-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
U
Well, she stated that 'you guys', as in collectively, the multitude of answers were attacking.
Also she did not quote the section you are saying may have been the problem.
And what i said in your quote is true. When asked what he meant, he responded with repeating the same things over and over. Is it really an attack to point out that he is not helping himself by stating the same thing repeatedly? Or is it pointing out that he is not helping by saying the same thing?
Also she did not quote the section you are saying may have been the problem.
And what i said in your quote is true. When asked what he meant, he responded with repeating the same things over and over. Is it really an attack to point out that he is not helping himself by stating the same thing repeatedly? Or is it pointing out that he is not helping by saying the same thing?
Yeah, it's me, you slid off my list somehow..
U
First you say 'he PROBABLY understands english very well'.
Next you say 'if he BARELY understands english'.
What you never did say is how my stating his repeating isn't helpful is an attack. So far we know you can contradict yourself, but we don't know that you can answer questions directed at you.
If you're going to change directions from one post to the next, then clearly you have no valid argument and are simply just arguing to be a jerk. So i'm done with you.
Next you say 'if he BARELY understands english'.
What you never did say is how my stating his repeating isn't helpful is an attack. So far we know you can contradict yourself, but we don't know that you can answer questions directed at you.
If you're going to change directions from one post to the next, then clearly you have no valid argument and are simply just arguing to be a jerk. So i'm done with you.
K
I thought he was talking to someone else.Maybe he was talking to you.lol Who's on first?
If he barely understands English, then maybe he's doing the best he can do.
First you say 'he PROBABLY understands english very well'.
Next you say 'if he BARELY understands english'.
What you never did say is how my stating his repeating isn't helpful is an attack. So far we know you can contradict yourself, but we don't know that you can answer questions directed at you.
If you're going to change directions from one post to the next, then clearly you have no valid argument and are simply just arguing to be a jerk. So i'm done with you.
I thought he was talking to someone else.Maybe he was talking to you.lol Who's on first?
Originally Posted by resurrection33
If he barely understands English, then maybe he's doing the best he can do.
First you say 'he PROBABLY understands english very well'.
Next you say 'if he BARELY understands english'.
What you never did say is how my stating his repeating isn't helpful is an attack. So far we know you can contradict yourself, but we don't know that you can answer questions directed at you.
If you're going to change directions from one post to the next, then clearly you have no valid argument and are simply just arguing to be a jerk. So i'm done with you.
If he barely understands English, then maybe he's doing the best he can do.
First you say 'he PROBABLY understands english very well'.
Next you say 'if he BARELY understands english'.
What you never did say is how my stating his repeating isn't helpful is an attack. So far we know you can contradict yourself, but we don't know that you can answer questions directed at you.
If you're going to change directions from one post to the next, then clearly you have no valid argument and are simply just arguing to be a jerk. So i'm done with you.
