ISP already at work - Netflix, Putlocker, etc . . .

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Oct 18, 2011
41
0
0
#1
Yup, it's already at work. Sites like Netflix, Putlocker, already are experiencing slow down at peak hours since Net Neutrality came down. I have a 15/5 download/upload, running on FioS Verizon. Never had an issue with Putlocker, not ever. Fastest it could be, until that very next day after Net Neutrality came down, I am experiencing bandwidth issues. Slow connection, and I would have to leave the computer for it to load at a speed that's about as slow as loading a website attracted to ads, adware, and flash video playing on the side bar. This is just awful. What can we do?
 
S

ServantStrike

Guest
#2
It's not net neutrality, it's peering.

ISP's have to pay to increase the bandwidth to other ISP's. They push that off as much as they can, and as a result, you end up with slow peering. Peering is expensive, as is bandwidth.

Net neutrality is a whole other, much more serious problem. But what specific thing happened that makes you think this has to do with creeping policy change?
 
Oct 18, 2011
41
0
0
#3
It's not net neutrality, it's peering.

ISP's have to pay to increase the bandwidth to other ISP's. They push that off as much as they can, and as a result, you end up with slow peering. Peering is expensive, as is bandwidth.

Net neutrality is a whole other, much more serious problem. But what specific thing happened that makes you think this has to do with creeping policy change?
Why isn't it Net Neutrality?
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#4
So people want the Internet to be this wild west where the government doesn't step in.
In order to achieve that, people are now asking the government to step in and tell privately owned ISPs what they can and can't do with their own equipment.

Can someone please tell me how this is not a contradiction?:p
 
Oct 18, 2011
41
0
0
#5
So people want the Internet to be this wild west where the government doesn't step in.
In order to achieve that, people are now asking the government to step in and tell privately owned ISPs what they can and can't do with their own equipment.

Can someone please tell me how this is not a contradiction?:p
No, we want Rights, not favoritism. Favoritism on the base of ISP to what they deem is okay, not okay. Imagine you living in a village where cannibalism was the ideal tradition to seeking revenge. All must participate only because they live within that village, and the villager has no where to go because he lacks money, a car, and moving isn't just possible. You have no choice in the matter, because the tradition is required by the village, but not certainly law, just require or you are prohibited the right of having access to storage of food and luxury that can or doesn't have to be a necessity, but can definitely change your life. But to partake within this blessing, you have to partake within what the village has deem necessary because they own the village. This isn't free choice, this controlling the outcome of a situation, because it is in their power to do so. It is much a like, Media, where it is biased, and controlled to favor or to in a sense, "change the thought" of a person, by false or manipulating what you hear and see, and displaying half-truths.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#6
That made no sense at all
 
Oct 18, 2011
41
0
0
#7
That made no sense at all
You have the power of free speech. But to stand on my property, you have to pay me the amount for how long you plan to stay there. Just because I really don't want you there, and I don't want to infringe your right. What I can do is, I'll raise the price to $500.00 an hour, just to stand there. See how long your free of speech last. Make sense now?
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#8
You have the power of free speech. But to stand on my property, you have to pay me the amount for how long you plan to stay there. Just because I really don't want you there, and I don't want to infringe your right. What I can do is, I'll raise the price to $500.00 an hour, just to stand there. See how long your free of speech last. Make sense now?
Except that its your property and at that point what you are doing is completely legal. Not to mention a lot of people forget the main goal of the first amendment was to protect the citizens from the government. It had nothing to do with 3rd parties like ISP's.