"THE LAW" ????

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
F

feedm3

Guest
#1
Many here on this site are taking passages so far out of context to support a doctrine of a Covenant without laws.
Every time a passage is posted concerning obedience, passages such as Rom 3:28 are posted back in an attempt to refute the position that obedience is required by the Christian, and is essential to salvation.

Rom 3:28 will be discussed shortly. If one is teaching that since we are under grace, that we have no more laws at all, then one is also teaching according to the definition of sin, that sin itself has ceased to exist.

There are many passages that tell us we are not under "the law" and that it is a sin to try and be justified (saved) by the "the law".

Yet if one is serious about understanding God's words, and not purposely trying to ignore context, then God has revealed to us the truth about laws.

1. "THE LAW" IS NOT SPEAKING OF "ALL LAWS" IN GENERAL.

When we see the words "the law", we must ask, which laws are considered "the law"?
Is this meaning all laws, or a certain set of laws?

Rom 3:28 shows exactly what his means:

Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

We could just take this passage, and say, "see we are not under and deeds of law, therefore disobedience will not hinder one from being saved".

Yet if we look at the context, we understand what laws are being spoken of. We must start at the begining. What is the context of verse 28?
Verse 1:
Rom 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.
Rom 3:20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.


It is not hard to see Paul here is speaking of the Jews and there laws. Circumcision, though instituted before the law of Moses, it was part of the laws as given again, to show as a sign one is under the covenant with God.

These passages have nothing to do with laws under the NT. This context is not about that, it does not say if we do, or do not have laws under the NT. SO this cannot be used to refute a teaching of laws, because it does not support that.

Passage 2:

Gal 5:4 Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace

First of all, those who attempt to use this passage to show we do not have any laws are contradicting themselves.

To say this passage is teaching that if we try to be saved by obeying God's commands, it will cause us to fall from from grace. they are in fact making a law that a Christian cannot seek to be under a law. That is a paradox.

You cannot have a law that says we have no law, and if that law that says we have no law is violated, then we fall from grace and Christ becomes of no effect.

Second, again, the context, is not about laws in general, but THE LAW OF MOSES. Those who teach we must obey God are not teaching that we should return to the law of Moses.

Context proves this:
1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. (<--the law of Moses)
2 Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. (circumcision again the problem the judaizing teachers were tying to bind on the Christians)
3 For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law
(a debtor to what law? The law of Moses)

Again, this NT LAW is stating that it is a sin to return and keep all or parts of the law of Moses. Doing so, will cause us to be a debtor to the whole law, and Christ will become of no effect.\

So
this is A NEW TESTAMENT LAW concerning keeping the law of Moses which has been done away with.

Passage 3:
Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster

This passage is used over and over to show we are not under any law. This is not saying we have no law, but it is saying we are no longer under THE LAW OF MOSES because it was only a tutor.

In fact, we in the NT do not even need the law to bring us to Christ, we can go directly to him through the teachings of the NT.

This was written to the Gal. The law was a tutor to bring man to Christ. It was a shadow of what was to come - Heb 10:1

Not that the true image has come (Christ and his covenant) we no longer need the shadow (the law of Moses).

A shadow leads to the true image. You can find an apple tree by following it's shadow, yet once found you dont need it anymore. You dont reach to the shadow to get the fruit, you reach for the tree.

Again the context, which has already been shown, shows this is dealing with the Law of Moses, not all laws.


2. IF WE HAVE NO LAWS, THEN SIN DOES NOT EXIST ANYMORE:
The definition of sin remains, it does not change:
I Jn 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law

If sin is only by the transgressing of God's laws, and we have no laws, then we cannot sin anymore under the NT.

Some say, this is true, because Christ died for all sin, past present and future.

Christ did die for sin, if he did not shed his blood, then we could not repent and be cleansed. This does not mean if we choose to violate the NT commands, that it is not sin anymore.

If sin take opportunity by the command, and it exists by the transgression of those commands then we must have commands:
Rom 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead

There is no way around this. In order to sin, a command MUST be broken.

3. NEW TESTAMENTS COMMANDS THAT WE ARE UNDER:

II Thess 3:4 And we have confidence in the Lord touching you, that ye both do and will do the things which we command you.
5 And the Lord direct your hearts into the love of God, and into the patient waiting for Christ.
6 Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us
14 And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed

I Thess 4:1 Furthermore then we beseech you, brethren, and exhort you by the Lord Jesus, that as ye have received of us how ye ought to walk and to please God, so ye would abound more and more. 2 For ye know what commandments we gave you by the Lord Jesus.
3 For this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication


There are so many other examples that can be given. These passages are written to Christians, warning them to keep those commands that have been given.

Commands are no different from laws. A command is a law, and the violation of those laws are sin.

Some may say, okay we have commands, but it does not say that if we do not keep them we will be judged eternally.

Yet is does say this. Example: I Thess 4:3 above says the abstaining from fornication is the will of God. Can we enter heaven if we do not do the will of God?

Answer:
Matt 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven

Do let any fool you into thinking we have no laws under the NT. We have many commands, and by keeping them is ONLY way to show we love Christ.- Jn 14:15, and 15:14.

So many want to say "love fulfills the whole law".

They are right!
If you have true love then your obeying his commands.
JN 14:15 "If ye love KEEP MY COMMANDS"

If you are obeying his commands then you are keeping the laws that have been given to us.

Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: 9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord. 10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people



 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jon4TheCross

Senior Member
Oct 19, 2012
1,864
7
38
#2
I agree that the laws of this everlasting priesthood are the same eternal laws that we saw the shadow of in the Levitical priesthood and law of Moses. Unlimited fruitfulness is one of our goals, and I think we both agree that if we want to grow in love it means we also follow all the commandments given to us for our edification. Good post, thank you.

King James Version Matthew 28:20 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
#3
The conclusion of the matter is this:
Some people think they are justified by obedience.
Others know they are justified by grace through faith.

That's as simple as I can put it.
 

pickles

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
#4
One simply needs to see that obediance is about one's love for God, not about condemnation.

God bless
pickles
 

gotime

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2011
3,537
88
48
#5
The conclusion of the matter is this:
Some people think they are justified by obedience.
Others know they are justified by grace through faith.

That's as simple as I can put it.
We are justified by Grace through faith. but faith without works is dead.

Paul was clear that we are justified by grace through Faith. but those who are truly receiving the grace of God will obey the law. Obedience is the fruit of Grave received by faith.

Paul clearly taught this.

Rom 2:13 (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified.

If you are justified then you will be a doer/keeper of the law.

Keeping the law is the result of the grace of God working in you.
 
Sep 8, 2012
4,367
59
0
#6
So faith through unmerited favor happens first.
Then the works of a clean conscience towards God follow.

That's what I said.
All the righteous works we do don't mean a hill of beans unless
they are done through the Holy Spirit of God which quickens,(makes us able to accomplish them).

Many Islamisists live outwardly pure lives.
They don't eat swine, they pray toward Mecca three times a day, they observe their laws to the best intent.
Yet they are lost, and dead in their trespasses and sins.
Same with Hindus, same with Shintoists and Buddists.
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#7
The conclusion of the matter is this:
Some people think they are justified by obedience.
Others know they are justified by grace through faith.

That's as simple as I can put it.
There is a third as well as the two you mentioned.

Some believe obedience is their duty and that they are still unprofitable servants - Luke 17:10

Not being justified by obedience, it is obeying because Almighty God said so. Which makes it essential to salvation, and a humble and submissive heart will fear and love God enough to know he must keep his duty.

You cannot have faith without obedience. Without it, it is not faith.

Obedience is not a good deed.
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#8
One simply needs to see that obediance is about one's love for God, not about condemnation.

God bless
pickles
Your right it is about love - Jn 14:15

Yet condemnation is real, judgement is real, and the Bible tells us to know this - II Cor 5:

11 Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men; but we are made manifest unto God; and I trust also are made manifest in your consciences


I Pet 4:17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God? 18 And if the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear? 19 Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing, as unto a faithful Creator


There must be a balance in our understanding God. Fear is something that is not popular but is necessary.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,838
6,377
113
#9
how about " perfect love casts out fear" ever read that one??
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#10
how about " perfect love casts out fear" ever read that one??
yes great passage. I jn 4:18. But in what is love perfected? Cant have that without keeping his commands. So if ones love is perfected, then he is keeping his commands. If your doing that, what is to fear.

When we stop doing that, we should fear, because we have placed ourselves outside the security of God.

If you keep reading verse 18 in its context into chapter 5, this is exactly what John is saying:


18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love. 19 We love him, because he first loved us.
20 If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? 21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also


Chapter 5 (a continuation of the context)
1 Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. 2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. 3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous

John
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,838
6,377
113
#11
this means the Royal Law, not all the O.T. laws ,600 and something, i think.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#12
There is a third as well as the two you mentioned.

Some believe obedience is their duty and that they are still unprofitable servants - Luke 17:10

Not being justified by obedience, it is obeying because Almighty God said so. Which makes it essential to salvation, and a humble and submissive heart will fear and love God enough to know he must keep his duty.

You cannot have faith without obedience. Without it, it is not faith.

Obedience is not a good deed.

Actually even this can be twisted into a false self centered merited gospel.

One who has faith will work. If we trust God in our condemnation part. we trust him in why we are condemned. Out of this trust comes obedience. Where we get into trouble is where we say obedience is essential to salvation, which it is not. In any moment of any day while we are alive no matter how good we THINK we are. we are still deserving of eternal condemnation based on our thoughts, our actions and our deeds (which are not perfect) Those with true faith understand this, and it helps them move forward.

As for obedience not being a good deed. This is not true.

Paul tells us in romans Abraham was not found by his good deeds, but by faiht in Christ.
Paul tells all of us in his letter to titus that it was not by deeds of righteousness which we have done, But by the washing and rebirth of the spirit.

The law would include ALL or PART of any aspect of regulations or commands given by God to any people at any time.

Thou shalt not murder, lie or steel is the law. if we are tying to be saved by not doing these. we are trying to be saved by law.

Loving the Lord your God with all your might (and anything that comes from this) is part of the law. If we do anything out of this to try to be saved, we are using the law to save ourselves.

there is no inbetween, it is either grace, or works. it can not be both.
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#13

Actually even this can be twisted into a false self centered merited gospel.

One who has faith will work. If we trust God in our condemnation part. we trust him in why we are condemned. Out of this trust comes obedience. Where we get into trouble is where we say obedience is essential to salvation, which it is not. In any moment of any day while we are alive no matter how good we THINK we are. we are still deserving of eternal condemnation based on our thoughts, our actions and our deeds (which are not perfect) Those with true faith understand this, and it helps them move forward.

As for obedience not being a good deed. This is not true.

Paul tells us in romans Abraham was not found by his good deeds, but by faiht in Christ.
Paul tells all of us in his letter to titus that it was not by deeds of righteousness which we have done, But by the washing and rebirth of the spirit.

The law would include ALL or PART of any aspect of regulations or commands given by God to any people at any time.

Thou shalt not murder, lie or steel is the law. if we are tying to be saved by not doing these. we are trying to be saved by law.

Loving the Lord your God with all your might (and anything that comes from this) is part of the law. If we do anything out of this to try to be saved, we are using the law to save ourselves.

there is no inbetween, it is either grace, or works. it can not be both.
Sorry man, I am not going to continually pointlessly keep feeding your desire to argue with me. I have said all I can say to you.

There is no point you can make until you clear up your contradictions. IF you are not willing to do that, every time we talk it is going to lead right back to them.

Nothing personal, I just feel you are not satisfied with your answers to me, so you keep coming back wanting to argue just like I said you would, when you said "I am done with you!!!" for the 100th time, on every other thread we speak to each other.

If you want to discuss, then go back to the other thread and clear those up. We cant move forward with those contradictions, because they are making every point you make invalid, because you base them off of contradictions you refuse to see, or admit is there.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#14
Sorry man, I am not going to continually pointlessly keep feeding your desire to argue with me. I have said all I can say to you.


1. This is an open chat. You placed an open discussion in this open chat. If you think I am going to sit still and not respond. think again.

2. If you do not want to talk with me thats fine, but if you think I am going to let you speak your false teaching without ocnfronting you on the issue, your sadly mistaken.


There is no point you can make until you clear up your contradictions. IF you are not willing to do that, every time we talk it is going to lead right back to them.


There are no contradictions. Only in your misinterpreting what I say and twisting them out of context. Just like you do Gods word. As long as your not going to listen to what people say, And think your the almighty one who has everything right, and anyone who does not agree with you is contradicting themselves. you will always see contradiction in what everyone says.

Nothing personal, I just feel you are not satisfied with your answers to me, so you keep coming back wanting to argue just like I said you would, when you said "I am done with you!!!" for the 100th time, on every other thread we speak to each other.

If you want to discuss, then go back to the other thread and clear those up. We cant move forward with those contradictions, because they are making every point you make invalid, because you base them off of contradictions you refuse to see, or admit is there.
lol. You think your so smart don't you? Don't think so highly of yourself. If you speak falsy in here, i will respond. I do not chose favorites of who I speak to. I speak to everyone., including you. If you think your attacking me is going to make you look good in front of people, instead of answering what I posted (which you have a habit of doing) then you are in trouble. the only people that will like it are those who are in your camp. I am not here to convince you, I gave up on that along time agao. I am here to show people who moight read what you post a different perspective. If you don;t like it. TO BAD!
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#15
See look, you cant even speak with me about not speaking with me, without getting personal. Glad I ended this before it began. Feel free to respond to anythign you want, I was just trying to tell you why I am not going to debate this issue with you.

Everything you say, I will just post your contradictions in reply until you clear them up.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#16
See look, you cant even speak with me about not speaking with me, without getting personal. Glad I ended this before it began. Feel free to respond to anythign you want, I was just trying to tell you why I am not going to debate this issue with you.

Everything you say, I will just post your contradictions in reply until you clear them up.


well for those interested, i think we can see his true self.

1. he did not respond to what I said, but instead attacked me.

2. i responded in kind. yet get attacked again.

3. I guess it is ok for him to say whever he wants, and anyone but me is aloud to respond to the ocntent of what he said, whether it is him or not. i did not know Christian chat was biased against people wanting to discuss things, maybe I am wrong??

I must scare this guy for some reason, because he never wants to discuss anything, but always wants to go to the past in where he thinks he somehow exposed me or something..

take from what he said as you will. as i always say, silence speaks loudly!
 
F

feedm3

Guest
#17
well for those interested, i think we can see his true self.

1. he did not respond to what I said, but instead attacked me.

2. i responded in kind. yet get attacked again.

3. I guess it is ok for him to say whever he wants, and anyone but me is aloud to respond to the ocntent of what he said, whether it is him or not. i did not know Christian chat was biased against people wanting to discuss things, maybe I am wrong??

I must scare this guy for some reason, because he never wants to discuss anything, but always wants to go to the past in where he thinks he somehow exposed me or something..

take from what he said as you will. as i always say, silence speaks loudly!
Little over dramatic there man.

Here congrats:

 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#18
There is a stumbling block called pride. Pride can keep the law just by willing their flesh to do so. Pride says this is not difficult at all. Pride says the rest of you are weak.

Pride knows this by its own intellect and philosophy and strength. To come against this is to attack pride directly. How the Lord is able to overcome this in a believers life is a miracle beyond comprehension.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#19
There is a stumbling block called pride. Pride can keep the law just by willing their flesh to do so. Pride says this is not difficult at all. Pride says the rest of you are weak.

Pride knows this by its own intellect and philosophy and strength. To come against this is to attack pride directly. How the Lord is able to overcome this in a believers life is a miracle beyond comprehension.
takes us back to cain and abel. abel out of faith did what God asked because he trusted him, Cain, who did not trust God, and only wanted to do something which puffed himself up. Rejected God, and his work was rejected By God. Pride is what did not allow Cain to see the error of his way, And also what caused him to lash out at his brother, Who did nothing but Trust God.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,190
113
#20
takes us back to cain and abel. abel out of faith did what God asked because he trusted him, Cain, who did not trust God, and only wanted to do something which puffed himself up. Rejected God, and his work was rejected By God. Pride is what did not allow Cain to see the error of his way, And also what caused him to lash out at his brother, Who did nothing but Trust God.
The flesh strives against the spirit since the beginning of time.

There is no striving in His Presence. This is the fear of the Lord.