Page 94 of 94 FirstFirst ... 4484929394
Results 1,861 to 1,863 of 1863
Like Tree527Likes

Miscellaneous

Random topics from random people!

Thread: Science Disproves Evolution

  1. #1861
    Senior Member Pahu's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 5th, 2011
    Age
    88
    Posts
    670
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Ape-Men? 5


    Another study, which examined their inner ear bones, used to maintain balance, showed a striking similarity to those of chimpanzees and gorillas, but great differences from those of humans (p). Also, their pattern of dental development corresponds to chimpanzees, not humans (q). Claims were made—based on one partially complete australopithecine fossil, Australopithecus afarensis, (a 3.5-foot-tall, long-armed, 60-pound adult called Lucy)—that all australopithecines walked upright in a human manner. However, studies of Lucy’s entire anatomy, not just a knee joint, now show that this is very unlikely. She likely swung from the trees (r) and was similar to pygmy chimpanzees (s). In 2006, a partial Australopithecus afarensis specimen—a 3-year-old baby—with clear apelike features—was announced (t). The australopithecines are probably extinct apes (u).

    p. “Among the fossil hominids, the australopithecines show great-ape-like proportions [based on CAT scans of their inner ears] and H. erectus shows modern-human-like proportions.”Fred Spoor et al., “Implications of Early Hominid Labyrinthine Morphology for Evolution of Human Bipedal Locomotion,” Nature, Vol. 369, 23 June 1994, p. 646. [Many H. erectus bones are probably those of H. sapiens.]

    q. “The closest parallel today to the pattern of dental development of [australopithecines] is not in people but in chimpanzees.”Bruce Bower, “Evolution’s Youth Movement,” Science News, Vol. 159, 2 June 2001, p. 347.

    r. William L. Jungers, “Lucy’s Limbs: Skeletal Allometry and Locomotion in Australopithecus Afarensis,” Nature, Vol. 297,24 June 1982, pp. 676–678.

    Jeremy Cherfas, “Trees Have Made Man Upright,” New Scientist, Vol. 93,20 January 1983, pp. 172–178.

    Jack T. Stern Jr. and Randall L. Susman, “The Locomotor Anatomy of Australopithecus Afarensis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 60,March 1983, pp. 279–317.

    s. Adrienne Zihlman, “Pigmy Chimps, People, and the Pundits,” New Scientist, Vol. 104, 15 November 1984, pp. 39–40.

    t. Zeresenay Alemseged et al., “A Juvenile Early Hominin Skeleton from Dikika, Ethiopia,” Nature,Vol. 443, 21 September 2006, pp. 296–301.

    u. “At present we have no grounds for thinking that there was anything distinctively human about australopithecine ecology and behavior. … [T]hey were surprisingly apelike in skull form, premolar dentition, limb proportions, and morphology of some joint surfaces, and they may still have been spending a significant amount of time in the trees.” Matt Cartmill et al., “One Hundred Years of Paleoanthropology,”American Scientist, Vol. 74, July–August 1986, p. 417.

    “The proportions calculated for africanus turned out to be amazingly close to those of a chimpanzee, with big arms and small legs. ... ‘One might say we are kicking Lucy out of the family tree,’ says Berger.” James Shreeve, “New Skeleton Gives Path from Trees to Ground an Odd Turn,” Science, Vol. 272,3 May 1996, p. 654.

    “There is indeed, no question which the Australopithecine skull resembles when placed side by side with specimens of human and living ape skulls. It is the ape—so much so that only detailed and close scrutiny can reveal any differences between them.”Solly Zuckerman, “Correlation of Change in the Evolution of Higher Primates,” Evolution as a Process,editors Julian Huxley, A. C. Hardy, and E. B. Ford (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1954), p. 307.

    “We can safely conclude from the fossil hominoid material now available that in the history of the globe there have been many more species of great ape than just the three which exist today.” Ibid., pp. 348–349.

    [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/LifeSciences30.html#wp3179991]
    Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

  2. #1862
    Senior Member Pahu's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 5th, 2011
    Age
    88
    Posts
    670
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Ape-Men? 6

    For about 100 years the world was led to believe that Neanderthal man was stooped and apelike. This false idea was based upon some Neanderthals with bone diseases such as arthritis and rickets (v). Recent dental and x-ray studies of Neanderthals suggest that they were humans who matured at a slower rate and lived to be much older than people today (w). Neanderthal man, Heidelberg man, and Cro-Magnon man are now considered completely human. Artists’ drawings of “ape-men,” especially their fleshy portions, are often quite imaginative and are not supported by the evidence (x).

    Furthermore, the techniques used to date these fossils are highly questionable. [In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - Techniques That Argue for an Old Earth Are Either Illogical or Based on Unreasonable Assumptions.]

    v. Francis Ivanhoe, “Was Virchow Right About Neanderthal?” Nature, Vol. 227, 8 August 1970, pp. 577–578.

    William L. Straus Jr. and A. J. E. Cave, “Pathology and the Posture of Neanderthal Man,” The Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 32,December, 1957, pp. 348–363.

    Bruce M. Rothschild and Pierre L. Thillaud, “Oldest Bone Disease,” Nature, Vol. 349,24 January 1991, p. 288.

    w. Jack Cuozzo, Buried Alive: The Startling Truth about Neanderthal Man (Green Forest, Arkansas: Master Books, 1998).

    Jack Cuozzo, “Early Orthodontic Intervention: A View from Prehistory,” The Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association, Vol. 58, No. 4,Autumn 1987, pp. 33–40.

    x. Boyce Rensberger, “Facing the Past,” Science 81,October 1981, p. 49.

    [COLOR=#000000][FONT=&quot][[url=http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes25.html#wp1066250]]In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 26.
    Last edited by Pahu; 6 Days Ago at 11:21 AM.
    Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

  3. #1863
    Senior Member Pahu's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 5th, 2011
    Age
    88
    Posts
    670
    Rep Power
    8

    Default Re: Science Disproves Evolution

    Fossil Man
    Bones of modern-looking humans have been found deep in undisturbed rocks that, according to evolution, were formed long before man began to evolve. Examples include the Castenedolo skeletons (a), Reck’s skeleton (b), and possibly others (c). Remains such as the Swanscombe skull, the Steinheim fossil, and the Vertesszöllos fossil present similar problems (d). Evolutionists almost always ignore these remains.

    a. Bowden, pp. 78–79.

    Frank W. Cousins, Fossil Man (Imsworth, England: A. E. Norris & Sons Ltd., 1971), pp. 50–52, 82, 83.

    Sir Arthur Keith correctly stated the dilemma evolutionists face with the Castenedolo skeletons.

    As the student of prehistoric man reads and studies the records of the “Castenedolo” find, a feeling of incredulity rises within him. He cannot reject the discovery as false without doing an injury to his sense of truth, and he cannot accept it as a fact without shattering his accepted beliefs.Arthur Keith, The Antiquity of Man (London: Williams and Norgate, Ltd., 1925), p. 334.

    However, after examining the strata above and below the Castenedolo skeletons, and after finding no indication that they were intrusively buried, Keith surprisingly concluded that the enigma must be resolved by an intrusive burial. He justified this by citing the un-fossilized condition of the bones. However, these bones were encased in a clay layer. Clay would prevent water from transporting large amounts of dissolved minerals into the bone cells and explain the lack of fossilization. Again, fossilization depends much more on chemistry than age.

    b. Bowden, pp. 183-193

    c. Ibid., 78–79.

    J. D. Whitney, “The Auriferous Gravels of the Sierra Nevada of California,” Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard College, Vol. 6, 1880, pp. 258–288.

    Bowden, pp. 76–78.

    Cousins, pp. 50–52, 82, 83.

    W. H. B., “Alleged Discovery of An Ancient Human Skull in California,” American Journal of Science, Vol. 2, 1866, p. 424.

    Edward C. Lain and Robert E. Gentet, “The Case for the Calaveras Skull,” Creation Research Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, March 1997, pp. 248–256.

    Cousins and Whitney state that the Calaveras was fossilized. This does not mean that it was pre-flood. Fossilization depends on chemistry much more than time.

    For many years, a story circulated that the Calaveras skull, buried 130 feet below ground, was a practical joke. This tidy explanation conveniently overlooks hundreds of human bones and artifacts (such as spearheads, mortars and pestles, and dozens of bowls made of stone) found in that part of California. These artifacts have been found over the years under undisturbed strata and a layer of basaltic lava that evolutionists would date at 25 million years old—too old to be human. See, for example:

    Whitney, pp. 262–264, 266, 274–276.

    G. Frederick Wright, Man and the Glacial Period (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1897), pp. 294–301.

    George F. Becker, “Antiquities from under Tuolumne Table Mountain in California,” Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, Vol. 2, 20 February 1891, pp. 189–200.

    d. Fix, pp. 98–105.

    J. B. Birdsell, Human Evolution (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1972), pp. 316–318.

    [COLOR=#000000][FONT=&quot][[url=http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes25.html#wp1066250]]In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 26.
    Last edited by Pahu; 1 Day Ago at 03:43 PM.
    Truth Frees! Evolution is evidence free speculation masquerading as science.

Page 94 of 94 FirstFirst ... 4484929394

Similar Threads

  1. The Great Lie and Fallacy of Evolution
    By DABEARS85 in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: July 12th, 2013, 08:45 PM
  2. Man Science is not Science at All
    By Ramon in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: July 12th, 2013, 06:34 AM
  3. Science Disproves Evolution
    By Pahu in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: April 26th, 2013, 05:53 PM
  4. evolutionist sister and my 2 yr old neice - conflict. any words?
    By Rissa77 in forum Christian Family Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: April 11th, 2011, 06:36 PM
  5. CREATION vs EVOLUTION: Faith vs Science
    By Knightjester in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: January 17th, 2010, 07:06 AM