holy Spirit who were called!
Acts 4,31 is not talking about receiving the Holy Spirit, but filled with the Holy Spirit. This is different. A believer can
only one time receiving the Spirit, but he can several times be filled with the Spirit.

Stones:may i ask which gift?

Wolf: Its the gift to distiguish the spirits

stones: we might think different things about many things if we didn't have history to teach us. We would understand much
more if we knew all that the Jews did. Thats the great thing about the web. We can research.

Wolf: I would be careful. It can help to understand. But it can leads us also astray. I trust the word of God more than human
wisdom. Normally the bible needs no outward explaining.

stones: the blood sacrifice of Jesus and belief that He died and rose from the dead is our salvation. The baptism of Holy
Spirit is for service, to do the same works. If you say you live in Him, walk as He walked.

Wolf: to be born again has in my eyes following aspects: Jesus is calling me, I believe Him, I recognize to be a sinner, I
repent from sin and I ask him to come into my heart, He gives me the Holy Spirit.

It is not possible to be a believer without having the Holy Spirit! Nobody can be born again, without having the Holy
Spirit.

What you mean do the same works?

Stones: I can't make you believe, but I did point to the Word that says it's the will of God for all.

Wolf: When you are right, why then the teaching about the second baptism and the gift of speaking in tongues came in
1900 ad and was not taugth in bible and in the whole church history?
If you believe that acts 2, 8, 10 and 19 are a proof for this theory, than you should read the context for to find out
the meaning of this events and you will find. This verse are no proof for an extraordinary doctrine which you can find
behind the scripture.
I have to repead: till know nobody could show me scripture proof for this doctrine which spread over the world since
1901.
That it became a big movement is no proof to me to be right. In the 2nd century was also a big movement, the
Montanists and even Tertullian became later a member of this sect. Montanus their funder claimed to be the Holy
Spirit, the Paracletus. (this was only around 160 ad and this movement stays till the 6th century) Look to the today
biggest sect the RCC.


Stones: I see that Passover represents salvation by hearing the gospel and believing. Pentecost as already discussed.
Tabernacles as the fullness of His glory.

Wolf: We are not Jewish. Where is the scripture proof for this assumption?
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,972
4,587
113
. . .
by the way it's easy to post just scripture. It's the discussion that brings out what we believe about them.
Evangelicals and most other Protestants Believe that SCRIPTURE must interpret SCRIPTURE, to have the right interpretation. That is called the Berean way of Interpretation. When you interject opinions and experiences, you increase the likelihood of many misinterpretations.

Acts 17:11 (NIV)
[SUP]11 [/SUP] Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.
 
Feb 21, 2012
3,794
199
63
And I believe that every Christian has the innate ability to speak in Charismatic Ecstatic Utterances, because it is not of the Holy Spirit, but rather for the most part, it simply psychological phenomina. The genuine Miracle of TONGUES was for the APOSTLES to Confirm to Unbelieving Jews, that the N.T. was as much the WORD of GOD as was the O.T.

1 Corinthians 14:21-22 (NIV)
[SUP]21 [/SUP] In the Law it is written: "Through men of strange tongues and through the lips of foreigners I will speak to this people, but even then they will not listen to me," says the Lord.
[SUP]22 [/SUP] Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers; prophecy, however, is for believers, not for unbelievers.

1 Corinthians 1:22 (KJV)
[SUP]22 [/SUP] For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:
Isaiah 28 . . . The Jews would not listen to the OT prophets - so God basically told them I came to you time and again and spoke plainly to you, word upon word, thought upon thought, but you would not listen therefore with stammering lips and another tongue will I speak to this people . . yet they will remain hard hearted. Tongues are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers . . . that the spirit of God dwells within believers. (I don't believe it says "unbelieving Jews" but just plain ole unbelievers) If this manifestation of the spirit were Charismatic Ecstatic Utterances then that's what God would have called them.
Acts 2:4-12 (HCSB)
[SUP]4 [/SUP] Then they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in different languages, as the Spirit gave them ability for speech.
[SUP]5 [/SUP] There were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven.
[SUP]6 [/SUP] When this sound occurred, a crowd came together and was confused because each one heard them speaking in his own language.
[SUP]7 [/SUP] And they were astounded and amazed, saying, “Look, aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans?
[SUP]8 [/SUP] How is it that each of us can hear in our own native language?
[SUP]9 [/SUP] Parthians, Medes, Elamites; those who live in Mesopotamia, in Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,
[SUP]10 [/SUP] Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes,
[SUP]11 [/SUP] Cretans and Arabs—we hear them speaking the magnificent acts of God in our own languages.”
[SUP]12 [/SUP] They were all astounded and perplexed, saying to one another, “What could this be?”

Mark 16:20 (HCSB)
[SUP]20 [/SUP] And they went out and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them and confirming the word by the accompanying signs.
Yes, the account in Acts was a phenomenon due to the fact that when they spoke in tongues all that were around heard them speak in their languages - even though the language the apostles spoke they did not know - the languages they spoke were given to them as the Spirit gave them utterance. When Jesus shed forth the gift of holy spirit on the day of Pentecost, the evidence through the 5 senses that they had received the gift of holy spirit internally was the manifestation of speaking in tongues. When the Gentiles in Acts received the "same gift" how did they know that they had been born again of the Spirit?

This gift of holy spirit was NOT just for the apostles but is given to every believer. Every believer can manifest that gift in nine different ways. (1 Cor. 12:7-11)

I am not saying that these manifestations cannot be abused for they can and were even being abused in the Corinthian church which is the WHY of the reproof and correction in 1 Corinthians 14. Some of this stuff going on today; i.e. barking like a dog, holy laughter, being slain in the spirit, holy dancing, etc. are NOT how God intended, I can agree here. And you are right a lot of the aforementioned activity is either due to emotionalism or demon possession. A demon will and can take control of a person to speak in a foreign language - God does not possess us. . . when a person speaks in tongues they are in full control meaning they can start speaking and stop speaking - God never takes away our free will. I have heard people say when they are "slain in the spirit" - something just came over me and I fell to the ground - that makes me question.

1 Corinthians 13:8-9 (ASV)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] Love never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall be done away; whether there be tongues, they shall cease {and did}; whether there be knowledge, it shall be done away.
[SUP]9 [/SUP] For we know in part, and we prophesy in part;

The Charismatic Tongues Movement started in 1901.

Matthew 24:24-25 (ESV)
[SUP]24 [/SUP] For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.
[SUP]25 [/SUP] See, I have told you beforehand.
1 Corinthians is not just addressed to the Corinthian church but to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord . . . I would consider that to be all born again believers.

Prophecy shall be done away . . . he that prophecies speaks unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort
Tongues shall cease . . . Forbid not to speak in tongues
Word (message) of knowledge shall be done away . . . That's an important issue . . . If we are not receiving spiritual knowledge from God - How do we know anything concerning any of this or any spiritual matter? God speaks to us all the time concerning things in our lives, giving us knowledge and wisdom - if that's done away . . . .

For we know in part . . . I still only know in part and would never claim that I know everything . . . I will not know everything until I see Jesus face to face.
 
Last edited: