I don't think his position as a believer has any bearing here.
If you are suggesting that, were he an unbeliever, that a different approach should be taken, I cannot agree with that.
This is not an issue of faith or belief but actually a common law and ethical question to which all of us are subject to:
Slander is both illegal and unethical...
This understanding is common to believers and unbelievers alike!
If you are suggesting that, were he an unbeliever, that a different approach should be taken, I cannot agree with that.
This is not an issue of faith or belief but actually a common law and ethical question to which all of us are subject to:
Slander is both illegal and unethical...
This understanding is common to believers and unbelievers alike!
The film posted by Speak2Me was unquestionably slander; but Speak2Me's posting of it IMO was not.
As I understand the nature of Slander, an intent to harm the reputation of the person slandered must be the primary motivation, not just the result.
Expressing the opinion that a person's teaching is unsound cannot be slander because there is no consensus on what constitutes sound doctrine. A forum, such as this is a proper venue for airing and discussing such opinions.