Free Gifts Come With Conditions....
- Thread starter SeaBass
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
excellent point! in fact this is what we have been saying all along. of ourse if I treat it well, I will get great blessings from it. if not. I will not benefit from it, BUT IT IS STILL MINE!
In fat, this puppy was offered to 6 of us.
2 rejeted it because they did not want it. One tried it out because he was not sure he trusted it would benefit him, so the owner let him try it out but said he would have to recieve it fully before it was actually his. The guy ended up giving it bak never having owned it. 1 Guy tried to pay for it, because he did not like receiving charity, which offended the giver so he did not recieve it. 2 guys took it with gladness. 1 guy took great are of it, and learned what he needed to do to benefit the most from it. The other did not take good are of it, And complained all the time as to why he was not benefiting like others. (BUT THE GIFT WAS STILL HIS)
thanks for this excellent example. Now if you would only see it for what it truly is
In fat, this puppy was offered to 6 of us.
2 rejeted it because they did not want it. One tried it out because he was not sure he trusted it would benefit him, so the owner let him try it out but said he would have to recieve it fully before it was actually his. The guy ended up giving it bak never having owned it. 1 Guy tried to pay for it, because he did not like receiving charity, which offended the giver so he did not recieve it. 2 guys took it with gladness. 1 guy took great are of it, and learned what he needed to do to benefit the most from it. The other did not take good are of it, And complained all the time as to why he was not benefiting like others. (BUT THE GIFT WAS STILL HIS)
thanks for this excellent example. Now if you would only see it for what it truly is
Working to take care of the puppy was a condition that came with the puppy. You are not going to be given a puppy you will not take care of. If you do not work to take care of it then you give it back.
The point being avoided is your working to care for the puppy does not in anyway mean you earned the puppy.
E
You do every day stating there are conditions, and it can be lost.
Stop saying no one is saying it when you know you are.
So you admit you have to earn the right to keep the puppy. thus earning the puppy.
Why do you continue to fool yourself into thinking your not earning. You just proved your trying to earn the puppy,
If the condition is I must take care. then I must earn the right to have the gift in order to keep it. Basic english 101. Or have you forgotten how things work.
Stop saying no one is saying it when you know you are.
So you admit you have to earn the right to keep the puppy. thus earning the puppy.
Why do you continue to fool yourself into thinking your not earning. You just proved your trying to earn the puppy,
If the condition is I must take care. then I must earn the right to have the gift in order to keep it. Basic english 101. Or have you forgotten how things work.
here's an example of the issue:
God owed Naaman nothing but out of God's grace He would freely heal Naaman's disease. But God's free gift of healing came with the conditions that Naaman dip 7 times in the Jordan River.
Simple question: did Naaman doing the work of going and dipping mean his healing was earned and not of grace?
Time out...
Let me help you see what I'm trying clarify.
1.) Works come from genuine faith, not the other way around.
2.) Receiving something that's free is not a work.
Understand?
Don't make it seem like salvation is something you have to redeem over and over again. If that were the case, we'd still be sacrificing tributes to God.
I'll say it again, Works comes from a genuine faith, it doesn't work the other way around.
I hope you're not one of those types who continue because they're scared of looking silly if they're wrong.
To answer your question:
1.) Naaman lived before Jesus came, my posts concerned salvation.
2.) Simple question: did Naaman doing the work of going and dipping mean his healing was earned and not of grace? With this question you're kinda proving my point.
Let me help you see what I'm trying clarify.
1.) Works come from genuine faith, not the other way around.
2.) Receiving something that's free is not a work.
Understand?
Don't make it seem like salvation is something you have to redeem over and over again. If that were the case, we'd still be sacrificing tributes to God.
I'll say it again, Works comes from a genuine faith, it doesn't work the other way around.
I hope you're not one of those types who continue because they're scared of looking silly if they're wrong.
To answer your question:
1.) Naaman lived before Jesus came, my posts concerned salvation.
2.) Simple question: did Naaman doing the work of going and dipping mean his healing was earned and not of grace? With this question you're kinda proving my point.
For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life.
Is this a promise? What is the condition of this promise? whosoever believes in him
Some are not saved because:
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned alrady, because he hkath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Who is condemned? he who has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God
Is that a promise? Is it assured that 'he who has not believed is condemned? So if that promise is given as a surety why not John 3:16?
Is this a promise? What is the condition of this promise? whosoever believes in him
Some are not saved because:
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned alrady, because he hkath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Who is condemned? he who has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God
Is that a promise? Is it assured that 'he who has not believed is condemned? So if that promise is given as a surety why not John 3:16?