Does god exsist

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Depleted

Guest
#21
"Exist" is not spelled as "exsist",in a hurry weren't you?
Well, if we're going to go all technical on this, lets take it full tilt.

"No the proof lays in the very begining of the alleged bible."

1. There should be a period after "No," and then a capital T in "The."
2. "Begining" should be "beginning."
3. Nothing alleged about the Bible. It really exists, and it is neither a person nor an incident being signified. It's a thing.
4. Capital B on Bible, since we're naming a book by its title.
5. Proof doesn't lay anywhere, even in the beginning. It can neither recline nor be placed somewhere.
6. Nothing was proven in this sentence.
7. This sentences said nothing and meant nothing.

All in all, if I were grading the post, I'd give it a G. Sure, most would go for F as in "failure," but most people who fail get something right on the test. This didn't even get a complete sentence right, and it wasn't that long a sentence.

You know. Just if we were going to go all technical on it.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#23
This is his "introduction" video:

[video=vimeo;57141205]https://vimeo.com/57141205[/video]
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,247
25,716
113
#24
God revealed Himself to me while I was still living in rebellion against Him, running from the Truth of Scripture, in defiance against His authority. I believed there was some Spiritual reality behind the physical world we see, but as far as the traditional/conventional God, in my view, that was not it. I spent years seeking something else, some other Truth, even after He first revealed His love and forgiveness offered through the cross of Christ and His shed righteous blood. The promise stands to those who will diligently seek, that they will find. Opening your mind is not the solution, for it is a heart problem to those who stand against the Living Word of God. The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. I pray for those whose hearts are closed to the One True God that they give pause to their rebellion and deeply ponder the meaning of life, for there can be none in a world without God, and He invites you to reason with Him, and forsake your worldly ways.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,261
2,386
113
#25
No the proof lays in the very begining of the alleged bible


A vague proposition isn't a proof.

A vague proposition isn't an argument.

A vague isn't even a good proposition.




If you want to debate, you'll have to do a lot better than this.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,247
25,716
113
#26
A vague proposition isn't a proof.

A vague proposition isn't an argument.

A vague isn't even a good proposition.

If you want to debate, you'll have to do a lot better than this.
One thing I learned during years of speaking with atheists and agnostics and secular humanists, is that they like to believe they are more rational and logical and smarter than any who professes to believe in God. It was certainly ironic that they would vaunt themselves in such a way when one of their major complaints against Christians was that they believed we behave as if we are superior, although Christians are the ones who humble themselves to admit their sins before an almighty God, while they would largely refuse to acknowledge any wrong-doing regardless of how flagrant their habitual abuse of Christians was.

Perhaps this OP was simply having a little fun after too much to drink on a Saturday night? He may not even remember today that he created an account here, and agreed to terms and conditions that he broke right away.
 

Silverwings

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2016
1,368
495
83
#27
Take a look at this video:

[video=youtube;sIBFm8FFkRw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIBFm8FFkRw[/video]
 
J

joefizz

Guest
#28
Well, if we're going to go all technical on this, lets take it full tilt.

"No the proof lays in the very begining of the alleged bible."

1. There should be a period after "No," and then a capital T in "The."
2. "Begining" should be "beginning."
3. Nothing alleged about the Bible. It really exists, and it is neither a person nor an incident being signified. It's a thing.
4. Capital B on Bible, since we're naming a book by its title.
5. Proof doesn't lay anywhere, even in the beginning. It can neither recline nor be placed somewhere.
6. Nothing was proven in this sentence.
7. This sentences said nothing and meant nothing.

All in all, if I were grading the post, I'd give it a G. Sure, most would go for F as in "failure," but most people who fail get something right on the test. This didn't even get a complete sentence right, and it wasn't that long a sentence.

You know. Just if we were going to go all technical on it.
Couldn't resist could you?
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,261
2,386
113
#29
One thing I learned during years of speaking with atheists and agnostics and secular humanists, is that they like to believe they are more rational and logical and smarter than any who professes to believe in God. It was certainly ironic that they would vaunt themselves in such a way when one of their major complaints against Christians was that they believed we behave as if we are superior, although Christians are the ones who humble themselves to admit their sins before an almighty God, while they would largely refuse to acknowledge any wrong-doing regardless of how flagrant their habitual abuse of Christians was.

Perhaps this OP was simply having a little fun after too much to drink on a Saturday night? He may not even remember today that he created an account here, and agreed to terms and conditions that he broke right away.

I agree with all of this.

The atheists do not have the more rational arguments.

And as far as the OP goes... people often just come in here to blow off steam.
It happens.

: )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.