another ? about baptism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G

greatkraw

Guest
#22
I love your answer. :D:D:D
Nice to see you greatkraw, where have you been hiding?
God bless, pickles
been busy

all I can think of now when I see your avatar are castrati:(
 

pickles

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2009
14,479
182
63
#23
been busy

all I can think of now when I see your avatar are castrati:(
Ouch!!:eek:
I have to find a new one now. :D
Cannot have those kind of thoughts.:rolleyes:
But I have to find some new photos and load them, lost all the ones I had to a computer breakdown.
Good to see you furry mug back here. :p
God bless, pickles
 

Cleante

Senior Member
May 7, 2010
280
0
16
#24
Actually there's considerable evidence from the Scriptures and from the history of the Early Christians supporting the practice of infant baptism. It's "believer's baptism" that is the new practice.

Keep in mind that not only do we Catholics practice infant baptism, the Oriental Orthodox do as well as the Eastern Orthodox. And the Oriental Orthodox and the Catholics parted ways in the 3rd century, so the practice is at least that old. Not to mention we see Paul talk about how baptism is the circumcision of Christ. Jews were circumcised at the age of 8 days, it is natural then that Christians who saw baptism as the new circumcision would baptize their infants.

For a more in depth understanding of Catholic teachings on baptism I would humbly present the following few links, all with numerous references to Scripture and historical teachings.

Infant Baptism
Early Teachings on Infant Baptism
Scripture Catholic - SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM
Scripture Catholic - SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM

I hope that these help explain that the idea of Infant baptism is not something that was just made up, but rather a practice with strong Scriptural and historical support.

In Christ's love.
Hello my brother in Western XC,

We Greek Orthodox do practice Infant Baptism and his links provide a pretty good summary on why the Western Church performs infant baptisms. Here is something from a Father of the Church

[SIZE=-1]"Baptize first the children, and if they can speak for themselves let them do so. Otherwise, let their parents or other relatives speak for them." (Hippolytus, Apostolic Tradition 21:15, c. 215 [SIZE=-1]A.D.[/SIZE])[/SIZE]
At any rate, I'd like to share an article from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. It is on infant baptism which includes scriptural and theological support for Infant Baptism. It also touches on Original Sin as well.

http://www.goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7067

In ΙΣ ΧΣ,

ΙΟΑΝΝΗΣ
 
Feb 9, 2010
2,486
39
0
#25
Infants do not need to be baptized,because repenting of your sins comes before you are baptized,in which a baby has no idea what repentance is,and they do not need to repent of anything.

When you come to the age that you realize you are doing wrong(God knows),then you repent of your sins and then you are baptized.Infants do not know to repent.

Also the angels behold the face of the Father for the infants,which means the infants are protected by angels spiritually,and are safe,and have no need to be baptized anyway.

A person must first repent of their sins before baptism,and if you were baptized of an infant not repenting of your sins,then you must be baptized later.

Jesus said you must be born of water and the Spirit to see the kingdom of God.

We must identify with Jesus by repenting,being baptized in water,and receiving the Holy Spirit.
The Bible says baptism does save us.

That infant baptism doctrine is a dangerous doctrine,and causes people who were baptized as an infant not to be baptized later on.

Matt
 

Cleante

Senior Member
May 7, 2010
280
0
16
#26
Infants do not need to be baptized,because repenting of your sins comes before you are baptized,in which a baby has no idea what repentance is,and they do not need to repent of anything.

When you come to the age that you realize you are doing wrong(God knows),then you repent of your sins and then you are baptized.Infants do not know to repent.

Also the angels behold the face of the Father for the infants,which means the infants are protected by angels spiritually,and are safe,and have no need to be baptized anyway.

A person must first repent of their sins before baptism,and if you were baptized of an infant not repenting of your sins,then you must be baptized later.

Jesus said you must be born of water and the Spirit to see the kingdom of God.

We must identify with Jesus by repenting,being baptized in water,and receiving the Holy Spirit.
The Bible says baptism does save us.

That infant baptism doctrine is a dangerous doctrine,and causes people who were baptized as an infant not to be baptized later on.

Matt
Matt,

Where exactly does it say that infants are protected by angels spiritually and are safe and have no need to be baptized anyways?

In Acts and throughout the New Testament we see the Apostles baptizing households, the Greek word is οικος. Oikos includes children and infants. There is no evidence that supports those who claim that the word oikos would only refer to adults.

In the Old Testament, we saw many ways that parents brought their children into the Old Covenant. For example, circumcision. This was done to male infants who were eight years old. It can be considered the "old baptism."

For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, and all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from a spiritual rock which followed them, and that rock was Christ." (1 Corinthians 10:1-4)
It is widely accepted, if not true, that Moses did not leave the Jewish infants and children on the banks of the Red Sea to face the wrath of the Pharaoh because they could not comprehend or understand being baptized into Moses.

Faith and comprehension is not something that is limited to adults. This argument is profoundly a Western argument because the West has always been heavily influenced by reason and word. How can an infant possibly comprehend and understand faith? The New Testament did not see it that way. For example, in Luke when the ΠΑΝΑΓΙΑ, ΤΗΕΟΤΟΚΟΣ, approached Elizabeth John the Baptists jumped with joy at the sight of his saviour, ΙΕΣΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ.

Also in Mark.

"And whoever causes one of these little ones who believe to stumble, it would be better for him if with a heavy millstone hung around his neck, he had been cast into the sea." (Mark 9:42)

Here is an excerpt from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese website.

The Bible's "sacramental theology" states that there is such a need since "...through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men." (Romans 5:12) For this reason, "...there are none righteous, not even one" (i.e. not infants). (Romans 3:10) How are these young ones saved from the sin they have received from Adam's race? They are saved through the regenerative power of baptism and the faith of the Church (i.e. the Christian faithful): "He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration (baptism) and renewing by the Holy Spirit." (Titus 3:5)
"Repent, and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins." (Acts 2:38)
"Jesus answered, 'Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God.'" (John 3:5)
"...when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah, during the construction of the ark, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through the water, and corresponding to that, baptism now saves you." (1 Peter 3:20, 21)
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#27
Always a joy to find an Eastern brother in Christ here. :) My father is Ukranian Orthodox and I have been privileged to participate in the Divine Liturgy at a Greek Orthodox parish and an Antiochian parish. :)
 
T

tryingtofindhim

Guest
#28
I know there is alot of different opinions on this, but it is an important question to me.
We are all asked to be baptised, but is infant baptism not a true baptism?
I have seen no where in scriptures that says it isnt, but nothing that referances if it is.
I have always accepted my baptism as a baby as my baptism in Jesus.
When another told me I had to deny it and be rebaptised, it felt like a lie to Jesus to do so.
I plead with those inclined to debate this to try and not do so, as this is a serious question Im asking.
In my heart I have always believed in my baptism in Jesus, and know I am.
But because of comments I ask? Am I disobaying Jesus?
I have no problem with a second baptism, I just have a problem with saying that my baptism was not valid. A pastor told me I had to deny the first and that I was condemned because the first one was not valid. Only when I denyed the first could a true baptism be performed, in his words.
I have never had a problem with infant baptism as Im sure if I were a parent when John the baptist was around I would bring him my child to be baptised.
So what does Jesus say to this or scriptures say?
Ive searched but know many here are better able to answer this.
I want to add that the elders of the church where this pastor had worked did apoligise for his comments.
Thankyou and God bless, pickles
the orginal word for batism is baptismo which means to submerge.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#29
This is an interesting subject to me, as I had the same question about infant vs. adult baptism. I have not been baptized, and probably won't be for several more years. I do think that both are acceptable, although I have no biblical reasoning for this. I do think an adult has better understanding, but that comes with age. Without really knowing much about it, I would assume doing both would be good. Sorta like, "keeping your back covered".
 

Cleante

Senior Member
May 7, 2010
280
0
16
#30
the original word for baptism is baptismo which means to submerge.
Are you sure about that? You should include all versions of βαπτω.

βαπτο - Simply put, to dip. Not submerge. The root of the word Baptism
Βέβαμμαι - To have dipped. (John 13:26, Luke 16:24) ; and to dye ( Revalations 19.13)
ἐβαπτίσθην - Present Tense ; to dip, immerse, to cleanse or purify by washing, to administer the rite of baptism, to baptize, to undergo the rite of baptism. (Acts 22:16)
Βάπτισμα, ατος, τὀ - Present ; immersion, baptism, ordinance of baptism (Matthew 3:7 and Romans 6:4)
Βαπτισμὀς, οῡ, ὁ - An Act of dipping or immersion (Hebrews 6:2) ; an ablution (Mark 7:4,8 and Hebrews 9:10)

Your Eastern Brother in ΙΕΣΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ,

ΙΟΑΝΝΗΣ