Well Rachel, nothing is superior to God's word, which is the King James Holy Bible. The King James Bible is supernatural. It is a supernatural Book. And if you don't believe that, look up the King James Code by Pastor Mike Hoggard and see what the Holy Ghost revealed to Pastor Mike in regard to the Authorized Version. There is a numerical code system all through out the King James Bible. That alone should tell you that the King James Bible is not an ordinary book, but that it is the perfect and inspired word of God.
Rachel, it seems that you continue to misunderstand what Peter Ruckman's stance is in regard to verbal inspiration of the Holy Scriptures. Peter Ruckman never claimed that the original Hebrew and Greek autographs had flaws. Now what he does rightfully claim is that no one has ever seen an original autograph a day in their life! And he is absolutely correct. In fact, no one in the last 2,000 years has ever seen the original Greek or Hebrew autographs. The original autographs vanished away a long, long time ago. And what Peter Ruckman also claims is that the King James Bible is superior to the Originals. And he is right about that.
He also mentions that 2 Timothy 3:16 is not in reference to the original autographs. And again, he is absolutely right when he says that. Because if you read the verse right before it (2 Timothy 3:15) You will see that Timothy did not possess the original autographs. What Timothy had in his possession was a translation and a copy of the Holy Scriptures.
So whether you or any other Alexandrian likes it or not. The King James Bible is superior to the Original Autographs. The King James Bible has numbered verses. The Original Autographs did not.
And of course to re emphasize the reasons that Peter Ruckman gave in the video. I am going to list the four reasons he gave of why the King James Bible is superior to the Originals. You see I have to write them down here because most modern day Christians won't take at least 7 minutes of their time to watch a video to see whether or not what the man is saying and teaching is so. And these same modern professing Christians think that just because they have been "educated" in some university, they think that makes them qualified to sit in judgment over the word of God. Which means these "professing" Christians who deny the perfection of the King James Bible, think they are so smart, that they can correct God and that they can correct what He said. Let me you proud and arrogant stuffed shirts something, you do not correct God's word, you let God's word correct YOU.
And the reason why most of you Bible agnostics don't believe that any translation is perfect, is because you simply refuse to submit to a Final Authority. Well whether you like it or not, the King James Bible is the Final Authority. And it is God's perfect word.
Now here are the main reasons Peter Ruckman outlined in the video of why the King James Bible is superior to the Original Autographs:
*We can read the King James Bible. We cannot read the originals because we do not have the originals.
*You can teach and memorize the King James Bible, but you cannot teach nor can you memorize the originals. Again, this is due since we do not have the originals. Just as Peter Ruckman correctly pointed out.
*The King James Bible has separation between words and sentences. The Originals did not.
*More souls have been saved by the preaching of the King James Bible in the last 402 years than all the Original Autographs combined.
*And finally, the King James Bible is superior to the Greek simply because English is the Universal Langauge of the End Times. Greek has been a dead language for more than 1700 years.
And of course Peter Ruckman also points out the hypocrisy of the Alexandrians when he shows that they left out the Apocrypha from the Siniaticus greek text when they printed and published it. See, if they really believed that you cannot correct "the Greek" with the English, then they would have left the Apocrypha in the Siniaticus greek text. You see how fickle you Alexandrians are?
So you are clearly wrong Rachel. And your reasoning is just illogical and way off. And the reason you are so against Dr. Peter Ruckman is because when he exposes the hypocrisy of the Alexandrians and Greek professors out there who deny the perfection of the Authorized Version, he is also exposing your hypocrisy. Just face up to it. You cannot handle the information that Dr. Ruckman has given over the many years of the ministry which the Lord has given him.
Most Bible agnostics cannot handle the information given by Dr. Peter Ruckman and because of that, they have to resort to name calling. They call us King James Bible believers the following names: "Ruckmanite," "Church Splitter," "Divisive," "Biblicist," "Bible Worshipper," etc. They will call anyone who believes that the King James Bible is perfect a ruckmanite. Even though that Christian they are calling a Ruckmanite may have never heard of Dr. Ruckman in his life.
Peter Ruckman has done many good works for the Lord. Only the Judgment Seat of Christ will tell in that day how much this man of God has done for the Lord.