This is simply not what the text says. The Bible gives us "Hagios Topos". Holy place.
So now let's see an example of hagios in use:
Matthew 5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, (hagios polis) and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
Why does Matthew call Jerusalem the Holy City? Because it was always called that. Daniel himself calls it that, (and yet you accuse me of symbologizing Daniel - who is being faithful to the text here, you or me?):
Daniel 9:16
O Lord, according to all thy righteousness, I beseech thee, let thine anger and thy fury be turned away from thy city Jerusalem, thy holy mountain: because for our sins, and for the iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and thy people are become a reproach to all that are about us.
Jesus says in Matthew 24 that the appearance of the 'desolating sacrilege' 'in the Holy place' is the sign for the Church to escape Jerusalem. It is also qualified by 'let the reader understand'.
Is this ambiguous. Yes, highly. That is why Matthew qualifies it. So why is it ambiguous?
Matthew is the gospel writer to the Jews. He is writing pre AD67-73, pre the Wrath. He is therefore deliberately opaque about the sign to escape Jerusalem, because that sign is for the Church, not for unbelieving Jews. So if a Pharisee reads Matthew pre AD67, he is not allowed to understand this sign. All these things are clearly explained in Daniel. The wise only shall understand.
So Matthew here is wrong-footing the apostate Jews. They think it is the abomination in the Temple that means it is time to escape Jerusalem. Haha. Not.
But the desolating sacrilege in the Holy Place also makes sense as the Roman Armies camped in BethAven in AD66 under Gallus. Bethaven was within Jerusalem's walls, (Agrippa had put up a third perimeter wall in AD44 - oh the beauty of prophecy), the desolating sacrilege is the Roman Army Standard. It is sacrilege because the eagle denotes Zeus worship, it is desolating because the Roman Army were the desolating force.
So now lets cross-reference with Luke
21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. 21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains;
So the equivalent text in Luke confirms that the sign was the Roman Armies camped around the city, in AD66.
So now let's see an example of hagios in use:
Matthew 5 Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, (hagios polis) and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,
Why does Matthew call Jerusalem the Holy City? Because it was always called that. Daniel himself calls it that, (and yet you accuse me of symbologizing Daniel - who is being faithful to the text here, you or me?):
Daniel 9:16
O Lord, according to all thy righteousness, I beseech thee, let thine anger and thy fury be turned away from thy city Jerusalem, thy holy mountain: because for our sins, and for the iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and thy people are become a reproach to all that are about us.
Jesus says in Matthew 24 that the appearance of the 'desolating sacrilege' 'in the Holy place' is the sign for the Church to escape Jerusalem. It is also qualified by 'let the reader understand'.
Is this ambiguous. Yes, highly. That is why Matthew qualifies it. So why is it ambiguous?
Matthew is the gospel writer to the Jews. He is writing pre AD67-73, pre the Wrath. He is therefore deliberately opaque about the sign to escape Jerusalem, because that sign is for the Church, not for unbelieving Jews. So if a Pharisee reads Matthew pre AD67, he is not allowed to understand this sign. All these things are clearly explained in Daniel. The wise only shall understand.
So Matthew here is wrong-footing the apostate Jews. They think it is the abomination in the Temple that means it is time to escape Jerusalem. Haha. Not.
But the desolating sacrilege in the Holy Place also makes sense as the Roman Armies camped in BethAven in AD66 under Gallus. Bethaven was within Jerusalem's walls, (Agrippa had put up a third perimeter wall in AD44 - oh the beauty of prophecy), the desolating sacrilege is the Roman Army Standard. It is sacrilege because the eagle denotes Zeus worship, it is desolating because the Roman Army were the desolating force.
So now lets cross-reference with Luke
21 20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. 21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains;
So the equivalent text in Luke confirms that the sign was the Roman Armies camped around the city, in AD66.
"From the time that the daily sacrifice is abolished and the abomination that causes desolation is set up, there will be 1,290 days.
The abomination will be set up in the holy place, which is the proper name for the room just outside of the holy of holies.
If you want to believe that the mention of the "holy place" is referring to the entire city of Jerusalem, then be my quest. But I know what the scripture is referring to.
We'll just simply have to agree to disagree here.