I need ur thoughts about this RECOVERD 2000 yo bible !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
AziziLoveChrist

AziziLoveChrist

Moderator
#1
Apr 20, 2012
127
17
18
meccatochrist.org
#1
hey guys , I found this website and they clam that they have found the original bible in the dead sea !
now they also clam that the bible we have is diffrent than the original bible they've found in the dead sea of Jordn !
see this and let me know of ur thoughts about it !


coYHWHjerusalem


thanks !
 
Drett

Drett

Senior Member
#2
Feb 16, 2013
1,663
38
48
#2
I think if it is written in Hebrew and dated 2000 years, I think that would be interesting.
 
looking2Jesus

looking2Jesus

Banned
#3
Jan 28, 2012
56
0
0
#3
AziziLoveChrist said:
hey guys , I found this website and they clam that they have found the original bible in the dead sea !
now they also clam that the bible we have is diffrent than the original bible they've found in the dead sea of Jordn !
see this and let me know of ur thoughts about it !


coYHWHjerusalem


thanks !
Click to expand...
thanks ill take a look at it ..
 
R

RachelBibleStudent

Guest
#4
#4
actually from reading the description it just sounds like a typical 'sacred name' bible...where they replace our common terms derived from greek or latin or english...and replace them with hebraic terms...

the problem is that these 'retro translations' are often based on faulty assumptions... like i see that this bible translates the new testament from the aramaic...the problem is that the aramaic text they are using actually dates to -later- than the greek text...this aramaic text is actually a translation of the greek text...so they are ending up with an english translation of an aramaic translation of what they claim is itself a greek translation of an original aramaic text...
 
W

WordGaurdian

Senior Member
#5
May 1, 2011
473
8
0
#5
still busy but so far it is pretty cool... thanks for the link
 
AziziLoveChrist

AziziLoveChrist

Moderator
#8
Apr 20, 2012
127
17
18
meccatochrist.org
#8
RachelBibleStudent said:
actually from reading the description it just sounds like a typical 'sacred name' bible...where they replace our common terms derived from greek or latin or english...and replace them with hebraic terms...

the problem is that these 'retro translations' are often based on faulty assumptions... like i see that this bible translates the new testament from the aramaic...the problem is that the aramaic text they are using actually dates to -later- than the greek text...this aramaic text is actually a translation of the greek text...so they are ending up with an english translation of an aramaic translation of what they claim is itself a greek translation of an original aramaic text...
Click to expand...
Thanks ! :)
 
R

richie_2uk

Guest
#10
#10
Looks like another attempt to change the true word of God. as it says in all bibles that no one shall add or take away. Yet they still trying to find a perfect bible to suit the needs of humans. But that's my opinion.
 
R

richie_2uk

Guest
#12
#12
AziziLoveChrist said:
thanks for sharing ur opinion !:)
Click to expand...
you watch, few years down the line, they will all of a sudden to find a new discovery of what they call biblical words. and think automatically its part of the bible. Jesus revealed every thing in the bible. He Has hid nothing. yet people will claim they found dead sea scrolls and link it to the bible, were it could be journals or something that people written around the time of Jesus. Until Jesus tells me that there is more to add to his word, I will stick in believing the word the true word of God, the Bible. and not mans findings and claims. as we know the Enemy is out to confuse the world, deceive and blind.
 
Domenic

Domenic

Banned
#13
Oct 14, 2012
335
4
0
#13
They claim it is a Hebrew Bible, made in Jerusalem. The people in Jerusalem are from the tribe of Judah...they are not hebrew.
The tribe of Juda has not been Gods people for two thousand years. When Jesus sent his apostils out to spread the Good News of the Kingdom, He told them not to speak to the tribe of Judah.
 
teuful_hunden

teuful_hunden

Banned
#14
Apr 21, 2012
269
1
0
#14
Domenic said:
They claim it is a Hebrew Bible, made in Jerusalem. The people in Jerusalem are from the tribe of Judah...they are not hebrew.
The tribe of Juda has not been Gods people for two thousand years. When Jesus sent his apostils out to spread the Good News of the Kingdom, He told them not to speak to the tribe of Judah.
Click to expand...
But Jesus preached in Jerusalem... Jesus was born from the tribe of Judah... Peter did his ministry in Jerusalem... WHAT?!
 
RedTent

RedTent

Banned
#16
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#16
They found the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1945 or so. The happenings surrounding that were not quiet. The news media would have loved it if they could have found an interesting scandal connected with the scrolls.

If this story has facts in it, we don't have to even think about it right now. The news media searching for stories, the biblical scholars looking for documents, all kinds of people will be giving us all sorts of stories aout it.
 
JGPS

JGPS

Banned
#17
Jan 11, 2013
629
0
0
#17
RachelBibleStudent said:
actually from reading the description it just sounds like a typical 'sacred name' bible...where they replace our common terms derived from greek or latin or english...and replace them with hebraic terms...

the problem is that these 'retro translations' are often based on faulty assumptions... like i see that this bible translates the new testament from the aramaic...the problem is that the aramaic text they are using actually dates to -later- than the greek text...this aramaic text is actually a translation of the greek text...so they are ending up with an english translation of an aramaic translation of what they claim is itself a greek translation of an original aramaic text...
Click to expand...
No love for Aramic Primacy? I dunnno, Camel hair needle makes a lot of sense to me.
 
Domenic

Domenic

Banned
#18
Oct 14, 2012
335
4
0
#18
teuful_hunden said:
But Jesus preached in Jerusalem... Jesus was born from the tribe of Judah... Peter did his ministry in Jerusalem... WHAT?!
Click to expand...
Mary, Mother of Jesus was a Livit. Her husmand Joseph was a Jew, but not the father of Jesus. God is the father of Jesus. Jesus was born a Kivit. He preached his ministry in and around Jerusalem...the Jews rejected him...What?
 
teuful_hunden

teuful_hunden

Banned
#19
Apr 21, 2012
269
1
0
#19
I believe Mary was of the tribe of Judah. They did reject him but Peter preached during Pentecost and 3000 believed on the Christ. Jesus never said do not preach to the tribe of Judah.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.