water baptism in Jesus' Name.

How am I leading people to hell? By exhorting them to be baptized?

That will save them.

But by removing the motivation for being baptized, you are helping people to excuse themselves from receiving the ordinance that would save them, and thus you are leading them to hell, whether you have been baptized or not. God will hold you accountable for that. Don't think that you will get off scott-free with your error.

That is something that has been said over the years but I don't think that there is any evidence to back it up. I think that even the dead sea scrolls had chapter divisions.

I gave you a bunch of scriptures, nothing else. And you said that they devalued the blood of Jesus.

Shame on you.

I believe in Jesus with all of my heart.

In being baptized, I identified with Him in His death, burial, and resurrection; and thus I confessed Him before men.

Jesus Himself said that such a thing is salvational, in Matthew 10:32 and in Luke 12:8.

Because the Bible speaks of people speaking in tongues unknown to them in Acts 2. And also, in 1 Corinthians 13, the tongues of angels, are spoken of. So, you may not think it is even a language; but it may be the tongues of angels.

No...the Bible says that they "believed for a while" (Luke 8:13).

That is only true if you are not one of the elect.

See Acts 10:43, which has been used of your "team" to say that we are saved by believing alone apart from baptism.

If salvation cannot be lost, then those who "believed and then fall away" (Luke 8:13) were never saved in the first place...and therefore they never had remission of sins. Yet Acts 10:43 says,

Act 10:43, To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.

Since they did believe, they also had remission of sins.

Therefore, the fact that they had remission of sins and then "fell away" means that once had remission of sins but then lost that benefit.

It can be said that they were saved in that they had forgiveness (temporarily); but that they were not saved in that they were not of the elect.

2Ti 3:16, All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
2Ti 3:17, That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.

So, what of faulty translations, that teach such things as Universalism? Their doctrine can be shown to be flawed by comparing them to the kjv which trumps every other version any time there is a discrepancy.

I drink poison into my body once every three weeks and it does not kill me. i take an injection for an illness (which shall remain unnamed) which is in fact poison.

I'm willing to learn from you. Which verb in John 3 is in the aorist tense? And, what exactly is the aorist tense?

Lol...my God certainly isn't "iffy".

He has given me promises that are more absolute than that of John 3:16.

No, obviously not.

They have attempted to strip away from the unbeliever the reason that he may have for being baptized.

He may think that he has to be "saved" first.

Thus he will not receive baptism in Jesus' Name which, if he received, would in fact save him.

Then why did you say that His promises were sometimes "iffy"? If you think that the promise in John 3 is iffy... you're not talking about the Jesus that I know. j/s...

It is an absolute promise for those who meet the condition.

As I said before, I believe that the 66 books in the Bible correspond to the 66 chapters in Isaiah.

So, either Judith and Tobit don't belong in the canon, or else you would have to take out two other books.

I believe that 1 Corinthians 14:34 and 1 Timothy 2:11 are for today.

Matthew 5:37 speaks of integrity.

Matthew 5:30 is hyperbole...exaggeration to make a point.

False teaching, also given by a female.

1Ti 2:11, Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1Ti 2:12, But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1Ti 2:13, For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1Ti 2:14, And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

Sorry, I meant 3:20-21.

Same context as all of John 3. Period.

The thing that I said was taught by pastor Chuck was, not everything that I teach; but specifically the doctrine of the Holy Spirit as being with, in, and upon. That is a basic teaching of the Calvary Chapel Movement. Ask your Bible Study teacher.

And it hurts my feelings that you keep calling me a heretic, even though it means that I am in good company with Paul (Acts 24:14 (kjv)).