Why the Gap Theory is unacceptable

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

LibrarianLeo

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
191
2
0
The Genesis account is scientific fact because it is the testimony of God the only one who knew precisely what he was doing and told us what we need to know to destroy the ridiculous and satanically inspired lies of modern false sciences.
But every man is free to be deluded till judgment day. God’s written word is a closed book to all who are in unbelief.
The process of Science is to create repeatable observations.
So Genesis is not a scientific account.
You may claim it is a historical account if you wish.
 
Dec 4, 2017
906
35
0
The vahv consecutive is used in Hebrew to denote circumstantiality. It in effect allows the vahv (usually translated as 'and' to be read as 'some time later' [with the elapsed time being indefinite]. I am not trying to present this as a doctrinal position. The Hebrew allows but does not demand a gap in time between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2; and/or between Gen 1:2 and Gen 1:3.
In my initial post on this thread, I attempted to show how the Hebrew allows and even suggests such a reading.
Whether or not one accepts the 'Gap Theory', Jesus still created the world as we know it in 6 literal 24 hour days.
amen
yes sir,
which is why you get the and, and, and in english transliterations.
and the continuity flows from beginning to end.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,610
13,019
113
Do you believe angels were created on the same day as God said, Let there be light? And then what? Whole groups of them fell immediately into damnation?
We are not told as to when the angels were created, but according to Job 38:7 they were observing creation and rejoicing. We are also not told as to when the evil angels rebelled and were cast out of Heaven, but it could have been shortly after the creation of the universe and before the Fall of Man. That is the impression one gets.

What it amazing is that God would have known about all these developments before He created anything, yet He allowed His creation to be marred. Thankfully that is not the end of the story.
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
822
113
I do not suppose Genesis to be inspired more than Gospels, for example.

And when you compare 3 gospels, you will see that inspired authors had sometimes problems with details.

Why do you expect the author of Genesis to write down everything perfectly, even in such problematic topic? Gen 1 and Gen 2 have different creation orders, for example.

BTW why do you think it was Moses? Did Jesus quote Genesis and said "Moses said"? I am not sure now.
I think this is stepping out into dangerous territory to say men were human and so Gods word did not get written down perfectly as relayed by the Holy Spirit. Because if it were imperfectly relayed or imperfectly written down, how could God say not one jot or tittle...
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,610
13,019
113
Why do you expect the author of Genesis to write down everything perfectly, even in such problematic topic? Gen 1 and Gen 2 have different creation orders, for example.
While some people have claimed that Gen 1 and Gen 2 are "different" narratives, you only have to study them carefully to see that the first chapter is an overview of the total picture, whereas the second chapter focuses on Man.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Where is the rule what the word can mean or which animals to exclude?

Where is the rule saying it cannot be every animal without any families or genera restrictions?
Pleas reread post 155
 

LibrarianLeo

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
191
2
0
Who in their right mind refuses to believe the testimony of everyone else, but believes only their own, and only after they themselves don the experiment repeatedly?
That would be Science minded people who do not take other people's word.
That includes both the physical and social sciences.
People of faith do consider testimony and use discernment as to it's value.
 
Last edited:

LibrarianLeo

Senior Member
Feb 8, 2018
191
2
0
The truth is that we have not been given many details, but we do know that everything described in those first two chapters pertains to six literal 24 hour days, since the Ten Commandments confirm that.
How is the period from night fall to day break one day?
Especially considering that "24 hours" has to do with star shine on a spinning earth.
Was God spinning and watching the sun (not yet created) come up?
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
There are some Christians who believe that the creation account in Genesis is actually a “re-creation” account, and that there was an inhabited earth BEFORE Adam and Eve were created. In order to reconcile the Bible with the extended geological ages proposed by evolutionists, some Christians began to teach that there was a gap between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. Hence “The Gap Theory”.


Brother N6,

The creation story is the creation of the 4 elements known to men 3000 yrs ago, air, water, earth, and fire. Light is not considered an element because it is not tangible or firm.

---

Before the creation began there was only 2 places that you could be, where God was, and where God was not.

Looking down from the throne of God, the face of the deep was the boundary between these 2 places.

The deep, is what we call the great void of endless outer space. It goes on forever, it is eternal, and it was completely empty of the universe that we have now.

The Spirit of God (wind) moved on the face of the waters, stirring and mixing, the void and the presence of God into the place where the universe would be created. The place that was created had the blessings of God, but there were places where there was, less blessings. This would be the place where God's glory spiritual light shown, mixed with the void.

This mixing and separating theme, continues throughout the creation story and the rest of the Bible.

This movement by the Spirit of God and the void was the first act in the creation shown to us here.

-----

In this place between the darkness of the void and the glory of God, God creates material light.

The light creation source would be God, but the light is mixed with the darkness and in chaos, so God separates the light from the darkness. This is also a repeating theme in the creation story and the rest of the Bible.

God is bringing reason to chaos, and separating light and dark. But remember that these things are constantly in motion, mixing and separating at the same time, like air and water on a lake in waves driven by the wind.

-----

So the waters described in Gen 1:1-2, are not the H2O waters created later on, but are the boundary between God, His glory, and the endless void of outer space that you see when you go outside at night. (no gap)
 

Dan58

Senior Member
Nov 13, 2013
1,991
338
83
"Let there be light" ... God doesn't work in the dark :)



"And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof." (Revelation 21:23)
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,610
13,019
113
Brother N6,

The creation story is the creation of the 4 elements known to men 3000 yrs ago, air, water, earth, and fire. Light is not considered an element because it is not tangible or firm.
Your mention of air, water, earth, and fire could be a little simplistic, but light is a form of energy, and energy and matter are interconvertible. Photosynthesis is what allows plant life to flourish. But the water mentioned in Gen 1:1-2 was actual water (which was converted into vapor later on). There is much that is hidden from view.
 

breno785au

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
765
113
39
Australia
I do not believe in the gap theory. I have read Genesis 1 in Hebrew, and although I am not close to where Marc is, I didn’t not see a gap. It is just not there.

What I do remember is all the theosophy and books by Blavatsky and Alice Bailey I read, that claim all this nonsense. But so much more! Atlantis, reincarnation, it got so esoteric it was crazy. And of course Jesus, ONE of the ascended masters.

People need to stick to the Bible. Even if a gap is remotely hinted at in Genesis, we know nothing, and idle speculation is unproductive and good for nothing!
This.

When I read Genesis I read consecutive days from when time was invented. Even if I miss something that relates to gap, I don't believe God is gonna say, "Well Brendan, you really ought to have seen and believed those large gaps in time in my creation."

As if it bears any relevance to our walk anyway.

What has any relevance is that we simply believe it says THE first day, THE second day etc.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Pleas reread post 155
I was not probably clear.

I meant - why do you think that we should restrict verses about Adam naming animals to kinds? The term "kind" is not present in the text.

"And God formed yet farther out of the earth all the wild beasts of the field, and all the birds of the sky, and he brought them to Adam, to see what he would call them, and whatever Adam called any living creature, that was the name of it.
And Adam gave names to all the cattle and to all the birds of the sky, and to all the wild beasts of the field, but for Adam there was not found a help like to himself. "
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I was not probably clear.

I meant - why do you think that we should restrict verses about Adam naming animals to kinds? The term "kind" is not present in the text.

"And God formed yet farther out of the earth all the wild beasts of the field, and all the birds of the sky, and he brought them to Adam, to see what he would call them, and whatever Adam called any living creature, that was the name of it.
And Adam gave names to all the cattle and to all the birds of the sky, and to all the wild beasts of the field, but for Adam there was not found a help like to himself. "

Gen 1:21-25
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
KJV

Gen 1:21-25
21 So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth."
23 And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.
24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds—livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds." And it was so.
25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
ESV

Gen 1:21-31
21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
22 God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth."
23 And there was evening, and there was morning — the fifth day.
24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.
25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

NIV


The Hebrew word nehem translated kinds and its singular nehoo can be translated as broadly as family or as narrowly as species. This is because nature has produced natural inter-generic hybrids but inter-familiar hybrids do not exist.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Gen 1:21-25
21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
KJV

Gen 1:21-25
21 So God created the great sea creatures and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth."
23 And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.
24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds—livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds." And it was so.
25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the livestock according to their kinds, and everything that creeps on the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
ESV

Gen 1:21-31
21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
22 God blessed them and said, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth."
23 And there was evening, and there was morning — the fifth day.
24 And God said, "Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: livestock, creatures that move along the ground, and wild animals, each according to its kind." And it was so.
25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.

NIV


The Hebrew word nehem translated kinds and its singular nehoo can be translated as broadly as family or as narrowly as species. This is because nature has produced natural inter-generic hybrids but inter-familiar hybrids do not exist.

My question is not about Genesis 1.

My question is about Genesis 2, where Adam was naming all animals. Why do you want to restrict these "all animals" to "kinds only"?
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
My question is not about Genesis 1.

My question is about Genesis 2, where Adam was naming all animals. Why do you want to restrict these "all animals" to "kinds only"?
Genesis 1 and genesis 2 are NOT separate accounts. Genesis 2 is a focused look at day 6 of Genesis 1 and is more concerned with relationships than with process.

Gen 2:19-20
19 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him
KJV


This is even more limited than all the animal families. we can eliminate aquatic life, and all invertebrates. We have left probably less than 1800 genera. However, we are told in Gen 1 that God created them by kind; so we are dealing with less than 200 families.