When Did Angels Become Fairies in Dresses?

  • Thread starter progressivenerdgirl
  • Start date
  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

progressivenerdgirl

Guest
#21
Folklore aside, the depictions of angels being fat babies with harps are the ones that grate my cheese. Angels are NOT fat babies playing harps! ugh......
That's just paganism.
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#22
It's not even paganism, it's commercialism.
 
P

progressivenerdgirl

Guest
#23
It's not even paganism, it's commercialism.
No, I mean it literally is paganism. The fat cherubs are an old concept based on pagan deities.

As for whether it's 'commercialism', I have never heard a meaningful definition. I think anti-capitalism is mostly humanist nonsense.
 
Last edited:
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#24
No, I mean it literally is paganism. The fat cherubs are an old concept based on pagan deities.

As for whether it's 'commercialism', I have never heard a meaningful definition. I think anti-capitalism is mostly humanist nonsense.
Selling junk for the purpose of selling junk, for the most part. Basically a pure form of capitalism not girded by the law of God, where man's greed (as Milton Friedman said, guilt is good) runs a muck.
 
P

progressivenerdgirl

Guest
#25
Selling junk for the purpose of selling junk, for the most part. Basically a pure form of capitalism not girded by the law of God, where man's greed (as Milton Friedman said, guilt is good) runs a muck.
Again, none of that is any kind of definition. It's subjective value judgments and non-specific accusations.

However, this is not even worth arguing. People are almost as bad on politics as they are on theology, and I can barely stand theological arguments.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#26
Again, none of that is any kind of definition.
It's an applied description that accurately reflects this definition:

(From Webster)
: commercial spirit, institutions, or methods
2
: excessive emphasis on profit


It's subjective value judgments and non-specific accusations.
I figured you weren't interested in detailed specifics. Additionally, that I would spare you the time.

However, this is not even worth arguing. People are almost as bad on politics as they are on theology, and I can barely stand theological arguments.
This much is true.