Does truth exist without evidence?
- Thread starter Socreta93
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I do not understand what you are attempting to convey here. Truth exists, and there is evidence for Truth existing. That people are blind (or deaf, as with the tree falling in the forest scenario 
) to the evidence does not in any way negate the fact that Truth exists, and there is evidence for it.
Also, since we are on a Christian site, with someone asking if Truth exists without evidence of that Truth's existence, I feel a need now to point to Romans one, not to spoil anybody's fun, but just as a reminder, that God has made evident His existence to all, and those who deny Him, do so willfully.
) to the evidence does not in any way negate the fact that Truth exists, and there is evidence for it. Also, since we are on a Christian site, with someone asking if Truth exists without evidence of that Truth's existence, I feel a need now to point to Romans one, not to spoil anybody's fun, but just as a reminder, that God has made evident His existence to all, and those who deny Him, do so willfully.
ALL 66 BOOKS OF THE BIBLE ARE TRUE... SO YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ONLY AND IDIOT DOES NOT BELIEVE THE BIBLE IS 100% SO THERE FOR EVIDENCE HAS JUST NOT BEEN DISCOVERED YET..... THE EVIDENCE HAS TO BE QUESTIONED! IT CAN REALLY GET GET COMPLICATED....
Last edited:
Sound is a concept created by brain activity (thoughts). Without a thought to create the concept of sound, sound will not exist to the observer. Sound or sound-waves is nothing more than compressions of air molecules. Some compressions are inaudible to the human ear, and even by instrumentation, yet the compressions must exist as part of the continuum spectrum. Just because it cannot be measured (evidence) does not mean that the compressions do not exist.
The truths we have direct evidence about largely pertain to the so-called visible world. However, there is more truths in the so-called invisible world, which we cannot gather evidence about unless we, and measuring instruments, also become invisible. The reason being is that the invisible (the finer realms) contain all the visible (denser realms). Where the visible cannot contain all that is invisible. In other words, the visible universe exists within a much larger invisible universe (so-to speak).
As I said, far more truths exist in the invisible than anything we can have evidence about in the visible.
The truths we have direct evidence about largely pertain to the so-called visible world. However, there is more truths in the so-called invisible world, which we cannot gather evidence about unless we, and measuring instruments, also become invisible. The reason being is that the invisible (the finer realms) contain all the visible (denser realms). Where the visible cannot contain all that is invisible. In other words, the visible universe exists within a much larger invisible universe (so-to speak).
As I said, far more truths exist in the invisible than anything we can have evidence about in the visible.
I do not understand what you are attempting to convey here. Truth exists, and there is evidence for Truth existing. That people are blind (or deaf, as with the tree falling in the forest scenario ) to the evidence does not in any way negate the fact that Truth exists, and there is evidence for it.
Also, since we are on a Christian site, with someone asking if Truth exists without evidence of that Truth's existence, I feel a need now to point to Romans one, not to spoil anybody's fun, but just as a reminder, that God has made evident His existence to all, and those who deny Him, do so willfully.
) to the evidence does not in any way negate the fact that Truth exists, and there is evidence for it. Also, since we are on a Christian site, with someone asking if Truth exists without evidence of that Truth's existence, I feel a need now to point to Romans one, not to spoil anybody's fun, but just as a reminder, that God has made evident His existence to all, and those who deny Him, do so willfully.
That has not really been clarified, though I have addressed both I am reminded of the atheists, agnostics, secular humanists etc with whom I conversed for many years before I arrived here, those who would claim there was no evidence for the existence of God. I cannot count how many times I informed them that denying evidence does not equate to there being no evidence [SUB][/SUB]
I am reminded of the atheists, agnostics, secular humanists etc with whom I conversed for many years before I arrived here, those who would claim there was no evidence for the existence of God. I cannot count how many times I informed them that denying evidence does not equate to there being no evidence [SUB][/SUB]I have seen more that the non-believer will say there is no evidence for God's existence, as opposed to saying there is evidence that God does not exist. The latter seems a logically fallacious assertion, along the lines of not being able to prove a negative I remember one guy, he seemed really reasonable and was always logical to a fault until it came to the point of what was to be considered acceptable as evidence. Then he would say such things as, since we have not examined ALL the evidence against, there was no way we could come to a faultless conclusion in favor FOR. So it became apparent that he was blind to his own failure to examine all the evidence in favor for, and his coming to the conclusion that God did NOT exist therefore clashed with his own belief that ALL the evidence must be taken into consideration before one can make such an assessment.
And yet that is not the Scriptural way, either, though God does say, "Come. let us reason together."
Yes, it is in the eye of the beholder, and it is to those who seek that the promise has been made, that they shall find Then they would ask me, why would they go looking for something they did not believe to exist in the first place? LOL. However, I believe people do search for truth, and Jesus Christ is the embodiment of Truth. God reveals Himself to those who seek diligently
I remember one guy, he seemed really reasonable and was always logical to a fault until it came to the point of what was to be considered acceptable as evidence. Then he would say such things as, since we have not examined ALL the evidence against, there was no way we could come to a faultless conclusion in favor FOR. So it became apparent that he was blind to his own failure to examine all the evidence in favor for, and his coming to the conclusion that God did NOT exist therefore clashed with his own belief that ALL the evidence must be taken into consideration before one can make such an assessment. And yet that is not the Scriptural way, either, though God does say, "Come. let us reason together."
Yes, it is in the eye of the beholder, and it is to those who seek that the promise has been made, that they shall find
Then they would ask me, why would they go looking for something they did not believe to exist in the first place? LOL. However, I believe people do search for truth, and Jesus Christ is the embodiment of Truth. God reveals Himself to those who seek diligently