True Baptism

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
It appears here what Peter might be saying is that be baptized in water,and then after they will receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. either way they must recieve the Holy Ghost.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
this wouldnt be a problem if we baptized someone in water the second they become believers. eazy.
You mean you wouldn't do it like this "So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls?"

Or like the Ethiopian, who professed faith in Christ, and was immediately baptized?

How long do you think you should wait, since you're not following biblical examples? Or, do you have a passage somewhere that says they should wait a while? Is something "supposed to take" if you wait a while longer?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
You mean you wouldn't do it like this "So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls?"

Or like the Ethiopian, who professed faith in Christ, and was immediately baptized?

How long do you think you should wait, since you're not following biblical examples? Or, do you have a passage somewhere that says they should wait a while? Is something "supposed to take" if you wait a while longer?
The first example cited is Holy Spirit baptism and not water. The second is quite correctly seen as water baptism and clearly demonstrates that Holy Spirit produces conversion prior to water baptism.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Apr 23, 2017
1,064
47
0
You mean you wouldn't do it like this "So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls?"

Or like the Ethiopian, who professed faith in Christ, and was immediately baptized?

How long do you think you should wait, since you're not following biblical examples? Or, do you have a passage somewhere that says they should wait a while? Is something "supposed to take" if you wait a while longer?
thats what i said. baptize them instantly. u cant start drama with me, take that somewhere else.
but most churches dont do that around here.

u didnt even read my post, i am agreeing with the verses u posted.....awkward
 

Rainrider

Senior Member
Jun 17, 2017
1,433
68
48
thats what i said. baptize them instantly. u cant start drama with me, take that somewhere else.
but most churches dont do that around here.

u didnt even read my post, i am agreeing with the verses u posted.....awkward

:rolleyes: well that is a bit embarrassing. I know I hate when that happens. :cool:

Ok I know leave the sarcasm at the door.
 
Last edited:

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
The first example cited is Holy Spirit baptism and not water. The second is quite correctly seen as water baptism and clearly demonstrates that Holy Spirit produces conversion prior to water baptism.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
sorry..... I disagree completely with this premise. The men at Pentecost asked what they had to do (to be saved), and Peter said basically the same thing Jesus said.... repent, and be baptized. Baptism was understood, correctly, to be immersion in water.

Only those who try to minimize the importance of water baptism would try to imply that Peter was talking about "spiritual baptism".... those Jews at Pentecost had NO concept of that. They KNEW what he was saying.
 

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
sorry..... I disagree completely with this premise. The men at Pentecost asked what they had to do (to be saved), and Peter said basically the same thing Jesus said.... repent, and be baptized. Baptism was understood, correctly, to be immersion in water.

Only those who try to minimize the importance of water baptism would try to imply that Peter was talking about "spiritual baptism".... those Jews at Pentecost had NO concept of that. They KNEW what he was saying.
Yes, it did refer to water baptism.
However, it is faulty exegesis to try and imply (or state explicitly) that water baptism was necessary for salvation.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
thats what i said. baptize them instantly. u cant start drama with me, take that somewhere else.
but most churches dont do that around here.

u didnt even read my post, i am agreeing with the verses u posted.....awkward
.
My bad I misread your post thus my response. Hope your looms aren't still in a wad. :D
 

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
Those verses negate the false teaching that water baptism (instead of/or in addition to repentance) obtains the remission of sins.

After properly harmonizing Scripture with Scripture, we discover that it's faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) which brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18). *Perfect Harmony*

In all of these verses, where repentance is in regards to salvation/receiving remission of sins, faith is implied or assumed. In verses where faith is mentioned yet not repentance, repentance is implied or assumed. Where you have one, you must have the other. Repentance and faith are two sides to the same coin of receiving Christ.

The Bible sometimes only mentions repentance as a condition for salvation. One example of this would be Luke 13:3, "I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish." See also Luke 24:47; Acts 3:19 etc.. A few times both repentance and believe/faith are mentioned in the same verse (Matthew 21:32; Mark 1:15; Acts 20:21). There are many, many verses which only mention belief/faith as the condition for salvation (John 3:15,16,18; 6:40,47; 11:25,26; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 16:31; 26:18; Romans 1:16; 3:22-28; 4:5; 10:4; Ephesians 2:8; 2 Timothy 3:15; 1 John 5:13 etc..).

Again, when only repentance is mentioned, belief/faith is implied or assumed. When only belief/faith is mentioned, repentance is implied or assumed. Where you have one you must have the other. If we believe the gospel, then we already repented in the process of changing our mind and choosing to believe the gospel/place faith in Christ for salvation. Not so with baptism. You can repent and believe the gospel but NOT YET BE WATER BAPTIZED (Acts 10:43-47; 11:17,18).

Notice in Acts 11:17, "If therefore God gave them the same gift (Holy Spirit) as He gave us when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could withstand God?" This is referred to as repentance unto life (Acts 11:18) and repentance/faith was established BEFORE water baptism (Acts 10:43-47).

Here we go with more of your faulty human logic.

That is religion that God accepts, in CONTRAST to vain, useless religion. James 1:26 - If anyone among you thinks he is religious, and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this one's religion is useless. This man's religion is vain, empty, devoid of power, lacking in content, nonproductive, dead and of no eternal value.

There is nothing wrong with "pure and undefiled religion" but there is certainly something wrong with impure and defiled religion. Also, looking after orphans and widows in their distress and keeping oneself from being polluted by the world is not how one becomes saved, but is how the saved are to live their lives, so your argument is moot.

News flash: *We are not saved by works, so religion that perverts the gospel is not "pure and faultless."

Baptism is for "in regards to/on the basis of" (and not in order to obtain) remission of sins that is received upon repentance (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:4; Acts 2:38) and "faith is implied or assumed" -- Repent (change your mind) new direction of this change of mind (faith in Christ for salvation).

That statement is the epitome of irony. :rolleyes:
"Implied in genuine repentance"?

"In verses where faith is mentioned yet not repentance, repentance is implied or assumed"?

"Again, when only repentance is mentioned , belief/faith is implied or assumed"?

"When you have one you must have the other"?

This is your reasoning? This is your theology?

So you and the "trust only" sects have decided what should be assumed/implied with these scriptures. When a scripture commands belief before the remission of sins, repentance is assumed to be commanded but not baptism. Did God tell you this?

You are simply cherry-picking verses that do not mention baptism, you then attempt to explain away the lack of belief or repentance by saying, "well it's assumed". Why not assume that baptism was expected but not mentioned as well? After all it would be a fair assumption since every conversion after the resurrection of Jesus Christ included it? Many people on this thread have mentioned how intertwined baptism is with the moment of salvation, lets just assume it is mandatory for salvation.

Belief, repentance and baptism are distinct. One cannot assume that one exists because of the others.

I have seen you use this faulty human logic on Mark 16:16. Since Jesus does not mention the lack of baptism as a cause of condemnation we can safely assume His words earlier in the same verse are meaningless. Yeah, that's good logic.

"Then said Jesus to those Jews who believed on him, if ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed." John 8:31 KJV

This verse states that these people "believed on him" (not mental assent of his existence) but believed on him but were not His disciples! None of your assumptions can change this.
 
Last edited:

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
The first example cited is Holy Spirit baptism and not water. The second is quite correctly seen as water baptism and clearly demonstrates that Holy Spirit produces conversion prior to water baptism.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
The baptism of the three thousand in Acts 2:41 was not with water? Are you serious?

Those of the "trust only" sects truly have no bounds. No limits to how far they are willing to ignore the obvious.
 

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
Your full quote is correct but not to your previous post.

You see if by your definition of the word "for" as in the previous thread is concern, then it's a mess up. For how Jesus Baptism is "for the remission of sins"? Are you not inferring Christ a sinner? and not a Saviour?

This needs to weigh your perspective.

God bless
The baptism of John is one of repentance and remission of sins (Mark 1:4).
The baptism of Jesus is one of repentance and remission of sins (Acts 2:38).

These are the two baptisms I was referring to, not the baptism by John of Jesus in Matthew 3:13-17.
 

DJ2

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2017
1,660
57
48
If someone states they do not believe what? Do not believe in the existence of God? Of course nobody would wish to baptize an atheist. Yet it still takes more than simply believing "mental assent" in the existence and historical facts about Christ to go from being an unbeliever to being a genuine believer "in the Biblical sense of the word," which means that person is now a child of God (John 1:12; 3:18; 10:43; Acts 16:31 etc..).

Again, many unbelievers in various false religions and cults (Roman Catholicism and Mormonism for example..) still end up getting water baptized because they trust in water baptism (along with other works to save them) yet are not "genuine believers" who have placed their faith (belief, trust, reliance) in Christ alone for salvation.
To answer the question, "If someone states they do not believe what?" you would have to ask fredoheaven. It was his post (#91)and his choice of words. Regardless, baptizing unbelievers is absurd, don't you agree?
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,195
6,536
113
Is this the old Acts 2:38 argument?

If so, then once again........folks gotta READ the Scripture correctly.

repent........and be baptized.....for the remission of sins.......

Now, question is, WHY is one being baptized?

1) To have their sins forgiven?

2) Because their sins were forgiven?

When one repents, comes to Christ, His precious blood is applied, and they are cleansed of all their sins......AND to show the CHURCH and the WORLD that they have become a disciple of Christ, they are WATER baptized.....water baptism is nothing more than a SYMBOLIC ACT which serves as the first act of obedience to Christ who told folks to be baptized. Neither the CHURCH nor the WORLD can SEE the cleansing, saving, baptism of the Spirit through the precious blood of Christ, SO water baptism REVEALS to both this wondrous act from the grace of God.

To show how the Scripture can be revealed in it's meaning, consider this;

Repent and jump for joy

Question: Is one jumping to receive joy, or is one jumping because when they repented they received joy? Pretty simple stuff, and it amazes me how so many folks can not grasp the simplicity of the Scripture.

Oh well, and the debate/argument will continue until Christ returns to END all of these debates/arguments....... :)




sorry..... I disagree completely with this premise. The men at Pentecost asked what they had to do (to be saved), and Peter said basically the same thing Jesus said.... repent, and be baptized. Baptism was understood, correctly, to be immersion in water.

Only those who try to minimize the importance of water baptism would try to imply that Peter was talking about "spiritual baptism".... those Jews at Pentecost had NO concept of that. They KNEW what he was saying.
 

p_rehbein

Senior Member
Sep 4, 2013
30,195
6,536
113
The ONLY WAY sins are remitted/forgiven......water DON'T DO IT


The Precious Blood of Jesus

Leviticus 17:11, 14 (cp. Deuteronomy 12:23) “For the life of the flesh
is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an
atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement
for the soul…. For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life
thereof …”


Hebrews 9:22 “Without the shedding of blood, there is

no remission of sins.”

1 John 1:7″… the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth

us from all sin.”

Exodus 12:13 “… and when I see the blood, I will pass over

you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you,
when I smite the land of Egypt.”


Revelation 12:11 “And they overcame him (Satan) by the blood

of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony …”

Hebrews 9:14 “How much more shall the blood of Christ, who

through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God,
purge your conscience …


Hebrews 10:19, 22 “Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter

into the holiest by the blood of Jesus … Let us draw near with a true
heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an
evil conscience …”


Hebrews 13:12 “Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify

the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate.”

Romans 3:24-25 “Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;”


Romans 5:9 “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.”

7fc70959b76f237514dcb9a5b68e1085.jpg
 
Apr 23, 2017
1,064
47
0
ey mon DJ2 what about them places in scripture where some got the Holy Spirit before they were baptized? and they was told sure we can baptize u with water since you got the Holy Spirit already u see?
 

hornetguy

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2016
6,646
1,396
113
Is this the old Acts 2:38 argument?

If so, then once again........folks gotta READ the Scripture correctly.

repent........and be baptized.....for the remission of sins.......

Now, question is, WHY is one being baptized?

1) To have their sins forgiven?

2) Because their sins were forgiven?
The "old Acts 2:38 argument" ??? :confused: so now, using scripture to prove your argument is silly? :D
There are many more scriptures, if you need me to post them again... but I'm sure you've seen them before.:cool:

This whole "when does a person become 'saved' " argument is silly. "What was the EXACT moment you were saved" Who cares?

the salvation plan was this..... that you hear the gospel.. the good news about Jesus and his sacrifice for us. You are "pricked in your heart", and believe in him, and you accept the gift of salvation (it's free, you know?) and accept Jesus as your savior, and you, in obedience, are baptized... immersed in water, which symbolizes the death, burial, and resurrection of our Savior.
You are resurrected from the death of your old life, and you come out of the water (are born again) a new creation... a baby, in Christ, and you begin your life as a believer/follower of Jesus.

this is the simple plan God laid out for us.... every step of that plan MEANS something, and every part of it is essential.

At what EXACT point are you saved? IT DOESN'T MATTER..... unless you are determined to find a way to "do it your way" and reject one of those events simply because you don't see the need for it.

That's Pharisaical in the extreme... tithing mint and cumin. Understand the salvation plan, and follow it, without all the parsing and twisting words.... live in obedience to our Lord.
 
Last edited:

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
sorry..... I disagree completely with this premise. The men at Pentecost asked what they had to do (to be saved), and Peter said basically the same thing Jesus said.... repent, and be baptized. Baptism was understood, correctly, to be immersion in water.

Only those who try to minimize the importance of water baptism would try to imply that Peter was talking about "spiritual baptism".... those Jews at Pentecost had NO concept of that. They KNEW what he was saying.
The baptism of the three thousand in Acts 2:41 was not with water? Are you serious?

Those of the "trust only" sects truly have no bounds. No limits to how far they are willing to ignore the obvious.
This takes more than a superficial reading of the passage to obtain the correct meaning. The word translated baptized in the passage is "baptizo" in the Greek. That Greek word means to immerse like a sunken ship. If you immerse someone in water like a sunken ship they will die for lack of air. The Holy Spirit would have used the word bapto if He had intended to teach water baptism.

Three thousand souls heard Peter preach the gospel and heard that Jesus was their promised Messiah. They received the word and believed so at that moment they were converted through the baptism of the Holy Spirit. Upon being converted they were added to the church which is the living body of Christ.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The "old Acts 2:38 argument" ??? :confused: so now, using scripture to prove your argument is silly? :D
There are many more scriptures, if you need me to post them again... but I'm sure you've seen them before.:cool:

This whole "when does a person become 'saved' " argument is silly. "What was the EXACT moment you were saved" Who cares?

the salvation plan was this..... that you hear the gospel.. the good news about Jesus and his sacrifice for us. You are "pricked in your heart", and believe in him, and you accept the gift of salvation (it's free, you know?) and accept Jesus as your savior, and you, in obedience, are baptized... immersed in water, which symbolizes the death, burial, and resurrection of our Savior.
You are resurrected from the death of your old life, and you come out of the water (are born again) a new creation... a baby, in Christ, and you begin your life as a believer/follower of Jesus.

this is the simple plan God laid out for us.... every step of that plan MEANS something, and every part of it is essential.

At what EXACT point are you saved? IT DOESN'T MATTER..... unless you are determined to find a way to "do it your way" and reject one of those events simply because you don't see the need for it.

That's Pharisaical in the extreme... tithing mint and cumin. Understand the salvation plan, and follow it, without all the parsing and twisting words.... live in obedience to our Lord.
Scripture says it does matter. A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. Gal 5:9

How much arsenic are willing to tolerate in your drinking water?

Let's not add water baptism to the gospel.

For the cause of Christ
Roger