Church Fathers = Fathers of “Catholic Tradition”

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#21
Ac 20:7 And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.

1Co 16:2 Upon the first day of the week let every one of you lay by him in store, as God hath prospered him, that there be no gatherings when I come.

Initially Christians met in the court of the temple on the Sabbath but the loving Judaists drove them from the temple on the Sabbath day. Christians then began to assemble on the first day of the week.

Righteousness is imputed from Christ not attained by keeping the Mosaic law. Law is the teacher of men not the Redeemer.

If you will keep the Sabbath then do not forget to turn the heat off in your house. No fire allowed in the home on the Sabbath day.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
huh was that one of the things about keeping the sabbath no heat in a home quite astonishing, so if someone lived in a below freezing area on the globe that could be quite dangerous for folks risking frost bite or even freezing to death especially the little ones.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
#22
I see that most of the paraphrases are false pursuing the keeping of the Sabbath on the last day by changing a non-time sensitive word(rest) in one that is sensitive to time (week) . The Greek had no word for week.

The word week is a false translation. It should be eliminated from the New Testament .The word Sabbath means rest (never week). Sunday is the new era or rests marking the new creation as children of light . Day one... let there be children of light. . Its Sabbaths the plural form

Matthew 28Young's Literal Translation (YLT)

28 And on the eve of the sabbaths, at the dawn, toward the first of the sabbaths, came Mary the Magdalene, and the other Mary, to see the sepulchre,

Hi garee,

I wouldn't say it is a false translation: the Esv has it correctly translated here:

Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.

And the NIV here:

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

eis mian sabbaton.. 'of the first day' basically refers to first day of the week.

We use the word week because that is what is mean't. This was also used to show the first day of the week in Acts 20:7

en eis mia ton sabbaton 'on the first day of the week' . It is clearly mean't to signify the first day of the 'week'.

So it's really the meaning that comes from the text.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#23
If you will keep the Sabbath then do not forget to turn the heat off in your house. No fire allowed in the home on the Sabbath day.
There is no Sabbath law that requires person not gather firewood on a Sabbath. It was not the reason the man was stoned.

It’s what he wanted to do with the firewood, violate the fast as it had to do with manna.

The Jews have added many so called kosher law as oral traditions to make the word of God without effect.

Num 15:33 And they that found him gathering sticks brought him unto Moses and Aaron, and unto all the congregation.
Num 15:34 And they put him in ward, because it was not declared what should be done to him.
Num 15:35 And the LORD said unto Moses, The man shall be surely put to death: all the congregation shall stone him with stones without the camp.


By the time the New Testament came around three kosher meals were allowed on the Sabbath. They even invented distances a person could walk on the Sabbath .
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#24
Hi garee,

I wouldn't say it is a false translation: the Esv has it correctly translated here:

Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.

And the NIV here:

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

eis mian sabbaton.. 'of the first day' basically refers to first day of the week.

We use the word week because that is what is mean't. This was also used to show the first day of the week in Acts 20:7

en eis mia ton sabbaton 'on the first day of the week' . It is clearly mean't to signify the first day of the 'week'.

So it's really the meaning that comes from the text.
Thanks for posting that, I didn't know about the words eis mian sabbaton, thinking on what you mentioned reminded me of these verses below, I think if the first day of the week wasn't concidered as being what people call today as Sunday then I'd assume a lot of juggling of days would happen and that doesn't seem correct to do in my opinion.

Mt27:62 The next day, the one after Preparation Day, the chief priests and the Pharisees went to Pilate.
Mt27:63 "Sir," they said, "we remember that while he was still alive that deceiver said, `After three days I will rise again.'
Mt27:64 So give the order for the tomb to be made secure until the third day. Otherwise, his disciples may come and steal the body and tell the people that he has been raised from the dead. This last deception will be worse than the first."
Mt27:65 "Take a guard," Pilate answered. "Go, make the tomb as secure as you know how."
Mt27:66 So they went and made the tomb secure by putting a seal on the stone and posting the guard.
 
Last edited:
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#25
Hi garee,

I wouldn't say it is a false translation: the Esv has it correctly translated here:

Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.

And the NIV here:

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

eis mian sabbaton.. 'of the first day' basically refers to first day of the week.

We use the word week because that is what is mean't. This was also used to show the first day of the week in Acts 20:7

en eis mia ton sabbaton 'on the first day of the week' . It is clearly mean't to signify the first day of the 'week'.

So it's really the meaning that comes from the text.
Hi thanks for the reply...

The meaning that comes from the word rest, is rest .It is not a time sensitive word. The word week destroys the new era of rests, sabbaths.(plural) Not the new era of weeks.

In the end of the first era of rests(Saturdays), as it began to dawn toward new era of rests(Sundays), came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
#26
Hi thanks for the reply...

The meaning that comes from the word rest, is rest .It is not a time sensitive word. The word week destroys the new era of rests, sabbaths.(plural) Not the new era of weeks.

In the end of the first era of rests(Saturdays), as it began to dawn toward new era of rests(Sundays), came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.

I'll have to disagree with you on that one garee. Yes the sabbath was a day of rest, but in the context of using it to articulate days it was in the context of a week in the scriptures being discussed.. As in 'first day of the week' not first day of our sabbath rest in christ!

The scriptures elsewhere talk about our sabbath rest in Christ.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#27
You will frequently find references to the Early Church Fathers, and their writings have been preserved and quoted frequently. Indeed, for the traditionalist churches, they are practically equal to Scripture.

Unfortunately these men are the ones from whom the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox churches get their false teachings. Thus the word “Catholic” and “tradition” can apply to either the RCC or the EOC in this context.

The Church Fathers were generally bishops, and they are grouped as (a) Apostolic Fathers, (b) Ante-Nicene Fathers, (c) Nicene Fathers, and (d) Post-Nicene Fathers, and they existed from the first to the fifth centuries AD.

They introduced many errors into Christianity, which have now become carved in stone. Some of those errors are :

1. Churches should have a ruling bishop over and above the elders, who are accountable to him [In Scripture there is no difference between elders and bishops (who are the pastors), and there must always be a plurality of elders in every church].

2. There is a middle state between Heaven and Hell called Purgatory [In Scripture it is either Heaven or Hell, with Sheol/Hades as the temporary abode of the unsaved dead].

3. The Eucharist literally becomes the body and blood of Christ [In Scripture the bread and the cup symbolize the body and blood of Christ].

4. Water baptism regenerates a soul and washes away sins [In Scripture water baptism represents the death, burial, and resurrection of the believer with Christ].

5. Mary was “the second Eve” and should be venerated as “the Mother of God” [Scripture reveals that Mary was simply the mother of Jesus of Nazareth, and that even while on earth, Christ gave her no special status].

6. Asceticism and monasticism were necessary for salvation and sanctification [In Scripture Paul condemns asceticism, and monasticism is foreign to the Bible].

7. “Holy water” has supernatural properties [There is no such concept in the Bible].

8. Prayers to the departed saints and prayers for the dead are acceptable to God [There is no such teaching in the Bible].

9. A celibate priesthood is a necessity [Celibacy is the except according to Christ, and elders are to be married and have children. Also, all believers constitute a Royal Priesthood].

10. Church “tradition” has equal authority with Scripture [The Bible makes it crystal clear that the Word of God – Scripture – is the sole authority for all Christians”].

We could list many other erroneous teachings, but we can now see why the RCC and EOC have elevated what th
ey call “Holy Tradition” to the level of Scripture. Therefore people in these churches have to make a critical decision -- should we go along with tradition, or should be believe only what is revealed in Scripture?
Same hat...same religion....different name...

kippah.jpg

popes-emeritus_2518151c.jpg

Ephesians 5:11, “Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.”

Daniyl 7:25, "And he will speak great words against YHWH, and will wear out; mentally attack to cause to fall away, the saints of YHWH, and think to change times and Laws…"


Catholic Record of London, Ontario, September 1, 1923 - “Sunday is our mark or authority...the church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact.”
Mattithyah 15:2-3, "Why do Your disciples transgress the traditions of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat. But He answered, and said to them; And why do you transgress the Laws of Yahweh by your traditions?"

Mat 15:7-9, "Hypocrites! Well did Isayah (29:13-14)* prophesy of you, saying: These people draw near to Me with their mouth and honor Me with their lips, but have removed their hearts far from Me. But in vain they do worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men."
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#28
They are called "Church fathers", because they helped to form the Church like fathers form the child, by their teachings or influence.

It does not mean they brought forth the Church, God did.
 
Last edited:

beta

Senior Member
Aug 8, 2016
2,782
333
83
#29
gospel according to beta is "keep the sabbath"
u make every thread about the sabbath.
Well...observing/sharing holy time with a holy God would be the best way to become holy yourself !

Ex31v13 says ' verily my Sabbaths you shall keep for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations: that you may know that I am the Lord that does sanctify you.

If you want God's way to 'rub off on you then you better spend 'quality time with Him....and that time is 'decided by God Himself ! It's not all there is to becoming God-like but it is a START for personal instruction.
Why do you think Jesus/Yahshua will tell 'the MANY to depart from him ? He never knew them, they did not learn from Him, would not listen to Him...and had no chance of salvation.

You should think seriously of what you are rejecting !
 

beta

Senior Member
Aug 8, 2016
2,782
333
83
#30
In my opinion I believe people go to church on Sunday to celebrate Jesus resurrection on the first day of the week as the bible testifies as to that was the day of Jesus resurrection and i have only heard people mention the day as the Lord's day, as well the bible mentions Jesus as Lord of the Sabbath.
Yes, people have been deceived into thinking that Jesus/Yahshua rose on the first day of the week....but scripture shows that He did not !!!
So does that mean they are basing their Belief and Faith on a LIE/UNtruth ?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,612
13,019
113
#31
All I was pointing out was that the early church fathers where christians like you and me.

I was not implying that they were unsaved at all. As I stated:
They introduced many errors into Christianity. People can be genuine Christians but also hold to erroneous doctrines.
All christian branches use the early fathers. (whether or not you agree with one branch or another)
Since I did not wish to make a very extensive OP I did not go into a lot of detail. Yes all Christians consult the writings of the Early Church Fathers, but it is the Catholic churches (RCC, EOC) which have made their writings "Holy Tradition" and placed them on the level of Scripture, or at least the doctrines they taught as authoritative as Scripture. Check the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the footnotes therein.
For instance you don't even state who where the ones with wrong teaching, like Marcion, Arius, pelagius etc etc. you ignorantly state they all are wrong and taught false teachings. Where they perfect? of course not.
No, I did not name names, since several of them held to the same erroneous doctrines, and the OP would have become cumbersome. Let's take the example of Cyprian. He is called Saint Cyprian by the traditionalist churches, and he taught baptismal regeneration. Now he was not a heretic and was a Christian, but this is false teaching. Today we have the same situation. There are men (and women) who are saved but they are also false teachers.
My question to you is ... was there any early church leaders that taught faithfully to the best of their ability and understanding.? If we read your post we would have to concur that there wasn't which is false.
So this needs clarification. What we can say is that the Early Church Fathers said many things which were true and perfectly in accord with Scripture. They were also generally devout Christians. But they also generally held to false doctrine. Polycarp can be given as an example of someone who was teaching faithfully and did not have any false teachings. Here is one quote:

Polycarp 1:3
though ye saw Him not, ye believe with joy unutterable and full of glory; unto which joy many desire to enter in; forasmuch as ye know that it is by grace ye are saved, not of works, but by the will of God through Jesus Christ.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#32
Yes, people have been deceived into thinking that Jesus/Yahshua rose on the first day of the week....but scripture shows that He did not !!!
So does that mean they are basing their Belief and Faith on a LIE/UNtruth ?
well I am not going to make that determation for you, that is something you have to understand in your heart.
 
May 11, 2014
936
39
0
#33
u know one thing i always wondered is what if there was a bunch of other early church guys who wrote something completely different to the writings we have. but because they werent "in line" the catholics destroyed their writings and we never got them. u know how catholic destroy writings of "heretics."

thats what i think about.
This has crossed my mind as well. The phrase victors write history can apply to this as well.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#34
I will say this what ever day in our modern times is used for the sabbath the next day after that is that day.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#35
I'll have to disagree with you on that one garee. Yes the sabbath was a day of rest, but in the context of using it to articulate days it was in the context of a week in the scriptures being discussed..

The scriptures elsewhere talk about our sabbath rest in Christ.
I thanks. Sorry in advance for rambling. I just can’t get past the changing of the meaning of a word that is not time sensitive in any way shape or form. Where some would give it form to represent to a certain time period.

The word Sabbath which is applies to anytime today is today (the present moment) or as long as the Sun and the Moon the two times keepers are above .

The word Sabbath defined ...

Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts Hebrew 4:7

The word Sabbath is not time sensitive word in regard to a day or week or any time .It simply means “rest” with no other meaning attached to it. Mixing it with time sensitive words destroys the rest we do have whenever we hear His Word and do not harden our heart, That I believe describes the meaning not subject to change. To me it’s not like the gospel is a New Testament principle it began in the beginning at the foundation.

For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faithin them that heard it. For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. Heb 4:2

I think the,” not being mixed with faith” (the unseen time period) is the key to understanding . When we try to make it fit a day or any time period we would be walking by sight.It would seem we then destroy His finished work, the works were finished from the foundation of the world.(verse 3)

Trying to make it into time sensitive word destroys the meaning of the word. It would be like speaking in another language .

It’s like another example of taking way the meaning of the word Sabbath and changing it into a time sensitive word rather than mixing faith in what they did hear or see(walking by sight)

In the parable the Pharisees was showing how much better he was that a tax collector hoping his outward religiosity would pay off. . At that time period the kosher amounts of times a person could eat the Pharisee's as a law of the fathers a oral traditions of men kosher foods was three meals on the Sabbath, (not week ) .He thought he had one up on common man.


Luk 18:12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess..

My offering below not changing the meaning of the word rest.

Luk 18:12 I fast twice in the Sabbbath , I give tithes of all that I possess..


I am sure there were plenty who fasted twice a week, some fast an entire week .But it must pertain to the fast set aside when no regular work was required a day we can bring the gospel out into the world the true fast that does, driving out lying spirits which the disciples could not cast out seeing they walked by sight and did not mix faith in what they did see and hear. This was until the gospel did drive out the lying spirits, a life time work. ..
 
Last edited:

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
#36
I thanks. Sorry in advance for rambling. I just can’t get past the changing of the meaning of a word that is not time sensitive in any way shape or form. Where some would give it form to represent to a certain time period.

The word Sabbath which is applies to anytime today is today (the present moment) or as long as the Sun and the Moon the two times keepers are above .

The word Sabbath defined ...

Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts Hebrew 4:7

The word Sabbath is not time sensitive word in regard to a day or week or any time .It simply means “rest” with no other meaning attached to it. Mixing it with time sensitive words destroys the rest we do have whenever we hear His Word and do not harden our heart, That I believe describes the meaning not subject to change. To me it’s not like the gospel is a New Testament principle it began in the beginning at the foundation.

For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faithin them that heard it. For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. Heb 4:2

I think the,” not being mixed with faith” (the unseen time period) is the key to understanding . When we try to make it fit a day or any time period we would be walking by sight.It would seem we then destroy His finished work, the works were finished from the foundation of the world.(verse 3)

Trying to make it into time sensitive word destroys the meaning of the word. It would be like speaking in another language .

It’s like another example of taking way the meaning of the word Sabbath and changing it into a time sensitive word rather than mixing faith in what they did hear or see(walking by sight)

In the parable the Pharisees was showing how much better he was that a tax collector hoping his outward religiosity would pay off. . At that time period the kosher amounts of times a person could eat the Pharisee's as a law of the fathers a oral traditions of men kosher foods was three meals on the Sabbath, (not week ) .He thought he had one up on common man.


Luk 18:12 I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess..

My offering below not changing the meaning of the word rest.

Luk 18:12 I fast twice in the Sabbbath , I give tithes of all that I possess..


I am sure there were plenty who fasted twice a week, some fast an entire week .But it must pertain to the fast set aside when no regular work was required a day we can bring the gospel out into the world the true fast that does, driving out lying spirits which the disciples could not cast out seeing they walked by sight and did not mix faith in what they did see and hear. This was until the gospel did drive out the lying spirits, a life time work. ..

Hi garee,

I can't really say anymore than what I said in previous post I disagree that the meaning is lost in the context of the Scriptures you first provided. The word week is clearly mean't. Regarding Luke 18:12, I have read similar jewish-christian website, give the same wording as you have.

Unless, you can convince me you know better than hundreds of linguistic.theological scholars over hundreds of years, I'll stick with my English translation whether you think it is false or not.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#37
huh was that one of the things about keeping the sabbath no heat in a home quite astonishing, so if someone lived in a below freezing area on the globe that could be quite dangerous for folks risking frost bite or even freezing to death especially the little ones.
Does seem to pose a problem doesn't it? You were not allowed to walk more than something like six steps or that was a violation of the no work thing. Keep the recliner close to the outhouse eh?

Judaism took ten commandments and expanded them to six hundred and thirteen laws. Therein lies the problem with legalism.

Mt 23:4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#38
Hi garee,

I can't really say anymore than what I said in previous post I disagree that the meaning is lost in the context of the Scriptures you first provided. The word week is clearly mean't. Regarding Luke 18:12, I have read similar jewish-christian website, give the same wording as you have.

Unless, you can convince me you know better than hundreds of linguistic.theological scholars over hundreds of years, I'll stick with my English translation whether you think it is false or not.

Thanks for the reply..

The word week is clearly mean't to do what ? Add a time element to word that has none? Can a non-time sensitive word change and become time sensitive without changing the actual word?

And I am no scholar just like words and their meaning. The Greek did not even have a word for week. But I can recognize when a word meaning is changed . There are some scholars like that of Young’s literal who have not changed the literal meaning of the word to reflect their own belief system like those of Seventh-day Adventists that worship a time period and not rest a word not subject to a time period.

PS I would not mind seeing that reference to Luke 18.
 
Jul 23, 2017
879
31
0
#39
There is no Sabbath law that requires person not gather firewood on a Sabbath. It was not the reason the man was stoned.

It’s what he wanted to do with the firewood, violate the fast as it had to do with manna.
wheres this in the bible?
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#40
Does seem to pose a problem doesn't it? You were not allowed to walk more than something like six steps or that was a violation of the no work thing. Keep the recliner close to the outhouse eh?
LOL.....Or if a person wanted to be twice as holy move the recliner in along with the refrigerator.