My Second ( FINAL) Effort: Why Pentecostal Doct Speaking in Tongues is False Doctrine

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#1
This is a re-posting of an old thread, of which I had all my posts cut off into very small paragraphs, and thus muddying and ruining the OP. I apologize to everyone who read that and is now reading the same thing here, but I was cut off, and I had written FAR more than what I posted. I used that thread as a "test" to see what went wrong with the forum bug, so hopefully, this thread will be my final CORRECT effort in conveying my thoughts and opinions on the subject. I appreciate everyone taking the time to read, and possibly respond to what I say, good or bad! In the end, everything is for the Glory of Christ, and I truly don't want to create hardened hearts and/or make anyone upset with what I say. If you don't agree, we can respectfully discuss it, and perhaps either one of us will see the truth, or we will agree to disagree :) With all that being said... READ ON!!!!

First of all, I'd like to state that every single denomination has some form of false man-made doctrine that really doesn't belong and shouldn't be taught. I'm focusing on one, but that doesn't justify, edify, and/or say any other denomination is better in any way. If you need to know, I'm non-denominational, because I view all denominations as a division in the church that shouldn't be there. That being said, read on.

One more thing: My grandmother is a Pentecostal, who has been baptized by the Holy Spirit many years ago, and I have never met a better Christian role model in my life. I look up to her in all things involving the Lord, since she seems to be able to recognize His voice far better than myself, and she is always willing to have very long biblical discussions with me, which we both enjoy. I also find that many Pentecostals are some of the best Christians I have ever met, and many are very very strong in their faith. I admire that, and I am in no way saying they are not AMAZING Christians. I am merely going to discuss the issue of the "speaking in tongues" area of the Pentecostal/Assembly of God type doctrine.

I've thought about all of this for quite a long time, being mainly the Gifts of the Holy Spirit. For a LONG, LONG time, I pondered on why I haven't spoken in "tongues," prophesied, etc etc. I also always wondered how quite a few Pentecostal Doctrine churches specifically said a person had to speak in tongues to show proof of being baptized in the Holy Spirit and/or saved, especially since I KNEW I am and already had been saved for quite a long time. I've felt the Holy Spirit touch my life (as well as the negative kind for you who actively enjoy the gift (sometimes feels like a curse) of discernment out there), and I've never had doubts into my salvation. To add to that, many Pentecostal preachers would claim you are a spiritually "dead" Christian if you were not actively either A) Speaking in tongues B) Interpretating aforementioned gibberish tongues or C) rolling on the floor doing the chicken dance/foaming at the mouth and doing the stanky leg.

Mainly, I've come up with one distinct conclusion: A large majority of Pentecostalism is a false doctrine hypnosis emotion scam. I'm NOT saying that all of it is, but there are a few things that I strongly believe is sensationalism, emotional hypnosis, and immature spiritualism in a very bad manner. I say this with a heavy heart, since I really don't want that to be true.

1. Speaking in Tongues - This is the most controversial aspect of all Pentecostalism, and the one that really sets them apart from almost all other denominations. Speaking in Tongues seems to be the "proof" aspect that many hold to with lockjaw. I guess, because of that, I should start here.


Matthew 7:21-24 (NIV)
T
21 Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’


Deuteronomy 18:20-22 (NIV)


20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”
21 You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the LORD?” 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the LORD does not take place or come true, that is a message the LORD has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.


2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 (NIV)


9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.


Colossians 2:18 (King James Version)


18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,


(basically, this means someone created a vision in their own mind, while God states simply that they are disillusions, and not from Him.)

Jeremiah 14:14-16 (King James Version)


14Then the LORD said unto me, The prophets prophesy lies in my name: I sent them not, neither have I commanded them, neither spake unto them: they prophesy unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart.
15Therefore thus saith the LORD concerning the prophets that prophesy in my name, and I sent them not, yet they say, Sword and famine shall not be in this land; By sword and famine shall those prophets be consumed.
16And the people to whom they prophesy shall be cast out in the streets of Jerusalem because of the famine and the sword; and they shall have none to bury them, them, their wives, nor their sons, nor their daughters: for I will pour their wickedness upon them.


Anyone getting a point here? I should have put them all in KJV quotes, but some are stated better in NIV, while others are clearly stated better in KJV. If you'd like, just type in the passage in google and you'll find the KJV if you don't like NIV.

Anyway, none of this directly refutes the Holy Spirit giving anyone the ability to speak in Tongues or Prophesy (tongues often do both) in today's world, so I'll get into that. I just wanted to give a few clear quotes to show the obvious.

Anyway, the purpose of speaking in tongues in the early Church (Book of Acts up to about 100 ADish) was to give miracles to edify and give proof that Christianity is the truth. Back then, unlike today's world, Christianity was a largely budding and 'niche' religion, being strictly a Judaism subculture, with a few Gentiles mixed in here and there. Obviously, the Apostles traveled the world to spread the Word, but the Early Church NEEDED these miracles to give proof. The Bible had not been created as of yet (aside from the Old Testament books, of which Moses wrote the first 5, others wrote the books that followed, and Christianity needed every miracle God could give it to give proof. The overall consensus was that EVERYONE that saw these miracles AGREED that they were real, and NO ONE could refute them, not even the enemies of Christianity. They were entirely supernatural AND instant. You don't see that in today's world, where most miracles either can be explained away with science, take months to happen (healing), or overall seem to be based on emotion rather than supernatural anything.

Before I continue, I want to explain one thing. Charismatic churches feed on EMOTION. This is an obvious truth, but emotion isn't what God is about. It is stated many times in the Bible that emotion is something God gives to IMMATURE Christians, who are like babies in their faith. When a Christian grows spiritually, God moves away from giving you strictly emotional feelings and gives you stronger pillars to build your faith/spiritual life upon. Once again, emotion is for spiritually immature Christians, and it is NOT the deciding force to make you an "elite" spiritually mature christian, as many charismatic/pentecostal churches would have their members believe. Don't fall into that trap where if you don't feel all emotional when you pray, that God isn't with you or hears you. That mistake is often made by new Christians and/or Charismatic/Pentecostal Christians. It is wrong.

To add to that before I move on, Isaiah lived off emotions and feelings as well, and look what happened to him. One minute, his faith was so strong that he was absolutely destroying the followers of Baal in their little "test" of God, but the next he is running/hiding for his life, afraid of evil spirits following him, simply because he lacked spiritual faith once the "feeling" of God departed him. Don't fall into that trap. God will depart from you quite a bit, if only to test your faith and/or make you stronger spiritually. Anyway....

Reasons Speaking In Tongues In Today's World/Time is False:

Here's a passage to ponder over while you read on:

1 Corinthians 13:8-13 (NIV)


8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 1011 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears.
13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love.


The first thing we need to know is: What IS speaking in tongues?

The 5 Bible Quotes Supporting Speaking in Tongues:

First:

Mark 16:17-20 (NIV)


17 And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”
19 After the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, he was taken up into heaven and he sat at the right hand of God. 20 Then the disciples went out and preached everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed his word by the signs that accompanied it.


Second:

Acts 2:4-8 (NIV)


4 All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues[a] as the Spirit enabled them.
5 Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken. 7 Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language?


Notice a key point here: Those that spoke in tongues each spoke in a REAL language, one that they never would have known naturally, and yet other foreigners in the crowd recognized it. Modern speaking in tongues is usually complete gibberish (and most Pentecostals will agree with that statement), and it has little to no real life language (past or present) to support it. It is merely gibberish, plain and simple. Is it a coincidence that the Apostles spoke in Tongues of real languages that foreigners could understand, while today's speakers say gibberish that only select few interpreters can? Coincidence? Is it that hard to understand WHY the Apostles would need to speak in tongues to foreigners that possibly didn't understand Hebrew/Greek/Aramaic to bring them the Word of God? Coincidence?

Third:

Acts 2:5-12 (NIV)

5 Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6 When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard their own language being spoken. 7 Utterly amazed, they asked: “Aren’t all these who are speaking Galileans? 8 Then how is it that each of us hears them in our native language? 9 Parthians, Medes and Elamites; residents of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia,[a] 10 Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya near Cyrene; visitors from Rome 11 (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs—we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!” 12 Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, “What does this mean?”

Fourth:

Acts 10:44-48 (NIV)


44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit came on all who heard the message. 45 The circumcised believers who had come with Peter were astonished that the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out even on Gentiles. 46 For they heard them speaking in tongues[a] and praising God.
Then Peter said, 47 “Surely no one can stand in the way of their being baptized with water. They have received the Holy Spirit just as we have.” 48 So he ordered that they be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked Peter to stay with them for a few days.


Fifth:

Acts 19:2-6 (NIV)

1 While Apollos was at Corinth, Paul took the road through the interior and arrived at Ephesus. There he found some disciples 2 and asked them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when[a] you believed?” They answered, “No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.”
3 So Paul asked, “Then what baptism did you receive?”
“John’s baptism,” they replied.
4 Paul said, “John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” 5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 When Paul placed his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came on them, and they spoke in tongues and prophesied. 7 There were about twelve men in all.


Now that we have that out of the way, let's go over it.

First passage: (1) Casting out demons; (2) speaking with new tongues; (3) picking up serpents; (4) drinking deadly poison; and (5) healing the sick. Jesus promised that this would happen, and they did. The reason for this was so that the Apostles could go forth and preach, and they used miracles to affirm what they preached was true. After the counsel of Nicea, when the Bible was finally formed as a whole, these gifts weren't needed. Why would they be? The Bible is the ultimate proof. It is the ultimate miracle. It is the ultimate Truth. Miracles aren't needed as "proof" any longer, as the Bible does away with the need for supernatural signs. Also, the bible is translated in every known language in the world as I speak, so the passage I already gave:

1 Corinthians 13:12 12

For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears.


clearly shows that these past "gifts" will cease (at least in a large majority), because they are not needed any longer. Speaking in Tongues as "proof" of being baptized in the Holy Spirit and/or being saved is false doctrine!

Also, a little tidbit of knowledge: Mormons, Latter-Day Saints, and Jehovah's Witnesses also claim to speak in tongues and prophesy as part of their doctrine. Are they also baptized in the Holy Spirit and saved?

One more interesting tidbit: The Biblical Church of Corinth was blessed with more gifts of the Spirit than any other in documented history. Did the bible say that they were spiritually mature "elite" Christians? Let's read:

1 Corinthians 3:1-3 (NIV)


1 Brothers and sisters, I could not address you as people who live by the Spirit but as people who are still worldly—mere infants in Christ. 2 I gave you milk, not solid food, for you were not yet ready for it. Indeed, you are still not ready. 3 You are still worldly. For since there is jealousy and quarreling among you, are you not worldly? Are you not acting like mere humans?


1 Corinthians 14 (NIV)


1 Follow the way of love and eagerly desire gifts of the Spirit, especially prophecy. 2 For anyone who speaks in a tongue[a] does not speak to people but to God. Indeed, no one understands them; they utter mysteries by the Spirit. 3 But the one who prophesies speaks to people for their strengthening, encouraging and comfort. 4 Anyone who speaks in a tongue edifies themselves, but the one who prophesies edifies the church. 5 I would like every one of you to speak in tongues, but I would rather have you prophesy. The one who prophesies is greater than the one who speaks in tongues,[c] unless someone interprets, so that the church may be edified. 6 Now, brothers and sisters, if I come to you and speak in tongues, what good will I be to you, unless I bring you some revelation or knowledge or prophecy or word of instruction? 7 Even in the case of lifeless things that make sounds, such as the pipe or harp, how will anyone know what tune is being played unless there is a distinction in the notes? 8 Again, if the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? 9 So it is with you. Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying? You will just be speaking into the air. 10 Undoubtedly there are all sorts of languages in the world, yet none of them is without meaning. 11 If then I do not grasp the meaning of what someone is saying, I am a foreigner to the speaker, and the speaker is a foreigner to me. 12 So it is with you. Since you are eager for gifts of the Spirit, try to excel in those that build up the church.
13 For this reason the one who speaks in a tongue should pray that they may interpret what they say. 14 For if I pray in a tongue, my spirit prays, but my mind is unfruitful. 15 So what shall I do? I will pray with my spirit, but I will also pray with my understanding; I will sing with my spirit, but I will also sing with my understanding. 16 Otherwise when you are praising God in the Spirit, how can someone else, who is now put in the position of an inquirer,[d] say “Amen” to your thanksgiving, since they do not know what you are saying? 17 You are giving thanks well enough, but no one else is edified.
18 I thank God that I speak in tongues more than all of you. 19 But in the church I would rather speak five intelligible words to instruct others than ten thousand words in a tongue.

TO BE CONTINUED!...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#2
Now, I hope that no one that reads this mistakes me from saying that the gift of speaking in tongues is impossible, not real, unable to be done in today's world, and/or is wrong. I merely want to state that the PENTECOSTAL/CHARISMATIC teachings of speaking in tongues as the BE ALL/END ALL of "proof" of being either A) Saved or B) Baptized in the Holy Spirit is FALSE.


The meat and potatoes of everything I'm trying to say is this: Actively seeking for the gift of speaking in tongues, acting as if it is the greatest gift (instead of a lessor, or even the least), telling other Christians that speaking in tongues is the only way you are saved/baptized through the Spirit, calling Christians who cannot speak in tongues spiritually dead, telling those that do not speak in tongues that they are living in deep sin, and therefore God does not want to give them gifts of the Spirit: All of these are wrong, hurtful, and false doctrine. The Word of God does NOT teach this, and you should not teach this either. As others have stated in other posts, being unable to speak in tongues at a younger age in a Pentecostal church has ostracized them to the point of almost losing their faith entirely.

As I stated in my previous thread, telling anyone that they HAVE TO speak in tongues to be a spiritually "alive" Christian is wrong. The Holy Spirit gives gifts as He wills, and we are not the ones who decide it. Secondly, PRACTICING AND/OR PRAYING for the gift of speaking in tongues is IMMATURE. Scriptures clearly state this, so why do people continue to use it as their "proof" when so many Pentecostals actually FAKE this? Many Pentecostals also fake the interpretations, which could be seen as even worse. I honestly (and sadly) believe that this doctrine of speaking in tongues has it's seeds from the devil. As I've stated before, all archtypes of Mormons claim the SAME THING as the charismatic types, and are they also saved/baptized in the Spirit? I believe that many Pentecostal/Charasmatic types are led astray, and I only hope to help them realize this, if only so they can continue to love and serve the Lord as best they can. I do this out of love, not out of envy or hate. Please don't mistake that, as I know I may hurt some feelings unintentionally through these posts.


The history of the MODERN teaching of speaking in tongues is a dubious one at best. Beyond Paul and later books of the new testament, there is no documentation of the gift of speaking in tongues as a standard thing. Past around 70-100 AD, it was almost unknown. This all changed in the 20th century charismatic movements.

As Paul clearly stated, once again I'll post it:

1 Corinthians 13:8-10

8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears.

This passage shows that the gift of tongues will CEASE. The reason is that it ISN'T NEEDED any longer. The proof is in scripture. Paul states that Love will never cease, but the gifts of prophesy, tongues, and knowledge WOULD. Who are we to deny scripture, based on 20th century Modernism? Who are we?

I am not saying that the gift of tongues is gone in everyone, but it is NOT the standard at ALL any longer. It just isn't. If it was, than why is it that ONLY charismatic type churches seem to be "baptized in the Spirit," while every other denomination of Christians don't get this gift as a standard proof of being saved/baptized in the Spirit? Does anyone ever question this? Think about it. Are Pentecostals the ONLY ONES who are saved/baptized in the Spirit? Really? Use logic here, if you truly cannot accept scriptural interpretation as it is.

1 Corinthians 13:9-10

9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears.

When the completeness/PERFECT comes (AKA: When the FULL BIBLE/SCRIPTURE is finally completed... (aka COUNSEL OF NICEA) what is in part DISAPPEARS.

Back then, the bible was NOT completed. They had the old testament, but the new testament was NOT COMPLETED. They only knew IN PART the full knowledge. For this reason, they had the GIFT of KNOWLEDGE, which is a supernatural understanding of scripture, even if it was not completed in their time. The gift of knowledge is NOT NEEDED any longer, because it is completed already, in the BIBLE.

Does this make sense to anyone?


Also, as far as many who claim to speak in tongues, there are MANY preachers who give a "study guide" to LEARN how to speak in tongues. What they do is give a list of sentences to pray OVER AND OVER again, until your words start to sound like GIBBERISH. To any of you who have learned your "gift" of tongues in this way, you are truly speaking in gibberish. Your emotions might run high, but have you tested it as the Lord commands you? If I tell you to pray "Peter Piper Picked a Pickled Pepper" over and over and over again until you stumble your words and continue to stumble, will you consider that speaking in tongues as well? Exchange those words for "Wisdom in the Lord is Wonderful Worship under Which We Wonder at the Lord's Wonderfulness." Say that 10 times fast 1000 times, and you will have now "spoken in tongues" as these preachers would have you believe.


If need be, I'll continue writing more, but I'm tired! I have plenty more to say, but...

TO BE CONTINUED!
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#3
YAY! IT WORKED! WOOHOO!!! I may write more now, since I never was completely sure if what I've written would even work in this thread. I AM TRULY THANKFUL TO EVERYONE WHO HELPED ME FIX THE BUG THAT CUT MY POSTS OFF!

It tried to in the first post, almost ALWAYS after the first biblical quote of Matthew, but thanks to all of you, it finally worked after I edited it!

Anyway, for anyone that may find me wrong in what I'm saying, once again, please don't assume that I believe that the gift of speaking in tongues is completely unable to happen. I simply believe that there are quite a few Christians who have been led astray, and many of them "believe" they are truly speaking in tongues through the Holy Spirit, but I'd estimate far less than the majority really are.

Ask and you shall receive, but the gifts of the Spirit are based on His will, not ours. I think we would all do well to remember that, instead of assuming it is a standard gift that everyone receives. If this were the case, far more than just Pentecostal type churches would preach so heavily about receiving such a gift as proof.

I pray this helps at least someone, and if not, I pray that it is at least worth your time as a good read! I thank the Lord for giving me the patience to write all of this, especially after the constant "bugs" I've dealt with! Amen :)
 
Jul 30, 2010
882
4
0
#4
Really good post. I am 100% with you all the way. Thankyou.
 

Scotty

Senior Member
Feb 10, 2010
906
44
28
#5
Nice! Now that I'm actually able to read it all I can say I agree with you.
God bless you. Thanks for sharing :)
-Scotty
 
Z

Zossima

Guest
#6
"First of all, I'd like to state that every single denomination has some form of false man-made doctrine that really doesn't belong and shouldn't be taught. I'm focusing on one, but that doesn't justify, edify, and/or say any other denomination is better in any way. If you need to know, I'm non-denominational, because I view all denominations as a division in the church that shouldn't be there."

This is nothing more than a rationalization that permits you to sit as judge and pick and choose what you want to belive or not believe. What makes you think you are a better judge of true or false than any of the denominations? Either one of the "denominations" is the true Church or Jesus is a liar (Matt. 16:18). Ask yourself, can your head go one direction while your body goes another? If not, then what makes you believe the Church (the body of Christ) could lapse into error while Christ (the head) remains faithful? Are you saying also that Paul was wrong to say the Church is the body of Christ? Is there really no essential difference for God's people under the New Covenant as opposed to the Old Covenant? Is the people of God just as liable to error under the New Covenant as they were under the Old Covenant? If so, then what did Christ accomplish for us if we are still in the same boat we were in previously? The only essential difference I see between Roman Catholicism and non-denominationalism is that in the Roman Catholicism only one man gets to be Pope and pronounce infallible doctrine; in non-denominationalism every man gets to be Pope and proclaim doctrine for everyone else. According to Paul (Eph. 5), Christ loved the Church and gave His life for her. Why can't you be like Christ and stop picking the Church apart and love her instead? If what you have is love, then, no thank you.

the sinner, Zossima
 
S

Scotth1960

Guest
#7
This is a re-posting of an old thread, of which I had all my posts cut off into very small paragraphs, and thus muddying and ruining the OP. I apologize to everyone who read that and is now reading the same thing here, but I was cut off, and I had written FAR more than what I posted. I used that thread as a "test" to see what went wrong with the forum bug, so hopefully, this thread will be my final CORRECT effort in conveying my thoughts and opinions on the subject. I appreciate everyone taking the time to read, and possibly respond to what I say, good or bad! In the end, everything is for the Glory of Christ, and I truly don't want to create hardened hearts and/or make anyone upset with what I say. If you don't agree, we can respectfully discuss it, and perhaps either one of us will see the truth, or we will agree to disagree :) With all that being said... READ ON!!!!

First of all, I'd like to state that every single denomination has some form of false man-made doctrine that really doesn't belong and shouldn't be taught. I'm focusing on one, but that doesn't justify, edify, and/or say any other denomination is better in any way. If you need to know, I'm non-denominational, because I view all denominations as a division in the church that shouldn't be there. That being said, read on.

mentioned gibberish tongues or C) rolling on the floor doing the chicken dance/foaming at the mouth and doing the stanky leg.

Mainly, I've come up with one distinct conclusion: A large majority of Pentecostalism is a false doctrine hypnosis emotion scam. I'm NOT saying that all of it is, but there are a few things that I strongly believe is sensationalism, emotional hypnosis, and immature spiritualism in a very bad manner. I say this with a heavy heart, since I really don't want that to be true.

1. Speaking in Tongues - This is the most controversial aspect of all Pentecostalism, and the one that really sets them apart from almost all other denominations. Speaking in Tongues seems to be the "proof" aspect that many hold to with lockjaw. I guess, because of that, I should start here.

Anyway, the purpose of speaking in tongues in the early Church (Book of Acts up to about 100 ADish) was to give miracles to edify and give proof that Christianity is the truth. Back then, unlike today's world, Christianity was a largely budding and 'niche' religion, being strictly a Judk
Before I continue, I want to explain one thing. Charismatic churches feed on EMOTION. This is an obvious truth, but emotion isn't what God is about. It is stated many times in the Bible that emotion is something God gives to IMMATURE Christians, who are like babies in their faith. When a Christian grows spiritually, God moves away from giving you strictly emotional feelings and gives you stronger pillars to build your faith/spiritual life upon. Once again, emotion is for spiritually immature Christians, and it is NOT the deciding force to make you an "elite" spiritually mature christian, as many charismatic/pentecostal churches would have their members believe. Don't fall into that trap where if you don't feel all emotional when you pray, that God isn't with you or hears you. That mistake is often made by new Christians and/or Charismatic/Pentecostal Christians. It is wrong.

Also, a little tidbit of knowledge: Mormons, Latter-Day Saints, and Jehovah's Witnesses also claim to speak in tongues and prophesy as part of their doctrine. Are they also baptized in the Holy Spirit and saved?


TO BE CONTINUED!.


..Dear friend, My experience with "speaking in tongues" may or may not be typical of A/G (Assemblies of God) Pentecostalism. I was an Evangelical Lutheran, but I seem to have felt something was missing in my Christian experience as a Lutheran. So I went to first Assembly of God here in Erie PA when the church was located at the old 32nd and Liberty street. It since has become a doctor's office. Anyway, I went for the baptism of the Holy Spirit with the "initial physical evidence of speaking in other tongues" that was standard A/G doctrine. I have since come to believe the tongues described in Acts (Acts 2, Acts 19, etc.) were legitimate, human foreign languages such as Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Armenian, Arabic, Ethiopian, etc. Actually languages of first century Palestine. The practice of "tongues" as I did it was a form of self-hypnosis, or hypnosis at the suggestion of the Pentecostal brethren, I now believe. I still have the remnants of what I view as a psychological illness of sorts. People with damaged emotions and feelings of guilt over personal sins may be susceptible to this self-induced form of charismatic hysteria. I view it as just one other mental disorder. I don't believe it is a valid form of speaking in tongues, as it was practiced in Acts 2 originally. These were intelligible foreign languages. Tongues as I have spoken them are incomprehensible. I am just babbling out loud. May God forgive me for being so susceptible to other spirits and a kind of neurosis that this certainly is, if not a psychosis, which would be worse. Sometimes I am still afflicted with this disease. I don't view it as really either having edified or necessarily irreparably harmed me, either. It is just an embarrassing annoyance. I think the Holy Spirit is more intelligent than to inspire such corrupt babbling. Maybe I am wrong now about this, but I am not ashamed to say it, though I don't want to upset any Pentecostal brethren. I just view it as unnecessary. All we need in Christ is faith, hope, love, joy, the fruit of the Spirit, more than seeking for spiritual gifts. God will give gifts if He wills, but we should let Him bestow them on us, we don't have to actively seek them. They will come from knowing Him and His Word. From knowing Jesus Christ. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington

 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#8
"First of all, I'd like to state that every single denomination has some form of false man-made doctrine that really doesn't belong and shouldn't be taught. I'm focusing on one, but that doesn't justify, edify, and/or say any other denomination is better in any way. If you need to know, I'm non-denominational, because I view all denominations as a division in the church that shouldn't be there."

This is nothing more than a rationalization that permits you to sit as judge and pick and choose what you want to belive or not believe. What makes you think you are a better judge of true or false than any of the denominations? Either one of the "denominations" is the true Church or Jesus is a liar (Matt. 16:18). Ask yourself, can your head go one direction while your body goes another? If not, then what makes you believe the Church (the body of Christ) could lapse into error while Christ (the head) remains faithful? Are you saying also that Paul was wrong to say the Church is the body of Christ? Is there really no essential difference for God's people under the New Covenant as opposed to the Old Covenant? Is the people of God just as liable to error under the New Covenant as they were under the Old Covenant? If so, then what did Christ accomplish for us if we are still in the same boat we were in previously? The only essential difference I see between Roman Catholicism and non-denominationalism is that in the Roman Catholicism only one man gets to be Pope and pronounce infallible doctrine; in non-denominationalism every man gets to be Pope and proclaim doctrine for everyone else. According to Paul (Eph. 5), Christ loved the Church and gave His life for her. Why can't you be like Christ and stop picking the Church apart and love her instead? If what you have is love, then, no thank you.

the sinner, Zossima
I'm wondering how you can judge me like that off of one sentence? I still don't understand the hate everyone has for those who don't take up a specific denomination as their banner of faith? Are you saying that I am unable, through the power of Christ and the Holy Spirit, to interpret scripture in a better way than someone in the past may have done?

Are you stating that I am unable to be correct in my scriptural interpretation, of which is the same as MANY soul winners and famous Christian figures, is wrong simply because I do not choose to be attached to any specific denominational legalization? Are you stating that I do not love the church, because I view ALL denominations as a SPLIT in the church, of which WERE NOT THERE IN THE EARLY CHURCH?

Please explain, or please don't judge me based on one sentence that you clearly misunderstood, using hate and (possibly) ignorance as your judgment.

Here's a great quote I've read before:

"Now, let me tell you frankly, the best soul winners did not talk in tongues, not Spurgeon, not Wesley, not Moody, not Torrey, not J. Wilbur Chapman, not Gipsy Smith, not Billy Sunday and not Bob Jones, Sr." Evangelist John R. Rice
 
D

DanuckInUSA

Guest
#9
Glad you finally got this up now what is the short version?
 
F

FireOnTheAltar

Guest
#11
Upon salvation everyone recieves a measure of the Holy Spirit. The disciples were saved when Christ was crucified yet they were not ready to fulfill the great commission. If they had Christ would not have commanded them to tarry in Jerusalem until they recieved "power from on high". When that power did indeed manifest they were able to speak to every person from various places in their own tongue despite never having learned that language prior. This no doubt still happens today for I know many people whom God used in this manner.

Think about it, if God felt that the gift of speaking in tongues was relevant 2000 years ago as people traveled hundreds and thousands of miles to spread the gospel, why wouldn't it be more even more relevant now that all one has to do to find people who speak different languages is to drive to the nearest apartment complex within minutes of your home?

The truth is that we are reliant on Christ in every aspect of Christianity. The Holy Spirit is the fulfillment of Christ's promise to be with us always, "Christ in us, the hope of glory". We are to abide in Christ daily for guidance, grace & the strength to overcome temptation. It only makes sense the we would seek God for empowerment to spread the gospel.

While I do not agree with every aspect of modern pentecostalism, I believe them to be closer to the biblical description of what a christian should live like than some of the other denominations which clearly embrace doctrines of compromise in order to embrace sinful lifestyles void of both the fruits and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
 
F

FireOnTheAltar

Guest
#12
You did not ask therefore you did not recieve. God's not going to give you a gift inwhich you do not have the faith to ask for nor use.

As far as sin goes, I never suggested that you had sin in your life. I merely asked if there was some unrepentant sin and how such unrepentant sin can be a hinderance.

Case closed.

As for my personal beliefs, I am an Absolute Continuationist also known as a Pure Continuationist. We believe in Sola Scriptura in it's purest form. We do not believe in Dispensationalism or Sessationism, both of which are man made doctrines contrived to explain away aspects of scripture that do not line up their prefered man doctrinnes of compromise.
 
F

FireOnTheAltar

Guest
#13
Btw - Not every pentecostal / charismatic believes the way inwhich you describe. There are several pentecostal denominations as well as multiple nondenominational charasmatic belief systems out there as well. Basically what you described accounts for only two or three of the larger pentecostal groups.
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#14
This is nothing more than a rationalization that permits you to sit as judge and pick and choose what you want to belive or not believe. What makes you think you are a better judge of true or false than any of the denominations?
Let me answer your bible versus, of which you say that either all these denominations (or only one?) is the truth, or Jesus is a liar. This statement alone is not from God I would think, but perhaps you are just having a bad day, or maybe you are angry at what I've posted about speaking in tongues. I'm sorry you feel this way, but I'll try to answer your questions the best I can.

Either one of the "denominations" is the true Church or Jesus is a liar (Matt. 16:18). Ask yourself, can your head go one direction while your body goes another? If not, then what makes you believe the Church (the body of Christ) could lapse into error while Christ (the head) remains faithful? Are you saying also that Paul was wrong to say the Church is the body of Christ? Is there really no essential difference for God's people under the New Covenant as opposed to the Old Covenant? Is the people of God just as liable to error under the New Covenant as they were under the Old Covenant? If so, then what did Christ accomplish for us if we are still in the same boat we were in previously?
You don't honestly believe this, do you? Let me ask you, do you think that every denomination is correct? You attack Roman Catholicism, and yet you view all protestentism is correct as well? I am not Catholic, and I disagree with many of their ideas, but I also am not so foolish to believe that all protestant denominations are correct as well. Do you BLINDLY follow everything anyone who wears the title of preacher/pastor/minister says to you? You really do this?
Matthew 7:15

“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves.


Colossians 2:8

See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.

1 John 4:1
Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.


1 Jude 1:4
For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

2 Peter 2:1
But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.


1 Timothy 4:3-4
For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander off into myths.



Need I continue here? You should judge what EVERYONE teaches you. EVERYONE!!! I don't care what their credentials are, you should judge what they teach with scripture and prayer. NEVER take what someone tells you as correct, simply because THEY said it. NEVER take what a denomination tells you as correct, simply because THEY said it. The bible specifically tells you NOT TO DO THIS!!

I find it unbelievable that people take man made rules from denominations and place them on the same level as scripture. This is false doctrine. I even had two girls come up to me the other day, who were clearly from some church in the area, and they tried to tell me that there are TWO "Gods," Male and Female. They quoted a Genesis verse that said "let US make...." and then used a Revelations verse that mentioned the Bride and used it to proclaim there are TWO GODS!!! Should I have believed them, simply because they might have been from a well respected denomination? Perhaps, they were preachers of their denomination. Should I have listened?

Either one of the "denominations" is the true Church or Jesus is a liar (Matt. 16:18).

Matthew 16:18 (NIV)
18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.


Are you telling me that the early church had denominations? Did not Peter tell them to NOT divide themselves as such? Why are we all divided then? Are you saying that there is either only ONE true denomination, and thus making all other denominations false Christians, or that every denomination is true? Are you completely unwilling to believe that EVERY denomination has at least ONE man-made rule that is not scriptural within their founding statements? Please let me know? I would hope that you judge everything like the Lord asked us to, even my own statements. I clearly said I hoped others would respond, good or bad, and we would have discussions based on that. Instead, you merely attack me and proclaim I must be unable to know love and/or must not be a saved brother in Christ. I just don't understand where you come at me with this hateful attitude, but I hope it passes you by soon!


Just to remind you, there have been MANY denominations that are basically created by madmen. There are MANY denominations that were started as cults, and they still ARE cults. Mormonism is one such denomination. Are you professing that they are correct? Otherwise, are you professing that Pentecostalism is the ONLY correct denomination, and all others live in sin for not agreeing? This type of attitude leads to hate, which you have shown in your post by your judgments. My OP was to show that the modern day aspect of speaking in tongues is false doctrine, of which (many) who proclaim to do it are led astray. They are not evil people, but they simply do not know the truth, because they are not studying and looking for it.


I have to say this as my main point here: Many Christians blindly follow their church doctrine and their preacher/pastor/minister's teaching, and none of them study the bible themselves. There are many more who do study, yet they don't really understand. Most Christians blindly follow what they are told, without judging the teaching like the Lord specifically told us to do. I feel as if the Lord has given me "urges" at times to specifically study something, and when I do study it, I do it for weeks and weeks at a time. It takes up ALL of my free time when I do this, and I feel that I am not happy or content until I am done. I strongly know that this comes from the Lord, and so I ask that when I write posts like these, you judge them based on scripture, and not attack my personal character or personal denominational (non-denominational) belief system based on one sentence or one post of which you may not agree. Study for yourself, judge for yourself, and prove me wrong with scriptural evidence, or please do not attack me with hate. Otherwise, who is leading you? Is that the Lord giving you righteous vengeance against a false teacher, or are you being led by Satan? We should all be aware of our surroundings.






Thanks for your time,

Chris.



PS:


The only essential difference I see between Roman Catholicism and non-denominationalism is that in the Roman Catholicism only one man gets to be Pope and pronounce infallible doctrine; in non-denominationalism every man gets to be Pope and proclaim doctrine for everyone else. According to Paul (Eph. 5), Christ loved the Church and gave His life for her. Why can't you be like Christ and stop picking the Church apart and love her instead? If what you have is love, then, no thank you.
This is a grossly ignorant statement, but I assume you don't really understand what you are saying. Secondly, are you stating that Roman Catholics are not truly Christians themselves? I believe they are, despite the fact that they have many false doctrines within their 'denomination'. For instance, purgatory and praying to saints is not scriptural, yet that doesn't mean they are not saved. It merely means they are led astray by their denomination and their 'Pope'.

To say that I am my own Pope, well, I would agree with that then. I judge for myself, as the Lord instructed me to in his Holy Bible, and I interpret other's teachings based on what scripture tells me to do, and what it truly does say in scripture. To attack me based on doing what the Lord told me to is not something I take lightly, so that is why I'm responding in such a manner.

Also, I don't proceed to proclaim doctrine for everyone else, although I do leave suggestions and also tell you to judge for yourself, as the Lord commanded you to. You do not have to agree, but it clearly shows that others have agreed with me as well.

Since you think that it is wrong for one man to interpret and judge man-made doctrines for themselves, who do you assume DOES own that right to decide doctrine for others? WHO does? Does the leaders of your specific denomination gain that right? Are they infallible in their interpretation? Have you studied the history of your denomination, and have you studied every rule and doctrine they proclaim as a church? Do you know your church leaders personally, and have you studied for certain if your denomination is COMPLETELY correct in every single doctrine?

Please respond to these questions before you attack me on being non-denominational again.

Thanks for your time.
 
Dec 19, 2009
2,723
7
0
#15
While I do not agree with every aspect of modern pentecostalism, I believe them to be closer to the biblical description of what a christian should live like than some of the other denominations which clearly embrace doctrines of compromise in order to embrace sinful lifestyles void of both the fruits and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Without wishing to upset anmyone, I would agree broadly with the Pentecostal denomination keeping closer to the Biblical description of how a person should live their life
But, a problem comes whern some of these churches do not equally preach the full Gospel of grace that shows people how to live as is being preached
Many feel crushed that they cannot live up to what is being asked of them week after week and many give up with God

For some it becomes very sad indeed
I was told by an American that half the sex addicts in the US had at one time or another been to 'holiness' churches. And Biblically it is not hard to understand why this happens

Do other denominations preach the Gospel of grace more fully than Pentecostal churches? No
But as you in effect say, they do not demand as much as to how someone should liove their life so the downside would not be as drasmatic

By all means tell people how according to scriptrure they should live their life, that should indeed be preached. But you MUST equally tell them how that victory is to be achieved according to the Bible that demands much in righteous living
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#16
You did not ask therefore you did not recieve. God's not going to give you a gift inwhich you do not have the faith to ask for nor use.

As far as sin goes, I never suggested that you had sin in your life. I merely asked if there was some unrepentant sin and how such unrepentant sin can be a hinderance.

Case closed.

As for my personal beliefs, I am an Absolute Continuationist also known as a Pure Continuationist. We believe in Sola Scriptura in it's purest form. We do not believe in Dispensationalism or Sessationism, both of which are man made doctrines contrived to explain away aspects of scripture that do not line up their prefered man doctrinnes of compromise.

May I ask you:

Have you read the Book of Job? Do you understand what happened in that book, and do you realize that you should not judge others on their sins, lest you be judged?

Also, may I ask: Are you assuming that the gifts of the Holy Spirit are simply based on who asks for them? Are you stating that the Lord and His Helper does not give gifts as He wills, not as we will? Did you not read the passages that say to not pray for the ability to speak in tongues, but rather to pray for the ability to interpret or prophesy? Did you read any of that?

What exactly makes you believe I don't have the faith to use a gift of the Holy Spirit? Perhaps, the gifts the Lord has given me, at various times, are different, and speaking in tongues was and is not needed?

As I've said, please read what my OP states, and then judge what it says yourself through scripture. Stop attacking my character or my faith in the Lord simply because you do not care to study, read, or judge the scripture for yourself.
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#17
You did not ask therefore you did not recieve. God's not going to give you a gift inwhich you do not have the faith to ask for nor use.

As far as sin goes, I never suggested that you had sin in your life. I merely asked if there was some unrepentant sin and how such unrepentant sin can be a hinderance.
I stand corrected then, however in your original post about the issue, you strongly suggested that I was living in deep sin, and that was the reason I was not "speaking in tongues" as others may.

My point of this post was never to say it cannot happen, but that it isn't needed in most cases. It surely isn't needed in a church service like it so widely is done in Pentecostalism, and therefore I strongly believe many of those who say they "speak in tongues" are merely speaking gibberish lies and are led astray.

AT Pentecost, speaking in tongues was needed. It had a purpose. Paul clearly states it isn't needed within a church service, as it distracts rather than edifies the church. Do you disagree with Paul?

I pointed out scripture, and yet I get attacked on my character, faith, and denominational beliefs (non-denominational), instead of others disputing what I say with SCRIPTURE!!!

How can any of you debate a subject over scriptural interpretation without using scripture? Scripture is the ultimate truth, so you should be able to find it there, or otherwise you risk saying lies and misleading others through the influence of things not of God.


Btw - Not every pentecostal / charismatic believes the way inwhich you describe. There are several pentecostal denominations as well as multiple nondenominational charasmatic belief systems out there as well. Basically what you described accounts for only two or three of the larger pentecostal groups.

Very true, and yet not every Catholic prays to saints or believes in purgatory either. Either way, Pentecostalism and other Charismatic churches, by definition, believe that speaking in tongues is the main "proof" of either being saved, or being baptized in the Holy Spirit. I prefer to say being filled in the Spirit, since the other term can be taken wrong, but to each their own. Either way, I used Pentecostalism as a broad term to define "most" charismatic churches. I cannot type that all in the Title, therefore you get what you got.
 
Last edited:
F

FireOnTheAltar

Guest
#18
May I ask you:

Have you read the Book of Job? Do you understand what happened in that book, and do you realize that you should not judge others on their sins, lest you be judged?

Also, may I ask: Are you assuming that the gifts of the Holy Spirit are simply based on who asks for them? Are you stating that the Lord and His Helper does not give gifts as He wills, not as we will? Did you not read the passages that say to not pray for the ability to speak in tongues, but rather to pray for the ability to interpret or prophesy? Did you read any of that?

What exactly makes you believe I don't have the faith to use a gift of the Holy Spirit? Perhaps, the gifts the Lord has given me, at various times, are different, and speaking in tongues was and is not needed?

As I've said, please read what my OP states, and then judge what it says yourself through scripture. Stop attacking my character or my faith in the Lord simply because you do not care to study, read, or judge the scripture for yourself.
I did not judge you. I merely asked that, if you were to evaluate your life, would you find unrepentant sin that could hinder the work of the Holy Spirit in your life seeing as sin grieves the Holy Spirit.

As for your personal faith is concerned, according to your original post, you obviously do not believe that this particular gift is relevant for today. It's very hard to have faith in something that you don't even believe in and is exactly why the gift has never manifested in your life. Need I bring up the parable of the 10 talents?

By no means have I attacked your character or intended to. If that's the way it came accross then I appologize. In no way was I trying to be insulting or inflamatory. I did not come looking for an argument nor will I participate in one. I for one believe that two people can discuss sensitive issues without slinging insults or harboring anger toward one another. Obviously this is not one of those conversations which is why I will no longer participate once I complete this post. :)

Take care, be blessed and don't put your faith in everything man teaches. Take it up with God Himself. The Holy Spirit will not lead you astray!
 
T

Timofree

Guest
#19
I respect your views, you clearly put a lot of time into your post.........would you consider Joel 2:28 to be regarding Pentecost? And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit on all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions:

I personally don't care for denominations, and if they disappeared tomorrow i wouldn't shed a tear! I do however experientially know the benefits of praying in tongues, and walking in the power of the Spirit......I would say 1 Corinthians 13: 8-12 speaks of when Jesus comes, I'm sure we won't be 'complete', and in any lesser need of manifestations of the Holy Spirit pre His return.

Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.


Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. We need power in the days to come, and praise God, we don't have to strive in our own strength :)
Healings can occur anywhere, but people in foreign countries can't always rely on a good health service. So praise God healings, prophesy, edifying ourselves, and glorifying God by speaking in tongues etc, all testify to a God who does provide, and will continue to provide as times get harder, according to His riches in glory!
I only say this because i desire that everyone thirsts to walk in the power available for them now, and as a testement of Gods power He desires to pour on His people. For the sake of Christians, and lost souls who need people, now as ever with a fire to reach them with the gospel. Of course any Christian can have a burning desire to reach the lost, but there's more power available through the Holy Spirit poured out on us :) .
None of the above should replace a relationship with Jesus, prayer, Bible reading etc, but should give us further desire to strive in all! Also don't look to men for authority on these things, there WILL be men who abuse these gifts, as always, look to Gods word!
God Bless, Tim :)
 
D

DABEARS85

Guest
#20
I did not judge you. I merely asked that, if you were to evaluate your life, would you find unrepentant sin that could hinder the work of the Holy Spirit in your life seeing as sin grieves the Holy Spirit.

As for your personal faith is concerned, according to your original post, you obviously do not believe that this particular gift is relevant for today. It's very hard to have faith in something that you don't even believe in and is exactly why the gift has never manifested in your life. Need I bring up the parable of the 10 talents?

By no means have I attacked your character or intended to. If that's the way it came accross then I appologize. In no way was I trying to be insulting or inflamatory. I did not come looking for an argument nor will I participate in one. I for one believe that two people can discuss sensitive issues without slinging insults or harboring anger toward one another. Obviously this is not one of those conversations which is why I will no longer participate once I complete this post. :)

Take care, be blessed and don't put your faith in everything man teaches. Take it up with God Himself. The Holy Spirit will not lead you astray!
I do suppose there is sin in my life, just as everyone else, yet as far as I can think of, I have repented to all my knowledge. Beyond that, I'm not sure, but I truly believe that the Lord would grant me the gift of tongues if it was needed in a specific situation. If I had to speak in tongues to win souls for the Lord, the Holy Spirit would grant that gift on the spot. I do not believe speaking in "gibberish, not ACTUAL language" tongues is scriptural, and I don't believe I have been in a situation where speaking in real tongues has been needed to win souls or to instruct others, but I do realize that if it was, I would and will be given the gift as the Lord wills. I will not ask for it simply to have a "gift" of the Spirit, because that is not what scripture teaches us. To do so is going against what Paul said, which I will not agree to do.

Also, I apologize if I have been overtly harsh with you as well. When I stated I was being attacked in my character, faith, denomination, etc, I mean multiple people, who both posted on these forums and who have sent me private messages, remaining largely anonymous (I guess out of cowardice of being judged themselves?). I am not saying you have done all of those things, but I included it in the post as a general statement. I apologize if you took it more personal than I meant it to be.

God Bless, and I hope the same for you. As you've said, the Holy Spirit will not lead you astray, although man made doctrine could! This was my reason for posting what I did, but I hope everyone judges it themselves, instead of blindly following. I would never want to be a wolf in sheep's clothing, and I truly believe everyone who teaches has the ability to lead others astray, even on accident.