Promoting Half-truth

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 27, 2007
3,179
19
0
1. All I am saying is that no one should claim that Catholics worship Mary, when the church doesn't teach catholics to worship Mary - I am not sure why this seems to be such a big deal.

2. Why should catholics stop praying the Rosary? Do you know what the Rosary consists of? It is a collection of scripture repeated, while meditating on the birth, life, death of Jesus and the end of the sanctification process within Mary's heart.......not sure how this practice, when understood, can be seen as offensive, but to each their own, I suppose.

3. You can pray to anyone within the Body you want to and ask them for prayer - just like you can ask any person on Earth who is apart of the Body to pray for you. Paul tells us in Romans 8:38 - And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God's love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow--not even the powers of hell can separate us from God's love. Catholics are taught to believe this verse.

4. So now you are holding the Catholic church responsible for your husband's grandmothers poor theology? How many Protestants fall into the same category??? It is best not to judge a church by it's least educated members.

5. I agree - it was a beautiful time in my life when I decided to leave my former church, where I was the youth director and join the Catholic Church after 2 years of studying my own church tradition and the Catholic Catechism.

Praying to Mary = WORSHIP
Matthew 6:7
You forgot the last and most important part of verse 38 it states the Love of God , which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Its speaking of our own death... not the deaths of the saints to whom you pray.
Actually she's his mother and the Catholic church had someone who knows not the Lord moulding the minds of their youth... does this not concern you? They are concerned with ceremony and tradition and not concerned at all with the salvation of lost souls. Its a big club and only those who belong belong. I pity the person who looking for the Lord goes to the Catholic church and experiences the condemnation I've experienced EVERY time I've attended that church.
I must say good on you, as for me, I'll attend a church where we see people come to the Lord weekly and a great movement of the Holy Spirit is upon us. Are you filled with the Holy Spirit? just curious cause some Catholics definitely are. btw I personally know many many Catholics and their faith is not evident to anyone except on sunday, they choose not to discuss the bible and the Lord or to let their light shine among men.
 
C

carpetmanswife

Guest
There is another thread titled " the biggest threat to christianity?" or something like that.. my response to that thread was, we christians can be the biggest threat to christianity, which SOME *myself included* have proven this true in this thread.I shant retaliate * storms off while looking at my own avatar*:eek::D

plz dont hurt me too bad :p
 
M

machew

Guest
There is another thread titled " the biggest threat to christianity?" or something like that.. my response to that thread was, we christians can be the biggest threat to christianity, which SOME *myself included* have proven this true in this thread.I shant retaliate * storms off while looking at my own avatar*:eek::D

plz dont hurt me too bad :p

I totally agree. I believe that this can be true. Many churches don't realize how much of the demonic they host in their church, with their doctrinal pride ( insistence of their non-essential doctrines at the expense of labeling other churches "demonic" or "unGodly"), their insistence on living a legalistic lifestyle to be righteous, their insistence that a relationship with God can only look like what they agree it should look like, etc... etc....

The most prevalent principalities in the church today is the spirit of religion and pride. Their goal is to use Christians to destroy the church from the inside out.

Machew
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
Look, I have no patience for these games. Just admit it, it's not like you're going to get shot. I have more respect for honesty than this game of cat and mouse to back out of saying something the minute someone points it out.



THAT is what you said, then proceeded to talk about someone going into a pentecostal church and having a certain experience, followed by a reference to UPCI as "proof" that that is what Pentecostals believe. Whether you did it intentionally or not, you DID lump all Pentecostals in with the UPCI.
so who is not letting go of the cat and mouse game, If I had intended to lump all together I would have left off that the post was about upci, only but go ahead believe what you will , But I will do this, if what i said lead you to beleive that i meant that all pentecostals believe the exact same doctrines then I will apologize, but why aren't you on the lady who siad that she was pentecostal and that i was wrong because penetalcostal doesn't believe that Tongues are the evidence, for if some do as they do she was wrong also how is it you are just picking on me?
 
Last edited:
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
so who is not letting go of the cat and mouse game, If I had intended to lump all together I would have left off that the post was about upci, only but go ahead believe what you will , But I will do this, if what i said lead you to beleive that i meant that all pentecostals believe the exact same doctrines then I will apologize, but why aren't you on the lady who siad that she was pentecostal and that i was wrong because penetalcostal doesn't believe that Tongues are the evidence, for if some do as they do she was wrong also how is it you are just picking on me?
You challenged me to prove that 90% of Pentecostals do not believe that speaking in other languages is a neccessary sign of salvation. Have you looked up the list of Pentecostal organizations that I referenced. You generalization is broad and disturbing and I think that you should take steps to verify and correct what you have stated as fact.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0

1.
Praying to Mary = WORSHIP

2. Matthew 6:7

3. You forgot the last and most important part of verse 38 it states the Love of God , which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Its speaking of our own death... not the deaths of the saints to whom you pray.

4. Actually she's his mother and the Catholic church had someone who knows not the Lord moulding the minds of their youth... does this not concern you? They are concerned with ceremony and tradition and not concerned at all with the salvation of lost souls. Its a big club and only those who belong belong. I pity the person who looking for the Lord goes to the Catholic church and experiences the condemnation I've experienced EVERY time I've attended that church.

5. I must say good on you, as for me, I'll attend a church where we see people come to the Lord weekly and a great movement of the Holy Spirit is upon us. Are you filled with the Holy Spirit? just curious cause some Catholics definitely are. btw I personally know many many Catholics and their faith is not evident to anyone except on sunday, they choose not to discuss the bible and the Lord or to let their light shine among men.
1. Show me in scripture where praying is reserved for God only.

2. Mat 6:7 is a great verse. Of course, our Rosary is easy to criticize and miss-categorize as 'babbling', especially when you ignore the repetitious, anti-intellectual, 1/2 hour 'worship' sessions so common to contemporary Sunday church services. Is our Rosary considered pagan and babble because we don't have electric guitars and drums like worship services?

3. You are simply not making sense - if the verse is speaking to everyone who is in a relationship with Christ than it is speaking to all Christians - including saints.

4. So, according to her doctrine you have determined that she is not really a Christian? Good thing God doesn't judge us by our doctrinal understanding - most Christians would be in trouble. Are you claiming that Catholic Churches are somehow more likely to be a 'big club' than all other churches? God sanctifies souls - not church - even yours. I am sorry you have faced condemnation at the Catholic church - I have never experience any sort of judgmental attitudes there......it is funny that you claim catholics are judgment, yet tolerant of nonbelievers in leadership - since you can't be judgmental and tolerant at the same time - which is it?

5. If you get something out of watching people make initial, outward confessions of their new faith, good for you. I found it much more compelling to watch the sanctification of the devout catholics that I worship God with daily. I had to leave my Protestant background behind, when I realized their primary focus was getting people saved, without regard for nurturing growth. I hit the ceiling and was still a baby Christian - and no one seemed to care. It was all milk and no meat. There were no examples I could look to for guidance because I was taught Jesus was born, ministered, died for my sins, was raised, and then Luther was born! I was shocked that my church had actually forgotten to mention 1500 years of Christian history. As far as Catholics not talking about their faith, most Christians do not talk about their faith.

So I see that on a thread where I have suggested that people not promote half truths like judging a churches by the theology of their weakest members and lumping terms together like prayer and worship in order to misinform others and support stereotypes, you have decided to continue promoting your own beliefs about the Catholic church rather than the doctrine they actually teach. Once again, I do not mind honest disagreement - it is your warped presentation of catholic doctrine that smacks of deceit.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
1. Show me in scripture where praying is reserved for God only.
ahh, disciple: "teach us to pray Lord".

Jesus: "say this"..

"our Father in heaven... etc etc".
 
S

SeekSolace

Guest
As previously mentioned, I believe most Catholics are in Christ because they accept the basis of salvation. I also believe much of the Church's teaching are, if not in error, misguided. There is the Word, and there are the traditions of Men. The Catholic Church holds them equally valid. On one of the threads above, the question was "where does it say you can't pray to other than God" (paraphrased). Where does it say you can? Where is the example? Why would you? Praying to someone is far different than praying for someone, or asking someone to pray for you. I'm not picking a fight with Catholics, but the Word doesn't support most of the practice, and that's just a fact. The Lord said "your laws are nothing but rules made by men, your hearts are far from Me." Was He talking about the Catholic Church? Not specifically, but the warning certainly applies.

That being said, some people need legalism and ritual to feel "religious." Is it a stumbling block to a personal relationship with God? I can certainly see how it could be. I suspect the confessional, while "good for the soul" likely has zero impact on forgiveness as it substitutes the judgement of men (particularly in having penance dictated by men) for what is rightfully the purview of the Lord. Nor do I believe that a priestly class is specially empowered to impact salvation one way or the other. I think it is dangerous to have any human inserted into a personal one-on-one relationship with the Father. Men are fallible and weak.

As for Mary, she has certainly been elevated to a position not biblically supported. I can't say all Catholics worship her, but I could certainly understand why some would be confused since her name is invoked so often. I guess it depends on what you consider "worship" to mean. The Word tells me to pray in the name of Jesus, and no other, for His name is above all others and it is only through Him that we are saved. I am told by the Word that I "stand or fall on my own," and not through the efforts of a priest, saint, or Mary.

I'm sorry if I offended anyone, and if I am in error take me to the Word and show me. There are many errors that metasticize within the body. All rely in some measure on placing a leader in charge of the salvation of others or judging the worthiness for salvation and adding additional layers to the requirements of salvation beyond what the Lord Said. If the argument is that they aren't necessary then why have them? Why add confusion, or leave an impression, or add a stumbling block to your brother? If there is a Catholic near death who is concerned about salvation because they haven't received last rites or confessed, isin't that doubt really directed at the Grace of the Lord? Who placed that notion in their head? What do they base it on other than the teaching or practices? What do we need beyond the Word, the Grace, the Mercy of the Lord? At what point does ritual and practice make us "whitewashed temples filled with dead men's bones?"
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
As previously mentioned, I believe most Catholics are in Christ because they accept the basis of salvation. I also believe much of the Church's teaching are, if not in error, misguided. There is the Word, and there are the traditions of Men. The Catholic Church holds them equally valid.

The Catholic Church holds Tradition, not mans traditions as equal in authority to the Bible. The Church proceeded the cannon of the Bible. Reformers were the first to label the Churches Tradition as man's tradition and it was an attempt to separate the Catholic Church from the Bible and Protestantism.

On one of the threads above, the question was "where does it say you can't pray to other than God" (paraphrased). Where does it say you can? Where is the example?

- Jesus and several of his disciples did - during the Transfiguration - Matthew 17:1-9, Mark 9:2-8
- Cloud of Witnesses - Hebrews 12:1 is also compelling.
- Also where does it say that we are supposed to change the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday? There's a tradition of man that we both follow - if you label traditions that are not explicitly commanded in the Bible as traditions of men.


Why would you?

Same reason you ask your Christian brothers and sisters to pray for you.

Praying to someone is far different than praying for someone, or asking someone to pray for you.

How so?

I'm not picking a fight with Catholics, but the Word doesn't support most of the practice, and that's just a fact. The Lord said "your laws are nothing but rules made by men, your hearts are far from Me." Was He talking about the Catholic Church? Not specifically, but the warning certainly applies.

No he was talking about man's laws - especially frivolous laws that are forced on people. Simony in the Middle Ages is a perfect example / believing that the Bible must be interpreted literally is another.

That being said, some people need legalism and ritual to feel "religious." Is it a stumbling block to a personal relationship with God?

Others need to feel like they have to eradicate all symbolism from Christianity or deny that they even belong to a religion in order to be a true Christian - like anything else this can be a stumbling block to a personal relationship with God.

I suspect the confessional, while "good for the soul" likely has zero impact on forgiveness as it substitutes the judgment of men (particularly in having penance dictated by men) for what is rightfully the purview of the Lord.

Mathew 2:6-12.

Also, when you sin, you sin against God and you sin against the Body. Asking God's forgiveness is the first step in confession, then you need to go to the Body, represented by a priest and ask forgiveness. The early church understood this idea - but they were a bit more strict - they had members confess their sins to the whole congregation.


Nor do I believe that a priestly class is specially empowered to impact salvation one way or the other. I think it is dangerous to have any human inserted into a personal one-on-one relationship with the Father. Men are fallible and weak.

I thought Protestants were really big on personal relationships with God? And despite our many weaknesses God uses us to advance His Kingdom everyday - Amen!

As for Mary, she has certainly been elevated to a position not biblically supported. I can't say all Catholics worship her, but I could certainly understand why some would be confused since her name is invoked so often.

Mary is a fully sanctified person - she is a deified, fully human creation - a work that Jesus has finished in a way we will all be finished - how is it unbiblical for us to recognize this fact? Or be excited about it? Mary always points to God.

I don't know of any Catholic that worships Mary. I know a lot of Protestants that think Catholics worship Mary - which group is more confused?

I guess it depends on what you consider "worship" to mean. The Word tells me to pray in the name of Jesus, and no other, for His name is above all others and it is only through Him that we are saved.

Where?

I am told by the Word that I "stand or fall on my own," and not through the efforts of a priest, saint, or Mary.

Verse?

I'm sorry if I offended anyone, and if I am in error take me to the Word and show me. There are many errors that metastasize within the body.

Not offended at all


All rely in some measure on placing a leader in charge of the salvation of others or judging the worthiness for salvation and adding additional layers to the requirements of salvation beyond what the Lord said. If the argument is that they aren't necessary then why have them? Why add confusion, or leave an impression, or add a stumbling block to your brother?

One man's spiritual treasure is another man's spiritual junk. It is impossible to judge the value of anything that you are afraid of, despise, or do not fully understand.

If there is a Catholic near death who is concerned about salvation because they haven't received last rites or confessed, isn't that doubt really directed at the Grace of the Lord?

No educated Catholic believes this to be true. You are judging the doctrine of my church through the eyes of a hypothetical pew-sitter.

Who placed that notion in their head?

It is based on their own bi-proxy relationship with God - it is similar to the insecure Protestant who believes they must read the whole Bible before they die - instead of working on their relationship with God, they have externalized their religion - happens all the time in all churches.

What do we need beyond the Word

Careful! Your Protestantism is showing....

At what point does ritual and practice make us "whitewashed temples filled with dead men's bones?"

When ritual and practice become externalized. The problem is not the doctrine, it is the person. Some people externalize everything in their lives. The husband, who ignores his wife except on Valentines Day in an effort to 'make up' for the rest of the year; the Catholic, who only show up to Mass to take the Eucharist because he is superstitious about it and believes it has some power to save him or keep him safe; or the Protestant that gets saved and never darkens the door of a church in his life and refers to God as the man upstairs and thinks he is going to Heaven.

I remember playing the trumpet in Junior High band - all I really did was push down the buttons and tap my foot, but I got to play at Disneyland! Everyone knew I was a fraud, but I thought I was a real member of the band. Lots of people tap there way through life - the answer to the spiritual foot-tapper, despite the Reformers is not to start a new church. Starting a new church in order to reform the foot-tappers is about as effective as a boss buying new equipment for his slacker employees in hopes of inspiring them to work.
Attempts at reformation lead to heresy and legalism and further attempts at reformation - it is man's solution to a problem other God can fix.
 
Last edited:
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
You challenged me to prove that 90% of Pentecostals do not believe that speaking in other languages is a neccessary sign of salvation. Have you looked up the list of Pentecostal organizations that I referenced. You generalization is broad and disturbing and I think that you should take steps to verify and correct what you have stated as fact.

so are you saying that no pentecostal believes that speaking In tongues is evidence of receiving the Holy Ghost?? if you are not saying that and that you know that some do believe this then that is the proof of what I am saying , and you are still playing the cat game that you say you wouldn't play, even after I apologized!!!!
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
You challenged me to prove that 90% of Pentecostals do not believe that speaking in other languages is a neccessary sign of salvation. Have you looked up the list of Pentecostal organizations that I referenced. You generalization is broad and disturbing and I think that you should take steps to verify and correct what you have stated as fact.
all pentecostals make broad generalisations

butyou need the gift of interpretation to realise that:D
 
S

SeekSolace

Guest
Aspen, none of the 3 verses you cite demonstrate prayers to other than God, and the Matthew and Mark references actually refute it. God's gentle rebuke of Peter for offering to build tabernacles to Moses, Elijah, and Jesus, leaving only Jesus alone...well, it seems a rather huge stretch to give as evidence of praying to other than God.
 
S

SeekSolace

Guest
Regarding tradition, if it isn't Man's tradition, whose is it? Gods? One would think it would have been in the Word as scripture.
I'm not sure how to answer the "how so" question regarding why praying to is different to praying for someone. To me it is self-evident and bespeaks of a far larger gulf between Catholics and other Christian faiths than I had thought. It goes beyond mere tradition into beliefs about the fundamental nature of God and our relationship with Him, as I understand it and as I see it written in the Bible.

I'm not judging doctrine necessarily against the hypothetical "pew-sitter" but by the Biblical method of "test all spirits" against the Word. I don't know if there are Catholics who don't believe the last rites, confession, and other trappings. I haven't met them but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

When I was referring to weak and fallible humanity and personal relationships, I was referring to 1 Cor 3-4...who do you follow? Whose word do you rely upon? Who speaks for God other than God?



I guess I'm showing my protestantism if I believe the Word of God is the sole authority in matters of man's relationship with God; I know of no others that are not contradicted by the word. I certainly am not aware of any faith (I don't doubt you, I've just never heard of it before) that requires you to read the Bible completely before you die as a matter of Salvation, or even for any other reason. I know lots of people who hunger for the word, or who set themselves goals, but thats it.

Romans 14 is the verse for "stand or fall on his own" and also answers the question about Saturday vs. Sunday as the Sabbath.

I think we have different views of what constitutes "externalism." A person who reads and seeks to understand Gods word doesn't strike me as externalism. External trappings; special clothing, rituals, external expressions of materialism that I can't find basis for in scripture reminds me of Biblical descriptions of the Pharisees.

The sin against the body is the sin against your own body. Where does it say confess to everyone, or more specifically, where does it say to confess to a proxy such as a priest? Where does it say that any man can tell you what atonement is necessary for forgiveness of sin? Who is the judge?

I'd recommend 2 Tim 3 5, Titus 1:16, and of course Matthew 15:8-9, "These people draw near to Me honoring Me with their lips but their hearts are distant from Me. And in vain do they worship Me teaching as doctrine rules made by men."

Mary was honored, but not "finished." Christ on at least 2 occasions set the record straight. But the main issue is this was a decision made be a council of men centuries after the fact, and is not supported biblically. Nor did she remain a virgin her whole life as Jesus had brothers and sisters (James was one).

And, dare I say it, if more is required than what is revealed in the Word, you Catholicism is showing.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
so are you saying that no pentecostal believes that speaking In tongues is evidence of receiving the Holy Ghost?? if you are not saying that and that you know that some do believe this then that is the proof of what I am saying , and you are still playing the cat game that you say you wouldn't play, even after I apologized!!!!
I said that the United pentecostals were an abherant denomination and gave you a list of Pentecostals who would disagree with your statement. You persisted that this was the standard belief system of Pentecostals. I said that 90% of Pentecostal disagreed with the United Pentecostals. You said that I couldn't make such a statement. I said that I could, referenced the previous post of Pentecostal organizations, and even looked up the largest (which is the second largest Christian fellowship of churches in the world). I have been nothing if not direct. You have a responsibility to check the veracity of your statement and correct it.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
all pentecostals make broad generalisations

butyou need the gift of interpretation to realise that:D
And Anglicans simply accept all broad generalizations.
 
K

kujo313

Guest
I said that the United pentecostals were an abherant denomination and gave you a list of Pentecostals who would disagree with your statement. You persisted that this was the standard belief system of Pentecostals. I said that 90% of Pentecostal disagreed with the United Pentecostals. You said that I couldn't make such a statement. I said that I could, referenced the previous post of Pentecostal organizations, and even looked up the largest (which is the second largest Christian fellowship of churches in the world). I have been nothing if not direct. You have a responsibility to check the veracity of your statement and correct it.

Coming from a Pentecostal, I must speak up.

I believe in the filling of the Holy Spirit with evidence. I speak in Tongues and if you ask me to prove it, I will not entertain you. Tongues is between God and me unless it's addressing a congregation. Then it must be followed by an interpretation.
When you are filled with the Holy Spirit, you really don't have to prove it to anyone. But other pieces of "evidence" is the Spiritual Gifts.

If somebody asks you to prove you have the Holy Spirit by speaking in Tongues, simply tell them "No. It's not for you."

As far as Catholics are concerned:

As a former Catholic, I find it troubling to recite the rosary while repeating "scripture" centered around Mary about 54 times. Why not repeat John 3:16? Why? Because it's about Mary.
This is not one of those "say the first thing that comes to you mind" games. When Jesus mentions "Father" you don't simply say "mother". It's all about being one with God and put in parables so simple that our finite minds can understand and relate to.
Finally, about Catholics, when their leader says that only his religion has the "exclusive on salvation" and that anybody else is "disfunctional", I have to strongly object. Christianity has the "exclusive".
 
O

oopsies

Guest
I believe in the filling of the Holy Spirit with evidence. I speak in Tongues and if you ask me to prove it, I will not entertain you. Tongues is between God and me unless it's addressing a congregation. Then it must be followed by an interpretation.
When you are filled with the Holy Spirit, you really don't have to prove it to anyone. But other pieces of "evidence" is the Spiritual Gifts.
Hello, does it just "happen" or do you "control" it? I'm curious because it just sounded like you could control it re: proving it. I can't speak in tongues but I always thought one couldn't control it - it just happens when the Holy Spirit moves you to do so?
 
G

Graybeard

Guest
As I classify myself as Pentecostal I believe that speaking in tongues is evidence one has been filled with the Holy Spirit...however, I do not believe that if one cannot speak in tongues then they do not have the Holy Spirit because of these verses:

1Co 12:10 To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits; to another divers kinds of tongues; to another the interpretation of tongues:

1Co 12:30 Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?