- Dec 20, 2017
Apocrypha, what does this mean to you? For marginal notes of 1611 were to show that the KJV translators were in full awareness of the other reading aside from the TR, however, they used it what they did knew were the best text that agrees with the majority text. The rule is to keep not any notes as much as possible and they were there only to clarify Heb or Greek for the other reading.
I was highlighting these changes to John due to the smears he and some others make repeatedly about all the modern translations.
"corrupt Bibles" Blah Blah Blah.
We are not entitled to any revisions or language updates.
My point is simply that the same standards must be met in the version they claim is perfect.
Or they are hypocrites.
And it fails to meet those standards.
- Show all