Wars in the Bible

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#21
Numbers 21: 14...The book of the wars of the Lord.

Isaiah 45: 11 & 12....Are you going to be the judge of God and argue with Him about the works of His hands?

Job 38: 2...Who is ignorant enough to question God with their finite human understanding?

Job 40: 8...The Lord asks Job, "Are you going to discredit my justice and condemn me so you can say you are right?"

I urge carefulness to all who would question the works of the Lord and Creator of the universe. We have no fear these days. Proverbs tells us that fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, but we have everything we need and we can explain everything we see, so we fear nothing, and that makes us proud and decadent. We should be focused on the commandments of Jesus to love God and to love our neighbor, but we should also remember that God is jealous and when we think that we have it all figured out, there is nothing more God loves to do than to prove Himself God by confounding our human wisdom, like when He sent a carpenter to save the entire world. Who saw that coming?
The written word invites questions. We are supposed to study and think about what we are reading. I am not questioning God - I am questioning humanity's behavior. I am also trying to find the loving God I know in the pages of the OT. Fearing God means having reverence for him. Some people seem to believe we are supposed to live in fear of the One we are in the closest relationship - this is wrong! That is a description of an abusive relationship - if I was afraid of my spouse I would leave.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#22
And so, after several thousand years, we have gotten better? And God has changed?
If God is sanctifying the hearts of more people everyday - we have to be getting better. Whenever God appears to change - and He does, He is actually revealing a new aspect of His never changing character.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#23
If God is sanctifying the hearts of more people everyday - we have to be getting better. Whenever God appears to change - and He does, He is actually revealing a new aspect of His never changing character.
That was not the question. As a people, human kind has gotten better? Our wars are more humane? That is my question. Humankind has not gotten better, he is just as fallen a creature as ever, if not worse. Of course, it is hard to get beyond the pale.

We have not even seen the destruction which awaits in God's judgment upon this world and the ruler of this world. It will cause us to have tears, and these tears God will wipe away, with His own hand, and there will never be any tears again.

The wars in the future are worse than anything yet seen, The prophet said that the entire land of Israel would be covered with the corpses of those who had invaded it for 7 years, that they would have no place to bury them. And at the end of the thousand years, the fire of God will destroy Gog and Magog with such utter destruction as to stagger the imagination.

God has not changed, and neither has mankind.
 
O

oopsies

Guest
#24
I'm a little wary of the idea that society determines what is acceptable by majority vote and more, that God would change his requirements depending on what we are used to.
But that begs the question, does God change his requirements or is He unchanging?

And so, after several thousand years, we have gotten better? And God has changed?
In the greater scheme of things, probably humankind has not gotten better but if God commands you to attack and destroy a nation (like what He told Israel to do), it would be foolhardy to ignore that command. So the question is, did God command them out of love or out of spite and hatred? If it is out of spite and hatred, God would have contradicted His teachings in the New Testament. But I'm sure it is difficult for anyone to say that God told Israel to destroy people out of love.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#25
But that begs the question, does God change his requirements or is He unchanging?



In the greater scheme of things, probably humankind has not gotten better but if God commands you to attack and destroy a nation (like what He told Israel to do), it would be foolhardy to ignore that command. So the question is, did God command them out of love or out of spite and hatred? If it is out of spite and hatred, God would have contradicted His teachings in the New Testament. But I'm sure it is difficult for anyone to say that God told Israel to destroy people out of love.

Ahh! God is love. But, He is a vengeful God, full of wrath against all unrighteousness and ungodliness of men. Why? Because He is love. It is the unrighteousness and ungodliness that is evil, not God destroying the evil.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#26
That was not the question. As a people, human kind has gotten better? Our wars are more humane? That is my question. Humankind has not gotten better, he is just as fallen a creature as ever, if not worse. Of course, it is hard to get beyond the pale.
Claiming that humanity has not gotten better as a whole is to claim that God's work in our hearts has made no impact on the world. I agree that the same evil is still in the world and continues to manifest in wars, famines, etc, however, the Spirit's presence in the world has had tremendous impact - their is greater good in the world than ever before.

We have not even seen the destruction which awaits in God's judgment upon this world and the ruler of this world. It will cause us to have tears, and these tears God will wipe away, with His own hand, and there will never be any tears again.
Most of the events in the Book of Revelation have already occurred - we are simply waiting for Christ's return.

God has not changed, and neither has mankind.
If so, God's sanctification has failed.
 
K

karuna

Guest
#27
But that begs the question, does God change his requirements or is He unchanging?
I'm not sure it does. Whether or not he changes his requirements, my point is that I doubt that he does so on the basis of what we're used to. My thought is that, if we find God adjusting his requirements to allow us to do what we'd do anyway, we've very likely replaced God with one of our own making. It's too convenient to have heavenly permission for habit. This to me has psychological, not theological, implications.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#28
I'm not sure it does. Whether or not he changes his requirements, my point is that I doubt that he does so on the basis of what we're used to. My thought is that, if we find God adjusting his requirements to allow us to do what we'd do anyway, we've very likely replaced God with one of our own making. It's too convenient to have heavenly permission for habit. This to me has psychological, not theological, implications.
God does not change, He does not need to change, because He is perfect and perfectly holy. He has at times changed His mind about destroying a people, but He has not changed how He is about unrighteousness and ungodliness, not in the least little way.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#29
Ahh! God is love. But, He is a vengeful God, full of wrath against all unrighteousness and ungodliness of men. Why? Because He is love. It is the unrighteousness and ungodliness that is evil, not God destroying the evil.
ugh. So a vengeful, jealous, impotent God is the same God who is sanctifying our hearts to love?

Unbelievable
 
K

karuna

Guest
#30
God does not change, He does not need to change, because He is perfect and perfectly holy. He has at times changed His mind about destroying a people, but He has not changed how He is about unrighteousness and ungodliness, not in the least little way.
My point is not whether God changes or does not change, but whether he would do so to align himself with the prevailing cultural values. Whether or not the larger question of God changing can be answered, I think mine certainly can.
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#31
My point is not whether God changes or does not change, but whether he would do so to align himself with the prevailing cultural values. Whether or not the larger question of God changing can be answered, I think mine certainly can.
Absolutely not, why would He conform Himself to prevailing cultural values? If so, then He embraces abortion and homosexuality and war for profit and rampant sexuality for teens. And so many other things.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#32
Yeah....I disagree. The message of the OT is 'I AM' - God exists. The rest of the OT is humanity's long record of failed attempts to respond to God's Being. The Israelites responded it typical fashion, superstition, war, genocide, nationalism, and grandiosity. God sent Jesus to let us know the proper response - 'love God and your neighbor' It is predictable that the Jewish people did not recognize Jesus as the Messiah because he didn't fit their image of the Messiah who would respond with war.
If we believe that the commanded wars of the OT were simply Israels nationalism, then we throw in doubt the veracity of scripture and the ability of God to clearly communicate with God. I do not believe that this way of looking at those wars is helpful.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#33
If God really commanded these atrocities, He is not worthy of our worship - it would be unethical to worship such a god.

I wouldn't treat an animal as poorly, and I am certainly not Good.
If an animal were sick and contagious, would you have it euthenised?
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#34
Has anyone here looked at how many times in the OT Israel was actually told to annihilate a nation?
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#35
Exodus 22:20-33 Says this "I will not drive them out before you in a single year, that the land may not become desolate, and the beasts of the field become too numerous for you. I will drive them out before you little by little, until you become fruitful and take possession of the land." and then "You will dreve them out before you. You shall make no covenant with them or with their gods. They shall not live in your land lest they make you sin against Me; for if you serve their gods, it will surely be a snare to you."
 

VW

Banned
Dec 22, 2009
4,579
9
0
#36
Has anyone here looked at how many times in the OT Israel was actually told to annihilate a nation?
Wasn't it when they came out of the wilderness to take possession of the land?

I can't remember any other times after they were settled in the land of Israel.

But, I am most likely wrong.

Blessing brother,
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#37
Exodus 17:8-15 "Then Amelek came and fought against Israel at Rephidim....So Joshua overwhelmed Amelek and his people with the sword. Then the Lord said to Moses, "Write this in a book as a memorial, and recite it to Joshua that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amelek from under the heaven.....The Lord has sworn; the Lord will have war against Amelek from generation to generation."
 
Jan 22, 2010
1,022
1
0
#38
Ah but God does not contradict Himself. He teaches love in the New Testament but in the Old Testament, there were many instances where God commanded, helped, and even permitted the Israelites to destroy nations.
The Tanakh is probably the single most misinterpreted and misunderstood piece of literature in the history of mankind.

The fact is you have to look at Scripture as a whole. The habit to divide the two is what causes all these problems. But if you look at the Tanakh and the new testament together as the WORD OF G-D rather than the "old" one and the "new" one, you get the full picture of the nature of G-d.
 
Feb 3, 2010
1,238
3
0
#39
If we believe that the commanded wars of the OT were simply Israels nationalism, then we throw in doubt the veracity of scripture and the ability of God to clearly communicate with God. I do not believe that this way of looking at those wars is helpful.
You know, I understand your concern about the veracity of the Bible. I would never throw out the OT or suggest that others do so. I accept everything in the OT as inspired - I just think we need to look at what God is trying to tell us - are Israel's national interests the message we need to take from Exodus, or our tendencies to mold God's will into our own national interests? Our habit of using God as an authority for our own atrocities. I think we need to learn from the mistakes in the Bible, not that God is jealous, or vengeful.

If the way I am choosing to focus on the OT is not helpful for you, please disregard it, but it is important for me that you understand how much I value the OT and the NT.
 
L

lighthousejohn

Guest
#40
In almost every instance where the Isrealites went to war, God went before them, He declared Himself to be a jealous God. We define God in terms that we are comfortable with and anything that does not fit into our definition we say is not of God. God will always be so much more than even our most expansive view of God.

God is a God of love but he also is a God of wrath. We should embrace His love and fear His wrath.