A
Originally Posted by eternally-gratefull
was 69 weeks literal?? Yes. (proven by history)
should not the last week be literal also then?? Yes or no??
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Abiding writes:
the answer is no 70 weeks IS NOT literal
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
EG said:But all PAST prophesy has been fulfilled literally. so we would be foolish not to interpret future prophesy the same as all past prophesy has been fulfilled. It is called precedence. Why would God change the way he does things?
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
according to this logic...we SHOULD NOT expect FUTURE prophecy to be fulfilled literally...it is called precedence according to EG.
was 69 weeks literal?? Yes. (proven by history)
should not the last week be literal also then?? Yes or no??
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Abiding writes:
the answer is no 70 weeks IS NOT literal
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
EG said:But all PAST prophesy has been fulfilled literally. so we would be foolish not to interpret future prophesy the same as all past prophesy has been fulfilled. It is called precedence. Why would God change the way he does things?
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
according to this logic...we SHOULD NOT expect FUTURE prophecy to be fulfilled literally...it is called precedence according to EG.