M
While I Do concur with a DoubleWOW... regarding your rejection of progressive's theology. I am going to have to question yours. Meggars, I don't know what the definition of "quiverful movement" is but the fact of the matter is God doesn't change, he is the same, yesterday, today and tomorrow... so in "clearing the table" of biblical principals on the basis that they are antiquated and have no bearing in modern times is ... FALSE. That particular reasoning and conclusion negates the omniscience of God... who knows the beginning to the end. I am sorry... but your understanding is poor if you can not percieve that God made provision for our social conduct for ALL TIME, thus there must be significance for OT laws and teaching. The entire content of scripture is beautifully woven together and harmonizes perfectly throughout. If approaching a particular subject you find a conflict... it is yours... not God's. I truly believe such conflicts arise to cause us to question and study and pursue understanding. So again, While i agree that the "father/rule principal has been overstated and warped in this thread. Simply dismissing the principal based on OT/antiquity is an error... God is not a man that he should lie... so it is our job to find out WHY we percieve a conflict and resolve it through study... not by dismissal.