Jesus: Both Son and Father?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,263
5,620
113
#81
He does indeed say they are one; However in John 6:44-46
44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.
46 Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
KJV
They are clearly not identical hence their unity in Jn 10:30 can't mean that they are identical.
I didn't think they were identical
 

bluto

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2016
2,025
506
113
#83
So in John 10:30, Jesus doesn't say he and the Father are one in Greek? He says they are two? (I don't read Greek)
No lucy, the text of John 10:30 literally reads in the Greek, "I and the Father, We are one." It is true they are one in purpose but the immediate context is that the Father and the Son are one in nauture or essence. The Jews understood what Jesus mean't because at vs31 it says, "The Jews took up stones again to stone Him."

Why? At vs 32 Jesus says, "I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of thme are you stoneing Me? Vs33, "The Jews answered Him, For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; (what was the blasphemy lucy?) because You being a man, make Yourself God." Btw, you don't have to know Greek to understand what's going on, just read the context. Does that make sense to you lucy? :eek;

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#84
The word translated 'one' in Dt 6:4 Deut 6:4
Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord:
KJV

is the Hebrew word אֶֽחָד ; which signifies composite unity NOT absolute unity; as seen in Num 13:23
23 And they came unto the brook of Eshcol, and cut down from thence a branch with one cluster of grapes, and they bare it between two upon a staff; and they brought of the pomegranates, and of the figs.
KJV
This is what I have understood from other scholars, that the word implies not a numeric value but a unity of ontology.
 

oldhermit

Senior Member
Jul 28, 2012
9,142
612
113
69
Alabama
#85
So in John 10:30, Jesus doesn't say he and the Father are one in Greek? He says they are two? (I don't read Greek)
I was talking about the Greek in John 1. It is not necessary to read Greek to understand the context in John 10.

In John 10, the context of 'one' is in relationship to Jesus and the Father as the shepherd of the flock. The flock obviously represents the people of God. The shepherd is represented in the following ways. Jesus says, I am the good shepherd” to whom the flock belongs and that no one can snatch them out of his hand. He then says that they also belong to the Father and no one can snatch them out of his hand. He closes this illustration then with the statement, “I and the Father are one.” The question then is one what? Contextually, they are one shepherd, one owner of the flock. Always allow the context to define its own use of language. We learn from a number of O.T. passages like Psalms 23 and Ezekiel 34 that the Shepherd of Israel is Jehovah. The Jews to whom Jesus spoke did not miss the implication of Jesus' illustration.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,876
26,037
113
#88
This is what I have understood from other scholars, that the word implies not a numeric value but a unity of ontology.
Fortress of Faith had a really good teaching recently on the compound unity of the Godhead. Their focus is on reaching Muslims, who of course believe we are polytheistic and commit shirk because we acknowledge Jesus as God, when Scripture teaches in several places that the Godhead is a compound. (FoF also aspires to educate Christians about Islam.)
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#89
I think this spells it out quite clearly:

John 8:17 “Even in your law it has been written that the testimony of two men is true.

John 8:18 “I am He who testifies about Myself, and the Father who sent Me testifies about Me.”

John 8:19 So they were saying to Him, “Where is Your Father?” Jesus answered, “You know neither Me nor My Father; if you knew Me, you would know My Father also.”

There is not indication of singularity here as far as I can see
 
Last edited:

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
#90
I think this spells it out quite clearly:

John 8:17 “Even in your law it has been written that the testimony of two men is true.

John 8:18 “I am He who testifies about Myself, and the Father who sent Me testifies about Me.”

John 8:19 So they were saying to Him, “Where is Your Father?” Jesus answered, “You know neither Me nor My Father; if you knew Me, you would know My Father also.”

There is not [an] indication of singularity here as far as I can see
Absolutely!
 

Locutus

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2017
5,928
685
113
#91
That was supposed be no indication..:p
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#93
Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

We know that this is a prophecy of Jesus Christ who is the Son. This verse of scriptures calls him the everlasting Father. If the Father and the Son are separate, how can this be?
This reeks of modalism. The Son, the Eternal Word, is NOT the Father. He is the Son, the second person of the Godhead.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#94
Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

We know that this is a prophecy of Jesus Christ who is the Son. This verse of scriptures calls him the everlasting Father. If the Father and the Son are separate, how can this be?
I'd bet dollars to donuts, if your moniker is what I think it is, is that you're of the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ, and they hold to the Oneness doctrine.
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#95
You're probably debating a dude who became an apostle after a few easy payments of $200.

I'd bet dollars to donuts, if your moniker is what I think it is, is that you're of the Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ, and they hold to the Oneness doctrine.
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#96
From one of the websites...


There is only ONE GOD: the Creator of the heavens and the earth, and of all mankind. This One God, the I AM, is manifested (revealed) to mankind as FATHER (Creator), SON (Savior)(1 Jn.5:20), and HOLY GHOST (indwelling Spirit) (Rom. 8:11). God is a Spirit (John 4:24), the Eternal One, the Creator of all things, and of all men. Thus making Him their Father (through creation) (Malachi 2:10). The LORD is the FIRST and the LAST, and beside Him there is no God (Isa. 44:6).
Modalism teaches that there is one God, and He manifests Himself as either the Father, OR the Son, OR the Holy Spirit.

They're heretics to advocate and teach that.

Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ - Beliefs
 

Deade

Called of God
Dec 17, 2017
16,724
10,530
113
77
Vinita, Oklahoma, USA
yeshuaofisrael.org
#97
No lucy, the text of John 10:30 literally reads in the Greek, "I and the Father, We are one." It is true they are one in purpose but the immediate context is that the Father and the Son are one in nauture or essence. The Jews understood what Jesus mean't because at vs31 it says, "The Jews took up stones again to stone Him."

Why? At vs 32 Jesus says, "I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of thme are you stoneing Me? Vs33, "The Jews answered Him, For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; (what was the blasphemy lucy?) because You being a man, make Yourself God." Btw, you don't have to know Greek to understand what's going on, just read the context. Does that make sense to you lucy? :eek;

IN GOD THE SON,
bluto
Thank you bluto for putting that oneness character in his place. I mean: with apostolic in his username, what were we supposed to think. Then he named thread after his oneness thinking. I was getting ready to call him on it, when I came upon your post. :cool:
 

SovereignGrace

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
5,455
236
63
#98
Jesus himself is not THE father, although in the Christian faith he shall be called "the everlasting father", but that does not make Jesus THE father.

Just as Abraham is called the the father of the faithful:

Rom 4:16 For this reason it is by faith, in order that it may be in accordance with grace, so that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all.

Adam Clarke in his commentary states

The everlasting Father,
"The Father of the everlasting age" - Or עד אבי Abi ad, the Father of eternity.

This makes much sense and avoids the confusion that is part of your opening post.
Tread lightly, as you're dealing with an Apostate Church of Jesus Christ member..