According to an ongoing temperature analysis led by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), the average global temperature on Earth has increased by at least 1.1° Celsius (1.9° Fahrenheit) since 1880. The majority of the warming has occurred since 1975, at a rate of roughly 0.15 to 0.20°C per decade.
Climate Change
- Thread starter Omegatime
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Here are a few countries with their hottest years on record.
It is interesting to observe when these ten hottest years occured.
Canada
Nine of the ten warmest years have occurred during the last 25 years, with 2010 being the warmest
on record (3.0°C above the 1961 to 1990 reference value).
Please note: Canada like Europe is 3 degrees Celsius above the 1961-1990 average temperature.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom recorded its hottest ever year in 2022, with an average temperature
of 10.03 degrees Celsius. Since the start of temperature recording in 1884, the 10 warmest years
recorded in the UK have all been from 2003 onwards.
Australia
The last decade was the hottest on record for Australia with the temperature almost 1C above
average and one third of a degree warmer than the previous decade, according to the (Bureau of Meteorology).
USA
The ten warmest years ever recorded have all occurred since 1998. (Climate.nasa.gov)
The temperature is rising across the globe and that is a scientific fact.
Well the explanation is straightforward.
Deforestation, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, increasing water vapor from warming ocean.
Add to that, ever increasing dark bitumen roads, dark roof tiles, too much concrete, etc.
We are warming the planet at an increasing rate.
You cannot debate the facts.
It is interesting to observe when these ten hottest years occured.
Canada
Nine of the ten warmest years have occurred during the last 25 years, with 2010 being the warmest
on record (3.0°C above the 1961 to 1990 reference value).
Please note: Canada like Europe is 3 degrees Celsius above the 1961-1990 average temperature.
United Kingdom
The United Kingdom recorded its hottest ever year in 2022, with an average temperature
of 10.03 degrees Celsius. Since the start of temperature recording in 1884, the 10 warmest years
recorded in the UK have all been from 2003 onwards.
Australia
The last decade was the hottest on record for Australia with the temperature almost 1C above
average and one third of a degree warmer than the previous decade, according to the (Bureau of Meteorology).
USA
The ten warmest years ever recorded have all occurred since 1998. (Climate.nasa.gov)
The temperature is rising across the globe and that is a scientific fact.
Well the explanation is straightforward.
Deforestation, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, increasing water vapor from warming ocean.
Add to that, ever increasing dark bitumen roads, dark roof tiles, too much concrete, etc.
We are warming the planet at an increasing rate.
You cannot debate the facts.
That does not mean destroy humanity to save the planet (which is already doomed). This is what the globalist elites are promoting. The earth was created for living creatures, and Climate Alarmism has already been debunked. The whole subject is far from cut-and-dried.
Refuting 12 claims by climate alarmists (published by a Senate committee)
https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/_...uting-12-claims-made-by-climate-alarmists.pdf
National Institute of Biotechnology Information
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1112950/
Hoover Institute
Flawed Climate Models
https://www.hoover.org/research/flawed-climate-models
Nature Journal
Is climate science taking over the science?’: A corpus-based study of competing stances on bias, dogma and expertise in the blogosphere
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00582-z
"Amid the growing enmeshment of politics with science, the adoption of a more adversarial stance to intervene in public debate is emerging as the preferred strategy by scientists involved in public outreach and dissemination activities, including but not limited to blogging."
If there was no hidden agenda, and science was truly science, we would know the truth. But today there are huge lies mixed with truth. The COVID19 situation illustrates this, where there was no science to support the destruction of people and economies.
Refuting 12 claims by climate alarmists (published by a Senate committee)
https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/_...uting-12-claims-made-by-climate-alarmists.pdf
National Institute of Biotechnology Information
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1112950/
Hoover Institute
Flawed Climate Models
https://www.hoover.org/research/flawed-climate-models
Nature Journal
Is climate science taking over the science?’: A corpus-based study of competing stances on bias, dogma and expertise in the blogosphere
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00582-z
"Amid the growing enmeshment of politics with science, the adoption of a more adversarial stance to intervene in public debate is emerging as the preferred strategy by scientists involved in public outreach and dissemination activities, including but not limited to blogging."
If there was no hidden agenda, and science was truly science, we would know the truth. But today there are huge lies mixed with truth. The COVID19 situation illustrates this, where there was no science to support the destruction of people and economies.
We need to also deal with the matter of the Net Zero Hoax to understand what is going on. Is the proposal to achieve Net Zero emissions practical or is it simply another hoax? Hardly anyone in any government has questioned the feasibility and validity of this concept, when everyone should have been asking “Is this some kind of globalist fantasy, or what, or is it just another tax grab?”
"NetZero was launched in October 1981. It was founded by Ronald T. Burr, Stacy Haitsuka, Marwan Zebian and Harold MacKenzie. The concept of net zero greenhouse gas emissions was first popularised by the Paris Agreement, a landmark deal that was agreed at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) to limit the impact of greenhouse gas emissions." And any time the UN is involved in anything, it spells harm and hurt.
What does Net Zero mean? Net-zero emissions or “net zero" means that all emissions released by human activities are reduced to zero or near zero, and counterbalanced by removing carbon from the atmosphere in a process known as carbon removal (which is probably another fantasy). That supposedly achieves a net zero increase in emissions.
"Achieving net zero will require a two-part approach: First and foremost, human-caused emissions (such as those from fossil-fueled vehicles and factories) should be reduced as close to zero as possible. Any remaining emissions should then be balanced with an equivalent amount of carbon removal, which can happen through natural approaches like restoring forests or through technologies like direct air capture and storage (DACS), which scrubs carbon directly from the atmosphere."
In other words every vehicle worldwide which uses gasoline must be junked to achieve this goal. Which means all transportation must come to a halt and everyone must go back to the stone age. And the idea that electric vehicles will stop emissions is crazy. In order to generate electricity one must either burn coal, or natural gas, or use nuclear energy, and they will all generate emissions far more than gasoline vehicles. Then every factory or manufacturing industry must be totally shut down, or else you will never achieve this goal. Once more you can go back to the stone age.
Can anyone see how stupid and nonsensical and evil this who impractical concept is? Yet the supposedly “most brilliant minds” have come up with this rubbish. Of course there are billions of dollars to be made in climate tax revenues which will not reduce emissions by even 1% but will enrich politicians.
And electric vehicles, and wind turbines have proven themselves to be more dangerous and harmful that gas driven vehicles. Entities which bought electric vehicles had to finally junk them and replace them with diesel or gasoline vehicles. And wind turbines did nothing except create hazards.
"NetZero was launched in October 1981. It was founded by Ronald T. Burr, Stacy Haitsuka, Marwan Zebian and Harold MacKenzie. The concept of net zero greenhouse gas emissions was first popularised by the Paris Agreement, a landmark deal that was agreed at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) to limit the impact of greenhouse gas emissions." And any time the UN is involved in anything, it spells harm and hurt.
What does Net Zero mean? Net-zero emissions or “net zero" means that all emissions released by human activities are reduced to zero or near zero, and counterbalanced by removing carbon from the atmosphere in a process known as carbon removal (which is probably another fantasy). That supposedly achieves a net zero increase in emissions.
"Achieving net zero will require a two-part approach: First and foremost, human-caused emissions (such as those from fossil-fueled vehicles and factories) should be reduced as close to zero as possible. Any remaining emissions should then be balanced with an equivalent amount of carbon removal, which can happen through natural approaches like restoring forests or through technologies like direct air capture and storage (DACS), which scrubs carbon directly from the atmosphere."
In other words every vehicle worldwide which uses gasoline must be junked to achieve this goal. Which means all transportation must come to a halt and everyone must go back to the stone age. And the idea that electric vehicles will stop emissions is crazy. In order to generate electricity one must either burn coal, or natural gas, or use nuclear energy, and they will all generate emissions far more than gasoline vehicles. Then every factory or manufacturing industry must be totally shut down, or else you will never achieve this goal. Once more you can go back to the stone age.
Can anyone see how stupid and nonsensical and evil this who impractical concept is? Yet the supposedly “most brilliant minds” have come up with this rubbish. Of course there are billions of dollars to be made in climate tax revenues which will not reduce emissions by even 1% but will enrich politicians.
And electric vehicles, and wind turbines have proven themselves to be more dangerous and harmful that gas driven vehicles. Entities which bought electric vehicles had to finally junk them and replace them with diesel or gasoline vehicles. And wind turbines did nothing except create hazards.
-
1
- Show all