Footprint of Christ Discovered! Brand New! Location Revealed Through the Bible!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,810
25,988
113
#61
That's funny, I didn't see that on his link. You are not making sense. Praise Jesus
Did you click the link? Links take you to another page, often off site. If you did not even check out the link, how can you call it wrong, or say anything about it at all?
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,810
25,988
113
#62
And that's how this all started, it was only in the Psalms until the feet of Job were noticed. Now if you want to chalk up Job 13:27, the print, Joshua 13:27 the last mention of the Sea in the O.T., and the satellite imagery of the Sea of most of Christ's ministry as a big coincidence then that's your choice, have a good day, Praise Jesus
I will chalk up your ignorance as hatred of the truth.
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#63
Here is the next paragraph of the source you used (without providing the source):

"In Christian circles, a number of different attempts were made over the centuries to subdivide the biblical books into smaller pieces for easier reference to specific passages, especially in the European schools of the late Middle Ages and early Renaissance. The system of chapters used today is usually credited to Stephen Langton, who served as Archbishop of Canterbury in the early 1200s, and their first use was in copies of the Latin Vulgate version. A 14th-century rabbi, Solomon ben Ishmael, seems to have adapted Langton’s chapter divisions for use in Hebrew Bibles, complementing the existing verse divisions in the Masoretic Text. New Testament verse divisions seem to have been introduced by Robert Estienne in the 1550s."


Chris Heard, "Why Are Bible Chapters and Verses Numbered?", n.p. [cited 3 Mar 2018]. Online: https://www.bibleodyssey.org:443/en/tools/bible-basics/why-are-bible-chapters-and-verses-numbered

Our references differ in some details, but not in terms of my point: that the numbering did not exist until well after 1000 AD. Implying that I am ignorant is quite unnecessary. Asserting that one source is incorrect merely on the basis of difference with another source is logically untenable.
Somehow you are not able to wrap your head around this. It's not who or when that's the subject. It's how the natural progression occurred and the link you later edited in does not provide anything on that subject, right?
Now if you want to chalk up Job 13:27, the print, Joshua 13:27 the last mention of the Sea in the O.T., and the satellite imagery of the Sea of most of Christ's ministry as a big coincidence then that's your choice, have a good day, Praise Jesus
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,679
13,364
113
#65
Wrong, it didn't say how, it just said who and when. Stop the hate and pay attention. Praise Jesus
"Stop the hate"? Seriously? You're being ridiculous and oversensitive.
I was telling her for her own sake. Having that kind of sentiment is bad for ones health. Now your gonna throw rocks for me helping her out? Lol:p
If she were demonstrating hatred toward you, I wouldn't have made the comment I did. I found your comment ridiculous and groundless. Telling the truth "is bad for one's health" ... another ridiculous statement. "Now your (sic) gonna (sic) throw rocks for me helping her out?" I wasn't, and you weren't.

You're (not "your") digging yourself a hole here. Perhaps you intend some of your comments in good humour, but they are not funny.
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#66
If she were demonstrating hatred toward you, I wouldn't have made the comment I did. I found your comment ridiculous and groundless. Telling the truth "is bad for one's health" ... another ridiculous statement. "Now your (sic) gonna (sic) throw rocks for me helping her out?" I wasn't, and you weren't.

You're (not "your") digging yourself a hole here. Perhaps you intend some of your comments in good humour, but they are not funny.
Seriously, yes stop the rude and hateful comments. telling someone that made a minor error about the number of verses that contained "feet" in Job that "they can't even count to seven" seems to be a person with a mean and hateful sentiment, I dunno. And then you want to label it as truth telling Lol:p booooooo
 
Last edited:

Laish

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2016
1,666
448
83
57
#67
If she were demonstrating hatred toward you, I wouldn't have made the comment I did. I found your comment ridiculous and groundless. Telling the truth "is bad for one's health" ... another ridiculous statement. "Now your (sic) gonna (sic) throw rocks for me helping her out?" I wasn't, and you weren't.

You're (not "your") digging yourself a hole here. Perhaps you intend some of your comments in good humour, but they are not funny.
A recommendation gather your pearls,and shake off the dust from your sandals . Her desire to get the last word will not let her admit where she is wrong . Chuck it up to youth or a emotional investment . Either way logic and rationally are poor tools in this discussion.
Blessings
Bill
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,810
25,988
113
#68
And I will chaulk up your hatred of the truth as ignorance
Jesus is the Truth. You are running after signs and wonders. Jesus decried signs and wonders for such as you. By the way, you have already called me many names. Your overkill is gauche.
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#70
Jesus is the Truth. You are running after signs and wonders. Jesus decried signs and wonders for such as you. By the way, you have already called me many names. Your overkill is gauche.
You are a false accuser, it was merely a Bible study, lol Praise Jesus
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#72
A recommendation gather your pearls,and shake off the dust from your sandals . Her desire to get the last word will not let her admit where she is wrong . Chuck it up to youth or a emotional investment . Either way logic and rationally are poor tools in this discussion.
Blessings
Bill
you mean 'spit some venom one last time, lol Praise Jesus
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,810
25,988
113
#73
You are a false accuser, it was merely a Bible study, lol Praise Jesus
Chasing after an alleged footprint of Jesus is not "merely a Bible study."
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#74
To encourage and strengthen the Saints as the days will grow darker.:rolleyes:
But my courage and strength don't come from math-gone-funky on the chapter and verses. And I think the days ebb and flow on the darkness scale. (Not into getting hyped up on the any-minute-nowness of modern eschatology either.)
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#76
If you knew how the scripture was written and how the verse numbers were chosen according to very carefully drawn lines of the parchment and papyrus , you wouldn't of replied, sorry. Even the Jews have their chapter and verse numbers exactly the same for Job and the book of Joshua. Praise Jesus
So, your theology is based on the publishing of the Bible rather than the author?

Not impressing me either.

Suggestion: Get to know the author rather than studying so hard on publication method.
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#78
But my courage and strength don't come from math-gone-funky on the chapter and verses. And I think the days ebb and flow on the darkness scale. (Not into getting hyped up on the any-minute-nowness of modern eschatology either.)
I guess it's all a coincidence

 
D

Depleted

Guest
#79
It's not essential to salvation. I do think it would be a little haphazard to count Job 13:27 and Joshua 13:27 as a big coincidence, my opinion.
I don't think your avatar of a wolf lying down with lambs is a coincidence either compared to lions lying down with them, however I'm not going to make some mighty declaration of revelation over it either.

(And why isn't this post in the Conspiracy Theory forum again?)

Bored now.
 

lydever91

Senior Member
Aug 5, 2011
491
14
18
#80
So, your theology is based on the publishing of the Bible rather than the author?

Not impressing me either.

Suggestion: Get to know the author rather than studying so hard on publication method.
It's based on the original manuscripts. Fortunately, impressing you is not the goal.
Suggestion: Don't perish for lack of knowledge