KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
The fact that something is "enough" does not imply that it is all there is.

You simply cannot lock unending eternal God into one book. Whole the universe with billions of stars and planets cannot contain Him.
No problem with this but you ain't gonna find what you are talking about now in any other book, or any other human source now are you?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
You're teetering upon RCC doctrine...please rethink. Please.
It seems to me like "USA vs Russia". Thats what Russians say, beware!!

I do not take sides regarding truth. All human sides have something true and something false. Thats why I said my ground is simply truth. Without any adjectives (catholic, protestant, new, old, biblical, scientific...).
 
Last edited:

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
The fact that something is "enough" does not imply that it is all there is.

You simply cannot lock undending eternal God into one book. Whole the universe with billions of stars and planets cannot contain Him.
But this one book is all we have that tells us about Him.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
It seems to me like "USA vs Russia". Thats what Russians say, beware!!

I do not take sides regarding truth. All human sides have something true and something false. Thats why I said my ground is simply truth. Without any adjectives (catholic, protestant, new, old, biblical, scientific...).
RCC avers that scripture alone(Sola Scriptura) is not enough, but also needs oral traditions, &c.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
No problem with this but you ain't gonna find what you are talking about now in any other book, or any other human source now are you?
I am not sure what you mean by this question.

Everything God created or does or allows gives us some information about Him.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
But this one book is all we have that tells us about Him.
Uhm.... no. :)

For example I just read Leibniz - Theodicea. It talks about God.

My case proved :)


----

You probably meant its the only book that is inspired..?
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
Everything you look at on the earth from grass to mountains make you wonder who created it.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
1 Chronicles 3 is the lineage of Christ isn't it? I'm not sure, I haven't looked into that yet.
1Chr 3 traces the line of Solomon which would parallel the lineage of Joseph.

Luke traces the lineage of Mary through Nathan, IMO.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Everything you look at on the earth from grass to mountains make you wonder who created it.
And not just that.

It also tells us what He is like. If there is order, elegance etc in His works, we can deduce things about Him.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Exactly. Final authority.

Not the only authority.

Also, there is nothing like "biblical truth". There is just truth.
Since when did the scriptures quit being enough for the Christian?
Extra-Biblical sources can be useful in witnessing to unbelievers when they affirm and establish a Biblical truth.

They are also sometimes helpful to clarify a Biblical truth when a verse can be understood in more than one way.

NOTHING that contradicts the Bible should be regarded as helpful.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
NOTHING that contradicts the Bible should be regarded as helpful.
Also, not everything that seems to contradict Bible is a real contradiction. Like the controversy with heliocentrism some centuries later. Church said that when Bible says the sun runs in the sky, it cannot be that we are actually running around a standing star.

Truth cannot contradict truth. Our views can be simply wrong, our work with Bible can be wrong as a work with anything else. We cannot lock ourselves in one source.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Exactly. Final authority.

Not the only authority.

Also, there is nothing like "biblical truth". There is just truth.
But how do we know how to come together as a church w/o the scriptures? What I meant when I said the church is founded upon the scriptures, is that w/o the scriptures, we do not know how to have a church to begin with.
I believe that if several people in a community are led to Salvation by word of mouth; and the Bible is unavailable and/or suppressed, the indwelling Holy Spirit can lead people into sound practices and there can be a church. When the Bible becomes available in such cases the practices of believers in such circumstances are often affirmed by it.
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
I HAVE WITNESSED TO SOME PEOPLE THAT WERE THRILLED AND EXCITED ABOUT WHAT i TOLD THEM ABOUT GOD, JESUS AND SALVATION. THEY COULD NOT WAIT TO GET A BIBLE TO READ MORE. Sorry about the upper case, went to far to start over again.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
1Chr 3 traces the line of Solomon which would parallel the lineage of Joseph.

Luke traces the lineage of Mary through Nathan, IMO.
Agreed, an 1 Chronicles 3 only traces one of the Ahaziah's.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,778
13,412
113
Agreed, an 1 Chronicles 3 only traces one of the Ahaziah's.
So how do you account for the alleged second Ahaziah, other than with the difference in ages? You would need additional information beyond that for it to be accepted as valid. Why would Solomon's lineage only have one if there were two?
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
So how do you account for the alleged second Ahaziah, other than with the difference in ages? You would need additional information beyond that for it to be accepted as valid. Why would Solomon's lineage only have one if there were two?
There are 2 different ages and 2 different beginnings of their reigns. I think the lineage in 1 Chronicles is the lineage of Jesus, at least it matches the lineage in Matthew as far as I have checked it.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
There are 2 different ages and 2 different beginnings of their reigns. I think the lineage in 1 Chronicles is the lineage of Jesus, at least it matches the lineage in Matthew as far as I have checked it.
You check a piece here, a piece there and then just invent or assume the rest.

Such a construction will not stand. Have you checked all genealogies in Matthew, whether they fit with 1 Chronicles? If they do not fit in some places, you have a problem again.
 
Last edited:
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
You check a piece here, a piece there and then just invent or assume the rest.

Such a construction will not stand. Have you checked all genealogies in Matthew, whether they fit with 1 Chronicles? If they do not fit in some places, you have a problem again.
My concern is not with the entire genealogy in Matthew, I just checked to see if the first part matched 1 Chronicles 3 and it does. Im sure the rest of it does too but that's not the point of my research right. Right now I'm interested in understanding the Ahaziah's age thing.