Eternal salvation and Ironside

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#21
Recently it was brought to my atttention that many believers are giving up some of the values of the christian faith such as the Once Saved Always saved doctrine. I wanted to address the eternal salvation issue because I feel that it is necessary for every beliver to take a stand on what they believe and to do so with a good biblical base.
I think what disturbs me about this is the assumption that anyone who does not agree with OSAS have abandoned Christian values. That and the "if you don't read what I have linked, you can't have an opinion on the subjest." By the way, I am following the rules by not arguing the subject, only the post.
 
R

Ricke

Guest
#22
Saint and Everyone

Everyone has had good input pro and con into this debate. Let me throw on my nickel's worth if I may.

First The Bible does not teach the doctrine of OSAS. This is one of hundreds of Man-made "make me feel good" doctrines.

We all must remember, God is not going to allow everyone in heaven just because they claim to be Christian. You can't earn your way in with "good works" either. We must adhere to the pure Gospel taught, that that most assuredly means obeying The Gospel as taught, the Standards and Doctrines outlined along with unshakeable faith.

Read: Acts 2 v 42/ITimothy 4v 16/ Galatians 1 v 6-10.

Here are a few scriptual evidence's to prove the point.

The Parable Jesus tells about the Five Wise and The Five Foolish Virgins. Matthew 25 v 1-13.

They are called "Virgins" because they were blood bought Born Again children of God. Five were wise, that were hot for serving the Lord, They loved him and do whatever it took to stay not on ly on fire for him, and their "Lamps" were full of oil, another term for being full of God's Spirit 24/7 packed up, ready to go. The Five "foolish" were just the opposite. They were blood bought, but their oil went out, by lack of a prayer life, maybe they even had excuses weekly for not worshipping The Lord by laying out of Church to keep their social calendar instead, etc etc. So when Jesus came ( The Bridegroom) 5 were ready, 5 were not. So he left the 5 Foolish go in The Rapture with him the 5 Foolish stayed behind....because they should have been prepared, but got lazy. Now let us read this;

Revelation 3 v 15-16 Jesus said..."I know thy works, that thou are neither cold nor hot: I would thou were cold or hot. So then because thou art LUKEWARM, and neither cold nor hot, I will SPUE thee out of my mouth."Amen and Amen.!

Finally we read where Jesus tells the Churches what he will do for them if they OVERCOME. Revelation 2 v 7, 11, 17, 26. Rev.3 v 5,7+12.
 
R

Ricke

Guest
#23
****** Correction******
This touchscreen Smart Phone is quick I meant to say The Five Wise went with The Bridegroom, the Five Foolish were left behind....lol
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#24


Robert T. Ironside says" JESUS LOVES YOU!"
 
R

Ricke

Guest
#25
Ageofknowledge
Good one Bro..still laughing Janis for the daymaker...lol.
 
Jun 24, 2010
3,822
19
0
#27
To keep questioning your salvation after you have believed upon the Son is to question whether you have been cleansed and forgiven of your sin. Even greater, to question if what Christ accomplished on the cross was enough to save you and reconcile you to the Father. Isn't everything that Christ accomplished on the cross eternal or is it temporal to some of you? Christ, the word, the Spirit, the blood, they are all eternal. Why is our salvation, that we receive by grace and through faith in what Christ did for sinners on the cross, not eternal? What took place on the cross was between the Father and the Son, both are eternal and both are eternal life. We had nothing to do with it. We were sinners, alienated from God, dead in trespasses and sins and as an enemy of God doing dead works.

However, that work on the cross was accomplished so that sinful man, who was conceived in sin, could be redeemed, reconciled and cleansed from his sin that separated him from God. The only thing that a sinner can do to receive salvation that God has provided through the cross is to believe it by faith. When we believe it by faith we have obeyed the gospel of Jesus Christ and him crucified. When we believe, God's righteousness comes in, God's Spirit comes in, grace comes in, the blood comes in, regeneration takes place, all sins are forgiven and cleansed, the conscience is cleansed and we are placed in Christ forever accepted of the Father. If I was to question any of this, after receiving it through faith, I would be double-minded at best and a fool with no understanding at worst.
 
S

Saint

Guest
#28
Saint and Everyone

Everyone has had good input pro and con into this debate. Let me throw on my nickel's worth if I may.

First The Bible does not teach the doctrine of OSAS. This is one of hundreds of Man-made "make me feel good" doctrines.

We all must remember, God is not going to allow everyone in heaven just because they claim to be Christian. You can't earn your way in with "good works" either. We must adhere to the pure Gospel taught, that that most assuredly means obeying The Gospel as taught, the Standards and Doctrines outlined along with unshakeable faith.

Read: Acts 2 v 42/ITimothy 4v 16/ Galatians 1 v 6-10.

Here are a few scriptual evidence's to prove the point.

The Parable Jesus tells about the Five Wise and The Five Foolish Virgins. Matthew 25 v 1-13.

They are called "Virgins" because they were blood bought Born Again children of God. Five were wise, that were hot for serving the Lord, They loved him and do whatever it took to stay not on ly on fire for him, and their "Lamps" were full of oil, another term for being full of God's Spirit 24/7 packed up, ready to go. The Five "foolish" were just the opposite. They were blood bought, but their oil went out, by lack of a prayer life, maybe they even had excuses weekly for not worshipping The Lord by laying out of Church to keep their social calendar instead, etc etc. So when Jesus came ( The Bridegroom) 5 were ready, 5 were not. So he left the 5 Foolish go in The Rapture with him the 5 Foolish stayed behind....because they should have been prepared, but got lazy. Now let us read this;

Revelation 3 v 15-16 Jesus said..."I know thy works, that thou are neither cold nor hot: I would thou were cold or hot. So then because thou art LUKEWARM, and neither cold nor hot, I will SPUE thee out of my mouth."Amen and Amen.!

Finally we read where Jesus tells the Churches what he will do for them if they OVERCOME. Revelation 2 v 7, 11, 17, 26. Rev.3 v 5,7+12.
Thank you for this, especially for Revelation 3:15-16

To keep questioning your salvation after you have believed upon the Son is to question whether you have been cleansed and forgiven of your sin. Even greater, to question if what Christ accomplished on the cross was enough to save you and reconcile you to the Father. Isn't everything that Christ accomplished on the cross eternal or is it temporal to some of you? Christ, the word, the Spirit, the blood, they are all eternal. Why is our salvation, that we receive by grace and through faith in what Christ did for sinners on the cross, not eternal? What took place on the cross was between the Father and the Son, both are eternal and both are eternal life. We had nothing to do with it. We were sinners, alienated from God, dead in trespasses and sins and as an enemy of God doing dead works.

However, that work on the cross was accomplished so that sinful man, who was conceived in sin, could be redeemed, reconciled and cleansed from his sin that separated him from God. The only thing that a sinner can do to receive salvation that God has provided through the cross is to believe it by faith. When we believe it by faith we have obeyed the gospel of Jesus Christ and him crucified. When we believe, God's righteousness comes in, God's Spirit comes in, grace comes in, the blood comes in, regeneration takes place, all sins are forgiven and cleansed, the conscience is cleansed and we are placed in Christ forever accepted of the Father. If I was to question any of this, after receiving it through faith, I would be double-minded at best and a fool with no understanding at worst.

It's not questioning your salvation, it is awareness of what you have done, and taking responsiblility. It's not thinking of your salvation as an ever-shaking-etch-a-sketch. and by the OSAS logic, every sinner should be saved, considering that the Bible says that Jesus dies for sinners.
 
B

Buddee

Guest
#29
You can't earn your way in with "good works" either. We must adhere to the pure Gospel taught, that that most assuredly means obeying The Gospel as taught, the Standards and Doctrines outlined along with unshakeable faith.
Good starting point.

What IS the Gospel of Jesus Christ?
 

Crypto

Senior Member
Nov 14, 2009
662
7
18
38
#30
Today at midweek service, we were in John 7: 25-70.

As I was reading, this verse stuck out to me as relevant to this discussion.

John 7: 66
From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him.


I wonder if some people would claim that these disciples were still saved? because they once followed Jesus and Jesus would never let them go?

Sometimes I think it comes down to another thing the pastor talked about today. Sometimes people preach a different Jesus than the true Jesus. Sometimes people make God 'everything they want him to be' and forget to discover who He truly is.

Just thoughts again

God bless
tony
A disciple by definition is a learner, that sits under a teacher. Some can be disciples without salvation, if they are curious. Many of Christ's disciples came to hear what He had to say and quit when it got too difficult for them.
 
S

Saint

Guest
#32
radio, i would really like a response soon, because i won't have much time after this week
 
R

RadioU

Guest
#33
radio, i would really like a response soon, because i won't have much time after this week
I am on vacation this week and because of this i have not been able to finish my write up. i should have it done soon though. you can expect a reply by sunday
 
R

RadioU

Guest
#34
I think what disturbs me about this is the assumption that anyone who does not agree with OSAS have abandoned Christian values. That and the "if you don't read what I have linked, you can't have an opinion on the subjest." By the way, I am following the rules by not arguing the subject, only the post.
i was not making the assumption that people who do not hold OSAS doctrine are not going on for the Lord, simply making the statment that it is a very important doctrine and it is worth looking into
 
S

Saint

Guest
#35
I am on vacation this week and because of this i have not been able to finish my write up. i should have it done soon though. you can expect a reply by sunday
OK, but i'm going on vacation for a week on Sunday, so I won't be able to reply for a while.
 
R

RadioU

Guest
#36
Alright, i guess i'll start out with the paper's talk aout Romans 8:38-39. He states that nothing can separate us from God's love, so how can we be unsaved? well, let's look at some scripture: Jesus loves everyone, including sinners (unsaved) and we can find that fact in Romans 5:8. Just because He loves us, that doesn't mean we love Him, or that we will be saved. And regardless, Isaiah 59:2 tells us that sin separates us from God's face so that He won't hear us. It also says that we are separated from Him. Now, looking at the paper, i believe that someone who believes in it would say that the people refered to in that verse weren't true followers, but notice the wording of that verse: "your iniquities have separated you from your God" how could He be their God if they did not believe in Him?

I also caught some speculation from the paper that shows that the writer was telling the Word so that it might fit into his opinion. For instance, he claimed that the Book of Life and the Lamb's Book of Life are completely different, which would have been fine if he had used Scriptual evidence. So i'm going to throw that out until that evidence is shown. And I will also talk about Psalm 69:28 where blotting out the names of the people in the Book of Life is mentioned, this shows that you can be blotted out.

That speculation brings me to a few points where he misread the Bible. He mentions Hebrews 6:4-6, saying that that verse proves him correct, not incorrect, because it says that it is impossible to fall if you've been saved. Well, let's reread those verses to show what it really means: 4 It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age, 6 if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace. well, let's take away the appositive at the beginning of verse 6 for a second. now we have the verse saying that it is impossible for a saved person to repent, right? wrong, it says "brought to repentence" or in other words, for someone to bring him there, or for God to bring him there, because from then on, it is up to the sinner to do so. now, let's look at that lovely appositive: if they fall away, now notice that it doesn't say if the impossible happens that they were to fall away, it says IF they fall away, which obviously means that it is possible.

Alright, now let's move on to Hebrews 10:26 which tells us that if we delibrately keep on sinning after we've received the knowledge of the truth, there are no sacrifices left for us. OK, so obviously the first argument is going to be "just because you know the truth, doesn't mean you believe it" well, it doesn't say that once you know the truth, it says once you have received or in other words, accepted, the truth. but you might call that speculation, well even if it is, let's look at it as if it simply means once someone has told you the truth and you haven't accepted it, well, that goes against the fact that Jesus taught the truth and was still persecuted, and even crucified, but He begged for their forgiveness, not fearful expectation of judgement.

And, of course, what of the unpardinalbe sin? Every non-Christian denies the Holy Spirit, every single one. so have all of us commited the unpardinable sin? well that would certainly make the crucifiction pointless. so what is that refering to? it must be refering to Christians who deny the Holy Spirit, but that would mean that they would be unsaved after they were saved, which goes against your beliefs.

Now let's look at Romans 10:9- That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is LORD," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. so notice that the definition for salvation is confessing that Jesus is LORD and believing in His resurection in your heart. well, plenty of people do this and fall away. For instance, when I was younger, I believed and confessed that Jesus is Lord, I knew in depths of my heart that God raised Him from the dead, but I still sinned and didn't care. so you see, when Dr. Ironside said that someone who is saved cannot sin without feeling remorse, well that is not only incorrect, but it doesn't address unintentional sins that are counted against us. Actually, the interesting part about unintentional sins is that those who commit one sin, are guilty of every sin. where do i get this? James 2:10 which says it much better than i, when it says that if someone who keeps the whole law, and yet stumbles at just one point, is guilty of all. Now no one here has ever stumbled intentionally, i don't think. and so if that unintentional sin doesn't condemn us, or if any amount of intentional sins can keep us from being saved after we've been saved, then what's the purpose of repentence? why would God command us to repent if, once we've been saved, we never have to repent again? and more importantly, why would Satan try to tempt us to sin, if that sin doesn't separate us from God (as Isaiah 7:9 states? and as Galations 5:19-21 refers to)?

Now, why does Jude 20 and 21 tell command us to build upon ourselves (which only gives us rewards and has nothing to do with being saved) and to keep ourselves in God's love (which we can't be separated from)? Why did Jesus get onto 5 or 6 churches for having sin with them? if a church (which is a people, not a building) can become corrupt, then how can a people (Christians) not sin?

Why can fruitless people be cast into hell? or even better, what of the parable where 2 people were forgiven, meaning that they were SAVED. and then one of them did not forgive someone else, and in the end the guy who was FORGIVEN was thrown into the darkness where there is gnashing of teeth (Hell)

Now, he also talked about 2 Peter 2:20-22, but he really corrupted what those verses said. apparantly, because it said dog instead of sheep, it was refering to non-Christians. that is an incredible reach, mainly because it says that we are ONLY sheep, and obviously we are sheep, children, brothers, desciples, friends, members of the Body, pots, etc... so why can't we be dogs or sows when we become foolish? So i'm going to keep that as refering to Christians, using the evidence that the persons he was refering to "knew the ways of righteousness" and so i will point out that it says that it would be better if they had sinned before they were saved. so why would that be true if that sin was forgiven in advance as Dr. Ironhide suggests?

Also, why does 2 Timothy 2:12 tell us that if we deny Him (which we can't do unless we know Him, and we can only know Him if we obey His commandments and love one another (1John 2:4) and why must we stand firm in our faith as Isaiah 7:9 tells us? And why should we rebuke our brother? i mean if our brother is going to go to heaven no matter what, then why should i bother to rebuke him? Why does Mark 8:36 tell us that we can forfeit our soul? why does Galations 5:1 say that we shouldn't burdern ourselves again? and if faith by itself saves us, then why is faith without works dead? and also, how could the sheep (and Dr. Ironside tells us that sheep are Christians) leave the flock? why did Christ have to persue that sheep, if the sheep, once saved, is always saved?

And finally, as I end this, I'll look at the beginning, let's look at Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were sinless, believed in God wholly and fully, and in more ways then any of us will, they were with God in a similar way as to the way we will when we are in Heaven, and yet, they delibrately sinned, and were cast out.

I hope you read the entire thing, i know it is long, but so is the Bible and so is the paper you sent.

Ok. first off i would like to thank you for your paitence in waiting, i was on vacation with my family and had precious few moments to go over what you said/form a responce with all the chaos that was around me. What i have currently is not a comprehensive responce and simply goes over a few main points that i was fairly sure on.

1. The first thing that you said that jumped out to me was in the second paragraph when you put forth the idea that in Psalms 69:28 it says that peoples names can be blotted out of the book of life. i readthe verse and went back to the greek to find that it is actually the book of the living. The word chay was used and it literally means living, alive. Some other verses where this word was used was in Genesis 1:20,21,24,25, and so forth.

2. The second thing that was brought to my attention was was use of Hebrews 6:4-6. To my understanding what you were suggesting that Hebrews was saying was that
a) if someone falls away they cannot come back
b) when someone falls away they lose their salvation.

in response to a), first off what is the point of falling away, where is it decided that at this point you have fallen away and therefore cannot come back.
and more importantly in response to b), looking at the context of the verse would cause me to wonder if the verse is refering to something other than salvation. If we look further down the passage we see Hebrews 9-11 which towards the end of that segment says "And we desire that each one of you show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope until the end, that you do not become sluggish, but imitate those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
Now if we look at the context of Hebrews 6:4-6 then we can see that the author is not talking about salvation but rather is talking about how we should always be progressing in our walk with Christ and the falling away where we cannot be brought back is not refering to salvation, but rather is refering to our usefulness to Gods service. (Hebrews 6:1-2) the overall passage here is refering to our progress in our walk, so to my understanding the way you use that verse is out of context.

3. In paragraph four i was confused as to what you were saying in reguards to Hebrews 10:26 however from my understanding this is what you were saying:
a) the passage was refering to believers
b) If we continue to live in sin we will lose our salvation because the passage says there will be no more sacrafices left for us

The first thing is that the passage is 100% refering to believers. the text says recieved, and in recieving it is more than just hearing, it is accepting. However your second premise is wrong. When the passage is put in context with the rest of the chapter we can see that it is not refering to salvation.

"If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. 28Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? 30For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay,"[d] and again, "The Lord will judge his people."[e] 31It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

If we look at the blue text along with the black to put it into context that it makes much more sense. I would suggest that the passage is not refering to the loss of salvation but rather a punishment. the people who rejected the law of moses were killed, so the passage is saying that those who reject the word of God how much more do that have to fear. My question to you is where else in thie passage is hell suggested other than verse 26.

also look at verses 11-14 focusing on verse 14 "11Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. 13Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool, 14because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

I am sorry but this is all that i have had time to look up and pray about. i will have more in the comming weeks, but i leave for El Salvador tuesday night and will be back in 10 days. i should have more to give you at that point in time.
 
R

RadioU

Guest
#37
I made the paragraphs that i responded to in bold
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#38
Ok. first off i would like to thank you for your paitence in waiting, i was on vacation with my family and had precious few moments to go over what you said/form a responce with all the chaos that was around me. What i have currently is not a comprehensive responce and simply goes over a few main points that i was fairly sure on.

1. The first thing that you said that jumped out to me was in the second paragraph when you put forth the idea that in Psalms 69:28 it says that peoples names can be blotted out of the book of life. i readthe verse and went back to the greek to find that it is actually the book of the living. The word chay was used and it literally means living, alive. Some other verses where this word was used was in Genesis 1:20,21,24,25, and so forth.
I think you mean Hebrew?

2. The second thing that was brought to my attention was was use of Hebrews 6:4-6. To my understanding what you were suggesting that Hebrews was saying was that
a) if someone falls away they cannot come back
b) when someone falls away they lose their salvation.

in response to a), first off what is the point of falling away, where is it decided that at this point you have fallen away and therefore cannot come back.
and more importantly in response to b), looking at the context of the verse would cause me to wonder if the verse is refering to something other than salvation. If we look further down the passage we see Hebrews 9-11 which towards the end of that segment says "And we desire that each one of you show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope until the end, that you do not become sluggish, but imitate those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.
Now if we look at the context of Hebrews 6:4-6 then we can see that the author is not talking about salvation but rather is talking about how we should always be progressing in our walk with Christ and the falling away where we cannot be brought back is not refering to salvation, but rather is refering to our usefulness to Gods service. (Hebrews 6:1-2) the overall passage here is refering to our progress in our walk, so to my understanding the way you use that verse is out of context.

3. In paragraph four i was confused as to what you were saying in reguards to Hebrews 10:26 however from my understanding this is what you were saying:
a) the passage was refering to believers
b) If we continue to live in sin we will lose our salvation because the passage says there will be no more sacrafices left for us

The first thing is that the passage is 100% refering to believers. the text says recieved, and in recieving it is more than just hearing, it is accepting. However your second premise is wrong. When the passage is put in context with the rest of the chapter we can see that it is not refering to salvation.

"If we deliberately keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifice for sins is left, 27but only a fearful expectation of judgment and of raging fire that will consume the enemies of God. 28Anyone who rejected the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace? 30For we know him who said, "It is mine to avenge; I will repay,"[d] and again, "The Lord will judge his people."[e] 31It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

If we look at the blue text along with the black to put it into context that it makes much more sense. I would suggest that the passage is not refering to the loss of salvation but rather a punishment. the people who rejected the law of moses were killed, so the passage is saying that those who reject the word of God how much more do that have to fear. My question to you is where else in thie passage is hell suggested other than verse 26.
And what would be that fearful judgement?

also look at verses 11-14 focusing on verse 14 "11Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God. 13Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool, 14because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.

I am sorry but this is all that i have had time to look up and pray about. i will have more in the comming weeks, but i leave for El Salvador tuesday night and will be back in 10 days. i should have more to give you at that point in time.
You aren't going to put off your trip for us? lol.
 
R

RadioU

Guest
#39
You aren't going to put off your trip for us? lol.
yes i did mean hebrew haha my bad,
i do not want to go beyond scripture with what that judgment is,
and finally.. i would if it were possiable, however i didnt choose the time of the missions trip, and besides, the plane ride/car ride willgive me more time to read and pray

If people who read this would be willing to pray for my missions trip that it would go well and we would be able to help the people with God in focs that would be great thanks.
 
T

thefightinglamb

Guest
#40
A disciple by definition is a learner, that sits under a teacher. Some can be disciples without salvation, if they are curious. Many of Christ's disciples came to hear what He had to say and quit when it got too difficult for them.
Crypto,

I believe this verse is using the same language either a 'backslider' or a 'carnal Christian' would be today. Anyone one confesses to know Jesus and then turns back because they find his teaching too hard...can they possibly be saved? I tell you the truth there are many who begin the trek but few who truly seek to follow.

I think anybody who turns back to sin either because 'they find the teachings of Jesus too hard' or 'they prefer living an ungodly life' can equally be called 'disciples who turned back' and anyone who has been a Christian even for as little as a month can possibly see this stupid phenomena of people who are his disciples but plunge foolishly back into death...

I think it rather narrow sighted to think someone who begins a quest for some distant land (in this case heaven) and have a road map (in this case Christ) assume that they will make it to the destination just because they begin.

God bless
tony
 
Last edited: