Which bible version is the original one?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NoTearsShed

Guest
#1
I read some bible verses online & but they are not word per word exactly the same as the one in my bible.
I have the recovery version...
So im a little confused... Is my bible the version real or a new remake or what?
Thanks all for your answer =)

& which bible version do you have?
 
D

Definition_Christ

Guest
#2
Try the NKJV, or the KJV if you like old English. I prefer the NKJV because it's just as accurate as the KJV with the correction on a few errors. Except it has modern day English.

There are a bunch of other Bible translations that are good too, I mean they are all translated from real Bible scholars. But - the most accurate English translation is probably the NKJV.

I have the NKJV and I use the complete Jewish bible as well. The complete Jewish bible translation wise isn't as accurate so when I get to a verse that I don't understand - I usually just look over at the NKJV and it makes sense. Hope that helps! God bless you.
 
N

NoTearsShed

Guest
#3
Thanks =)

I just did some research & so far im liking the The New American Standard Bible & the New King James version...
The king james version i just read that its hard to understand & difficult to read.
 
N

NoTearsShed

Guest
#4
I just looked up the recovery version & found this

In 1385 John Wycliffe translated the Bible into English from the Latin Vulgate. This translation and its subsequent distribution was instrumental in opening the door to the spread of the truth. Around 1525 the Bible was translated into English directly from the original languages by William Tyndale. Since then many excellent English translations have followed. The New Testament Recovery Version is translated from the original languages according to principles and standards of translation established by major English translations of the last five centuries.
The New Testament Recovery Version was translated and revised by the Editorial Section of Living Stream Ministry from 1974 to 1991. The New Testament Recovery Version contains numerous study aids, including, the subject and background of each book; detailed, interpretive outlines; enlightening footnotes, valuable cross-references, and a variety of useful charts and maps. All of these study aids were written by Witness Lee, who received much help from the writings of noted Bible expositors throughout church history, including his co-worker, Watchman Nee. The New Testament Recovery Version in its current format in English was published in 1991, and it is also available in Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Japanese, and several other languages. The Recovery Version of the Bible, including outlines, footnotes, and cross-references for both the Old and New Testaments is now available.
http://www.recoveryversion.org/

After reading that i feel more happy that im reading the recovery version...
In my church i hear good things about Witness Lee, A dedicated son of the Lord.
So That made me feel more comfortable that im reading The Recovery version =)
 
D

Definition_Christ

Guest
#5
:) glad to hear.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#6
I have the recovery version but I'm throwing it out along with the other material from this Witness Lee cult/sect. It's filled too much with Lee's errors in the footnotes.
 
M

miktre

Guest
#7
I have the recovery version but I'm throwing it out along with the other material from this Witness Lee cult/sect. It's filled too much with Lee's errors in the footnotes.
Good for you, it belongs in the trash.
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#8
well the King James Bible was the Authorized version for almost 400 years now(1611) most of the newer preversions came along in the 1950's some later, I only say preversions for the fact if the KJB was the Bible for 400 years in order to get someone back in the 1950's and to date, to lay down the Authorized King James version , they have to attack the very Bible that was the Word for 400 years now. fine example of this, the ones that told you it was too hard to understand are attacking the Word, finding something wrong with it so you will use their translation, if you are not for God you are against Him , if you are not for His Word, You are against it . A house divided can not stand but other translators can come in attack the Authorized Word Of God in order to sell you theirs to make a buck, and Christians buy in to it and do it in the Name of Jesus. The Bible Say if ye lack wisdom , ask God , not change His word,. another thought on this, Kids are doing so much harder classes than I did 30 years , no one can disagree with this , but yet the same kids that are doing trig in the eighth or less now maybe, or not as smart. they can not understand the same bible that kids did 300 years ago, does this make any sense to anyone. They have put the most popular Niv. and the Kjb though the reading test that determines the reading Grade that a book is rated and the King James Bible came in at a 5th grade level and the NIV came in at a upper 8th grade level, but yet almost everyone says the the NIV is the easiest to understand. Now I am not, at this point going over where the differences within the translation but there are some major conflicts within the translations that are all suppose to be the true inspired word of God.

yeah I don't know about others, but they will get My King James Bible from me when they pry my cold dead fingers from around it.
 
C

charisenexcelcis

Guest
#9
What made the Authorized Version authorized was that King James was the head of the Anglican Church and had the authority to determine which book would be used in the Anglican Church. The KJV set some new standards for translation, such as being close to a word-for-word and being translated by a team. It was not without problems, fFor instance, the transliteration of baptizo into baptise to prevent controversy over the true meaning of the word (immerse). Overall it is a good version, but the language is obviously outdated. A few things that will help if you prefer it:
1. You, ye, your are all plural. Thou, thee, thine is singular.
2. In many additions, the English words that are added for clarification are in italics.
3. Remember that the chapters, verses, and punctuation are all added for the readers understanding and ease of study. (One exception: the chapters in Psalms are original.)
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
#11
I read some bible verses online & but they are not word per word exactly the same as the one in my bible.
I have the recovery version...
So im a little confused... Is my bible the version real or a new remake or what?
Thanks all for your answer =)

& which bible version do you have?
Actually, some early versions of the Living Bible were fun.
Saul went into the cave to go to the bathroom. lol
Then there was the misprint run of the KJV centuries ago ' Thou SHALT commit adultery.
 
M

miktre

Guest
#12
This bothers me. If you BOTH don't like it there may be some benefit! lol
Well if its the only copy of the Bible you can get your hands on it'd be one thing. I wouldn't waste my time with witness lee material myself, to much strange commentary involved.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#13
Exactly it's the commentary that's off. But then you don't know which words/scriptures they have changed to suit their purposes. They told me "use this bible, it's a better one". A hallmark of any fringe group, cult/sect of christianity is that they say you should use the material they themselves provide.

For anyone who doesn't know, these Witness Lee groups teach:
a) a form of modalism.
b) the gap theory of creation.
c) pray-reading - a type of repetitive chant.
d) exclusiveness - you're supposed to marry within the group and they practice shunning.
e) easy believism - just say Jesus is Lord a couple of times and you are saved.
f) That the Spirit doesn't come to live with you, but that when the Spirit comes into you, a new combined human/God spirit is formed.

plus there's a few more funny things about them.

Now Watchman Nee on the other hand is not so bad, his books are OK. It was mainly Witness Lee his co-worker went off the tracks a bit and their group.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#14
So to NoTearsShed I think it was who uses the Recovery Version, I would avoid this group if possible for the sake of your soul.
 
C

Cako53

Guest
#15
All the versions have there errors. Google it and you will see tons. I myself use the NIV, NLT, and the NKJV.
 
G

greatkraw

Guest
#16
All the versions have there errors. Google it and you will see tons. I myself use the NIV, NLT, and the NKJV.

But the KJV is AUTHORISED - der......
 
G

GnosticJohn

Guest
#17
Wow, lots of comments about which Bible to read. The KJV was translated so that the people of the day could understand it easily, that was 400 years ago. The KJV is certainly not the original, those were in greek and arimaic and I don't believe King James had any authority, authority is given to my Lord. 400 years ago people spoke in a language we now call old english, they spoke with words that we no longer use and it is difficult for us with out taking a course in old english to fully and accuratly understand them. Read the Bible that is clearest to you, study regularly and compare it to the KJV and others. If you find something that is unclear, ask someone for help in understanding. Pray for understanding. God wants you to understand his word, not be confused by it. When Wycliff first translated into english sone 700 years ago the english people had no Bible, they made one that they could understand. The same is true now. Don't be bothered by those who throw stones at you for reading what helps you understand, for those whom are perfected, they should cast the first one.
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#18
Wow, lots of comments about which Bible to read. The KJV was translated so that the people of the day could understand it easily, that was 400 years ago. The KJV is certainly not the original, those were in greek and arimaic and I don't believe King James had any authority, authority is given to my Lord. 400 years ago people spoke in a language we now call old english, they spoke with words that we no longer use and it is difficult for us with out taking a course in old english to fully and accuratly understand them. Read the Bible that is clearest to you, study regularly and compare it to the KJV and others. If you find something that is unclear, ask someone for help in understanding. Pray for understanding. God wants you to understand his word, not be confused by it. When Wycliff first translated into english sone 700 years ago the english people had no Bible, they made one that they could understand. The same is true now. Don't be bothered by those who throw stones at you for reading what helps you understand, for those whom are perfected, they should cast the first one.

you know maybe you missed this But I find it strange that, the kids now are doing alot harder classes than I did just 30-35 years I not sure what grade level that trig is introduced to, but I don't think we even had it in the 12th grade, and the amazing thing is how everybody says that our kids are a lot smarter today than in years past, But yet most will say that the same bible that kids used 390 years, is too hard for your kids today, simply amazing!!!!!
 
G

GnosticJohn

Guest
#19
I suppose there are some pretty smart kids, but old English is a different language than they speak. My wife was no student, but a lovely lady, she has difficulty with the KJV and at one point was so frustrated that she didn't want to read anymore, because she did understand.

Many people have a hard time with learning and reading, why should they suffer (in KJV suffer means "bring" did you know that?)

I read many different Bible versions, including KJV, sometiimes I prefer it. It is not for everyone, it can be discoureging. People need to be encouredged and helped any way possible. This is not the tome to argue over small potatoes, lets help these people know the Lord. Time is short
 
J

Jordan9

Guest
#20
If the KJV was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.