Smithsonian Wont Budge

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#1
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#2
Saw this on Fox News last night. The arrogance of the museum is amazing.

“Margaret Sanger is included in the museum’s collection, not in tribute to all her beliefs, many of which are now controversial, but because of her leading role in early efforts to distribute information about birth control and medical information to disadvantaged women, as well as her later roles associated with developing modern methods of contraception and in founding Planned Parenthood of America."

Here Nazi ideology is "controversial" but not her founding of Planned Parenthood, I guess. That just means they didn't ask the right people.
 
Feb 1, 2015
1,198
15
0
#3
A lot of die-hard liberal head Federal agencies and Institution's, they are the army of the 'left'.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#4
The irony is that all those "disadvantaged women" they proudly cite her as having "provided birth control and medical information" to were the very same black women she wanted to sterilize, and in fact, the information she "provided" was nothing more than an excuse to get those women into the clinics, and led to those sterilizations! But that's not "controversial," right?

Bear in mind, too, the liberal media 35 years ago made a huge fuss about those sterilizations that affected the women, who at that time were coming to adulthood and could not get pregnant. But the media immediately dropped the story when they were reminded it was Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, who began those heinous programs.
 
Last edited:
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#5
The irony is that all those "disadvantaged women" they proudly cite her as having "provided birth control and medical information" to were the very same black women she wanted to sterilize, and in fact, the information she "provided" was nothing more than an excuse to get those women into the clinics, and led to those sterilizations! But that's not "controversial," right?

Bear in mind, too, the liberal media 35 years ago made a huge fuss about those sterilizations that affected the women, who at that time were coming to adulthood and could not get pregnant. But the media immediately dropped the story when they were reminded it was Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, who began those heinous programs.

Right,not like information isnt available about Sanger and her beliefs.You can read it in her own words,her book is online.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#6
They should remove the bust, but it does not surprise me that they don't considering the Smithsonian is behind promoting a lot of curious things.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
#7
Come on now people from government buildings is one thing, but wanting things removed from a museum is another all together.

Signs that symbolize racism should not be on government buildings, but museums should include all history.

Should we also take out all Egyptian artifacts as well because they enslaved the Jews ???
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#8
Come on now people from government buildings is one thing, but wanting things removed from a museum is another all together.

Signs that symbolize racism should not be on government buildings, but museums should include all history.

Should we also take out all Egyptian artifacts as well because they enslaved the Jews ???
This is where again I am down to do all that, but it does not surprise me such questionable institutions will not.
 
M

Mitspa

Guest
#9
Come on now people from government buildings is one thing, but wanting things removed from a museum is another all together.

Signs that symbolize racism should not be on government buildings, but museums should include all history.

Should we also take out all Egyptian artifacts as well because they enslaved the Jews ???
No doubt this lady is trying to be upheld as some example of justice in the in this statue thing...she was a monster and should be portrayed for what she is if they "must" have her in their museum? Her own words....

" she describes African-Americans and immigrants as “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” and “spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”
 

Angela53510

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2011
11,782
2,951
113
#10
Maybe if they combined her exhibit with the Hitler, Pol Pot and Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un exhibits it would be appropriate??
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#11
Maybe if they combined her exhibit with the Hitler, Pol Pot and Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un exhibits it would be appropriate??
Exactly! That is the point! She was evil,she does not deserve to have a place of honor.
 
K

KennethC

Guest
#12
No doubt this lady is trying to be upheld as some example of justice in the in this statue thing...she was a monster and should be portrayed for what she is if they "must" have her in their museum? Her own words....

" she describes African-Americans and immigrants as “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” and “spawning… human beings who never should have been born.”

Yes they should portray them truthfully in the museums, but to remove them is crazy as that is what museums are all about displaying history good and the bad.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#13
Come on now people from government buildings is one thing, but wanting things removed from a museum is another all together.

Signs that symbolize racism should not be on government buildings, but museums should include all history.

Should we also take out all Egyptian artifacts as well because they enslaved the Jews ???
The Egyptians are not being honored as part of the "Struggle for Justice." Sanger is being so honored. She was a Nazi, an ethnic bigot who advocated the sterilization of an entire generation of blacks and other minorities her Darwinistic worldview told her were "inferior" to the white majority. She wasn't an uneducated hick sheriff in rural Mississippi. She was a nurse and had a degree in education. She was an intellectual ultra-socialist bigot with a streak of hate a mile wide.

Yes, all history should be included in museums, but in their proper perspectives. Sanger should be vilified and publicly acknowledged for the monster she was, not remade as some kind of saint.

Displaying this racist in a "Struggle for Justice" exhibit, this woman who did horrible injustice to young black women and would have, if given the green light, exterminated entire future generations of minorities by killing their mothers' wombs, is the equivalent of displaying a bust of Adolf Hitler in a "Great Humanitarians" exhibit.

It is only the absolute hypocrisy of the feminist movement that allows these educated fools to pretend she was not essentially a murderer, definitely the kind of bigoted racist they would not tolerate, the moral equivalent of Josef Mengele.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,712
3,651
113
#14
Come on now people from government buildings is one thing, but wanting things removed from a museum is another all together.

Signs that symbolize racism should not be on government buildings, but museums should include all history.

Should we also take out all Egyptian artifacts as well because they enslaved the Jews ???
hmm, I wonder if Smithy has the Confederate flag on display?