Bible versions-Is there only one?
- Thread starter Aerials1978
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Not quite true, those quacks think they’re the only ones who actually believe “the Bible.” And they are quacks.
Your comment is not even close to being true, but it tends to feed the self-righteousness of those in your sect which is founded upon mocking others as if they’re not the believers they are.
KJVOnlyism is a hobby of the ignorant. Most, like yourself, are full of heresies which is another manifestation of ignorance, as in your open theism heresy which you believe since you cannot implement 2 Timothy 2:15.
We who are not KJVO cultists know the Scriptures are trustworthy. We believe the entirety of its message. You cannot accept this truth.
Your comment is not even close to being true, but it tends to feed the self-righteousness of those in your sect which is founded upon mocking others as if they’re not the believers they are.
KJVOnlyism is a hobby of the ignorant. Most, like yourself, are full of heresies which is another manifestation of ignorance, as in your open theism heresy which you believe since you cannot implement 2 Timothy 2:15.
We who are not KJVO cultists know the Scriptures are trustworthy. We believe the entirety of its message. You cannot accept this truth.
-
2
-
1
- Show all
Not quite true, those quacks think they’re the only ones who actually believe “the Bible.” And they are quacks.
Your comment is not even close to being true, but it tends to feed the self-righteousness of those in your sect which is founded upon mocking others as if they’re not the believers they are.
KJVOnlyism is a hobby of the ignorant. Most, like yourself, are full of heresies which is another manifestation of ignorance, as in your open theism heresy which you believe since you cannot implement 2 Timothy 2:15.
We who are not KJVO cultists know the Scriptures are trustworthy. We believe the entirety of its message. You cannot accept this truth.
Your comment is not even close to being true, but it tends to feed the self-righteousness of those in your sect which is founded upon mocking others as if they’re not the believers they are.
KJVOnlyism is a hobby of the ignorant. Most, like yourself, are full of heresies which is another manifestation of ignorance, as in your open theism heresy which you believe since you cannot implement 2 Timothy 2:15.
We who are not KJVO cultists know the Scriptures are trustworthy. We believe the entirety of its message. You cannot accept this truth.
Of those original people, the ones of that “firstborn” generation, only 2 made it into the promised land. And those 2 had ANOTHER SPIRIT leading them. Another spirit that all of the others did not have.
I don’t know how much of that you will understand, but you should at least take away the fact ALMOST all of the children of Israel were wrong in their beliefs.
I don’t denigrate anybody. You don’t understand the symbolism I mentioned and most likely neither does he. If you did understand you would be making comments on the post rather than railing against me.
You didn’t make a single comment about the lack of people entering the promised land nor offer any comments about the other spirit that was with Joshua and Caleb.
Why not counter my claim with an argument like how I’m wrong that Joshua and Caleb had another spirit. What was that spirit? How was it different than the spirit with the others?
Lighten up and just enjoy the conversation.
You didn’t make a single comment about the lack of people entering the promised land nor offer any comments about the other spirit that was with Joshua and Caleb.
Why not counter my claim with an argument like how I’m wrong that Joshua and Caleb had another spirit. What was that spirit? How was it different than the spirit with the others?
Lighten up and just enjoy the conversation.
-
1
- Show all
And when he had apprehended him he put him in prison
and delivered him to four quarternions of soldiers to keep him
intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Acts 12 verse 4 KJV
If the KJV is so perfect why isn't Passover used instead of Easter here? Easter is said to have been derived from Ishtar a pagan fertility Goddess?
and delivered him to four quarternions of soldiers to keep him
intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.
Acts 12 verse 4 KJV
If the KJV is so perfect why isn't Passover used instead of Easter here? Easter is said to have been derived from Ishtar a pagan fertility Goddess?
-
4
- Show all
Oh dear!
Rev 20:14
KJV
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
Young's Literal
14 and the death and the hades were cast to the lake of the fire -- this [is] the second death;
NIV
14 Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death
-
2
- Show all
@KJV1611 does you King James Version look like this?
View attachment 211663
If this is a no, then you have a modern revision of the King James Version.
View attachment 211663
If this is a no, then you have a modern revision of the King James Version.
-
1
- Show all
We who are not KJVO cultists know the Scriptures are trustworthy. We believe the entirety of its message. You cannot accept this truth.
-
1
- Show all
Trying my best to share a truth that God has given to me isn't being arrogant in most people's book. I know the king James bible, symbolism and foreshadowing, those are my strong points. What am I supposed to do, acquiesce to you and not share what I do know.
I don't why you can't just come up with an argument against what I said. Prove that Israel isn't a type of the church, prove that Joshua and Caleb didn't have another spirit with them. Tell me how neither of those things don't apply to us today.
My whole point in saying what I said was to point out that the "consensus" in a religious group is always WRONG. The truth and those that follow i,t is ALWAYS a subset of the larger group. And what I mean by that is, the consensus of the church is that God only preserved his word in the contradictory copies of the original-language writings.
I'll stand against that all day long.
I don't why you can't just come up with an argument against what I said. Prove that Israel isn't a type of the church, prove that Joshua and Caleb didn't have another spirit with them. Tell me how neither of those things don't apply to us today.
My whole point in saying what I said was to point out that the "consensus" in a religious group is always WRONG. The truth and those that follow i,t is ALWAYS a subset of the larger group. And what I mean by that is, the consensus of the church is that God only preserved his word in the contradictory copies of the original-language writings.
I'll stand against that all day long.