V
Fierce backlash against the liberal who trashed the PC police
Eleven years ago, Jonathan Chait wrote the following:
“I hate President George W. Bush. There, I said it. I think his policies rank him among the worst presidents in U.S. history…I suspect that, if I got to know him personally, I would hate him even more.”
Having interviewed Chait at the time, when he worked for the New Republic, I can attest that he is indeed a staunchly liberal writer. And earlier this month he wrote a story titled “Why History Will Be Kind to Obama.”
Which is why Chait is making waves by beating up on his own side. The Twitterverse is exploding, and some women are denouncing him, over his New York magazine piece, “How the Language Police Are Perverting Liberalism.”
Eleven years ago, Jonathan Chait wrote the following:
“I hate President George W. Bush. There, I said it. I think his policies rank him among the worst presidents in U.S. history…I suspect that, if I got to know him personally, I would hate him even more.”
Having interviewed Chait at the time, when he worked for the New Republic, I can attest that he is indeed a staunchly liberal writer. And earlier this month he wrote a story titled “Why History Will Be Kind to Obama.”
Which is why Chait is making waves by beating up on his own side. The Twitterverse is exploding, and some women are denouncing him, over his New York magazine piece, “How the Language Police Are Perverting Liberalism.”
The social media outlets and the so-called MSM cable and over-the-air outlets love the discord, the division, the anger sociopolitical debates generate. Why? For the websites, it creates traffic. For the cable and over-the-air outlets, it generates viewership. The issues being discussed don't matter to them as much as does the fact people are paying attention to them, visiting their websites, tuning them in.
Our national debate is being driven by sellers of soap and software solely for the purpose of selling the products. And we let them. How stupid does that make us?